Recurrence of a right ventricular hemangioma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Agostinelli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIM: Incidence evaluation of cutaneous neurologic symptoms in the lower limbs as a new event after great saphenous vein (GSV) harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Each day we harvest the GSV for CABG. Some authors have reported the onset of saphenous neuralgia complex as a new event of which we would evaluate the incidence. METHODS: From January 2000, until June 2001, 2,091 patients underwent cardiac surgery; 1,326 underwent CABG, 1,227 of them using the GSV as a conduit for almost one graft. These patients were prospectively reviewed; all were preoperatively examined to determine the presence of normal sensation in the lower limbs and elude the presence of saphenous neuralgia. Then, we evaluated sensations in the lower limbs at 5 days, 8 weeks, and 5 months after operation to determine the new onset of saphenous neuralgia. The areas of sensory loss were recorded each time and reported in a diagram to obtain 3 areas. RESULTS: Hyperaesthesia and pain were noted in a few patients, especially at 5 days and 8 weeks control, but at 5 months none of them complained of real pain. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that saphenous neuralgia after harvesting the GSV for CABG is a rare consequence. The main symptom is anaesthesia but its duration is generally no longer than 2 months. Hyperaesthesia and pain, for the early onset and the early disappearance, are considered as a normal consequence of surgical procedure.
OBJECTIVES: The combination of endovascular and standard surgical techniques may facilitate the management of complex aortic disease although the long-term durability of this approach needs to be confirmed. DESIGN: A retrospective review of our experience in the treatment of patients with complex aortic pathology using a combined endovascular and surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, 27 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent stent-graft implantation. Eight required combined endovascular and surgical procedure because of complex pathology. In 3 cases, combined repair was carried out for a concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm or aorto-iliac-femoral occlusive disease. In the other 5 cases, vessel relocation was performed to obtain safe landing zones: left subclavian artery to left carotid artery translocation in 3 patients, celiac trunk to superior mesenteric artery translocation in one and aorto-celiac-mesenteric bypass grafting in one. RESULTS: One of the 8 patients died on 12th post-operative day of intestinal bleeding and bowel infarction. No neurological sequelae were reported. The other patients are currently well at 11 months mean follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous surgical and endovascular procedure is a feasible and may be a valuable adjunct to the treatment of complex aortic and peripheral vessel anatomy.
Between January 1990 and February 2001 a total of 323 patients underwent following operations at our Institution: respectively 256 on the ascending aorta, 13 on the transverse arch and 54 on thoracic descending aorta. Sixteen patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent endovascular stent graft implantation. The overall in-hospital mortality was respectively: 7% for ascending aortic aneurysms, 7.7% in the aortic arch aneurysms group and 5.5% for descending aortic aneurysms. The mortality was greater in case of emergency surgery and in the subgroup of patients with acute type A dissection. Stroke with permanent dysfunction occurred in 1.5% of ascending aneurysms, 7.7% of arch aneurysms and in 3.7% of thoracic descending aneurysms. In the latter group, all the major neurological events were related to conventional surgical procedures only: really no mortality or neurological morbidity occurred with endovascular stent graft implantation. Even if modern physiologic monitoring devices and new surgical techniques have been developed in the last years, the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms remains challenging. Endoluminal placement of stent grafts has developed as an alternative procedure for the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms, even if longer term follow-up is still necessary to fully define the efficacy of this approach.
It is well know that atherosclerosis can simultaneously affect different vascular subsystems, and patients with diffuse atherosclerosis can be a major management problem both for preoperative evaluation and for intraoperative management. The authors have conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence of coronary artery disease in arteriopathic patients, and vice versa, to assess the effectiveness of aggressive screening together with a priority-based approach. Study 1 consisted of 1,000 consecutive non-emergent patients who were affected by abdominal aortic or carotid disease and were screened for the presence of coronary artery disease before surgery with a newly developed clinical risk assessment. They were stratified into three risk categories with different preoperative evaluation strategies. When coronary artery disease was concomitantly demonstrated in these patients, the choice of surgical method was based on priorities, and the use of combined surgical procedures as required. In study 2, 1,000 consecutive patients that required coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease were screened for the presence of carotid or abdominal aortic pathology, directly in the cardiac catheter laboratory during coronary angiography, by obtaining views of the aortic arch and abdominal aorta. Surgical approaches paralleled those of study 1. The results for study 1 showed that 720 patients (72%) were affected by abdominal aortic disease, 238 (24%) by carotid disease and 42 (4%) by both pathologies. Significant coronary artery disease was found in 152 patients (15%), of these 123 (81.5%) were affected by abdominal aortic disease and 29 (18.5%) by carotid artery disease. Abdominal aortic surgery was performed directly or after myocardial revascularization, with an overall mortality rate of 4/718 (0.6%), and a perioperative myocardial infarction rate of 10/718 (1.4%). For patients with carotid artery disease, the completed screening and possible therapy for coronary artery disease resulted in an in-hospital mortality rate of 2/238 (0.8%), and a perioperative myocardial infarction rate of 2/238 (0.8%). There were no significant differences in these rates between patients with or without coronary artery disease. Results for study 2 showed that of the 1000 consecutive patients enrolled for suspicion of coronary artery disease, 767 (77%) were affected by significant coronary artery disease. Among these, 38 (4.9%) had a surgically correctable aortic disease and 31 (4%) a surgically correctable carotid disease, which was monolateral and bilateral in 22 (74%) and nine (26%) patients, respectively, and four (0.5%) were diagnosed with both pathologies. These arteriopathic patients were treated for their coronary and vascular disease with no in-hospital mortality nor perioperative myocardial infarction. In patients with multiple vascular involvement, both coronary and vascular surgery can be performed with low risk when aggressive screening and priority-based therapy are adopted.
From February 1998 and March 2000 fourteen patients underwent "custom made" aortic self-expanding endoprostheses implantation (World Medical Talent Sunrise): nine of them for dilative pathology of thoracic aorta and 5 for abdominal aortic aneurysm below renal arteries. The etiology was degenerative in 8 patients, false aneurysm in 2, chronic dissection in 2 cases, acute dissection in one patient and post traumatic in the last one. All patients underwent preoperative Computed Tomography and Substraction Angiography studies. Stent-graft implantation was successful in all cases but one who required the conversion of the endovascular procedure in traditional surgery for technical problems. There were no perioperative deaths or major complications. We registered 2 cases of dissection of the femoral artery used to introduce the stent-graft, and treated with an iliac-femoral prosthetic bypass. There were no cases of paraplegia or renal failure or bowel ischemia. With the exception of one patient, died for a car accident, the others are alive and continue their scheduled follow-up controls. Our experience shows that this procedure is safe, allowing favorable results, if compared to traditional surgery, even if it requires further long-term evaluations.
The dosimetry of total-skin electron therapy (TSET) usually requires ionization chamber measurements in a large electron beam (up to 120 cm x 200 cm). Exposing the chamber's electric cable, its connector and part of the extension cable to the large electron beam will introduce unwanted electronic signals that may lead to inaccurate dosimetry results. While the best strategy to minimize the cable-induced electronic signal is to shield the cables and its connector from the primary electrons, as has been recommended by the AAPM Task Group Report 23 on TSET, cables without additional shielding are often used in TSET dosimetry measurements for logistic reasons, for example when an automatic scanning dosimetry is used. This paper systematically investigates the consequences and the acceptability of using an unshielded cable in ionization chamber dosimetry in a large TSET electron beam. In this paper, we separate cable-induced signals into two types. The type-I signal includes all charges induced which do not change sign upon switching the chamber polarity, and type II includes all those that do. The type-I signal is easily cancelled by the polarity averaging method. The type-II cable-induced signal is independent of the depth of the chamber in a phantom and its magnitude relative to the true signal determines the acceptability of a cable for use under unshielded conditions. Three different cables were evaluated in two different TSET beams in this investigation. For dosimetry near the depth of maximum buildup, the cable-induced dosimetry error was found to be less than 0.2% when the two-polarity averaging technique was applied. At greater depths, the relative dosimetry error was found to increase at a rate approximately equal to the inverse of the electron depth dose. Since the application of the two-polarity averaging technique requires a constant-irradiation condition, it was demonstrated than an additional error of up to 4% could be introduced if the unshielded cable's spatial configuration were altered during the two-polarity measurements. This suggests that automatic scanning systems with unshielded cables should not be used in TSET ionization chamber dosimetry. However, the data did show that an unshielded cable may be used in TSET ionization chamber dosimetry if the size of cable-induced error in a given TSET beam is pre-evaluated and the measurement is carefully conducted. When such an evaluation has not been performed, additional shielding should be applied to the cable being used, making measurements at multiple points difficult.