Biomedical subjects

A Ateshkadi

Publications and source records attributed to A Ateshkadi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Serum advanced glycosylation end-products in patients on hemodialysis and CAPD.

OBJECTIVES: Part I: To evaluate the long-term effects of daily glucose absorption from the peritoneal dialysis fluid on the formation of low-molecular-weight advanced glycosylation end-products (AGE-peptides) in nondiabetic continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Part II: To determine the acute effect of CAPD on serum AGE-peptide concentrations. DESIGN: Part I: Noninterventional, parallel, cross-sectional clinical trial. Part II: Crossover clinical trial. SETTING: A university-based hospital, and clinics. PATIENTS: Part I: Sixty nondiabetic subjects recruited into three age-matched (+/- 5 years) groups, as follows: 20 healthy volunteers (controls); 20 hemodialysis patients; and 20 CAPD patients. Part II: Eight patients with diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and chronic renal failure who were about to undergo CAPD. INTERVENTION: Part I: None. Part II: Uninterrupted CAPD, as medically required. MEASUREMENTS: Part I: To determine serum AGE-peptide concentrations blood samples were obtained randomly from controls and CAPD patients, and predialysis from hemodialysis patients. Hemoglobin A1c was also measured in all subjects. Part II: To determine serum AGE-peptide concentrations, blood samples were collected within one month prior to initiation of CAPD (predialysis) and, again, one week after initiation of uninterrupted CAPD (postdialysis). Hemoglobin A1c was measured predialysis. RESULTS: Part I: Mean hemoglobin A1c values for all groups were within the normal range; however, the mean value for CAPD patients was significantly higher than for both hemodialysis patients and healthy controls (controls, 5.21% +/- 0.6%; hemodialysis, 5.12% +/- 0.5%; CAPD, 5.78% +/- 0.6%; p < 0.01). The dialysis patients had a significantly higher mean serum AGE-peptide concentration than the control subjects (controls, 7.02 +/- 3.4 units/mL; hemodialysis, 11.9 +/- 3.6 units/mL; CAPD, 11.1 +/- 4.5 units/mL; p < 0.01). There was no difference in the mean serum AGE-peptide concentration of patients in the hemodialysis and CAPD groups. Part II: The mean hemoglobin A1c value in the diabetic predialysis patients was 9.2% +/- 1.9%. There was no difference between the predialysis and postdialysis serum AGE-peptide concentrations (predialysis, 16.9 +/- 9.6 units/mL; postdialysis, 16.0 +/- 2.9 units/mL; p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased glucose load and the higher hemoglobin A1c values, indicating poor glycemic control, nondiabetic CAPD patients did not have higher serum AGE-peptide concentrations than the nondiabetic hemodialysis patients. In diabetic patients, CAPD did not further increase the serum concentrations of AGE-peptides.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMed1993

Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal, intravenous, and subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) were compared after mean single 99.1 U/kg intraperitoneal (IP), intravenous (i.v.), and subcutaneous (SC) doses in eight noninfected patients on peritoneal dialysis in a randomized, three-way, cross-over fashion. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was performed in all patients on the days of the study. The IP dose was instilled into an empty peritoneum; total dwell time was 10 hours (4 hours dry, 6 hours with 2 L of peritoneal dialysis fluid). Blood samples were collected for 96 hours following IP and SC Epo, and for 72 hours following i.v. Epo. For the IP dose, a 10-hour effluent dialysate sample was collected to determine Epo recovery. Enzyme immunoassay was used for Epo analysis. The mean apparent volume of distribution was 0.05 L/kg, equivalent to 4.5% of total body weight; the mean total body clearance was 0.08 mL/min/kg. All eight patients exhibited multiexponential decay in serum Epo concentrations following i.v. Epo. Absorption of IP Epo was significantly greater than previous reports, presumably due to its administration into a dry peritoneum. The maximum concentrations following the IP and SC doses were nearly identical, but amounted to only 5% of the maximum concentrations for the i.v. dose. Subcutaneous Epo took nearly twice as long as IP Epo to achieve peak serum concentrations (17.1 +/- 5.0 hours v 9.4 +/- 1.9 hours). Compared with the IP route, the SC dose achieved a higher area under the serum concentration time curve from time 0 to 96 hours (AUC0-96; P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorption↗

PubMed1993

Pharmacokinetics and ex vivo susceptibility of cefpodoxime proxetil in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime, an extended-spectrum cephalosporin, were determined for eight noninfected patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and eight healthy volunteers. Subjects were matched for sex, age (+/- 6 years), and body weight (+/- 10 kg, except for one pair) and received a single 200-mg (cefpodoxime equivalents) oral dose of the prodrug cefpodoxime proxetil in an open-label, paired-design fashion. Dialysate (CAPD group only), plasma, and urine samples were collected and assayed for cefpodoxime by a microbiologic method. In addition, mean bactericidal titers of the effluent dialysate against selected bacterial strains often associated with CAPD-related peritonitis were determined at 6 and 24 h after the dose. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in all pharmacokinetic parameters between healthy and CAPD subjects, except for lag time to absorption. The mean peak plasma cefpodoxime concentration of 1.88 +/- 0.6 micrograms/ml occurred at 2.44 +/- 0.5 h for healthy volunteers, while the peak concentration of 3.25 +/- 1.4 micrograms/ml occurred at 12.0 +/- 4.2 h for patients on CAPD. The average elimination half-life in CAPD patients was approximately 12 times greater than that seen in healthy volunteers. Peritoneal dialysis had a minimal effect on cefpodoxime clearance. In healthy volunteers, 24.2% +/- 13% of the dose was recovered from the urine, in contrast to only 5.59% +/- 6.9% for CAPD patients. The mean bactericidal titers for all CAPD patients, at 6 and 24 h, were mostly less than 1:2 and did not exceed 1:4 for any of the isolates. Because of the decreased renal clearance and negligible dialysate clearance of cefpodoxime, and delayed drug absorption, the dosage interval for cefpodoxime proxetil may need to be extended in CAPD patients.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Effect of peritonitis on plasma and dialysate alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentrations in peritoneal dialysis patients.

The effect of peritonitis on plasma and dialysate alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations was determined. Plasma and dialysate samples were obtained at the onset of infection and one month after treatment from 10 peritoneal dialysis patients with peritonitis. Plasma and dialysate samples were also obtained from 10 noninfected matched controls. Sampling was repeated after a minimum of one month. Samples were assayed for AAG by radial immunodiffusion. The mean +/- S.D. plasma AAG concentrations for patients with peritonitis and for control patients were 152.4 +/- 30.9 mg/dL and 146.6 +/- 45.0 mg/dL, respectively (p > 0.05). The dialysate AAG concentrations for nine control patients were below the limit of detection. The mean +/- S.D. dialysate concentration for the nine infected patients with detectable AAG concentrations was 15.4 +/- 9.5 mg/dL. After successful antimicrobial therapy, dialysate AAG concentrations declined. There was no obvious correlation between dialysate white blood cell count and dialysate AAG concentration during peritonitis. Peritonitis increased dialysate AAG concentrations but had no effect on plasma AAG concentrations.

Bacterial Infections↗

PubMed1993

Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease.

The role played by Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is discussed, and the epidemiology, identification, diagnosis, eradication, and treatment of H. pylori infection are reviewed. Isolation of H. pylori from up to 100% of patients with duodenal ulcer and 80% of patients with gastric ulcer establishes a strong association between H. pylori and idiopathic PUD, although other factors also may be essential for the development of PUD. Invasive procedures for diagnosis of H. pylori infection include upper endoscopy and biopsy of gastroduodenal tissues followed by culture or the rapid urea test; noninvasive tests include the urea breath tests and serology. Although H. pylori is susceptible to a number of antimicrobials, eradication (as opposed to suppression) of this organism has been a major challenge. The most important predictive factor for clinical and microbiological efficacy is the pretreatment susceptibility of H. pylori to nitroimidazoles. Triple therapy with bismuth, metronidazole, and either amoxicillin or tetracycline has resulted in better clinical and microbiological outcomes than either monotherapy or dual therapy. Possible adverse effects of this regimen include nausea, vomiting, taste disturbance, and diarrhea. Anti-H. pylori therapy should be reserved for those patients who have recurrent symptomatic or intractable PUD. Currently, the regimen of choice includes bismuth, metronidazole, and either amoxicillin or tetracycline given for at least two weeks.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of publication rates for basic sciences versus practice from pharmacy-based grant programs.

The future of a profession in an era of scarce resources depends on maintaining a focus on science. The times demand that pharmacy practice examine its commitment to science. To address this concern, pharmacy practice-based research awards from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Research Institute Award Program, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Foundation Grant Program, and American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy New Investigator Program were compared with basic sciences awards from the American Association Colleges of Pharmacy New Investigator Program from their inception to 1991 to determine the percentage of awarded grants successfully published (publication rate). Pharmacy practice published awarded grants at 46% (70/154) versus 62% (26/42) for basic sciences (p = 0.09). A significant decline of 37% in pharmacy practice publication rate was observed over the study period. Economically, an average of $11,393 was spent to publish one manuscript in pharmacy practice versus $8077 in basic sciences. The results suggest that pharmacy practice should redefine a paradigm of commitment to scholarship to provide firm evidence for supporting science and sustaining professional growth.

Financing, Organized↗