PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Ardizzoni

Publications and source records attributed to A Ardizzoni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: ready for clinical practice?

Radical surgery remains the only treatment with curative potential for patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite complete surgical resection, long-term survival is still disappointing with an average 5-year survival rate lower than 60%. Thoracic post-operative radiotherapy trials demonstrated a possible impact in reducing loco-regional recurrence but not overall survival. Moreover, the majority of post-surgical failures are represented by distant metastases, indicating a possible role for adjuvant systemic therapies. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has now been clearly established in many solid tumors and the role of last generation platinum-based chemotherapy has now being considered as standard of care in advanced NSCLC. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected NSCLC remains highly controversial. After the meta-analysis published in 1995, which showed a non-statistically significant 5% improvement in 5-year survival with second generation platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, several randomized clinical trials addressing the role of last generation adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected stage I, II and IIIA NSCLC have been completed with conflicting results. The available scientific evidence is reviewed and strengths/weaknesses of each trial are discussed in this article. Although most of the available evidence points to a possible survival benefit in long-term survival improvement ranging from 4% to 15%, the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy as standard of care in the treatment of resected NSCLC is still a matter of debate. Practical issues and clinical aspects which may help clinicians in the decision making process about prescription of adjuvant treatment are also discussed.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2004

Glufosfamide administered by 1-hour infusion as a second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer; a phase II trial of the EORTC-New Drug Development Group.

The activity of glufosfamide (beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard) was tested in a multicentre phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were treated with 5000 mg/m(2) glufosfamide by a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks following registration at the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Data Center. Patients were randomised between hydration and no hydration to evaluate the nephroprotective effects of forced diuresis. Patients experiencing >/= 35 micromol/l increase of serum creatinine compared with baseline values were taken off the treatment. The Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) criteria were applied for the response assessment. Blood sampling was performed for a pharmacokinetic analysis. 39 patients from seven institutions were registered and a median of three cycles was given (range 0-6) cycles; 20 patients were randomised to the hydration arm. Haematological toxicity was mild, but treatment-related metabolic and electrolytic abnormalities and increases of serum creatinine occurred in several patients. Hydration did not have any significant influence on the plasma pharmacokinetics of glufosfamide and did not show any nephroprotective effect. Only one confirmed partial remission was observed (response rate 3%; 95% (Confidence Interval (CI) 0-14) and 18 cases with stable disease (49%) were recorded as assessed by an independent panel. Median survival of all patients treated was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2-7.9). In conclusion, glufosfamide administered by a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks has modest activity in advanced NSCLC patients after one prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Inadequacy of the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: report of four cases.

Unidimensional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) has been recently proposed in the attempt to simplify the standardized bidimensional World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The complete accord between these two measurement systems was established in a large comparative study [J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(3) (2000) 205] that demonstrated the validity and the good performance of RECIST criteria. We report four cases of inadequacy of RECIST criteria in the evaluation of response to chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. These four patients were enrolled in two consecutive multicenter phase II clinical trials investigating the activity of a novel chemotherapy regimen in advanced pleural mesothelioma. They were judged as having an objective response to chemotherapy according to WHO criteria. Reassessed according to both methods, we found that results obtained with RECIST criteria do not correspond to WHO underestimating response to chemotherapy. Our data raise doubts about the applicability of unidimensional RECIST response criteria to mesothelioma and, possibly, to any tumor involving the chest wall.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Complete spontaneous remission of non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report.

Spontaneous remission (SR) of cancer is a rare event, particularly in lung cancer. We report the case of a 68-year-old man, who came to our attention with a diagnosis of poorly differentiated pulmonary adenocarcinoma and, in absence of any active therapy, underwent a durable complete SR. Our case supports the rare occurrence of SR in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Serodiagnosis of infectious diseases with antigen microarrays.

AIMS: To generate protein microarrays by printing microbial antigens on slides to enable the simultaneous determination in human sera of antibodies directed against Toxoplasma gondii, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2. METHODS AND RESULTS: Antigens were printed on activated glass slides using high-speed robotics. The slides were incubated with serum samples and subsequently with fluorescently labelled secondary antibodies. Human IgG and IgM bound to the printed antigens were detected using confocal scanning microscopy and quantified with internal calibration curves. The microarray assay could detect as little as 0.5 pg of both IgG and IgM bound onto the glass surface. Precision profiles ranged from 1.7 to 18.5% for all the antigens. Microarrays and commercial ELISAs were utilized to detect serum antibodies against the ToRCH antigens in a panel of characterized human sera. Overall >80% concordance was obtained between microarray and ELISA kits in the classification of sera. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the microarray is a suitable assay format for the serodiagnosis of infectious diseases. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Antigen microarrays can be optimized for clinical use, their performance is equivalent to ELISA but they offer significant advantages in throughput, convenience and cost.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine-cisplatin with or without trastuzumab in HER2-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab provides significant clinical benefits in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients when administered in combination with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy has also been shown to be beneficial in some patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present randomized phase II trial examined the effect of adding trastuzumab to a standard chemotherapeutic combination (gemcitabine-cisplatin) in patients with HER2-positive NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated stage IIIB/IV HER2-positive NSCLC received up to six 21-day cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (day 1). Patients in the trastuzumab arm received trastuzumab 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) followed by 2 mg/kg/week i.v. until progression. RESULTS: Of 619 patients screened, 103 were eligible. Fifty-one patients were treated with trastuzumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and 50 with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Efficacy was similar in the trastuzumab and control arms: response rate 36% versus 41%; median time to progression 6.3 versus 7.2 months; and median progression-free survival (PFS) 6.1 versus 7 months. Response rate (83%) and median PFS (8.5 months) appeared relatively good in the six trastuzumab-treated patients with HER2 3+ or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive NSCLC. Addition of trastuzumab to gemcitabine-cisplatin was well tolerated, side-effects were as expected, and trastuzumab did not exacerbate the known toxicity of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Symptomatic cardiotoxicity was observed in one trastuzumab-treated patient. Serum trastuzumab concentrations in the presence of gemcitabine-cisplatin were comparable to those of trastuzumab alone. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin is well tolerated. Clinical benefit was not observed. Although HER2 3+/FISH-positive patients may benefit from trastuzumab, the subgroup is too small to provide definitive information. No significant effect of gemcitabine-cisplatin on trastuzumab pharmacokinetics was observed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an European Experts Panel.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended as the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its benefit seems limited to fit patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. For PS2 patients, there is no consensus on standard treatment. With the aims of reviewing the evidence supporting each of these therapeutic options, possibly reaching a consensus for treatment of PS2 patients affected by advanced NSCLC in clinical practice, and suggesting the priorities for clinical research in this field, an European Experts Panel took place in Avellino, Italy in April 2003. RESULTS: and conclusions On the basis of current evidence, chemotherapy treatment appears justified for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) could be the preferred option, although carboplatin-based or low-dose cisplatin-based doublets may represent alternative options. Stronger evidence is expected from new clinical research specifically focused on PS2 patients. Single-agent chemotherapy should be the standard arm against which experimental treatments are tested in randomised trials dedicated to PS2 patients. High priority should be given to the evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of platinum-based combinations, and to the testing of new biological agents. Another research priority is the improvement of supportive care. Patients strongly need symptomatic improvement: end points such as symptom relief, clinical benefit and quality of life should have a central position in trials dedicated to PS2 NSCLC patients.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

An increasing number of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after front-line chemotherapy are still in good performance status and willing to receive further treatment. Several drugs have been tested in this setting of treatment, but the only agent registered world-wide for second-line chemotherapy of advanced NSCLC is docetaxel. This drug, at dose of 75 mg/m2 every three weeks, has been the standard of care as second-line chemotherapy since 2000, based on two trials that reported improved survival times and quality of life when comparing with best supportive care (TAX 317) and with ifosfamide or vinorelbine (TAX 320). Docetaxel, given at this dose and schedule, resulted in significant haematological toxicity, with many patients at risk for neutropenic fever. Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeted antifolate agent with single-agent activity in first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC. In a phase III study in 571 patients pemetrexed, comparing with docetaxel in second-line chemotherapy, demonstrated clinically equivalent therapeutic outcomes, but a more favourable haematological toxicity profile, with fewer episodes of neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and infections and less use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Others several agents have been evaluated for the second-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but no comparative phase III studies with docetaxel has been carried out. The epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) and erlotinib (OSI 774, Tarceva) have been evaluated in the second- and third-line setting. Both drugs have demonstrated interesting response rates and toxicity profile and, in particular, erlotinib evidenced a survival advantage of 2 months respect placebo in recent phase III trial. Future developments are likely to value poli-chemotherapy or combination chemotherapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2004

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: a new prospective in the treatment of lung cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. Current treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, provide only limited improvement in the natural course of this disease. Therefore, the development of new therapeutic strategies is highly awaited. This review focuses on recent achievements on a novel class of anticancer drugs targeting the EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor). The EGFR family is a group of four structurally similar growth factor receptors with tyrosine-kinase activity (EGFR, HER2/neu, ErbB-3, ErbB-4), which dimerize upon binding with a number of ligands, including EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor) and TGF (Transforming Growth Factor), allowing downstream transduction of mitogenic signals. Overexpression of EGFR and HER2 is frequently found in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for over 80% of all malignant lung tumors, and has been associated with a worse clinical outcome. New agents developed to inhibit EGFR function include monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. In this review, results of most recent clinical with EGFR inhibitors including monoclonal antibodies, such as Trastuzumab (Herceptin), IMC-C225 (Cetuximab) and others (ABX-EGF, EMD 72000), and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, such as ZD1839 (Gefitinib, Iressa), OSI-774 (Erlotinib, Tarceva) and others (CI-1033, GW2016), are summarized. In particular, final results of phase II (IDEAL 1 and 2) and III (INTACT 1 and 2) studies of ZD1839 are reported. In IDEAL trials (ZD1839 single agent in patients pre-treated with chemotherapy) there was clear evidence of tumor regression, symptoms improvement and overall clinical benefit, whereas in the two INTACT trials (ZD1839 in combination with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in chemo-naive patients) ZD1839 did not improve either survival or other clinical endpoints. Possible explanations for these contradictory results and future perspectives are discussed.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

The activity of raltitrexed (Tomudex) in malignant pleural mesothelioma: an EORTC phase II study (08992).

We investigated the activity and toxicity of raltitrexed (Tomudex) as a single agent treatment in patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) in a multicentre phase II European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study. This study enrolled chemonaíve patients with histologically-confirmed measurable MPM. Raltitrexed was administered at the dose of 3 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. A maximum of eight cycles was planned in cases with an absence of progression or unacceptable toxicity. 24 patients received a total of 104 courses. 5 patients (20.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1-42.2%) had a partial response (PR), which was confirmed by an independent radiology committee. Toxicity was mild, with diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and neutropenia as the major side-effects, but not exceeding grade 3 toxicity. We conclude that raltitrexed has activity as a single agent in the treatment of MPM, and that further studies with this drug in MPM are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prognostic significance of K-ras, p53, bcl-2, PCNA, CD34 in radically resected non-small cell lung cancers.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of a panel of biological parameters in patients with radically resected non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). 269 cases with pathological stage I-IIIA NSCLC were retrospectively analysed. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect protein expression of p53, bcl-2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and CD34. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/direct nucleotide sequencing method was used to detect mutations in K-ras (codons 12, 13, 61, exons 1-2). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were calculated for clinical and biological variables using the Cox model for multivariate analysis. Histological subtype and the pathologic tumour extension (pT) were the most powerful clinical-pathological prognostic factors for survival (P=0.030 and P=0.031, respectively), whereas among the biological parameters, p53 overexpression (P=0.032) and K-ras mutation (P=0.078) had a negative prognostic role, as demonstrated by multivariate analysis. Conversely, bcl-2, PCNA and CD34 expression were not correlated with survival. Statistically significant associations between p53 expression and the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subtype, bcl-2 expression and SCC subtype, K-ras mutation and p53 negative expression, p53 and bcl-2, bcl-2 and PCNA overexpression were observed. In conclusion, some biological characteristics such as the K-ras and p53 status may provide useful prognostic information in resected NSCLC patients, in addition to the classical clinico-pathological parameters. However, further studies are needed to clarify the value of adopting biological prognostic factor into clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Temozolomide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases. a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group (08965).

This study was performed to evaluate the activity of single-agent temozolomide in two groups of chemotherapy-naïve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with (12 patients) and without (13 patients) brain metastases (BM). Patients in both groups were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m(2)/day, administered orally for 5 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued for up to six cycles, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median number of received cycles was only one in the group with and two in the group without BM, and early disease progression was the main reason for treatment discontinuation. Toxicity was moderate-in the group of patients with BM, the most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 side-effects included thrombocytopenia (17%), granulocytopenia (17%), lethargy (17%); other neurological (17%) and other genitourinary toxicity (17%). Patients without BM experienced anaemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (23%), nausea (15%) and lethargy (15%). This trial was designed according to Simon one-sample two-stage testing procedure and both groups of patients were assessed separately. No objective response was observed in either group and the study was closed after the first step of accrual with the conclusion of a lack of therapeutic activity of single-agent temozolomide in patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Economic evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an EORTC double-blind placebo-controlled phase III study (08923).

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the cost of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy is offset by cost savings due to a decreased incidence of febrile leukopenia (FL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were randomised to standard or intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to assess the impact on survival (n = 244). In addition, patients were randomised to prophylactic ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin or placebo to assess the impact on FL (n = 161). The economic evaluation examined the costs and effects of patients taking antibiotics versus placebo. Medical resource utilisation was documented prospectively, including 33 patients from one centre in The Netherlands (NL) and 49 patients from one centre in Germany (GE). The evaluation takes the perspective of the health insurance systems and of the hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the main trial, prophylactic antibiotics reduced the incidence of FL, hospitalisation due to FL and use of therapeutic antibiotics by 50%. In GE, the incidence of FL was not reduced by prophylaxis. This resulted in an average cost difference of only 35 Euros [95% confidence interval (CI) (-)1.713-2.263] in favour of prophylaxis (not significant). In NL, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of FL by nearly 50%, comparable with the results of the main trial, resulting in a cost difference of 2706 Euros [95% CI 810-5948], demonstrating savings in favour of prophylactic antibiotics of nearly 45%. Sensitivity analyses indicate that with an efficacy of prophylaxis of 50%, and with expected costs of antibiotic prophylaxis of 500 Euros or less, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL; that is, a risk >10-20% for FL per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Giving oral prophylactic antibiotics to SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy is the dominant strategy in both GE and NL, demonstrating both cost-savings and superior efficacy. The sensitivity analyses demonstrate that, due to the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics and their low unit cost, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL. We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients at risk for FL during chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Phase III randomised trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cooperative multinational trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin has significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study of chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC patients was designed to assess whether response rate in patients receiving a paclitaxel/carboplatin combination was similar to that in patients receiving a paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) (3-h intravenous infusion) followed by either carboplatin at an AUC of 6 or cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m(2), all repeated every 3 weeks. Survival, toxicity and quality of life were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive one of the two combinations, stratified according to centre, performance status, disease stage and histology. The primary analyses of response rate and survival were carried out on response-evaluable patients. Survival was also analysed for all randomised patients. Toxicity analyses were carried out on all treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients were randomised. The two treatment arms were well balanced with regard to gender (83% male), age (median 58 years), performance status (83% ECOG 0-1), stage (68% IV, 32% IIIB) and histology (38% squamous cell carcinoma). In the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, 306 patients received a total of 1311 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses) while in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, 302 patients received a total of 1321 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses). In only 76% of courses, carboplatin was administered as planned at an AUC of 6, while in 96% of courses, cisplatin was given at the planned dose of 80 mg/m(2). The response rate was 25% (70 of 279) in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 28% (80 of 284) in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (P = 0.45). Responses were reviewed by an independent radiological committee. For all randomised patients, median survival was 8.5 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm [hazard ratio 1.20, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]; the 1-year survival rates were 33% and 38%, respectively. On the same dataset, a survival update after 22 months of additional follow-up yielded a median survival of 8.2 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.06-1.40; P = 0.019); the 2-year survival rates were 9% and 15%, respectively. Excluding neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, and nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, the rate of severe toxicities was generally low and comparable between the two arms. Overall quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13) was also similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial comparing carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Although paclitaxel/carboplatin yielded a similar response rate, the significantly longer median survival obtained with paclitaxel/cisplatin indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be the first treatment option.

Adult↗