Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Adenis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Improvements of the results of combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer has led several groups to adopt a non surgical attitude specially in case of complete response (endoscopy +/- biopsy). Few information are available about the follow-up of these patients. We studied long-term results of 35 patients who underwent resection after complete response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 161 patients with resecable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus have received the same protocol of CRT (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, radiation therapy split course: 37.5 Gy) all patients were followed every for 4 months (no lost of view). RESULTS: Complete response (endoscopy and biopsy) was obtained for 35 patients (21.7%), 19 of them (54%) had pathologic complete response (PCR) (no tumor in the specimen), 16 have microscopic foci of residual tumor (46%). The overall 5-year survival rate was 49.8% for the whole group (median survival 64 months), 70% for the group without tumor in the specimen, 48% for the group with microscopic foci of residual tumor (NS). CONCLUSIONS: One half of the complete response (endoscopy + biopsy) have not a pathologic complete response (microscopic foci of residual tumor in the specimen). The 49.8% of five year survival suggests a benefit from esophagectomy for complete response after combined chemoradiotherapy.
This regional survey was aimed to detect hypothetical variations in attitudes among truth telling in colon cancer by an anonymous questionnaire sent to the 290 gastroenterologists, surgeons and oncologists of the Northern France area. The answers were assessed as always (A), often (O), rarely and never. Diagnosis was revealed to the patient (whether or not he asked the question) or to his spouse in 83%, 40% and 93% of the cases, respectively. The diagnosis of diffuse metastasis was revealed (A + O) to the patient or to his spouse in 23% and 95% of the cases, respectively. Only 3% of the physicians told (A + O) the patient that his condition was incurable while this aspect was A + O revealed to the patient's spouse in 34% of the cases. Most of the time, the diagnosis of colon cancer was revealed by oncologists rather than by surgeons or gastroenterologists. Conversely the full truth was more commonly told to the family by surgeons and gastroenterologists than by oncologists. We found variation in attitudes towards truth telling in colon cancer which depend on the physician's speciality. It seems to us that the magnitude of the full truth told to the patient or his family in Northern France area, is somewhat intermediate between the attitude of doctors in Northern Europe and in Latin Mediterranean or Eastern Europe countries.
This regional survey was aimed to detect hypothetical variations in attitudes among truth telling in colon cancer by an anonymous questionnaire sent to the 290 gastroenterologists, surgeons and oncologists of the Northern France area. The answers were assessed as always (A), often (O), rarely and never. Diagnosis was revealed to the patient (whether or not he asked the question) or to his spouse in 83%, 40% and 93% of the cases, respectively. The diagnosis of diffuse metastasis was revealed (A + O) to the patient or to his spouse in 23% and 95% of the cases, respectively. Only 3% of the physicians told (A + O) the patient that his condition was incurable while this aspect was A + O revealed to the patient's spouse in 34% of the cases. Most of the time, the diagnosis of colon cancer was revealed by oncologists rather than by surgeons or gastroenterologists. Conversely the full truth was more commonly told to the family by surgeons and gastroenterologists than by oncologists. We found variation in attitudes towards truth telling in colon cancer which depend on the physician's specialty. It seems to us that the magnitude of the full truth told to the patient or his family in Northern France area, is somewhat intermediate between the attitude of doctors in Northern Europe and in Latin Mediterranean or Eastern Europe countries.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Raltitrexed, a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, was given to 21 patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer, at a dose of 3 mg m(-2) as a 15-min intravenous infusion at 21-day intervals. All of the patients had extensive disease and 17 had received prior therapy. Patients with disease refractory to primary chemotherapy were excluded. Forty-one treatment cycles were given (median two, range one to four). The drug was well tolerated. No objective tumour response was documented. The patients had chemoresistant disease, as shown by a response in only one of ten patients who went on to receive alternative cytotoxic regimens. We conclude that raltitrexed given in this schedule is inactive as second line therapy for small-cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, induction chemotherapy has been tested by several investigators in the management of operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our current study was aimed to evaluate, pragmatically, in patients (74 stage II and 30 stage III) whose treatment would have been mastectomy, the percentage of them in whom a conservative treatment can be performed if primarily treated with a mitoxantrone/vinorelbine regimen. RESULTS: 67/104 patients (64%; 95% CI: 55-74%) had a conservative treatment (lumpectomy: 54, radiation therapy: 12, radiation therapy then lumpectomy: 1) Neutropenia was the major dose-limiting side effect, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia registered in 83% of patients and 53.3% of the 442 cycles. Overall, a grade 3 or 4 non hematologic side effect occurred in 19.8% of patients and in 9.1% of cycles. One toxic death was observed after 2 cycles in a patient with aplasia who developped septicemia. Seventy one per cent of the patients experienced nausea and vomiting but grade 3 were observed in only 12% of the patients. Other side effects, including stomatitis, asthenia, alopecia, and constipation, were generally mild and uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: This mitoxantrone/vinorelbine regimen is an efficient induction treatment with only neutropenia as a noticeable side effect. It allows 64% of conservative treatment in patients whose treatment would have been mastectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate and toxic effects of vinorelbine (VNB) administered as a single agent in metastatic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six eligible patients with measurable lesions were included and were stratified according to previous chemotherapy. Thirty patients without prior chemotherapy and 16 pretreated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were assessable for toxicity and response. VNB was administered weekly as a 25-mg/m2 short intravenous (i.v.) infusion. RESULTS: Six of 30 patients (20%) without prior chemotherapy achieved a partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 39%). The median duration of response was 21 weeks (range, 17 to 28). One of 16 patients (6%) with prior chemotherapy had a complete response (CR) of 31 weeks' duration (95% CI, 0% to 30%). The overall response rate (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) was 15% (CR, 2%; PR 13%; 95% CI, 6% to 29%). The median dose-intensity (DI) was 20 mg/m2/wk. VNB was well tolerated and zero instances of WHO grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred. At least one episode of grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in 59% of patients. A grade 2 or 3 infection occurred in 16% of patients, but no toxic deaths occurred. Other side effects were rare, and peripheral neurotoxicity has been minor (26% grade 1). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that VNB is an active agent in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, further evaluation of VNB in combination therapy is warranted.
PURPOSE: A pharmacokinetic study was performed during a phase II clinical trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to confirm the pharmacokinetic profile of this drug and its metabolite and to investigate interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variations and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six men and 21 women (mean age, 61 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, performance status less than 3 (World Health Organization [WHO] scale), and normal renal and hepatic function were administered CPT-11 (350 mg/m2) by 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 21 days. CPT-11 and its metabolites SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorimetric detection. RESULTS: The mean CPT-11 clearance and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were 15.2 L/h. m2 and 24,769ng. h/mL, respectively. The large difference in SN-38 and SN-38G AUCs (559 v 2,283 ng. h/mL) was suggestive of extensive glucuronidation of SN-38. Interindividual variation in the metabolic ratio ([AUCSN-38 + AUCSN-38Gl/AUCCPT-11) was marked (coefficient of variation [CV] = 51.6%] compared with intrapatient variation in this variable (CV = 32.6%). A significant relationship existed between percentage reduction in neutrophil count and the AUC of CPT-11 (r = .597, P < .001) and SN-38 (r = .559, P < .001). No relationship was identified between any pharmacokinetic parameter and delayed diarrhea or therapeutic outcome. CONCLUSION: Interindividual variations in the metabolic ratio suggest interpatient variation in carboxylesterase activity. Furthermore, glucuronidation of SN-38 may also be in part responsible for the large interpatient variability in the total SN-38 AUC. Conversely, low intrapatient variation of this parameter was observed in this study, which indicates a lack of autoinduction of the carboxylesterase system. The relationship between neutropenia and both CPT-11 and SN-38 pharmacokinetic parameters confirms the results of previous studies.
PURPOSE: Tomudex (ZD1694; Zeneca Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) appears to have a favorable toxicity profile (defined in phase I studies) and antitumor activity in a broad range of epithelial tumors. We report here the results of a large phase II study of Tomudex in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven patients were entered onto the study between October 1992 and September 1993. Patients were required to have advanced CRC without prior chemotherapy (adjuvant chemotherapy was permissible) and at least one measurable lesion. Tomudex (ZD1694) was administered at a dose of 3 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks in the absence of toxicity or disease progression. Patients were assessed for objective response, progression, and survival. RESULTS: Of 177 patients entered onto the study, 5% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 83% had liver metastases. Objective responses were seen in 26% of patients (95% confidence interval, 19% to 33%; four complete responses [CRs] and 41 partial responses [PRs]) while median time to progression was 4.2 months and median survival 9.6 months. All sites were audited, and responses were reviewed by an independent panel. Common toxicities included mild reversible transaminitis, nausea and vomiting, and asthenia or flu-like symptoms, and World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 leukopenia and diarrhea were seen in 6% and 9.8% of patients, respectively. Stomatitis and alopecia were common. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter phase II study of patients with advanced CRC, interesting activity was seen (objective response rate, 26%). In addition, Tomudex has an acceptable toxicity profile and a convenient dosing schedule (single intravenous injection every 3 weeks) and thus appears to offer real potential as a novel agent for the treatment of patients with advanced CRC.
Cathepsins, which are secreted by tumour and/or stromal cells, are thought to be involved in the degradative processes of tumour invasion and metastasis. The purpose of our study was to compare the cytosolic content of cathepsin B, L, and D in a series of matched malignant and adjacent normal colorectal tissues. Further we attempted to correlate these different proteinase values to classical clinico-pathological prognostic variables. Cathepsin B, L, and D activities were higher in tumour tissues than in normal mucosa (P < 10(-6), P < 0.004, P < 0.004, respectively) with median tumour/normal ratios of 7.9, 5.9, and 1.4, respectively. We found no difference in cathepsin B, L, and D activities either as a function of gender (except for cathepsin B values), age at time of surgery, tumour site, tumour differentiation, tumour stage (TNM or Astler-Coller staging system) or whether or not we found a mucinous component. Based on our data, cathepsin B seems to be the most discriminant parameter of the three proteinases that we studied, suggesting that cathepsin B expression may be of critical value in the progression of colorectal cancers.
Vinca alkaloids are widely used in the medical treatment of breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic activity of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, S12363 (vinfosiltine), which is 36 and 72 times more cytotoxic in vitro than vincristine and vinblastine, respectively. Because phase I studies did not allow a choice of the best treatment schedule, a randomization was performed between two schedules with the same dose intensity, that is, 0.3 mg/m2 given weekly or 0.6 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks. A total of 16 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed a first-line treatment without any vinca alkaloid were entered in the study. Additionally, 6 women received the bimonthly regimen as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. Altogether, 17 patients received, prior to vinfosiltine, an anthracycline-based regimen given either as adjuvant (n = 4) or as first-line palliative treatment (n = 13). All 22 patients were evaluable for both toxicity and response. Neutropenia was the main toxic event (maximal toxicity per patient) with grade 3 (WHO) toxicity developing in 7/22 patients and grade 4, in 8/22. Other severe toxicities included leukopenia (n = 9), anemia (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), constipation (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 1). No patient achieved a complete or partial response. Vinfosiltine does not appear to have significant single-agent activity in advanced breast cancer at the doses and the schedules used in our study.
Type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors have been recently characterised in human colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine whether type I IGF receptor concentration may be related to prognostic variables in colorectal cancers. Saturation experiments with [125I]IGF-I were performed on membrane preparations of 46 frozen specimens (20 tumours, 26 controls) and analysed according to the Scatchard method. In all the studied cases, we found a single class of high affinity binding sites in both normal and malignant colorectal tissues (median 0.17 and 0.15 nmol/l, respectively). Using paired analysis, we found no significant difference in terms of type I IGF receptor concentration between malignant and normal colorectal tissues. There was also no relationship between type I IGF receptors and any of the tumour characteristics studied. This study does not support a critical role of the type I IGF receptors in the clinical management of colorectal cancers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The combination of CDDP and ARA-C has shown some clinical efficiency as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Our study was aimed to evaluate the therapeutic activity of this combination in advanced colorectal cancer who failed 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (LV) regimen. Seventeen patients with measureable metastatic colorectal cancer who failed 5FU-LV therapy as first line (n = 14) or second line treatment (n = 3), entered the study. Three patients who recurred during adjuvant treatment with 5FU and levamisol, were also included. Median age was 59.5 (40-69). Performance status was as follows: 0 (n = 5), 1 (n = 11), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 1). Site of metastases included liver (n = 16), lung (n = 7), abdomen (n = 2), pelvic recurrences (n = 2), cutaneous (n = 1). Seven patients had 2 metastatic sites and two 3. The treatment was given as follows: ARA-C 75 mg/m2/day, days 1-3, followed 1 hour later by CDDP 30 mg/m2/day, days 1-3, every 28 days. The median number of cycles was 3 (range: 1-6 cycles). All patients but one were evaluable for both response and toxicity. Of these patients, 50% experienced severe hematologic toxicity and nonhematologic toxicity mainly consisted of fatigue and/or vomiting. No objective response was observed, but there were 3 stabilizations and 16 progressive diseases. Median time to progression was 10 weeks. Thus, the CDDP/ARA-C regimen is not of clinical value as salvage therapy in advanced colorectal cancer because of its toxicity and its lack of efficiency.
This study was performed in a group of 89 patients treated for breast carcinoma with a FEC regimen (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). The aim was to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of one 8 mg tablet ondansetron (OND), and in case of failure, to measure the recovering level by the administration of 8 mg i.v. OND. One tablet of OND was given before the first course. A complete or major control of emetic episodes (EE) (0-2 EE) over the 24 first hours was obtained in 55 patients (62%). A complete or major control of nausea (absent or mild) was obtained in 46 patients (52%). A success, defined as a complete or major control for EE and nausea during the first 5 days, was obtained in 36 patients (40%). These 36 patients were treated again with 8 mg oral OND at the second course, with a success level of 61% (22/36). Among the 53 patients unresponsive to the oral OND, 38 were treated by 8 mg i.v. OND at the second course. A complete or major control for EE and for nausea over the first 24 hours was obtained respectively in 11 patients (29%), and 11 patients (29%). No success was obtained. The 15 remaining patients, who had a very bad tolerance at the first course were excluded from the study and treated by OND-methylprednisolon, with only one success obtained. This study shows that the exclusive use of one 8 tablet OND is not sufficient in prevention of emesis induced by a FEC regimen, and that failures are only partially recovered by the i.v. route.