PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Avallone

Publications and source records attributed to A Avallone.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Biweekly oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid combination chemotherapy during preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase I-II study.

Oxaliplatin (OXA), raltitrexed (RTX), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) have shown activity in metastatic colorectal cancer, radioenhancing effect and synergism when combined. We evaluated a chemotherapy (CT) combination of OXA, RTX and FU/FA during preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Fifty-one patients with LARC at high risk of recurrence (T4, N+ or T3N0 < or =5 cm from anal verge and/or circumferential resection margin < or =5 mm) received three biweekly courses of CT during pelvic RT (45 Gy). Surgery was planned 8 weeks after CT-RT. Recommended doses (RDs) determined during phase I were utilised in the subsequent phase II trial, where the rate of tumour regression grade (TRG) 1 or 2 was the main end point. No toxic deaths occurred, and severe toxicity was easily managed. In phase II, RDs delivered in 31 patients were OXA 100 mg m(-2) and RTX 2.5 mg m(-2) on day 1, and FU 900 mg m(-2) and LFA 250 mg m(-2) on day 2. Main severe toxicities by patients were grade 4 neutropenia (23%) and grade 3 diarrhoea (19%). In 71% (95% confidence limits, 52-86%) of patients, TRG1 (13) or TRG2 (9) was obtained. All patients are alive and recurrence-free after a median follow-up of 29 months. Combination of OXA, RTX and FU/FA with pelvic RT has an acceptable toxicity and a high clinical activity in LARC and should be studied further in patients at high risk of recurrence.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and has been detected at various rates in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The role of MSI in colorectal tumorigenesis was assessed further in this study by both microsatellite analysis of two CRC subsets [unselected patients (n = 215) and patients <50 years of age (n = 95)], and mutation screening of the two major MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2 among familial CRC cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCR-based microsatellite analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues. In CRC families, MLH1/MSH2 mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining were performed on germline DNA and MSI+ tumour tissues, respectively. RESULTS: The MSI+ phenotype was detected in 75 (24%) patients, with higher incidence in early-onset or proximally located tumours. Among 220 patients investigated for family cancer history, MSI frequency was markedly higher in familial [18/27 (67%)] than in sporadic [32/193 (17%)] cases. Three MLH1 and six MSH2 germline mutations were identified in 14 out of 36 (39%) CRC families. Prevalence of MLH1/MSH2 mutations in CRC families was significantly increased by the presence of: (i) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria; (ii) four or more CRCs; or (iii) one or more endometrial cancer. While MSH2 was found mostly mutated, almost all [8/9 (89%)] familial MSI+ cases with loss of the MLH1 protein were negative for MLH1 germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Both genetic (for MSH2) and gene-silencing (for MLH1) alterations seem to be involved in CRC pathogenesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus: a salvage regimen for colorectal cancer patients.

The aim of the present study was to define the activity and tolerability of a triplet regimen including oxaliplatin 130 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg x m(-2) (15 min i.v. infusion) given on day 1, followed by levo-folinic acid 250 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and 5-fluorouracil 1050 mg x m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 2 weeks, in pretreated colorectal cancer patients. From April 1999 to December 2000, 50 patients were enrolled: 26 were males and 24 females, their median age was 63 (range, 43-79) years; ECOG performance status was 0 in 26 patients, > or =1 in 24 patients; 26 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 40 patients had been exposed to one or two lines of palliative chemotherapy (including irinotecan in 31 cases); 18 patients were considered chemo-refractory. A total of 288 cycles were administered, with a median number of 6 (range 1-12) courses per patient. A complete response was obtained in three patients, and a partial response in nine patients, giving a major response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval, 13-38%), while 15 further patients showed a stable disease, for an overall control of tumour growth in 60% of patients. Three complete responses and three partial responses were obtained in patients pretreated with irinotecan (response rate, 19%); among refractory patients, three achieved partial responses (response rate, 13%). After a median follow-up of 18 (range, 10-30) months, 40 patients showed a progression of disease: the growth modulation index ranged between 0.2 and 2.5: it was > or =1.33 (showing a significant delay of tumour growth) in 16 (40%) patients. Actuarial median progression-free survival time was 7.6 months, and median survival time was 13.6 months: estimated probability of survival was 55% at 1 year. Main severe toxicity was neutropenia: World Health Organisation grade 4 affected 32% of patients; non-haematological toxicity was mild: World Health Organisation grade 3 diarrhoea was complained of by 8%, and grade 3 stomatitis by 4% of patients; neurotoxicity (according to Lévi scale) was scored as grade 3 in 8% of patients. In conclusion, this regimen was manageable and active as salvage treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients; it showed incomplete cross-resistance with irinotecan-based treatments, and proved to delay the progression of disease in a relevant proportion of treated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Prevalence and prognostic role of microsatellite instability in patients with rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Association between microsatellite instability (MSI) and favorable postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy has been indicated. To evaluate whether an analogous positive prognostic role of MSI could be present in rectal carcinoma (RC; most RC patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy), PCR-based microsatellite analysis of archival RCs and statistical correlation with clinico-pathological parameters were performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA from paraffin-embedded paired samples of tumors and corresponding normal tissue from 91 RC patients was analyzed for MSI using five microsatellite markers (tumors were classified as MSI(+) when two or more markers were unstable). RESULTS: Seventeen (19%) RC patients exhibited a MSI(+) phenotype. Prevalence of instability was found in patients with earlier RC onset (28% in cases with diagnosis age < or =55 years versus 15% in cases >55 years), whereas similar MSI frequencies were observed in patients with different disease stage or receiving different adjuvant therapies. While MSI was detected in seven (64%) of 11 familial patients, a remarkably lower MSI incidence was observed in sporadic cases (10/80; 12.5%). A significant association with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI(+) patients (median DFS/OS, 30/32 months) in comparison to MSI(-) ones (median DFS/OS, 18/21 months) (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MSI was demonstrated to be a strong molecular prognostic marker in rectal carcinoma, independent of the administered treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both).

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil triplet regimen every other week: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs in first-line as well as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown synergism with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We planned this phase I study to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and the recommended doses (RDs) for a triplet regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and 6S-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU on day 2, every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At least three patients had to be treated at each dose level, and the trial proceeded if no more than 33% of patients showed a DLT after the first cycle. Starting from OXA 85 mg/m(2) (over 2 h) and IRI 150 mg/m(2) (over 1 h), an alternated escalation was planned up to 110 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2), respectively. Thereafter, a fixed dose of LFA, 250 mg/m(2) (as 2-h infusion), plus an escalating dose of 5-FU (from 650 to 800 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus) was added on day 2 to the previous dose level of OXA and IRI. RESULTS: Forty-six patients, all but four affected by advanced colorectal primaries, entered this study. The MTDs for OXA and IRI given on the same day were 110 and 200 mg/m(2): these doses caused a DLT in three of six patients. The previous dose level (110 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) on day 1 was safely followed on day 2 by LFA plus 5-FU up to 800 mg/m(2). Indeed, only one of three patients treated at this last level had a DLT. This cohort was then expanded including a total of 14 patients, and on the whole series five cases of DLT occurred: WHO grade 4 neutropenia (two patients), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (three patients). Cumulative toxicity was analysed in 43 patients for a total of 347 cycles: grade 4 neutropenia was detected in 13 patients (30%); it was not dose-related, nor was it exacerbated by the addition of modulated 5-FU. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was suffered by nine (21%) and five (12%) patients, respectively. Two complete and nine partial responses were reported on 40 evaluable patients (six patients were disease-free at study entry), giving a response rate of 27.5% (95% confidence interval 15% to 44%); nine of 18 (50%) assessable patients of the two last cohorts treated with the triplet regimen achieved a complete response (two patients) or a partial response (seven patients). CONCLUSIONS: The RDs for this biweekly regimen were: OXA 110 mg/m(2) plus IRI 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on day 2. This regimen appeared active in pretreated gastrointestinal malignancies, and it is worthy of being evaluated in advanced colorectal carcinoma after failure of 5-FU-based adjuvant or palliative treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Phase I study of mitoxantrone, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in advanced solid tumours.

PURPOSE: We have recently evaluated the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer, and we have shown that this combination is well tolerated and has clinical activity. Clinical combination studies have shown that raltitrexed and anthracyclines can be combined at full doses without unexpected toxicities. Based on these observations, we started a phase I study of mitoxantrone plus raltitrexed administered on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2 in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mitoxantrone was given at a starting dose of 6 mg/m2, raltitrexed at a fixed dose of 3 mg/m2, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, and 5-FU at a starting dose of 750 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone and 5-FU doses were subsequently escalated alternately up to dose-limiting toxicity. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. RESULTS: Four dose levels were tested in 18 patients. All three patients treated at the fourth dose level had grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle. Therefore, this level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose and the dose level immediately below (mitoxantrone 7 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2) was selected for further evaluation. Neutropenia was the main toxic effect. Nonhaematologic side effects were mild. One complete response and five partial responses (all but one in patients with head and neck cancer) were observed, for an overall response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval, 13% to 59%). CONCLUSIONS: Mitoxantrone, raltitrexed and 5-FU can be combined at doses which are close to those used in monotherapy. The observed activity is encouraging, especially in the subset of patients with head and neck cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Docetaxel and cisplatin in locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG).

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is one of the most promising new drugs against squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), while cisplatin is one of the most active single agents. A phase I study has shown the feasibility of the combination of the two drugs, and activity in SCCHN has been seen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic SCCHN, never pretreated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, received three courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2, every three weeks. Thereafter, responsive metastatic patients received additional chemotherapy, while patients with locally advanced disease underwent radiation therapy. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (forty-five with locally advanced, one with metastatic disease) were entered into the study. Ten patients did not complete three courses of chemotherapy because of early death; one patient discontinued treatment after one course. Twenty-one objective responses were observed (46%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-60%), including five complete responses (11%) and sixteen partial responses (35%). Following induction chemotherapy plus radiation therapy, 9 of 21 evaluable patients were rendered disease free, while 8 additional patients had a partial response. After a median follow-up of 18 months, the median duration of response was 12 months, (range 3-25+), and the median overall survival was 11 months. Six early deaths were considered possibly treatment-related (sepsis following grade 4 neutropenia in two cases, hypovolemic shock following severe diarrhea in four cases). Neutropenia was the most severe toxicity (grade 3-4 in 28 patients, median duration 4 days); diarrhea and vomiting were the most troublesome non-haematologic toxicities (grade 4 in 4 and 3 patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is active in SCCHN, but toxicity is substantial. This schedule does not appear to offer any advantage compared with conventional regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy.

Preclinical evidence of a schedule-dependent synergism between raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has prompted clinical studies of this combination. We review the main preclinical and clinical results of raltitrexed/5-FU-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy. Promising results include: response rates of 25 and 23% with combinations of raltitrexed/5-FU/levofolinic acid (LFA) as first-line treatment and oxaliplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, respectively; and a 67% response rate in a phase I study of cisplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as first-line treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, including a 100% response rate at the recommended dose. These combinations were well tolerated, with neutropenia as the main dose-limiting toxicity, allowing the drugs to be combined at the doses used in monotherapy. These results suggest a role for raltitrexed within combination regimens in colorectal cancer therapy, as well as other tumors such as head and neck cancer. A further potential application of raltitrexed in combination therapies is within multidisciplinary chemo-radiotherapy strategies, mainly in rectal cancer. Phase II studies are planned/ongoing to investigate these interesting possibilities.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Irinotecan and mitomycin C in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer patients. A phase I/II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan (CPT-11) given on days 1 and 8 with mitomycin C (MMC) given on day 1 in a monthly cycle, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this regimen in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Fifty-two patients, all pretreated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (20 patients) and/or one (35 patients) or two (8 patients) lines of chemotherapy, were entered in this study. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (starting from 150 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8, with escalating doses of MMC (starting from 8 mg/m2) given on day 1, recycling every 28 days. At least 3 patients were treated at each dose level. Escalation proceeded unless 2 out of 3 or 4 out of 6 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) after the first cycle. RESULTS: Twelve patients were entered in the phase I study, and 4 consecutive dose levels were tested. At the last dose level (CPT-11 200 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2) 4 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (i.e., grade 4 neutropenia in 2 patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2 patients). Therefore, this dose level was considered as the MTD. Forty patients were treated at the previous dose level (CPT-11, 175 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2). One complete, 4 partial, 3 minor responses and 11 cases of stable disease were registered, giving a response rate of 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4-27%] and an overall control of tumor growth in 47% (95% CI, 31-64%) of patients. The median time to treatment failure was 6 months (range 1-19+). The median survival time was 14.5 months, and the 1-year and 2-year probability of survival were 56 and 43%. Neutropenia and diarrhea affected 62 and 58% of patients, grade 3 or 4 being registered in 26 and 23% of them, respectively. One episode of neutropenic fever was reported. Other acute toxicities were usually mild and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 175 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 associated with MMC 10 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks, is a safe and moderately active regimen in heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The role of MMC in this combination is doubtful, and further attempts with other new agents should be made to improve the outcome in these patients.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Oxaliplatin and raltitrexed combined with leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus every two weeks: a dose finding study in advanced previously treated colorectal carcinoma. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given as a two-hour infusion followed by raltitrexed (Tomudex [TOM]) administered as a 15-min infusion on day 1, and bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by a fixed dose of levo-folinic acid (LFA) 250 mg/m2 on day 2, recycling every two weeks, and to have preliminary evidence of activity of this combination in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with one (25 cases) or two or more lines of chemotherapy, including irinotecan (26 cases), and/or modulated 5-FU (40 cases) entered this study. Starting doses of L-OHP, TOM, and 5-FU were 85, 2.5 and 750 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: Seven dose levels were tested. Neutropenia was the main dose limiting toxicity of the dose escalation (8 of 13 cases). The recommended doses were 130 mg/m2 of L-OHP, and 3.0 mg/m2 of TOM on day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 of LFA, and 1050 mg/m2 of 5-FU on day 2, every two weeks. Severe diarrhoea and stomatitis were rarely reported. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive aeurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Twelve patients were considered as having a major responses (one complete), and an additional eight patients showed a minor response; the median time to treatment failure was twenty-four weeks. CONCLUSIONS: With this regimen it is possible to give full doses of all three cytotoxic drugs every two weeks. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I study of Caelyx (doxorubicin HCL, pegylated liposomal) in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposome technology represents a favourable drug-carrier system, since stealth liposomal drugs have a reduced clearance with prolonged circulation half-life and selective drug accumulation in tissues with increased vascular permeability, such as tumor tissues. Caelyx is a pegylated liposome containing doxorubicin, which has been developed to target drug delivery to cancer cells, thus reducing toxicities. Biodistribution studies have shown a selective tumor uptake in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), thus justifying the present phase I study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC were treated with Caelyx administered at the starting dose of 30 mg/m2 every three weeks and escalated by 5 mg/m2 per step. Dose escalation was stopped if more than a third of patients of a given cohort had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except for nausea and alopecia), or > 2 week delay in chemotherapy recycling. The above dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose level immediately below was recommended for phase II evaluation. Response was evaluated after three courses of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated at five dose levels. At 50 mg/m2, three out of six patients had grade 3 stomatitis; therefore, this level was defined as MTD and 45 mg/m2 was the selected dose for phase II. Stomatitis occurred in 11 patients across all dose levels, considering all delivered cycles. Neutropenia occurred in 10 of 24 patients, but reached grade 4 in only 2 patients at fourth dose level. Skin toxicity, mainly appearing in the form of palmar-plantar erythrodysestesia, was the most frequent toxicity, occurring in 14 patients. Other side effects were mild. One complete response (4%) and seven partial responses (29%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 16%-55%). CONCLUSIONS: Caelyx is a safe and promising new treatment in HNC, that deserves further evaluation both alone and integrated within chemo-radiotherapy strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG).

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be regarded as a reference regimen in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a direct and specific thymidilate synthase (TS) inhibitor, which has shown clinical activity against SCCHN in a previous phase I study, when combined with 5-FU and levo-folinic acid (LFA). Preclinical data support the combination of CDDP and raltitrexed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of cisplatin, raltitrexed. LFA and 5-FU in a phase I-II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN were treated with a combination of cisplatin at the starting dose of 40 mg/m2. followed by raltitrexed at the starting dose of 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1; levo-folinic acid at fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil at the starting dose of 750 mg/m2 on day 2. Doses of the three cytotoxic agents were alternately escalated up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Treatment was recycled every two weeks and given up to a maximum of eight courses; after chemotherapy, patients with locally advanced disease received a locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered into the study. Six dose levels were tested. At CDDP 50 mg/m2, raltitrexed 3 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2, four out of six patients showed DLT, which was in all cases grade 4 neutropenia. Therefore, this dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD). CDDP 60 mg/m2, raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2, LFA 250 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2 was the dose level recommended for phase II. CDDP, Raltitrexed and 5-FU mean actually delivered dose intensities at the selected dose level were 26, 1.05, and 378 mg/m2/week, respectively. Neutropenia was the main side effect and was observed even at the lowest dose levels. Nonhematologic side effects were mild. Nine complete responses (20%) and twenty-one partial responses (47%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 51%-80%), according to intention to treat analysis. Fifteen of fifteen patients (100%) treated at the dose level selected for phase II had an objective response (5 complete responses, 10 partial responses). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our dose escalation clearly demonstrate that it is possible to combine CDDP, raltitrexed, and modulated 5-FU at effective doses, without unexpected toxicities. The response data point to an impressive clinical activity, which will be better defined by an ongoing large phase II study.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (LFA-5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex) (TOM + LFA-5-FU), in advanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison of both these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration of LFA-5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA-5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease (34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated to receive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m2 s i.v. bolus (arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm B); or MTX, 750 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm C). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Response rate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was defined to have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimental treatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with the standard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. RESULTS: The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval (95%, CI): 21%-48%) in arm A, including 3 complete responses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%), with 2 CRs and 11 PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18-108) weeks, the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C, respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability of survival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%, respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU. Median relative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI8) was 78% for CPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA-5-FU were neutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relative DI8 was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 + LFA-5-FU compares favorably in term of activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 and continuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than the MTX + LFA-5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interim analysis. The TOM + LFA 5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profile very close to the MTX + LFA 5-FU combination, and dose not deserve further evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A phase II trial of cisplatin, methotrexate, levofolinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with locally advanced, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) might improve survival with respect to radiation therapy alone. Furthermore, chemotherapy represents the only therapeutic option in metastatic head and neck carcinoma. METHODS: To improve further the results that could be obtained with an induction regimen of cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the authors treated 50 patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN with a combination of CDDP 65 mg/m2 on Day 1, methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on Day 1, levofolinic acid 250 mg/m2 on Day 2, and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on Day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The authors' aim was to increase the activity of CDDP plus 5-FU (PF) using a regimen that combined the three most active drugs in SCCHN and provided an adequate biochemical modulation of 5-FU, which was administered as an intravenous bolus infusion. RESULTS: Forty objective responses were observed among 50 evaluable patients (80%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 66-90%), including 7 complete responses (14%; 95% C.I., 5-27%), and 33 partial responses (66%; 95% C.I., 51-79%). Locoregional treatment, consisting of radiotherapy or surgery, was given at the end of chemotherapy. On completion of induction chemotherapy and locoregional treatment, 42 of 46 patients (91%) were rendered disease free. After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median duration of response was 10 months, the median failure free survival was 10 months, and the median overall survival was 21 months. The treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (50%), but it was febrile in only 3 patients. Nausea and vomiting were well managed with serotonin-3 blocking agents. Severe mucositis was seldom observed and easily manageable, and it never required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of activity, the manageable toxicity, and the noteworthy survival data of this regimen compare favorably with most of the drug combinations used worldwide to treat similar patient populations, with the additional advantage of significantly lower cost.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Concurrent irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus levo-folinic acid given every other week in the first-line management of advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levofolinic acid (LFA) administered together every two weeks, to define the toxicity profile of this regimen, and to have a preliminary evidence of its activity in the first-line management of advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven colorectal carcinoma, no prior chemotherapy for their advanced disease, and with at least one measurable or evaluable indicator lesion, were admitted to this study. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 150 mg/m2 given i.v. (90 min infusion) on day 1, followed on day 2 by a fixed dose of LFA (250 mg/m2) as a two-hour i.v. infusion plus a starting dose of 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed among three patients of each cohort, CPT-11 and 5-FU were alternately escalated in the subsequent cohort. Otherwise, three more patients were enrolled at the same dose level. DLT was defined as: WHO grade 3 non-haematological toxicity (except for vomiting or alopecia), grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutro- or thombocytopenia, or a > 2-week delay in recycling. The MTDs were defined as the doses at which two of three, or four of six, patients showed the same DLT. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (five pretreated in adjuvant setting) were enrolled in this study, and a total number of 293 cycles (median 6/patient) were administered. Dose escalation safely proceeded to 210/950/250 mg/m2 of CPT-11/5-FU/LFA. These dosages were considered as MTDs, since four of six patients showed grade 4 neutropenia, in one case associated with grade 3 stomatitis. A mild decrease of both the CPT-11 and 5-FU doses to 200 and 850 mg/m2, respectively, caused different DLTs (neutropenia and diarrhoea) in two out of seven patients. At these dosages, transient grades 3 or 4 neutropenia affected two patients each during their treatment, while only one patient suffered from a severe delayed diarrhoea. Other non-haematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Therefore, we recommend this latter dose level for further study. Major responses (3 complete and 11 partial) were reported in 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI: 27%-64%) according to an intent-to-treat analysis. Responses were observed from first dose level, and in four of five previously treated patients. Median failure-free and overall survivals, after a median follow-up of 39 weeks, were 42 and 55 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent administration of CPT-11 and modulated 5-FU every two weeks is feasible at the recommended dosages. This regimen demonstrated interesting activity in the management of advanced colorectal cancer patients, and it probably better exploits the synergism between CPT-11 and 5-FU than recently tested alternating schedules. A phase II study is ongoing to more precisely define its activity and toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tomudex combined with 5-fluorouracil plus levofolinic acid in advanced head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer.

In vitro studies have shown a schedule-dependent synergism between Tomudex and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Incubation of different types of head and neck and colorectal cancer cells with levofolinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU for 4 or 24 h, after 24-h incubation with Tomudex, produces a clear synergism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and activity of a combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the potential for 5-FU pharmacomodulation by Tomudex was also evaluated through an intrapatient assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and 5-FU AUC with and without pretreatment with Tomudex. Eligible patients were treated with Tomudex at the starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2 on day 1, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2 on day 2, immediately followed by bolus 5-FU at the starting dose of 600 mg/m2. Tomudex and 5-FU doses were alternately escalated. Courses were repeated every 2 weeks. In the second course, LFA and 5-FU were administered on day 1 and Tomudex on day 2; further treatment was given according to the sequence used in the first course. Plasma 5-FU concentrations were analyzed on courses 1 and 2 using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay with UV detection. DPD activity was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on courses 1 and 2 using incubation of cytosol with [14C]FU and quantitation of metabolite formation. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Dose escalation was stopped at step 8, because of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two of three patients. The dose level immediately before (3 mg/m2 Tomudex, 1050 mg/m2 5-FU) was selected for further evaluation. Tomudex and 5-FU mean dose intensities actually delivered at the seventh step were 1.32 and 462 mg/m2/week, respectively. Six of 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer obtained an objective response (15%; 95% confidence interval, 6-30%). In particular, three complete responses and three partial responses were observed. Six of 17 patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer obtained an objective response (1 complete response + 5 partial responses; 35%; 95% confidence interval, 14-62%). Median duration of response in colorectal cancer patients was 12 months. 5-FU AUC was not significantly different between the two courses (median intrapatient difference, 9.3%; P = 0.28). DPD activity in course 1 was significantly higher than course 2 (P = 0.041) in the 16 patients in which values were evaluable. The combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU is well tolerated and active in colorectal and head and neck cancer. The Tomudex mean dose intensity actually delivered is higher than usually achieved in monotherapy. The absence of a clear pharmacokinetic interaction suggests that the synergism of Tomudex and 5-FU might occur at the cellular level.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Beta- and gamma-catenin expression in thyroid carcinomas.

Cadherins are calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecules whose intracellular domain forms a complex with proteins required for their function, called catenins. Down-regulation of cadherins has frequently been detected in many types of human carcinomas, being associated with tumour progression. The present study investigates the immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin and beta- and gamma-catenin in 27 human thyroid carcinomas. E-cadherin immunoreactivity was found to be decreased at cell-cell contacts in 8/15 (53 per cent) papillary, 5/7 (71 per cent) follicular, and 5/5 (100 per cent) anaplastic carcinomas. Beta-catenin membrane localization was found to be decreased in 6/15 (40 per cent) papillary, 2/7 (28 per cent) follicular, and 5/5 (100 per cent) anaplastic carcinomas. Gamma-catenin expression was partially or totally lost in 13/15 (86 per cent) papillary, 6/7 (85 per cent) follicular, and 5/5 (100 per cent) anaplastic carcinomas. A normal pattern of expression for these three molecules was observed in areas of normal tissue in each sample. These data indicate that in addition to E-cadherin, catenins are also down-regulated at cell-cell junctions in thyroid tumours and could represent potentially useful differentiation and/or transformation markers. The high frequency of alterations of gamma-catenin expression found in thyroid carcinomas suggests an important role for this gene product in thyroid carcinogenesis.

Adenocarcinoma, Follicular↗
PubMed1995

Alpha 1 B, but not alpha 1A, adrenoreceptor activates calcium influx through the stimulation of a tyrosine kinase/phosphotyrosine phosphatase pathway, following noradrenaline-induced emptying of IP3 sensitive calcium stores, in PC Cl3 rat thyroid cell line.

In PC Cl3 rat thyroid cell line noradrenaline-induced Ca2+ response, mainly due to the activation of alpha 1B receptors, is characterized by a rapid peak phase, due to the Ca2+ mobilization from inositol trisphosphate-sensitive internal stores, followed by a sustained plateau, representing the capacitative calcium entry. The plateau phase elicited by noradrenaline returns to the basal value within 100 sec from the removal of agonist. The tyrosine kinases inhibitor genistein completely abolishes the plateau upon noradrenaline withdrawal. On the contrary, the tyrosine phosphatases blocker, vanadate, potentiates the plateau phase of calcium response to noradrenaline and prevents the gradual decrease of [Ca2+]i after removal of noradrenaline. The noradrenaline-induced Ca2+ influx, due to the activation of alpha 1A receptor-operated Ca2+ entry is not affected by vanadate. The treatment with noradrenaline induced the tyrosine phosphorylation of specific substrates in lysates derived from PC Cl3 cells, an effect inhibited by genistein pretreatment. These results show that a balance between tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is required for the regulation of capacitative calcium entry following noradrenaline stimulation of alpha 1B receptor, whilst the influx of Ca2+ directly operated by alpha 1A receptor activation seems to be independent of the tyrosine phosphorylating pathway.

Animals↗