Biomedical subjects

A C Collier

Publications and source records attributed to A C Collier.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Clinical efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data.

A meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials (1792 patients, 2947 patient-years of follow-up) showed that acyclovir (> or = 3200 mg/day) offered a significant survival benefit (P = .006 by log-rank test) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The treatment effect did not vary significantly in patient subgroups of different CD4 cell counts, hemoglobin levels, age, race, and sex, and with or without AIDS diagnosis. Acyclovir treatment (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.93), higher CD4 cell count (P < .001), higher hemoglobin level (P < .001), and younger age (P < .001) reduced the hazard of mortality. Acyclovir decreased herpes simplex virus infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.21-0.37) and varicella-zoster virus infections (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.63) but not cytomegalovirus disease or mortality from lymphoma or Kaposi's sarcoma. A survival advantage was seen specifically in studies with high incidence of clinical herpesvirus infections (> or = 25% per year). Given the wide confidence intervals, the small effect in low-risk patients, and recent changes in HIV therapeutics, the results should be interpreted cautiously, but the meta-analysis supports the importance of pathogenetic interactions between herpesviruses and HIV.

Acyclovir↗

PubMed1998

Screening for distal sensory peripheral neuropathy in HIV-infected persons in research and clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of a screening examination for distal sensory peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) performed by nonphysician clinicians and to explore the associations between DSPN and clinical features in HIV-infected persons. METHODS: A case-control study of a volunteer sample of 226 HIV-infected individuals was performed. An interview, focusing on risks and symptoms of DSPN, and a screening neurologic examination were performed. RESULTS: Compared with the neurologist's examinations, the clinicians' examination was sensitive (92 to 95%) but not as specific (71 to 84%) for the diagnosis of DSPN. After excluding 27 patients with confounders, 42 of 199 patients (21%) had DSPN. This was associated significantly with neurotoxic nucleoside antiretroviral use and with more advanced HIV disease. Of the 42 patients with DSPN, 30 (71%) had no neuropathy symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A brief examination performed by trained nonphysician clinicians can be used to screen for DSPN in HIV-infected persons. Asymptomatic DSPN is common in these individuals.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1997

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine in combination therapy.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine, zalcitabine, and saquinavir in AIDS Clinical Trial Group protocol 229. Patients received either saquinavir, zalcitabine, or a combination of both, together with zidovudine three times a day. Approximately 100 patients were enrolled in each treatment arm, and intensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed on about 25 patients per arm at weeks 1 and 12. We estimated the pharmacokinetic parameters of all three drugs by using parametric and nonparametric methods. The mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters of zidovudine (clearance [CL]/bioavailability [F], 168 liters/h; volume of distribution [V]/F, 185 liters; half-life, 0.76 h) and zalcitabine (CL/F, 25 liters/h; V/F, 92.2 liters; half-life, 2.7 h) were similar to those reported previously. For saquinavir, the mean pharmacokinetic parameter estimates using parametric methods were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax], 70.8 ng/ml; time to Cmax, 3.11 h; area under the curve, 809 ng x h/ml; CL/F, 989 liters/h; V/F, 1,503 liters; half-life, 1.38 h. For all three drugs, clearance decreased with age. Weight did not influence the clearance of zidovudine, but the clearance of zalcitabine and saquinavir increased with weight. There were no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between study weeks and arms, suggesting that there is no change in kinetics with chronic administration and that there are no significant pharmacokinetic interactions among these three drugs.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Exposure-response relationships for saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine in combination therapy.

The relationship of CD4+ cell response, level of RNA in plasma, and quantitative peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) titer to apparent drug exposure was investigated by using data from AIDS Clinical Trial Group protocol 229, a multicenter randomized study. Patients received either saquinavir, zalcitabine, or a combination of both, along with open-label zidovudine. Approximately 100 patients were enrolled in each arm, and the primary study duration was 24 weeks. Individual drug exposure, the area under the concentration-time curve, was estimated by using population-based pharmacokinetic methods. Response was defined as the maximum increase in CD4+ cell count or the maximum decrease in RNA in plasma or PBMC titer adjusted for baseline CD4+ cell count, RNA in plasma, and PBMC titer, respectively. Regression of responses on exposure demonstrated an exposure effect for saquinavir which was significant for the maximum increase in CD4+ cell count and the decrease in RNA in plasma. For the PBMC titer, no significant relationship could be demonstrated but the results suggested a trend similar to that of the other response variables. For all three response variables, the slope of the saquinavir exposure response was greater with the triple combination (saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine) than with the combination of saquinavir and zidovudine, suggesting possible synergism between saquinavir and zalcitabine.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Variations in medical care for HIV-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: a comparison of process and outcome at two hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Institutional variation in the quality of medical care may be evaluated by examining process measures, such as use of diagnostic procedures or treatment modalities, or outcome measures, such as mortality. We undertook this study to examine variations in both process and outcome of care for patients with HIV-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) at two geographically diverse, HIV-experienced, public municipal hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective review of hospitalized patients diagnosed as having PCP cared for at two municipal hospitals from 1988 to 1990. At hospital A, charts of all patients diagnosed as having PCP were abstracted (n=209); at hospital B, a random sample of 15% were abstracted (=136). RESULTS: Among all hospitalized patients diagnosed as having PCP, the frequency of making a definitive diagnosis of PCP (as opposed to treating empirically) differed markedly at the two hospitals (85% in hospital A vs 26% in hospital B; p<0.001), as did the use of intensive care (18% vs 3%; p<0.001) and "do-not-resuscitate" orders (39% vs 14%; p<0.001), although the timing of starting anti-Pneumocystis medications (89% vs 88% within the first 2 hospital days) and the use of corticosteroids (21% vs 23%) were similar. Despite differences in the process of care, survival rates were similar at the two institutions (75% vs 76%; p=0.8) and remained similar when logistic regression was used to control for demographic variables and severity of illness (odds ratio for survival, hospital B vs A, 1.2 [95% confidence interval, 0.7, 2.0]). The 95% confidence intervals (0.7, 2.0), however, were consistent with a considerable (and clinically significant) disparity in survival (from 30% lower to a twofold higher odds of survival). Sample size calculations showed that a sample of 10 cases in each hospital would be required to detect the observed difference in definitive diagnosis rates (85% vs 26%), but 722 cases in each hospital would be required to detect a relevant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The process of care for hospitalized patients with PCP in these two institutions differed considerably, but the survival rates were not significantly different, even after adjusting for confounding factors. While sample sizes available at the individual institutions were sufficient for evaluation of the process of care, they did not provide the power necessary to evaluate outcomes. Comparisons of outcomes such as mortality between individual hospitals may not have the statistical power to exclude important differences.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1996

Clinical and epidemiologic features of primary HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: The acute clinical events surrounding the acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To further define the clinical and epidemiologic presentation of primary HIV infection. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study. SETTING: University research clinic. PATIENTS: 46 adults (43 men and 3 women) with primary HIV infection who enrolled in the study a median of 51 days after HIV seroconversion. MEASUREMENTS: Documentation of recent HIV seroconversion. Standardized collection of demographic characteristics and sexual contact history, results of tests for HIV RNA, HIV culture, and T-cell subsets. RESULTS: 41 of 46 patients (89%) developed an acute retroviral syndrome. Primary HIV infection was infrequently diagnosed at the initial medical encounter, even in persons enrolled in routine HIV screening programs. Median numbers of sexual partners 6 months and 1 month before acquisition of HIV were three and one, respectively; 21 patients (46%) reported having had only one partner in the month before seroconversion. Of the 12 patients who could identify the precise date of and activity leading to seroconversion, 4 reported having only oral-genital contact. CONCLUSIONS: Primary HIV infection causes a recognizable clinical syndrome that is often underdiagnosed, even in persons enrolled in a program of routine surveillance for HIV infection. Frequency of sexual contact and overall numbers of sexual partners in this group of homosexual men who acquired HIV were markedly lower than those seen a decade ago. Acquisition of HIV does occur, even in persons with relatively few sexual partners. Increased attention to oral-genital contact as a means of acquiring HIV appears to be warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: In patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, combined treatment with several agents may increase the effectiveness of antiviral therapy. We studied the safety and efficacy of saquinavir, an HIV-protease inhibitor, given with one or two nucleoside antiretroviral agents, as compared with the safety and efficacy of a combination of two nucleosides alone. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, patients with HIV infection were randomly assigned to receive either saquinavir (1800 mg per day) plus both zidovudine (600 mg per day) and zalcitabine (2.25 mg per day) or zidovudine plus either saquinavir or zalcitabine. The 302 patients enrolled had CD4+ counts of 50 to 300 cells per cubic millimeter and had previously received zidovudine for a median of 27 months. The study lasted 24 weeks, with an optional double-blind extension period of an additional 12 to 32 weeks. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of the patients completed the 24-week study. In all three treatment groups, CD4+ cell counts rose at first and then fell gradually. The normalized area under the curve for the CD4+ count was greater with the three-drug combination than with either saquinavir and zidovudine (P=0.017) or zalcitabine and zidovudine (P<0.001). There were significantly greater reductions in plasma HIV with the three-drug combination than with the other regimens when peripheral-blood mononuclear cells were cultured for HIV and HIV RNA was assessed, and there were greater decreases in serum neopterin and beta2-microglobulin levels. There were no major differences in toxic effects among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with saquinavir, zalcitabine, and zidovudine was well tolerated. This drug combination reduced HIV-1 replication, increased CD4+ cell counts, and decreased levels of activation markers in serum more than did treatment with zidovudine and either saquinavir or zalcitabine. Studies are warranted to evaluate whether the three-drug combination will reduce morbidity and mortality.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Efficacy of combination antiretroviral therapy.

Combination therapy with two nucleosides has been shown to improve clinical outcome compared with zidovudine monotherapy. There is every expectation that more potent antiretroviral combination regimens will increase the clinical benefits. However, this remains to be proven definitely. The increasing number of choices of antiretroviral therapies create new challenges for those studying and those using these therapies.

Antiviral Agents↗

PubMed1996

Combination therapy with zidovudine, didanosine and saquinavir.

The goal of AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Protocol 229 was to evaluate the shorter term (24 week) and longer term (48 week) safety and activity of the HIV-1 proteinase inhibitor saquinavir in combination with zalcitabine (ddC) and zidovudine (ZDV) versus saquinavir in combination with ZDV versus ddC in combination with ZDV. This study confirms and extends the conclusions from the first 24 weeks of this study and showed that in subjects with extensive prior antiretroviral experience, the triple combination of saquinavir, ddC and ZDV was well-tolerated, safe and remained superior to the other double drug regimens as measured by CD4+ cell counts, quantitative HIV-1 microculture and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels.

Antiviral Agents↗

PubMed1996

Neurologic Manifestations of HIV Infection Without AIDS:Follow-UP of a Cohort of Homosexual and Bisexual Men.

To identify neurological abnormalities in HIV infection, 159 HIV-seropositive men without AIDS and 76 seronegative controls underwent standardized general and neurological examinations, lumbar puncture (LP), neuropsychological (NP) assessment, and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. History, physical, and laboratory evaluations were repeated every six months. NP tests (all subjects) and MR imaging (seropositives only) was repeated every 6-12 months; LP (seropositives only) was repeated yearly. Mean follow-up was 24.6 months. Neurological abnormalities, most related to hearing, were seen in 60 (38.2%) of 157 seropositives and 23 (30.3%) of 76 controls at baseline (p = NS). During follow-up, 43 (31.6%) of 136 seropositives had persistent hearing abnormalities compared to 9 (14.1%) of 64 seronegatives (p = 0.008). Seven HIV-seropositives developed peripheral neuropathy; this was more common among those with hearing abnormalities (p = 0.03). HIV-seropositives performed less well on NP tests than controls, but overall performance did not decline. Worsening brain atrophy by MR imaging or cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities are more common in HIV-seropositives than seronegatives and may share a common mechanism with peripheral neuropathy. Further study is needed to determine whether these abnormalities portend more serious neurological disease.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1996

Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid in Southeast Asian refugees with reactive serologic tests for syphilis.

To determine the prevalence of cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in Southeast Asian refugees with reactive serologic tests for syphilis, we evaluated 65 patients, 36 prospectively and 29 retrospectively, in a primary care clinic. Information was collected on history of treponemal infections, neurologic symptoms and signs, and total protein concentration, leukocyte count, and the VDRL test in the cerebrospinal fluid. Neurologic symptoms were reported by all patients for whom data were available. Abnormal neurologic signs were found or noted in medical records in 15 (42%) prospectively evaluated patients and 9 (64%) of 14 retrospectively evaluated patients for whom data were available. No patient had evidence of congenital or non-neurologic sequelae such as cutaneous or cardiovascular manifestations of syphilis. No patient had a positive cerebrospinal fluid VDRL test, 1 had more than 5 x 10(6) leukocytes per liter (5 leukocytes per mm3), and 6 (9%) had elevated total protein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. Previous therapy for syphilis was not associated with lower serum VDRL reactions, neurologic symptoms and signs, or cerebrospinal fluid findings. In the absence of other indications, routine examination of the cerebrospinal fluid in seropositive Southeast Asian refugees who have nonspecific neurologic symptoms has a low yield, perhaps because of the high prevalence of yaws in this population, and may not be warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral response of CD4-immunoglobulin G by intravenous bolus in AIDS and AIDS-related complex.

To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral effects of intravenous recombinant CD4 immunoglobulin G (CD4-IgG), a 12-week Phase One study with an optional maintenance phase was performed. Twenty-two subjects with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were enrolled; 15 subjects completed the initial 12 weeks. CD4-IgG doses were 30, 100, or 300 micrograms/kg weekly; 1,000 micrograms/kg once, twice, or three times per week; or 3,000 micrograms/kg twice weekly. Serum concentrations of CD4-IgG increased linearly with dose, with average peak serum concentrations of 22 micrograms/ml with 1,000 micrograms/kg. CD4-IgG was well tolerated; one patient had self-limited tachycardia and flushing associated with CD4-IgG therapy. No changes were seen in CD4 cell counts, hematologic or coagulation studies, serum chemistries, HIV p24 antigen titers, or plasma HIV titers. No subject developed anti-CD4 antibodies. HIV isolates from five patients had IC90 values that were higher than the peak concentrations of CD4-IgG achieved in those patients. Additional studies that achieve higher CD4-IgG concentrations are necessary to evaluate the antiviral activity of this compound.

AIDS-Related Complex↗

PubMed1995

A comparison of immediate with deferred zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 500 or more per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of zidovudine remain unproved in patients with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection when CD4 cell counts exceed 500 per cubic millimeter. We compared zidovudine therapy given immediately with deferred therapy in such subjects. METHODS: Beginning in 1987, subjects with asymptomatic HIV infection and 500 or more CD4 cells per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned to receive placebo or zidovudine (either 500 or 1500 mg per day, starting immediately). In 1989, the study was modified so that open-label treatment with 500 mg of zidovudine per day (deferred therapy) was offered when CD4 cell counts fell below 500 per cubic millimeter. The study end points included overall survival, survival free of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), toxic effects, and changes in CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: There were 1637 subjects who could be evaluated: 547 in the deferred-therapy group, 549 in the group receiving 500 mg of zidovudine immediately, and 541 in the 1500-mg group. The subjects were followed for up to 6.5 years (group medians, 4.8, 4.8, and 4.9, respectively). There was no significant difference in AIDS-free survival in the deferred-therapy group as compared with the low-dose or high-dose groups (81 cases of progression to AIDS or death vs. 81 and 74, respectively; P = 0.95 and P = 0.13) or in overall survival (51 deaths vs. 47 and 46; P = 0.25 and P = 0.16). The decline in CD4 cells was slower in both immediate-therapy groups than in the deferred-therapy group (P < 0.001 for both). Adverse effects were uncommon, and before the study modification their incidence was similar among the treatment groups, but severe anemia and granulocytopenia were more frequent in the 1500-mg group than in the deferred-therapy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic, HIV-infected adults with 500 or more CD4 cells per cubic millimeter, treatment with zidovudine slows the decline in the CD4 cell count but does not significantly prolong either AIDS-free or overall survival. These results do not encourage the routine use of zidovudine monotherapy in this population.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1995

Phase I study of high-dose, intravenous rsCD4 in subjects with advanced HIV-1 infection.

In vitro, recombinant soluble CD4 (rsCD4) attaches to and inactivates human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). To determine if prolonged therapy with high-dose intravenous rsCD4 provides an in vivo benefit, we gave three HIV-1-infected patients with AIDS, whose isolates were susceptible in vitro to rsCD4, 10 mg/kg of rsCD4 for 4 weeks, 5 mg/kg for 4 weeks, and 1 mg/kg for 2 weeks. Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies performed prior to this showed transient in vivo decreases of HIV-1 plasma viremia in all three subjects. Surrogate markers of HIV activity, clinical status, HIV-1 p24 antigen, plasma HIV-1 titers, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) intracellular titers of virus were measured at entry, and every other week after onset of therapy. All subjects demonstrated rsCD4 concentration-dependent reduction in plasma viremia, with two subjects having complete neutralization of cell-free virus. The third subject's isolate was relatively resistant to the in vivo effects of rsCD4 and only partial reduction in plasma virus titers was obtained, even at the highest dose of 10 mg/kg. There was no change in the PBMC intracellular viral titer or surrogate markers of HIV-1 activity (including CD4 cell count and beta 2-microglobulin). There was subjective improvement in clinical symptoms, and all subjects gained weight with the highest doses of rsCD4. rsCD4 exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. We conclude that high-dose intravenous rsCD4 can be safely given for up to 10 weeks and that it has a stable pharmacokinetic profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1995

Combination and monotherapy with zidovudine and zalcitabine in patients with advanced HIV disease. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of continuing zidovudine therapy with that of zalcitabine alone or zalcitabine and zidovudine used together. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: AIDS Clinical Trials units and National Hemophilia Foundation sites. PATIENTS: 1001 patients with symptomatic human immunodeficiency (HIV) disease and 300 or fewer CD4 cells/mm3 or asymptomatic HIV disease and 200 or fewer CD4 cells/mm3 who had tolerated zidovudine therapy for 6 months or more. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine, 600 mg/d; zalcitabine, 2.25 mg/d; or zidovudine, 600 mg/d, and zalcitabine, 2.25 mg/d. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was time to disease progression or death. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 17.7 months. The estimated 12-month event-free rates were 70%, 67%, and 73%, respectively, for the zidovudine, zalcitabine, and combination groups (P = 0.26). A trend analysis showed significantly lower progression rates for combination therapy compared with zidovudine therapy as the pretreatment CD4 cell count increased (P = 0.027). For patients with 150 or more CD4 cells/mm3, those receiving combination therapy were less likely to have disease progression or to die than were those receiving zidovudine (relative risk, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.93; P = 0.029). We observed no difference between the zalcitabine and zidovudine groups (relative risk, 0.74; CI, 0.40 to 1.36; P = 0.33). For patients with 50 to 150 CD4 cells/mm3 or fewer than 50 CD4 cells/mm3, we found no differences among the treatment groups (P = 0.69 and P = 0.57, respectively). Severe toxic effects occurred less frequently among patients with 150 or more CD4 cells/mm3. CONCLUSIONS: We found no overall benefits of zalcitabine used alone or with zidovudine. However, a trend analysis suggested a better outcome for combination therapy compared with zidovudine as the pretreatment CD4 cell count increased.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1995

Cerebrospinal fluid treponemal antibodies in untreated early syphilis.

OBJECTIVE: Examine prevalence and diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) treponemal antibodies in early syphilis. DESIGN: Comparison study. SETTING: Sexually transmitted diseases clinic. PATIENTS: Forty patients with untreated early syphilis who underwent lumbar puncture. Fifteen were human immunodeficiency virus seropositive. MEASUREMENTS: Cerebrospinal fluid cell count, protein, VDRL test, and antibodies to Treponema pallidum by microhemagglutination test for T pallidum (MHA-TP) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS); albumin ratio; and IgG index. RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid cell count was not available for one sample, and this patient was excluded from analysis. Of 39 patients, eight (21%) had reactive CSF-VDRL (definite neurosyphilis). Eleven (28%) had mildly elevated cell count or protein concentration, but nonreactive CSF-VDRL (possible neurosyphilis). Twenty had normal cell count and protein concentration, and non-reactive CSF-VDRL (normal). Cerebrospinal fluid MHA-TP and CSF FTA-ABS were reactive in all eight with neurosyphilis. Cerebrospinal fluid MHA-TP was reactive in seven (70%) of 10 with possible neurosyphilis and in six (32%) of 19 with normal CSF. Cerebrospinal fluid FTA-ABS was reactive in four (36%) of 11 with possible neurosyphilis and in five (28%) of 18 with normal CSF. A reactive CSF treponemal test was associated with higher mean CSF cell count and reactive CSF-VDRL. CONCLUSION: When criteria to define neurosyphilis depend on cell count or CSF-VDRL reactivity, the sensitivity of CSF treponemal antibodies is high. Nonreactive CSF treponemal tests may help to exclude a diagnosis of neurosyphilis in patients with early syphilis.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

PubMed1995

Cervical but not urinary excretion of cytomegalovirus is related to sexual activity and contraceptive practices in sexually active women.

The relationship between sexual activity and genitourinary excretion of cytomegalovirus (CMV) was evaluated in 1481 women at a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic. Among 951 who were CMV-seropositive, 16.6% had CMV isolated, from cervix alone in 9.4%, urine alone in 3.8%, and both sites in 4.2%. Isolation rates were highest in young women (P < .001). Compared with those with only cervical infection, women shedding from both cervix and urine were younger, began sexual activity when younger, had more recent partners, and a higher frequency of CMV-specific IgM, suggesting recent CMV infection. By logistic regression, cervical CMV excretion was associated with concomitant gonococcal infection (P = .008) and was less frequent in those using barrier contraception (P = .036). Isolated urinary excretion of CMV was not associated with sexual activity, concomitant cervical infections, or use of contraception. Cervical CMV infection is related to sexual activity, acquisition of other STDs, or exogenous reinfection, and urinary CMV is not.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Seminal shedding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and human cytomegalovirus: evidence for different immunologic controls.

Contact with semen of seropositive men is important for sexual transmission both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 and human cytomegalovirus (CMV), but the factors that determine shedding of either virus in semen are poorly understood. HIV was cultured from 36 (17%) of 215 semen specimens from 56 seropositive men, and CMV was cultured from 42 (30%) of 139 specimens. In logistic regression models, the CD8+ cell count in peripheral blood was the best predictor of HIV shedding in semen. Shedding of HIV was more closely associated with concomitant shedding of CMV than with CD4+ cell count, and antiretroviral therapy had minimal influence on shedding of HIV. In contrast, CD4+ cell count was the best predictor of CMV shedding in semen. Factors that determine shedding of viruses in semen may differ substantially from those that influence virus levels in the systemic immune compartment. Likewise, immunologic factors that determine shedding of HIV appear to differ from those that control shedding of CMV in semen.

Antiviral Agents↗