PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Bembenek

Publications and source records attributed to A Bembenek.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Impact of patient- and disease-specific factors on SLNB in breast cancer patients. Are current guidelines justified?

BACKGROUND: The evidence on which to base guidelines for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer is still limited. In order to facilitate the further implementation of renewed guidelines, we evaluated patient- and disease-specific factors for their impact on the results of SLNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective data acquisition from patients undergoing surgery for primary invasive breast cancer was performed. All patients underwent SLNB using the radiocolloid or the combined technique. The association of patient- and disease-specific factors to detection rate and false-negative rate was calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.05 considered as significant). Calculation of the false-negative rate was based on patients who underwent a backup axillary dissection. RESULTS: Among 455 consecutively enrolled patients, a significant inverse association to the detection rate was found for extracapsular extension of non-SLN metastases, body mass index (BMI), number of involved lymph nodes, pT category, tumor size, and age. A significant association to the false-negative rate to identify macrometastases was found for pT category, tumor size, and grading. Other factors, such as prior surgery, multicentric tumor growth, or vascular invasion, showed no influence. A cut-point analysis revealed that a tumor size of 2 cm separated the collective of patients with the highest significance in regard to the false-negative rate (9% vs. 25%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SLNB can be safely used in elderly and obese patients with multicentric tumors and those having undergone prior surgery for benign breast disease. However, the method should be applied with caution in patients with tumors larger than 2 cm.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Hepatic arterial Fotemustine chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from cutaneous melanoma is as effective as in ocular melanoma.

AIM: Hepatic metastases from melanoma are associated with poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy and biological treatments remain unsatisfactory. This study investigated the impact of hepatic arterial chemotherapy in patients with ocular and cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: In a retrospectively analysed observational study, 36 consecutive patients with hepatic metastases from ocular or cutaneous melanoma were assigned for surgical hepatic port-catheter implantation. Fotemustine was delivered weekly for a 4-week period, followed by a 5-week rest and a maintenance period every 3 weeks until progression. Overall survival, response and toxicity were analysed and compared. RESULTS: After port-catheter implantation 30/36 patients were finally treated (18 with ocular and 12 with cutaneous melanoma). A median of 8 infusions per patient were delivered (range 3-24). 30% thrombocytopenia grade >or=3, 7% neutropenia grade >or=3 but no nausea or vomiting grade >or=3 were encountered. Nine out of 30 patients achieved partial remission, 10/30 stable disease; 11/30 patients were progressive. Median survival for all treated patients was 14 months. Partial remission and stable disease were associated with a survival advantage compared to progressive disease (19 vs. 5 months). No significant difference in survival was observed for ocular versus cutaneous melanoma. Serum LDH was a significant predictor of both response and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arterial Fotemustine chemotherapy was well tolerated. Meaningful response and survival rates were achieved in ocular as well as cutaneous melanoma. Careful patient selection in consideration of extra-hepatic involvement is crucial for the effectiveness of this treatment. Independent from the primary melanoma site, it is debatable if patients with highly elevated serum-LDH may benefit from this approach.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

Isolated tumor cells as a consequence of minimal residual disease are often not detectable by routine diagnostic procedures. However, before or after surgery, isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes, the peritoneal cavity, blood, or bone marrow can frequently be identified by immunohistochemical or molecular methods. Failure to reveal the presence of such cells results in under-staging of tumor patients and may constitute the source of unexpected tumor recurrence after radical surgery. These facts emphasize the importance of isolated tumor cells at least as a surrogate marker. The frequency of appearance of isolated tumor cells in different organ systems also depends on the type of primary tumor. Developments in modern detection methods have led to increasing sensitivity but at the expense of specificity. Isolated tumor cells demonstrate remarkable heterogeneity with respect to proliferative potential and tumorigenicity. This characteristic is also reflected by a striking variability in the expression of various genes conditioning the aforementioned biological behavior. Unfortunately there is also remarkable heterogeneity in methods used for sampling and processing patient material as well as for the enrichment and detection of isolated tumor cells. Despite the ongoing controversies concerning detection methods and biological significance of isolated tumor cells, several clinical trials providing data supporting the prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease should also be considered for gastrointestinal carcinoma. In future this finding should be integrated in the planning of trials in surgical oncology, and "minimal residual disease" should receive stronger attention as a stratification criterion in such clinical studies.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2005

Prediction of gastric cancer lymph node status by sentinel lymph node biopsy and the Maruyama computer model.

AIMS: The extent of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer remains controversial. The Maruyama computer model and the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are compared for their value to predict the nodal status and lead to stage-adapted surgery. METHODS: Thirty four patients with stage I-IV gastric cancer underwent both staging procedures. For SLNB, 15 patients underwent endoscopic, peri-tumoural injection of (99m)Tc-colloid, and 19 patients were injected of Patent blue V. All 'hot' or blue sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were separately excised and histopathologically assessed. If the SLN was negative after routine staining by H&E, it was processed completely and reanalysed after immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: At least, one SLN was detected by means of SLNB in 33/34 of the patients. The sensitivity to identify a positive nodal status was 22/33 and the specificity/positive predictive value was 10/10 and 22/22. Additional micrometastases or isolated tumour cells in the SLN led to 'upstaging' of 5/15, initially classified as nodal negative by H&E-staining. Using the Maruyama computer model, a sensitivity of 22/23 for the correct prediction of the lymph node involvement was associated with a specificity of 2/10 and a positive predictive value of 22/30. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of the Maruyama computer model is limited due to low specificity and a low positive predictive value, rendering the method less useful as an indicator for individualised surgery.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed2005

[Optimization of staging in colon cancer using sentinel lymph node biopsy].

Routine determination of the nodal status in colon cancer is strongly dependent on the individual quality and technique of histopathological assessment and surgical lymph node dissection. We evaluated whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) could contribute to an improvement in staging. At least one SLN (median n=2) was detected (detection rate 84%) in each of 38 of 45 patients with primary colon cancer. Ten of these 38 were found to have lymph node metastases by HE staining (26%), six of them in the SLN. Nine of the 28 patients that were initially nodal-negative by HE revealed one micrometastasis and eight cases of isolated tumor cells by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining (32% upstaging response). Including the IHC-positive cases, 19 of the 38 patients were nodal-positive (50%), 15 of them with tumor-infiltrated SLN (overall sensitivity of SLNB 79%). Using the dye method, SLNB is clinically practicable and leads in the majority of the patients to the detection of SLN. The selective, intensified histopathological assessment of SLN identifies small tumor cell deposits in a relevant percentage of patients with little and clinically practicable effort.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer.

BACKGROUND: Forty-three years after the first description of the sentinel lymph node technique in malignant tumours of the parotid by Gould, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a precious tool in the treatment of solid tumours. METHODS: In the following review we give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the sentinel lymph node concept and then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SNLB in gastrointestinal cancers. RESULTS: In some tumour entities, SNLB has been shown to reflect reliably the lymph node status of the tumour-draining lymph node basin. In melanoma and breast cancer, it became a widely accepted element of the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merckel cell carcinoma of the skin, were published more recently. CONCLUSION: SNLB has become an important component of diagnosis and treatment of solid tumours. A growing number of publications on SNLB in gastrointestinal cancer documents the interest of many investigators in the application of this technique in this tumour entity. As long as imaging techniques like 18FDG PET or other molecular imaging techniques are limited by their spatial resolution, SNLB remains the technique of choice for lympho-nodal staging.

Anus Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal carcinoma].

Lymph node status as an important prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer is affected by the selection and number of lymph nodes examined and by the quality of histopathological assessment. The multitude of influences is accompanied by an elevated risk of quality alterations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is currently under investigation for its value in improving determination of the nodal status. Worldwide, the data of 800 to 1000 patients from about 20 relatively small studies are available that focus rather on colon than rectal cancer patients. SLNB may be of clinical value for the collective of patients that are initially node-negative after H&E staining but reveal small micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in the SLN after intensified histopathological workup. If further studies confirm that these patients benefit from adjuvant therapy, the method may have an important effect on the therapy and prognosis of colon cancer patients as well. Another potential application could be the determination of the nodal status after endoscopic excision of early cancer to avoid bowel resection and lymphonodectomy.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Sentinel node biopsy in gastrointestinal-tract cancer.

Forty three years after Gould's first description of the sentinel lymph node (SN) technique in malignant tumours of the parotid, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an invaluable tool for the treatment of solid tumours. In some tumour types, it has been shown to reliably reflect the lymph node (LN) status of the tumour-draining LN basin. In melanoma and breast cancers, it has become a widely accepted element in the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours like non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merkel Cell carcinoma of the skin were published more recently. In the following review, we will give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the SN concept and will then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SLNB in gastrointestinal cancers.

Anus Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in rectal cancer--not yet ready for routine clinical use.

BACKGROUND: The value of sentinel node biopsy in visceral cancers is uncertain. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of radiocolloid lymphatic mapping and selective lymph node sampling in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with rectal cancer were investigated. Thirty-seven patients had already undergone preoperative radiochemotherapy for locally advanced tumors. Eleven patients underwent primary surgery. An endoscopic injection of 1 mL technetium 99m-sulfur-colloid into the peritumoral submucosa was performed 15 to 17 hours before surgery. Ex vivo identification of the nuclide-enriched "sentinel lymph nodes" (SLNs) was performed using a hand-held gamma-probe. The selected SLNs were then carefully and systematically examined using serial sections and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: One or more SLNs were found in 46 of the 48 patients. The SLN detection rate was 96%. Sixteen of the 48 patients had lymph node metastases (35%). In 7 of the 16 patients, the SLNs correctly represented the nodal status. In 9 of the 16 patients, the SLN was tumor-free whereas non-SLN harbored metastases. This result represents a sensitivity of only 44%, and a false-negative rate of 56%. Further analysis showed that the method correctly predicted the nodal status only in the small subgroup of 5 patients with early cancer without preoperative radiation. In 4 patients, juxtaregional lymph nodes were excised on the basis of intraoperative radiocolloid detection, leading to upward staging in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using the radiocolloid technique with ex vivo lymph node identification shows a relatively high detection rate; however, the sensitivity in patients with locally advanced/irradiated rectal cancer is low. Nevertheless, the detection of juxtaregional metastases can improve staging in some patients. Further studies should focus on patients with early rectal cancers where the data were more promising.

False Negative Reactions↗
PubMed2004

New concepts of staging in gastrointestinal tumors as a basis of diagnosis and multimodal therapy.

The therapy of gastrointestinal tumors is becoming more and more sophisticated and complex. This is due to an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of tumors, a more detailed classification and increasing therapeutic options. The basis of optimized therapeutic concepts is the exact evaluation of tumor spread and exact staging. The following review describes some of the most recent staging concepts in gastrointestinal tumors. Multislice computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) and new supraparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging enable an increasing quality of the visualization of tumors and metastases. 3D imaging will be used for planning of surgical interventions in the future. Optical coherence tomography may contribute to an improved tumor staging and, thus, to the safety of limited interventions in early oesophageal- and gastric cancer patients. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound become increasingly important for the identification of small metastases in the peritoneum, in lymph nodes and in the liver. The sentinel lymph node concept will contribute to an improved staging and individualized therapy as well.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed2004

[Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer].

The international consensus conference from St. Gallen concerning the treatment of early breast cancer concluded in 2003, that sentinel node biopsy was now accepted as method allowing axillary staging in breast cancer. This procedure may avoid complete lymph node dissection in appropriate cases. Since numerous questions associated with the technique are still not defined and the procedure itself is not yet standardized, the German Society of Senology defined the conditions for the routine clinical use of sentinel node biopsy in an interdisciplinary consensus meeting.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

[Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer].

INTRODUCTION: Lymphatic mapping and the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has been validated in malignant melanoma and breast cancer.However, the application for other solid tumors is still controversial. One of the most promising approaches is selective lymph node staging in gastric cancer.The presented pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the radiocolloid technique in gastric cancer patients and its value in predicting a positive nodal status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with gastric cancer (u T(1-3)) underwent endoscopic submucosal injection of 0.4 ml 60 MBq (99m)Tc-Nanocis around the tumor 17 (+/-3) h prior to surgery. After laparotomy the activity of all 16 (JGCA) lymph node stations was measured by a handheld probe. All patients underwent standard gastrectomy with systematic D2 lymphadenectomy. After resection the site was scanned for residual activity. All sentinel lymph nodes (SLN's) were removed ex vivo from the resected specimen and processed for intensified histopathologic assessment including serial sections and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 14 of 15 patients at least one or more SLN's were obtained (93%), the median number of SLN's was 3 (1-5). Of the 14 patients, 9 revealed lymph node metastases. In eight of the nine patients the sentinel node(s) correctly predicted metastatic lymph node invasion. In five cases the lymph node station with positive sentinel node(s) was the only positive node station resulting in a sensitivity of 8/9 (89%). In one case immunohistochemical staining revealed micrometastases leading to an upstaging in 1/6 of the initially nodal-negative patients. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy using the radiocolloid technique is feasible in gastric cancer. Limited results indicate a correct prediction of the nodal status and the potential of upstaging.Further studies seem to be justified to evaluate the clinical impact of the method.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Sentinel node biopsy in anal cancer - a promising strategy to individualize therapy.

BACKGROUND: In order to individualize the therapy in patients with anal cancer, we evaluated the applicability of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept for the staging of inguinal lymph nodes in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: SLN mapping using the radiocolloid technique was performed in 12 patients with histopathologically proven anal cancer. Mean age of the 4 male and 8 female patients was 62 years (range: 37-83 years). All patients underwent injection of (99m)Tc-colloid (Nanocis) in 4 portions around the tumor followed by scintigraphy after 17 h and selective lymph node biopsy in case of nuclide enrichment. The nuclide-enriched lymph node was intraoperatively identified by a hand-held gamma-camera. Histopathological assessment of the harvested SLNs included serial sections and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Enrichment of radiocolloid in lymph nodes was seen in 10 of the 12 patients (detection rate: 83%). SLN biopsy was performed in 9 patients, one patient refused the SLN biopsy (SLNB). 4 patients revealed tumor-infiltrated sentinel lymph nodes including one patient with bilateral biopsy, who showed metastases unilaterally. The remaining 5 patients had no evidence of metastases in the excised SLNs. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to evaluate the nodal status of the groin in patients with anal cancer using the radiocolloid technique. Preliminary results indicate a refined diagnostic work-up for anal cancer patients, potentially improving the results of clinical and sonographical examinations. Further application of the method may lead to an individualized treatment of patients with anal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Surgical oncology in the interplay of surgical and nonsurgical disciplines.

Advances in surgical tumor therapy are founded on a very close interaction between different surgical subspecialties as well as the inclusion of surgical into modern multimodality treatment concepts. The ongoing development of surgical techniques, e.g. microsurgical flap transfers or pouch reconstructions of intestinal reservoirs, has increasingly enabled organ- and function-preserving surgery. In addition, new materials (e.g. modular tumor endoprosthesis) has supported this development. The broad application of the sentinel node technique in melanoma and breast cancer and also in gastrointestinal tract cancers opens new concepts of diagnosis and therapy for lymphatic metastasized tumors. Locally advanced tumors can be treated in neoadjuvant protocols to increase the resectability rate and the probability for local control as a prerequisite for long-term survival. Especially for metastatic disease, interventional treatment techniques such as laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) or photodynamic therapy have added valuable options to surgical treatment.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2002

Sentinel lymphonodectomy in gastrointestinal cancer--where are we now?

Up to now, no reliable methods for the pre- or intraoperative prediction of the nodal status are available in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Therefore, after the successful application of the sentinel lymph node concept in melanoma and breast cancer, ongoing research on this field is extended to gastrointestinal tumor entities. According to recent experiences, the most promising tumor entities are colon, gastric and anal cancer. First results with these patients indicate that the method could be a reliable predictor of the nodal status and, thus, may have important future implications for adjuvant therapy and the extent of surgery. The dye method for colon cancer and the combined method (dye and radiocolloid) for gastric cancer seem to be appropriate approaches, even when the general experience is still low. In rectal cancer, however, current experience failed yet to yield satisfying results. Up to now, anal cancer has not been a focus of publication, even when the concept seems to be very attractive for the evaluation of the inguinal lymph node status.

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Lymphatic mapping and retrieval of the sentinel lymph node in treatment of early breast cancer.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy is an important step to surgical individualization of breast cancer therapy. With lymphatic mapping and minimally invasive biopsy of one or two detected lymph nodes the method provides an exact evaluation of the nodal status. Using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), costs and morbidity of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in nodal negative patients, whereas nodal positive patients are chosen for ALND very selectively according to the detection of an increased percentage of micrometastases. While experienced centers are introducing this method into clinical practice for the benefit of patients with early-stage breast cancer in Europe, further research should focus on quality control, definition of standards considering the individual needs of the individual patient, and the evaluation of the impact of micrometastases. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge of SLNB and discusses critically current indications and methods as well as application techniques.

Axilla↗