PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Bigas

Publications and source records attributed to A Bigas.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Differential expression and phosphorylation of CTCF, a c-myc transcriptional regulator, during differentiation of human myeloid cells.

CTCF is a transcriptional repressor of the c-myc gene. Although CTCF has been characterized in some detail, there is very little information about the regulation of CTCF activity. Therefore we investigated CTCF expression and phosphorylation during induced differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells. We found that: (i) both CTCF mRNA and protein are down-regulated during terminal differentiation in most cell lines tested; (ii) CTCF down-regulation is retarded and less pronounced than that of c-myc; (iii) CTCF protein is differentially phosphorylated and the phosphorylation profiles depend on the differentiation pathway. We concluded that CTCF expression and activity is controlled at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1998

Notch1 and Notch2 inhibit myeloid differentiation in response to different cytokines.

We have compared the ability of two mammalian Notch homologs, mouse Notchl and Notch2, to inhibit the granulocytic differentiation of 32D myeloid progenitor cells. 32D cells undergo granulocytic differentiation when stimulated with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Expression of the activated intracellular domain of Notch1 inhibits the differentiation induced by G-CSF but not by GM-CSF; conversely, the corresponding domain of Notch2 inhibits differentiation in response to GM-CSF but not to G-CSF. The region immediately C-terminal to the cdc10 domain of Notch confers cytokine specificity on the cdc10 domain. The cytokine response patterns of Notch1 and Notch2 are transferred with this region, which we have termed the Notch cytokine response (NCR) region. The NCR region is also associated with differences in posttranslational modification and subcellular localization of the different Notch molecules. These findings suggest that the multiple forms of Notch found in mammals have structural differences that allow their function to be modulated by specific differentiation signals.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Inhibition of granulocytic differentiation by mNotch1.

Effective hematopoiesis requires the commitment of pluripotent and multipotent stem cells to distinct differentiation pathways, proliferation and maturation of cells in the various lineages, and preservation of pluripotent progenitors to provide continuous renewal of mature blood cells. While the importance of positive and negative cytokines in regulating proliferation and maturation of hematopoietic cells has been well documented, the factors and molecular processes involved in lineage commitment and self-renewal of multipotent progenitors have not yet been defined. In other developmental systems, cellular interactions mediated by members of the Notch gene family have been shown to influence cell fate determination by multipotent progenitors. We previously described the expression of the human Notch1 homolog, TAN-1, in immature hematopoietic precursors. We now demonstrate that constitutive expression of the activated intracellular domain of mouse Notch1 in 32D myeloid progenitors inhibits granulocytic differentiation and permits expansion of undifferentiated cells, findings consistent with the known function of Notch in other systems.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Generation of hematopoietic colony-forming cells from embryonic stem cells: synergy between a soluble factor from NIH-3T3 cells and hematopoietic growth factors.

Murine embryonic stem cells are able to differentiate into embryoid bodies (EBs) in vitro in the absence of leukemia-inhibitory factor with the formation of different types of hematopoietic precursors within these EBs. With the aim of determining the in vitro requirements for the continued development of hematopoietic colony-forming cells (CFCs) and their progeny from embryonic stem-derived cells, cells from EBs disrupted after 9 days of formation in the absence of leukemia-inhibitor factor were cultured under different conditions. Low numbers of day-9 EB cells (5 x 10(5) or less) cultured in the presence of several growth factors (interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-1, c-kit ligand, basic fibroblast growth factor, insulin growth factor-1, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, fetal liver kinase-2 ligand) develop few or no CFCs after 1 week of culture. When these cells are plated on irradiated NIH-3T3 with IL-3 or c-kit ligand or combinations containing these and other growth factors, they are able to generate CFCs for at least 3 weeks. These cultures were found to include granulocytic, monocytic, erythrocytic, and megakaryocytic cells. Transwell cultures in which NIH-3T3 cells were separated from the EB cells and cultures in which cells were replaced by NIH-3T3 conditioned medium showed that the interaction between EB-derived cells and NIH-3T3 is via a soluble factor(s). These studies show that maximal generation of hematopoietic CFCs from precursors present in day-9 EBs is stimulated by a combination of known hematopoietic growth factors and a soluble factor(s) produced by NIH-3T3 cells.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1993

A single dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor modifies radiation-induced death in B6D2F1 mice.

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates the proliferation of progenitor cells committed to myeloid differentiation. In animal models, G-CSF is able to stimulate granulocyte recovery and promote survival after lethal or sublethal irradiation when administered as daily injections, suggesting an influence on the residual hematopoietic primitive precursors surviving irradiation. In this study, we clearly demonstrate that a single dose of G-CSF (1 mg/kg) administered to B6D2F1 mice 2 hours after a lethal dose 95/30 irradiation achieves a 78% survival at day +30 after irradiation. Survival of G-CSF treated mice compares favourably with that of syngenic bone marrow transplantation recipients (78% vs 90%, ns).

Animals↗