PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A A Mescheryakov

Publications and source records attributed to A A Mescheryakov.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human cortactin as putative cancer antigen.

Humoral immune response against overexpressed oncogenic or tumor supressor proteins has been demonstrated for many types of cancer. In this study we report on the detection of the autologous antibody response to putative oncogene, human cortactin using serological analysis of breast carcinoma expression library. Cortactin maps to chromosome 11q13, the region amplified in about 15% of primary breast carcinomas and 30% of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cortactin overexpression due to such amplification might affect adhesive properties of human cancer cells and is associated with poor disease prognosis. Accordingly, we detected overexpression of cortactin transcript in autologous tumor and amplification/overexpression of cortactin in tumors of breast cancer patients serologically positive for this marker. We demonstrate that 15% of breast cancer patients elicit humoral immune response against human cortactin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Cisplatin-etoposide and carboplatin-etoposide induction chemotherapy for good-risk patients with germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy in good-risk testicular cancer patients the two drug combinations, cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) and carboplatin plus etoposide (EC), have been compared. METHODS: Good risk was defined according to the MSKCC and IU criteria. 39 Patients have been treated with EP (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 5), and 23 patients received EC (carboplatin 350 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5). Four cycles of chemotherapy were given at 21- and 28-day intervals, respectively, with delays of up to 7 days in instances of leukocyte counts less than 3.0 x 10(9)/l or platelet counts less than 100 x 10(9)/l. RESULTS: In the EP group 34 (87%) of 39 patients achieved CR (26 with chemotherapy alone, 8 with additional surgery). After a median follow-up of 26 (12-58) months 3 (9%) patients relapsed from CR. Currently 38 patients are alive, and 37 (94%) are NED. In the EC group 20 (87%) of 23 patients achieved CR (15 with chemotherapy alone and 5 with additional surgery). After a median follow-up of 45 (26-57) months 6 (30%) patients relapsed from CR. Currently 19 patients are alive and 17 (74%) are NED. There was no difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.13), but in the EC group the relapse rate was higher (p = 0.052) and the proportion of patients with NED was lower (p = 0.03) in comparison with EP. Toxicity in both groups was mild and similar, but 3 EP-treated patients presented hair loss. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that carboplatin-etoposide combination therapy is inferior to cisplatin-etoposide in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors.

Adult↗