PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Cordero Villafáfila

Publications and source records attributed to A Cordero Villafáfila.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Identification of the actual experiencing of pain. Methodological basis for an evaluation].

FUNDAMENTALS: The doctors don't have reliable instruments in order to detect the painful experience in a patient with intention of deceiving. The objective of this investigation is the development of an instrument that helps the doctors on that task. METHOD: The investigation is based on that the pain is not possible to evoke. A patient that doesn't feel pain, really, will introduce the modifications characteristic of all memory when requests you that he/she describe the pain that says feel. The will of deceit will also distort their description. A discriminant analysis will detect the difference between the description of a pain that is not present and another that yes it are, and between the sincere descriptions of the deceiving one. RESULTS: The descriptions of the pain carried out by two different samples of nursing students have been studied with a list of pair of antonym adjectives (Osgood's semantic differential). A subgroup of the first sample described a pain that they suffered in the same moment of description, and the other subgroup described a suffering pain some days before. In the other sample, a subgroup made a sincere description of their pain and other subgroup described the pain with will of deceiving the interviewer. The investigation has provided two discriminant models. A discriminant model differentiates between a present and another remembered pain (sensibility: 0.75; specificity: 0.85; kappa reliability: 0.60; p < 0.000000001; probability of success p: 89%). The other discriminant model differentiates between a description of a pain with will of deceiving and another pain described sincerely (sensibility: 0.94; specificity: 0.95; kappa reliability: 0.89; p < 0.000000001; probability of success p: 97%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation seem to demonstrate that it is possible to discriminate between the descriptions of real pains and the suspicious pains of not being real, and that also one is able to discriminate between pains described with will of deceit and pains described sincerely. These discriminant models allows to classify the description of the subjects in four groups: "liars", "sincere", "magnifiers", and "psychogenic". However, it is necessary still carry out more effort of investigation so that these results could be replied in patients that suffer pain.

Adult↗

Measuring anankastic personality traits.

INTRODUCTION: The authors validate a 20 item scale designed to measure anankastic (obsessive) personality traits: the Mini-Inventory of Anankastic Personality Traits, 2nd version (MIAPT-2). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The answers of a sample of 418 subject of both genders obtained from the general population were used to analyze construct validity (factorial analysis), its alpha reliability and its internal consistency through the item/total correlations and the two halves test. An additional sample of 22 medical students was used to analyze the concurrent validity of the scale (external criterion: the Maudsley Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory) and the temporary reliability with the test-retest method. After this, the total scores of the instrument and the factorial scores were standardized and distributed into percentiles. RESULTS: The scale shows good concurrent validity (r = 0.67; p < 0.000) and construct validity (56 % of the total of the variance explained by the factorial analysis) as well as a good internal consistency through the item/total correlations (all p = 0.000) and two halves test (r = 0.71; p < 0.000; with the Spearman-Brown correction R= 0.83). The alpha reliability of the scale (alpha = 0.84), and the test-retest (r = 0.69; p < 0.000) are high. CONCLUSIONS: The validated MIAPT-2 shows good validity and reliability to evaluate anankastic personality traits. The authors include an appendix with the scale and the standardization of its total and factorial scores distributed into percentiles to be used in clinical and general population samples.

Adult↗

[The distinctive quality of depressed mood. VIII. A review of the concept and a proposal].

The authors have analyzed psychiatrists' problems for to measure reliably the sign "distinct quality" of depressed mood. They underline a semantic problem adding to difficulties to the diagnostic process. The authors propose methods for increase the reliability in detecting "distinct quality" and they propose also a new word for to replace the term "vital sadness": anelasticoendosthenia; from Greek an (absence), sthenos (strength), endon (inside), elastikós (driving out).

Depressive Disorder↗

[Development of a probability index for suicide risk in depression].

Authors have developed a Suicidal Risk Index for depressed. This index included: sex, duration of current phase, suicidal ideas presents in last months, attempts previous and a number of contacts with a psychiatrist. The predictive validity of index is good. Sensibility: 0.73; specificity: 0.91; probability pi: 0.93; false positives rate: 9%; Kw: 0.65.

Adult↗

[Prevalence of suicide in depression].

The authors have reviewed the literature on suicide in depressives. 47% of suicides are depressed. From 4% to 7% of depressives die by suicide and the life-time suicide morbidity risk is 9%.

Depression↗

[Suicide among psychiatric patients].

The authors have reviewed the literature on suicide in psychiatric patients. They are the group at highest risk and commit suicide some few months after discharge. This data suggests that psychiatrists have problems in evaluating the suicidal risk of their patients.

Humans↗

[Bulimia today].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anxiety↗