PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Agustí

Publications and source records attributed to A Agustí.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents in heart failure: benefits of vasodilating and non-vasodilating agents according to patients' characteristics: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In patients with heart failure, beta-adrenergic blocking agents reduce overall and cardiovascular mortality. This meta-analysis aimed at clarifying their effect on sudden death, the magnitude of their benefit according to the cause of heart failure, and whether there is any difference between vasodilating and nonvasodilating agents. METHODS: Randomized, clinical trials were included if they evaluated a beta-adrenergic blocking agent without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, included a control group receiving placebo or standard treatment, evaluated mortality on an intention-to-treat basis, and lasted at least 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials with 5,849 patients (3,130 receiving beta-blockers) were included. Median length of treatment was 6 months. Most patients had mild or moderate heart failure and were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and digitalis. The beta-blockers significantly reduced overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and mortality due to pump failure and sudden death by 34% to 39%. The decrease in overall mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) (30%) was no different from that among patients with non-IHD (26%) (P = .08). The reduction in overall mortality was greater with vasodilating than with nonvasodilating agents (45% vs 27%; P = .007), particularly in patients without IHD (62%), compared with those with IHD (22%; P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure, beta-blockers reduce total and cardiovascular mortality at the expense of a decrease in mortality due to pump failure and sudden death. The magnitude of the benefit is similar in patients with IHD and in those with non-IHD. Vasodilating beta-blockers have a greater effect on overall mortality than nonvasodilating agents, particularly in patients with non-IHD.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Trends of prescribing patterns for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction over a 13-year period.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction has been well recognized since the beginning of the 1980s. In a previous paper, however, we reported a lower than expected use of these drugs during the period 1982 1988. In 1989 the results of this survey were presented and discussed with the prescribing physicians. In the present paper we describe the prescription patterns for the same indication and in the same centre over the following 6 years (1989-1994). We also describe the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, for which efficacy in certain subgroups has been recently shown. METHODS: Random samples of patients discharged from our hospital between 1989 and 1994 with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction with Q-wave were studied. Information about diagnoses, other clinical variables and treatments prescribed at discharge was obtained from the hospital discharge forms. The results were compared with those obtained in the previous study. RESULTS: We studied 514 patients (80% men) with a median age of 59 years (range 31-89). The proportions of patients prescribed beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid increased from 34% and 28%, respectively, in 1986-1988, to 62% and 75% in 1989 1991. In 1994 they had reached a steady state (63% and 71%). In addition, a continued decrease in the use of calcium channel blockers was noted, from 36% in 1986-1988 to 17% in 1994. The increase in the prescription of beta-adrenergic blocking agents was especially remarkable in the subgroups for which a larger underuse was recorded in the previous study, such as the elderly. The proportion of patients prescribed an ACE inhibitor increased from 14% in 1989-1991 to 23% in 1994. In a multivariate analysis the prescription of ACE inhibitors was associated with female gender, hypertension during admission, heart failure during admission, and previous myocardial infarction. A substantial increase in the prescription of beta-adrenergic blocking agents and acetylsalicylic acid and a decrease in the prescription of calcium channel blockers was recorded between 1982 and 1994. The prescription rate of beta-adrenergic blocking agents has increased substantially in certain subgroups where underuse had been previously recorded. Most of the changes occurred in 1989-1991, and reached a steady state in 1994. In 1994 an increase in the prescription of ACE inhibitors was also recorded.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1997

[Utilization of thrombolytic drugs in Barcelona. Study Group on Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction].

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical trials including more than 50,000 patients have shown the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in reducing mortality associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the results of some recently published drug utilization studies have shown that only one third of admitted patients with a diagnosis of AMI receive thrombolytic treatment. The aim of the present study was to quantify and characterize the use of thrombolytic drugs in three hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected retrospective information about some clinical variables and drug prescription of patients discharged with a diagnosis of AMI from three hospitals in Barcelona between January and June 1994. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients (247 men, 68%) with a mean age of 68 years (SD 13) were included in the study. The median time from the beginning of clinical symptoms to hospital admission was 3 h (range 1 to 96). One hundred and two patients (28%) were prescribed thrombolytic drugs, and of these, 62%, received streptokinase. No one patient received any thrombolytic treatment before hospital admission. In a multivariate analysis the following variables were negatively associated with thrombolytic use: age over 75 years, more than three hours from the beginning of symptoms to hospital admission and an EKG with bundle-branch block, ST depression or normal. After excluding patients with limitations to thrombolytic use, 18% of all patients could be identified who did not receive any thrombolytic treatment they could have benefited from. CONCLUSIONS: Only one third of admitted patients with a diagnosis of AMI in the three study hospitals receive thrombolytic treatment. One fifth of the study population with AMI does not receive any thrombolytic therapy but could have benefited from it.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

From clinical trials to clinical practice: oral anticoagulation among patients with non-rheumatic, atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the results of clinical trials on the prophylactic treatment of non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation with oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Retrospectively, we studied a random sample of 375 patients discharged from our hospital with a diagnosis of non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation between 1991 and 1993. Information about diagnoses, other clinical variables and treatments prescribed at discharge was obtained from the hospital medical records. RESULTS: During the whole study period, 14% of patients were prescribed an oral anticoagulant agent and 17% were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid. A non-significant increase in the proportion of patients prescribed oral anticoagulant drugs, from 9% to 17%, was observed. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of stroke (OR = 5.96) and younger age were significantly associated with the prescription of oral anticoagulants. ASA prescription was strongly associated with a history of concomitant vascular disease (OR = 5.8), but not with other risk factors for stroke. Sixty-five percent of patients had one or more risk factors for stroke, did not present any contraindications to anticoagulant agents, but nevertheless were not prescribed one of these drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant agents and acetylsalicylic acid were largely underprescribed to patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation, and oral anticoagulants were not prescribed according to the individual patients' risk of stroke.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed1997

Is aspirin underused in myocardial infarction?

This article reviews the relevant published literature in order to assess whether aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) is underused in myocardial infarction (MI), taking into account: (i) the evidence of efficacy and safety from clinical trials; (ii) authoritative recommendations about its use; and (iii) published drug-utilisation studies. The use of low-dosage aspirin in the acute phase of MI, and as secondary prevention, should be recommended to all patients who do not have contraindications to the drug. This is a solid evidence-based recommendation with potential benefits that are, at least, similar to those obtained with other standard treatments. As this treatment is well tolerated and inexpensive, it is also assumed that net savings can be achieved. No conventionally used prophylactic aspirin regimen seems to be free from the risk of serious gastrointestinal toxicity. This is especially important in primary prevention, in which the benefits are small; there is, as yet, no clear evidence that aspirin is indicated for routine use in patients at low risk of occlusive vascular events. We have identified 21 published drug-utilisation studies, and the potential underuse of aspirin in MI was not properly assessed in most of them. In these studies, fairly high aspirin prescription rates were usually documented. However, it seems clear that there is room for improvement, and that a significant proportion of patients who could have benefited from aspirin did not receive it or received less well-studied and more costly drugs. The prescription rates for other drugs with proven efficacy have been lower, and the potential underuse greater, than those documented for aspirin.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1994

Clinical trials versus clinical practice in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

To examine whether the results of trials on the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction have led to a change of prescription practice, the discharge forms of a random sample of 737 patients admitted to a university hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) with Q wave from 1982 to 1988 were examined. Information about cardiovascular and other risk factors, contraindications, and prescription of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta AA), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) was collected. The prescription of these drugs was analysed in relation to clinical variables and the date of patients' discharge from hospital. During the 7 years of follow-up, the prescription of beta AA increased gradually from 20% to 30-35%; the prescription of CCB was above 30% during the same period and did not change significantly with time. The prescription of ASA increased from 0% to 30-35% in the last 3 years of follow-up. Contraindications to beta AA were present in 23.2% of cases and contraindications to ASA in 14.4%. In a multivariate analysis, hypertension (odds ratio 2.29, 95% confidence interval 1.55-3.38) and the period 1986-1988 (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.57-3.30) were associated with the prescription of beta AA, although the prescription of beta AA decreased significantly with advancing age. Other variables inversely associated with the prescription of beta AA were contraindications (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.66) and the presence of heart failure during admission (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.20).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗