PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Cheadle

Publications and source records attributed to A Cheadle.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Evaluating community-based nutrition programs: assessing the reliability of a survey of grocery store product displays.

A pilot test of a survey of grocery store product displays was conducted to measure the amount of health-education information provided and the proportion of the display devoted to "healthier" products. Inter-rater reliability ranged between 0.73 and 0.78 for the healthiness indices and between 0.30 and 0.67 for the health education measures. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.44 to 1.0.

Food Labeling↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Environmental indicators: a tool for evaluating community-based health-promotion programs.

We propose using a class of community-level measures--environmental indicators--as part of the evaluation of community-based health-promotion programs. Community-level measures of health-related behavior can be divided into three conceptual categories. The first two categories comprise statistical aggregates (e.g., means, sums, percentages) of measurements made on individuals, distinguished by whether individual-level covariates are also available. Individual-disaggregated measures include covariates, such as a comprehensive survey of health-risk behavior, including demographic information; individual-aggregated measures, such as sales data, do not. Our main focus is on the third category, environmental indicators, derived from observations of the community environment. Environmental indicators measures aspects of the physical, legal, social, and economic environment in a community that reflect, and likely influence, the attitudes and behavior of individual community members. They also measure an important intermediate step in community-based health-promotion interventions, namely environmental factors that programs target to modify individual attitudes and behavior. We present examples of environmental indicators for tobacco use and diet.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A community-based approach to preventing alcohol use among adolescents on an American Indian reservation.

This paper examines the effectiveness of a 5-year community-based health promotion program to reduce the rate of substance use, particularly alcohol, by adolescents on a Plains State American Indian reservation. The program was part of the Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program. Since a reservation control group was not available, adolescents serving as control groups for other Community Health Promotion Grants Program communities, including a small sample of rural American Indians, were used as a basis for comparison. School-based surveys of 9th and 12th graders were carried out on the reservation and in five relevant California control communities--two suburban, three rural--in 1988, 1990, and 1992. The results showed that the use of both alcohol and marijuana declined substantially among American Indian adolescents living on the reservation. Binge drinking (five or more drinks on an occasion) declined from 46 percent to 30 percent, and marijuana use (in the past month) declined from 46 percent to 29 percent over the 4-year period. However, there were similar, if smaller, declines in alcohol use in the comparison groups. Since there was no evidence of a relative increase in exposure to alcohol and drug programs on the reservation, the authors are cautious in attributing the significant and heartening declines in substance use among adolescents on the reservation to the community-based program.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Relationship between socioeconomic status, health status, and lifestyle practices of American Indians: evidence from a Plains reservation population.

This paper presents information on the prevalence of a variety of health behaviors and health conditions on an American Indian reservation in the Plains region of the western United States. In addition, data from two non-Indian comparison groups were used to examine the extent to which differences in health status and health behaviors between Indians and non-Indians could be explained by differences in socioeconomic status. The American Indian data were from a survey conducted in 1988 during an evaluation of a local community-based health promotion program, part of the Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grants Program. The comparison groups were 12 communities in California surveyed in evaluating the Community Health Promotion Grants Program and three Plains States participating in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. The results show that the higher prevalences of risk-taking behavior among Indians and their poorer self-reported health status remained after adjustment for socioeconomic status. Also, among Indians, higher levels of income and education were not associated with improved self-reported health status and lower prevalence of tobacco use, as was the case with the comparison groups. The higher prevalences of risk-taking behaviors and ill health among American Indians residing on one reservation, even among those with higher socioeconomic status, suggests a need for the investigation of other social and environmental influences.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of community-level influences on individuals' attitudes about cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and consumption of dietary fat.

A basic premise of community-based health promotion is that enduring changes in health behaviors are facilitated by changing community norms or the standards of acceptable behavior in the community. We examine whether community-level influences on individuals' normative attitudes can be related to cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary fat intake. We conducted a random-digit dialing survey of 8,849 adults in 15 communities in the western United States as part of the evaluation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grant Program. We found independent associations among attitudes for tobacco, alcohol, and diet and both individual-level and community-level characteristics. A significant community effect on attitudes remained even when we controlled for individual demographics and health behaviors, as well as for the overall prevalence of the target health behavior in the community. The specific community characteristics that account for this effect were not clear in our analyses, suggesting that influential characteristics vary from community to community.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Conference report: community-based health promotion--state of the art and recommendations for the future.

The evaluators of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program in the West and the Foundation brought together 21 researchers, funders, and community organizers with a variety of perspectives on community-based health promotion to share what has been learned to date and how that knowledge should be applied in the future. The two-day conference was divided into three sessions, covering conceptual, implementation, and evaluation issues. Specific topics were selected by the organizers with input from participants. Two papers were presented in each session, followed by comments from discussants and a general discussion involving the entire group. The dominant theme of the conference was the relationship between communities and outside institutions, focusing on problems with the current state of relations and how they might be improved in the future. All viewed building partnerships between communities and institutions as a desirable goal; however, the challenges involved in building effective partnerships are considerable and require a substantial investment to make them work. Recommendations that emerged from the discussions included explicitly acknowledging the diverse interests of the parties in community-based programs at the earliest stages of program planning; making a concerted effort to bridge the cultural gaps that exist among the parties; structuring funding to allow enough lead time for partnerships to develop or using social reconnaissance to identify strong existing partnerships; and integrating the evaluation more closely into the process of program development.

Community Participation↗