PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Balshem

Publications and source records attributed to A Balshem.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Prostate cancer risk assessment program. A model for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer (except skin cancer) in men. Several factors have been associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer, including age, ethnicity, family history, lifestyle, and environmental exposures. Recognition of the importance of the interaction of these factors in prostate cancer has led to an interest in their evaluation as a model both for studying genetic susceptibility patterns and for studying and providing educational tools and preventive interventions. One such model has been developed at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Critical to the implementation of the model has been the establishment of the Prostate Cancer Risk Registry (PCRR) and Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP). Together, they serve as a unique resource for investigating the interaction between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility patterns; exploring the early, premalignant biological markers of prostate cancer; and prospectively assessing the quality of life (QOL) of men at risk. In addition, PRAP facilitates the evaluation of models for prostate cancer risk counseling and screening in the community. This paper describes this model for early detection and risk reduction, along with preliminary data from its first two study aims. The program is particularly relevant in view of the wealth of genetic information emerging from the Human Genome Project.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Exploring family relationships in cancer risk counseling using the genogram.

OBJECTIVES: The genogram is a tool that has facilitated counseling in family therapy and social work for many years. It is hypothesized that genograms may also be useful in genetic counseling, because they help the counselor to acquire more objective and consistent information from the client, as well as to incorporate family dynamics and psychosocial issues into the counseling approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot study of genograms used as an adjunct to genetic counseling was performed at Fox Chase Cancer Center's Family Risk Assessment Program. A questionnaire was developed to elicit genograms from 38 women at risk for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. After standard pedigree expansion, a series of questions was asked about the consultand's relationship with other family members, communication patterns within the family, attitudes toward genetic testing, family reactions to cancer, roles individuals play in the family, and significant historical or anniversary events. Relationships were defined by the consultand as close, very close, conflictual, fused and conflictual, distant, or estranged. RESULTS: The majority of relationship types reported by 38 individuals was "very close" or "close." Eighty-one % reported having close/very close relationships with their spouses, 83% reported close/very close relationships with their mothers, and 70% reported close/very close relationships with their fathers. The degree of familial cohesion as depicted by the genogram correlates positively with scores obtained on the standardized Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given the family-wide implications of genetic testing, the genogram may offer important guidance in family-targeted interventions.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Clinical relevance of chromosome abnormalities in non-small cell lung cancer.

The relationship between clonal chromosome alterations and various clinical parameters was evaluated in 70 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for whom detailed karyotypic assessment was possible. Included in the analysis are karyotypes of 63 previously published cases and seven new NSCLCs. Clinical features investigated were diagnosis, tumor stage and grade, gender, smoking history measured in pack years, and survival. Certain chromosome abnormalities were significantly associated with histologic subtype, tumor grade, stage, and prognosis. Rearrangements involving chromosome arms 2p and 3q were more common in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) than in adenocarcinoma (ADC). Loss of 3p was observed more often in SCC. Gain of 7p was more frequent in ADC. Rearrangement of 17p was associated with a lower tumor grade. Rearrangement of Xp and loss of chromosome 12 or 22 were each associated with higher tumor stage. Rearrangement of 3p or 6q was correlated with a better survival outlook. In contrast, loss of chromosomes 4 or 22 portended a poor prognosis. Finally, an increased number of marker chromosomes was observed in patients having a higher number of pack years. These data indicate that chromosome abnormalities can have clinical and pathologic significance in NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Results of an office-based training program in clinical breast examination for primary care physicians.

BACKGROUND: This study hypothesized that an office-based training program in clinical breast examination (CBE) would improve the lump-detection skills of primary care physicians. METHODS: A one-group pretest-posttest design was utilized, without outcome measurements taken prior to instruction, immediately afterwards, and six months later. Fifty physicians from 117 practices that had been randomly selected and met program eligibility criteria elected to participate. The intervention was a one-hour office-based CBE training program based on the MammaCare method, a standardized approach to teaching the detection of breast lumps using silicone breast models. RESULTS: There were five lumps in the silicone model. The mean number of correct lump detections increased significantly, from 0.66 before to 3.2 after instruction, and this gain was maintained at six-month follow-up. The mean number of false positives decreased from 2.9 before to 1.16 after instruction, increasing slightly to 1.6 at six-month follow-up. Ninety-six percent of the physicians reported that they had modified their methods of CBE as a result of the training. CONCLUSIONS: This office-based instruction using an academic detailing model improved the participating physicians' abilities to correctly detect lumps in a silicone breast model and was received favorably.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.

The recent cloning of a breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1), and determination of the locus of a related gene (BRCA2), offers potential for clinical genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. This study examined interest in and expectations about an impending genetic test among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast cancer patients. One hundred five females completed two structured telephone interviews to assess demographics, breast cancer risk factors, psychological factors, and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Overall, 91% of FDRs said that they would want to be tested, 4% said they would not, and 5% were uncertain. The most commonly cited reasons for wanting genetic testing were to learn about one's children's risk, to increase use of cancer screening tests, and to take better care of oneself. Women with less formal education were motivated by childbearing decisions and future planning to a greater degree than were women with education beyond high school. Most women anticipated a negative psychological impact of positive test results, involving increased anxiety (83%), depression (80%), and impaired quality of life (46%). In addition, 72% of women indicated that they would still worry if they tested negative. In multivariate regression analysis, level of baseline depression was the strongest predictor of an anticipated negative impact of genetic testing (Beta = .15; P, .0001). These results suggest that the demand for genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be great, even among women who are not likely to have predisposing mutations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that a majority of women with a family history of breast cancer have exaggerated perceptions of their own risk of this disease and experience excessive anxiety. In response to the need to communicate more accurate risk information to these women, specialized programs for breast cancer risk counseling have been initiated in medical centers across the United States. PURPOSE: Our purpose was 1) to evaluate the impact of a standardized protocol for individualized breast cancer risk counseling on comprehension of personal risk among first-degree relatives of index breast cancer patients and 2) to identify women most and least likely to benefit from such counseling. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized trial comparing individualized breast cancer risk counseling to general health counseling (control). We studied 200 women aged 35 years and older who had a family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative. Women with a personal history of cancer were excluded. Risk comprehension was assessed as the concordance between perceived "subjective" lifetime breast cancer risk and estimated "objective" lifetime risk. RESULTS: The results of logistic regression analysis showed that women who received risk counseling were significantly more likely to improve their risk comprehension, compared with women in the control condition (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.5; P = .01). However, in both groups, about two thirds of women continued to overestimate their lifetime risks substantially following counseling. Examination of subjects by treatment interaction effects indicated that risk counseling did not produce improved comprehension among the large proportion of women who had high levels of anxious preoccupation with breast cancer at base line (P = .02). In addition, white women were less likely to benefit than African-American women (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.11-0.99; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Efforts to counsel women about their breast cancer risks are not likely to be effective unless their breast cancer anxieties are also addressed. IMPLICATIONS: Attention to the psychological aspects of breast cancer risk will be critical in the development of risk-counseling programs that incorporate testing for the recently cloned breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1 (and BRCA2 when that gene has also been cloned).

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Mammography interventions for 65- to 74-year-old HMO women. Program effectiveness and predictors of use.

This study evaluated the impact of two interventions designed to encourage mammography use among HMO women aged 65-74 who had not had a mammogram within the past year and had not used their referral for a free mammogram. Ninety days after the referral mailing, women were randomized to receive (a) a survey, (b) a survey in addition to telephone mammography counseling, or (c) a survey, telephone counseling, and a letter. Follow-up data indicated that only 13% of control group women compared to 27% who received phone counseling and 32% who received counseling and a letter obtained a mammogram within 120 days following the baseline survey and/or intervention. Results of the logistic regression analysis indicated that having received either of the interventions, mammography history, access ease, breast cancer/mammography beliefs, and having a friend or family member with breast cancer were independently and significantly related to mammography use.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: An explanatory framework referred to as the Preventive Health Model was used to identify factors associated with prospective adherence to colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: Data on sociodemographic, psychosocial, social influence, and program factors were collected via telephone survey for 501 older adult members of an independent practice association-type health maintenance organization. Subjects were later mailed fecal occult blood tests for completion and return. Adherence was defined as the return of the tests within 90 days. RESULTS: Structural analysis shows that for men (N = 145), perceived self-efficacy (OR = 1.4), salience and coherence of testing (OR = 2.3 for a 5-point increment on a 30-point scale), and exposure to health education interventions (OR = 6.8) were significant independent predictors of intention to adhere and of adherence. Among women (N = 185), predictors were age (OR = 1.8) and salience and coherence of testing (OR = 1.8 for a 5-point increment on a 30-point scale). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that for both men and women, adherence is influenced strongly by the extent to which the behavior is judged to make sense in everyday life. It also appears that additional education and encouragement may persuade men and younger women to participate in screening.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1994

Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

PURPOSE: In anticipation of the availability of genetic testing for a breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1), this study examined interest in and expectations about the impact of a potential genetic test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 121 first-degree relatives (FDRs) of ovarian cancer patients. The design was cross-sectional. Subjects completed a structured telephone interview of attitudes about cancer and genetic testing, and self-report psychologic questionnaires to assess coping style and mood disturbance. RESULTS: Overall, 75% of FDRs said that they would definitely want to be tested for BRCA1 and 20% said they probably would. In bivariate analyses, interest was associated positively with education, perceived likelihood of being a gene carrier, perceived risk of ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer worries, and mood disturbance. In logistic regression analysis, perceived likelihood of being a gene carrier was associated strongly with interest (odds ratio, 3.7; P = .006). Results of stepwise linear regression modeling indicated that an anticipated negative impact of genetic testing was associated with being younger (beta = -.66, P = .009), having more mood disturbance (beta = .015, P = .01), and having an information-seeking coping style (beta = .19, P = .002). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the demand for genetic testing for BRCA1 among FDRs of cancer patients may be great. Moreover, those who elect to participate may represent a more psychologically vulnerable subgroup of high-risk women.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective?

This study evaluated interventions implemented with women in a health maintenance organization who had not utilized their annual free mammogram referral 45 days (step 2) and 95 days (step 3) after its mailing. The step 2 evaluation compared mammography utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a brief reminder letter or no reminder: 42% of the reminder group vs 28% of the control group obtained mammograms. The step 3 evaluation compared utilization for women randomly assigned to receive a second reminder, a letter suggesting a preventive office visit, or telephone counseling: 29% of those who received telephone counseling, 14% of those who received a letter, and 12% of those who received a second reminder obtained mammograms.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies estimate that first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer have a twofold to 10-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Recently, attention has focused on the mammography screening practices of women who are at high risk for breast cancer. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to characterize mammography screening practices in a sample of first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients and to identify variables that may serve as barriers to or facilitators of adherence to mammography. METHODS: Cross-sectional (rather than prospective) data were collected by telephone interviews with 140 women aged 35-79 years who had a family history of breast cancer in at least one first-degree relative (mother, sister, or daughter). Data were recorded on mammography screening patterns, depression, stress impact, and breast cancer worries. RESULTS: Women whose mammography history adhered to age-specific recommendations varied by age: 76% of first-degree relatives aged 35-39 years, 86% aged 40-49 years, and 63% aged 50 years or more. In bivariate analyses, level of education (P = .001), employment (P = .046), and time since diagnosis of the index patient (P = .044) were significantly and positively associated with mammography adherence. Variables associated negatively with adherence included age (P = .019), intrusive thoughts about breast cancer (P = .042), and breast cancer worries that interfered with daily functioning (P = .004). Multivariate analysis by logistic regression indicated that only breast cancer worries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-5.9) and education (OR = 4.8; CI = 1.6-14.3) were significant independent predictors of mammography adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that most women at high risk for breast cancer adhere to the recommended mammography screening guidelines of the National Cancer Institute. However, rates of adherence among high-risk women aged 50 years and older are suboptimal; only 63% of these women received annual screening mammograms, and 13% had never been screened. Breast cancer worries may pose a barrier to mammography adherence among high-risk women, particularly those with less formal education. IMPLICATIONS: Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to validate the present findings and to evaluate the impact of psychoeducational interventions for women with affected first-degree relatives.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Mammography-related beliefs of older women. A survey of an HMO population.

Although breast cancer risk increases with age, most studies show that mammography use decreases. A 15-minute telephone survey of 548 women health maintenance organization (HMO) members aged 65 to 74 who had not obtained a mammogram within the past year was undertaken to identify sociodemographic factors as well as knowledge, belief, and attitudinal characteristics associated with mammography history. Women who had never had a mammogram were less likely to have received a physician's recommendation and more likely to express negative attitudes about mammography, such as having a mammogram means "looking for trouble" and "makes me nervous." In addition, they expressed doubts about their need to have a mammogram and reported that "other problems" prevented them from having a mammogram. These results suggest that women who have never had a mammogram may require more intensive interventions to encourage them to obtain mammograms. In addition to receiving a mammography recommendation from their physicians, they might benefit from individual or small group educational sessions where negative attitudes about mammography could be explored and modified.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1991

Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening.

This investigation was a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of health education interventions on the return of mailed fecal occult blood (FOB) tests (FOBT adherence) in a colorectal cancer screening program. The study sample included 2,201 men and women aged 50 to 74 years who were members of an Independent Practice Association (IPA)-type health maintenance organization (HMO). Subjects were randomly assigned to a "usual care" Control Group (advance letter, screening kit, reminder letter), and Treatment Groups 1 (usual care + reminder call), 2 (usual care + self-held screening booklet + reminder call), or 3 (usual care + self-held screening booklet + instruction call + reminder call). Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences in adherence (P less than .001) across study groups: Control Group (27%), Group 1 (37%), Group 2 (37%), Group 3 (48%). In addition, a significant positive association between age and adherence (P less than .001) was found. Logistic regression analysis revealed an interaction between sex and treatment. Adherence among men in all treatment groups increased significantly (P less than .0001) in relation to Control Group males. Men in Group 3 also were more likely to adhere than those in Group 2 (P less than .01) or Group 1 (P less than .01). Among women, adherence was significantly higher in Group 3 than in Group 2 (P less than .03), Group 1 (P less than .025), or the Control Group (P = .0008). The primary reason cited for nonadherence was perceived inconvenience of the FOB testing procedure.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

This study identified barriers and facilitators of repeat participation in mammography and breast physical examination among women ages 50 years and over. Telephone interviews were conducted with 910 women in this age group. Forty percent of respondents had never had a mammogram. Only 38% had had one in the past 12 months. Of women who had a prior mammogram, 43% had had only one. Only 60% of women had had a breast exam in the past 12 months. A physician recommendation was the single best predictor of adherence to mammography. However, only 60% of women reported that their physicians had ever recommended mammography. Several other barriers to mammography were revealed, including anxiety, embarrassment, and concerns about cost and radiation. Both a family history of breast cancer and heightened perceived vulnerability to breast cancer were associated positively with repeat mammography participation; anxiety about screening reduced the likelihood of this outcome. These findings suggest that physicians can play a powerful role in motivating women to participate in initial and subsequent breast cancer screening. Reassurance may reduce women's anxiety and embarrassment and increase utilization further.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1990

How valid are mammography self-reports?

We compared mammography reports in medical records to self-reports obtained during a 1989 telephone interview survey for a sample of 100 women members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) who indicated they had mammograms within the past year and 100 who said they had not had mammograms within the past year. Of the women reporting they had not had mammograms within the past year, none had mammogram reports in the HMO data center. Of the 100 women reporting they had mammograms within the past year, 94 had confirmatory radiology records.

Aged↗