Biomedical subjects

A Applewhite

Publications and source records attributed to A Applewhite.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1993

Osteogenic sarcoma with clinically detectable metastasis at initial presentation.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy and surgery have improved the length of survival for patients with osteogenic sarcoma (OS) who present without metastatic disease. We reviewed our experience with patients with OS who presented with clinically detectable metastasis to determine the prognostic factors and the effects of surgery on the primary tumor and on metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1975 to 1984 we treated 62 patients who had previously untreated OS with metastasis detected at presentation. All of these patients received intensive chemotherapy that included high-dose methotrexate; doxorubicin; and bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD). Selected patients also received cisplatin. The intent of surgery was resection of the primary tumor and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Survival was extremely poor; only 11% of patients survived, with a median survival of 20 months. Survival was not affected by use of preoperative chemotherapy versus immediate surgery, and did not correlate with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, alkaline phosphatase level, or the site of the primary tumor. Survival did correlate with age, location of metastatic disease, histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, and completeness of surgical resection of all sites of tumor. Resection of all sites of tumor identified at initial presentation was necessary for survival. CONCLUSION: OS that presents with metastatic disease has a very poor prognosis with therapy, although therapy has achieved good results for patients without metastasis detected at diagnosis. Aggressive surgical resection of tumor is necessary for survival. The use of novel therapies at initial presentation is justified with this group of patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with osteogenic sarcoma (OS). We reviewed our experience with OS to determine prognostic factors, the role of preoperative chemotherapy and subsequent histologic response, and the role of salvage chemotherapy after poor initial response. METHODS: From 1975 to 1984, we saw 279 patients with previously untreated OS without metastasis. All patients received intensive chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection of primary tumor. Chemotherapy included high-dose methotrexate; Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH); and bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD). Selected patients also received cisplatin. RESULTS: DFS was not affected by use of preoperative chemotherapy versus immediate surgery, by use of limb-sparing surgery versus amputation, age, sex, or dose intensity of chemotherapy. DFS did correlate with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, primary tumor site, race, and histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy. There was no difference in DFS for patients with a poor histologic response who did or did not receive cisplatin, although patients who did receive cisplatin had a longer time to relapse. The 5-year DFS was 76% for patients aged less than or equal to 21 years who had extremity primary tumor and were treated with the T10 protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive chemotherapy can achieve DFS for a high proportion of patients with OS. Although it is a powerful predictor of DFS, histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy cannot be assessed at diagnosis. We have not shown an ability to salvage patients with an unfavorable response. We need to increase the proportion of patients with a favorable response, identify the patients who will have an unfavorable response, and develop novel treatments to salvage poor responders.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1988

Etoposide (VP-16) in the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Twenty-six patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with etoposide (VP-16), 100-180 mg/m2 i.v., days 1, 2, and 3, monthly. Twenty-five had bidimensionally measurable disease and one had evaluable disease only. This regimen and dosage schedule were well tolerated, with minimal toxicity including myelosuppression; a median WBC count nadir of 3,600 cells/mm3 (range 200-2,400); and a median platelet nadir of 215,000 cells/mm3 (range 15,000-405,000). However, no patients responded and only two had stable disease for 3.5 and 4 months, respectively. At this dosage and schedule, there is no role for VP-16 in the treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗