PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Custovic

Publications and source records attributed to A Custovic.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Domestic allergens in public places III: house dust mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in British hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Exposure and sensitization to indoor allergens is a major cause of asthma. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the levels of house dust mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in the dust and air in hospitals and the effects of regular vacuum cleaning on allergen levels in hospital chairs. METHODS: Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1 and Bla g 2 were measured in the dust collected by vacuuming upholstered chairs and a 1 m2 area of carpet and mattress in 14 hospitals. Air samples were collected using an air sampler (flow rate 60 L/min) on 10 separate days for 4 h in the outpatient department in one of the hospitals during busy clinics when patients were waiting for their appointments. In addition, dust samples were collected on four occasions, at 4-weekly intervals, from 36 fabric covered chairs in the outpatient area of a busy chest clinic by vacuuming each chair for 2 min. During the intervening weeks, 18 of the chairs (active group) were each cleaned by vacuuming for 1 min, three times per week. Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1 and Bla g 2 were assayed using monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. RESULTS: In total, 83 carpets, 69 mattresses and 42 upholstered chairs were sampled. The levels of dust mite allergen Der p 1 and cockroach allergen Bla g 2 found in the hospital setting were low. High levels of Fel d 1 (GM 22.9 microg/g, range 4.5-58) and Can f 1 (GM 21.6 microg/g, range 4-63) were found in upholstered chairs. Airborne Can f 1 was detected on every occasion (range 0.12-0.56 ng/m3), whilst detectable airborne Fel d 1 was found on 7 out of the 10 sampling days (range 0.09-0.22 ng/m3). Der p 1 and Bla g 2 were below the detection limit in all airborne samples. Following repeated vacuuming the mean cat and dog allergen levels decreased significantly (P<0.001) and were almost fivefold lower in the vacuumed chairs compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of mite allergen are unlikely to be of any clinical significance to mite-sensitive asthmatic patients. However, upholstered chairs in hospitals constitute a significant reservoir of cat and dog allergen. Inhalation of airborne allergen in patients attending their hospital appointment may exacerbate asthma in those highly allergic to cats or dogs. These results question the wisdom of introducing soft furnishings and carpets into hospitals. Three-times weekly vacuuming significantly reduces allergen levels in upholstered chairs.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗
PubMed1998

The effect of dry heat on mite, cat, and dog allergens.

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been tried in an attempt to reduce allergen levels in homes. This study investigated the effect of dry heat on mite, cat, and dog allergens. METHODS: Samples (50 mg) of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae cultures, and of house dust rich in the major cat and dog allergens Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were heated for 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min at 60 degrees, 80 degrees, 100 degrees, 120 degrees, and 140 degrees C. Control samples remained at room temperature. Extracts were assayed with the appropriate two-site mono- or mono/polyclonal sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: For Der p 1, the breakdown was proportional to temperature and heating time; after 30 min at 120 degrees C, allergen levels were reduced to < 1% of control. Der p 2 was more heat stable, requiring 140 degrees C for 30-60 min to achieve > 99% reduction. D. farinae groups 1 and 2 allergens showed results similar to those obtained with D. pteronyssinus. In contrast, Can f 1 and Fel d 1 were considerably more thermostable, with 50% and 70%, respectively, of allergen remaining after 60 min at 140 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of dry heat on allergens increased with increasing time and temperature, cat and dog allergens demonstrating greater heat resistance than mite allergens. Dry heating methods may represent an alternative technique for removal of mite allergens; however, the greater stability of Fel d 1 and Can f 1 suggests that this procedure may not be appropriate for pet allergens.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Variability of house-dust-mite allergen levels within carpets.

Sensitization and exposure to house-dust-mite allergens is an important cause of asthma. Standardized, reliable, and reproducible methods for measuring exposure are essential for the assessment of the relationship between exposure, sensitization, and asthma. This study investigated the variability of the house-dust-mite allergen Der p 1 concentration in reservoir dust collected within whole carpets in living rooms and bedrooms. The carpets of nine bedrooms and 11 living rooms were sampled. Each room was divided into 1 m2 areas measured from wall to wall where the carpet was accessible. Reservoir dust samples were collected by vacuuming each 1 m2 area for 2 min. Der p 1 was assayed by a two-site monoclonal-antibody-based immunometric ELISA. Der p 1 was detectable in the carpets of all nine bedrooms and six of the 11 living rooms. Within these 15 rooms, there was a wide range of Der p 1 levels. The smallest range of allergen within a single room was 0.9 microgram Der p 1/g dust (0.2 and 1.1 micrograms/g; 5.5-fold difference), and the largest was 149.2 micrograms Der p 1/g dust (0.8 and 150 micrograms/g; 192-fold difference). The mean range of allergen levels in the living rooms was 11.5 micrograms Der p 1/g of dust, and the mean coefficient of variation of these rooms was 80.2%, illustrating the huge variation of mite allergen levels within each room. The variation within bedrooms was also large, with a mean coefficient of variation value of 88.7%. The coefficient of variation was significantly lower around soft furnishings or beds (57%) than in the rest of the room (89.3%), with the mean difference being 32% (95% CI 2-63%; P = 0.04). In conclusion, this study has shown that there is a great variation of Der p 1 levels between areas within a room. No consistent pattern of distribution of mite allergen within a room was found. Der p 1 levels in areas around soft furnishings and beds varied less than the levels in the rest of the room.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Risk levels for mite allergens. Are they meaningful?

Allergens found in house dust are among the most common environmental antigens to which man is naturally exposed. Standardized methods for measuring allergen exposure are essential for assessing the relationship between exposure, sensitization, and the severity of asthma. Monoclonal antibody-based assays are the most widely used method for assessing allergen exposure. In the effort to define the best "index of exposure" to mite allergens, several factors need to be investigated, including: 1) whether allergen should be measured in reservoir dust or airborne 2) whether the results of reservoir measurement should be expressed as recovered allergen per unit weight or per unit area. As yet, airborne sampling is insufficiently sensitive to produce reliable and repeatable results. Therefore, measurement of house-dust-mite allergen concentration in reservoir dust should be regarded as the best-validated index of exposure. The results should be expressed and reported both per unit weight (concentration) and per unit area. The strongest predictor of chronic symptoms and acute exacerbation of asthma is sensitization to indoor allergens. A simple dose-response relationship between IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and allergen exposure has been established. For example, exposure to more than 2 microg Group 1 mite allergen/g dust should be regarded as a risk factor for the development of IgE antibody and asthma in susceptible children. The quantitative relationship between exposure and symptoms in patients already sensitized is complex due to a number of possible confounding factors (e.g., other allergens, viruses, asthma medication). A simple threshold level for provocation of asthmatic symptoms has not been clearly defined.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗
PubMed1998

Importance of indoor allergens in the induction of allergy and elicitation of allergic disease.

During the last few decades, many countries have experienced an increase in the prevalence and severity of asthma. Over the same period, the population in the developed world has retreated indoors, and homes have become better insulated and more energy efficient, resulting in a warm and humid environment with low ventilation rates, ideally suited to house-dust-mite population growth throughout the year. Increasing exposure and increasing sensitivity to indoor allergens represent a progressively higher risk factor for the development of asthma. The development of sensitivity to indoor allergens and the symptoms and severity of asthma in later childhood are directly related to the exposure to allergens in infancy. It was relatively straightforward to demonstrate a quantitative linear dose-response relationship between exposure to house-dust-mite allergens and subsequent sensitization. However, showing the same for exposure and asthma severity has been more difficult, as the relationship between exposure and asthma symptoms in already sensitized individuals is much more complex than in the case of exposure and sensitization. Nevertheless, sensitized individuals are likely to have more severe asthma if exposed to high allergen levels than if their level of exposure is low. Sensitization to house-dust mites is a major independent risk factor for asthma in all areas where climate is conducive to mite population growth. The relevance of allergens other that mite is not consistent between different areas, and depends on the climate, habits, and socio-economic features of the local community. It would appear that presence of mite allergens in homes "overshadows" other allergens (e.g., cat, dog, or cockroach) as a risk factor for sensitization and subsequent development of allergic disease. It is possible that this is the consequence of the difference in inherent potency between allergen sources, and the question of why mite allergens are so potent in inducing sensitization and atopic disease remains to be answered.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗
PubMed1998

Distribution, aerodynamic characteristics, and removal of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 in British homes.

BACKGROUND: Sensitisation to cat allergen (Fel d 1) is an important risk factor for asthma in the UK. A study was undertaken to investigate the distribution of cat allergen in British homes, the aerodynamic characteristics and particle size distribution of airborne Fel d 1, and the method of removing it. METHODS: Dust was collected from 50 homes with a cat and from 50 homes without a cat, and airborne levels of Fel d 1 were measured in 50 homes with a cat and 75 homes without a cat. Particle size distribution was determined using an Andersen sampler (8 hours/day) in 10 homes with cats. This was repeated on five separate days in a house with four cats, and then one, two, four, seven, and 14 days after the cats were removed from the living room area. The effect of high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) cleaner on airborne levels of Fel d 1 was investigated in seven homes with cats. Samples were collected on two separate days from two rooms of each house concurrently, one of which contained the cat, one day with the HEPA cleaner on and the other day as a control. Three one hourly samples were collected over a nine hour period (baseline, 4-5 hours, 8-9 hours) using a high volume dust sampler (air flow rate 60 l/min) and the air sample was collected onto a microglass fibre filter (pore size 0.3 micron). RESULTS: Fel d 1 concentrations were much lower in houses without a cat than in those with a cat (260-fold difference (95% CI 167 to 590) in living room carpets: geometric mean (GM) 0.9 microgram/g (range 0.06-33.93) versus 237 micrograms/g (range 2.8-3000); 314-fold difference (95% CI 167 to 590) in upholstered furniture: 1.21 micrograms/g (range 0.06-61.9) versus 380 micrograms/g (range 7.1-6000); 228-fold difference (95% CI 109 to 478) in bedroom carpets: 0.24 microgram/g (range 0.06-2.24) versus 55 micrograms/g (range 0.06-2304); and 215-fold difference (95% CI 101 to 456) in mattresses: 0.2 microgram/g (range 0.06-2.3) versus 55 micrograms/g (range 0.06-3400). Airborne levels of Fel d 1 were detected in all houses with cats, and the levels varied greatly between the homes (range 0.7-38 ng/m3). Low concentrations of airborne Fel d 1 (range 0.24-1.78 ng/m3) were found in 22 of 75 homes without a cat. Although airborne Fel d 1 was mostly associated with large particles (> 9 microns, approximately 49% of the allergen recovered), small particles (< 4.7 microns) comprised approximately 23% of the total airborne allergen. Total airborne Fel d 1 was reduced by 61.7% two days after removal of the cat but this was due predominantly to the decrease in larger particles (> 4.8 microns) which fell to 13% of their baseline level. Fel d 1 levels associated with small particles (< 4.8 microns) remained largely unchanged on days 1, 2 and 4 and then slowly decreased to 33% of the baseline levels at day 14. With HEPA cleaner a significant reduction in airborne Fel d 1 was observed compared with the control sampling (GM 5.04-0.88 ng/m3 versus 3.79-1.56 ng/m3 at baseline and 8 hours, active versus control group; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Airborne Fel d 1 was detectable in undisturbed conditions in all homes with cats and in almost a third of homes without cats. In houses with cats a significant proportion (23%) of airborne Fel d 1 was associated with small particles (< 4.7 microns diameter). Removal of the cat from the living room and bedroom areas of the home and the use of HEPA air cleaner reduced airborne levels of cat allergen in homes with cats, but the reduction following cat removal was not evenly spread across the particle size range.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗
PubMed1997

Exercise induced bronchospasm in Ghana: differences in prevalence between urban and rural schoolchildren.

BACKGROUND: As more developing countries adopt a westernised style of living, an increase in the prevalence of asthma can be expected to occur in these areas. A study was undertaken to establish the normal response to exercise in Ghanaian children and to use these normal values to determine the prevalence of exercise induced bronchospasm (EIB) in urban rich (UR), urban poor (UP), and rural (R) school children. Skin test reactivity to common inhalant allergens in UR, UP, and R children with and without EIB was also investigated. METHODS: Two hundred children aged 9-16 years without a previous history of respiratory symptoms were randomly selected and underwent free running exercise testing. A normal response to exercise was defined as the group mean change in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) +/- 2 standard deviations. This value was used to identify the prevalence of EIB in UR, UP, and R schoolchildren. A total of 1095 children from three different schools underwent exercise testing (220 UP, 599 UR, 276 R), after which 916 children underwent skin prick testing to six common inhalant allergens (D farinae, D pteronyssinus, cat, dog, Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans). RESULTS: From the results of exercise testing in asymptomatic children the normal range was defined as a fall in PEFR of < 12.5% after exercise. Thirty four children were classified as having EIB on the basis of the above definition, giving an overall prevalence of 3.1%. The prevalence of EIB was significantly higher in UR children (4.7%) than in both UP (2.2%; p < 0.05) and R children (1.4%; p < 0.01). However, the prevalence rates in the UP and R children were similar. The prevalence of atopy in the whole population was 4.4%. Of the children with EIB, 10% were skin test positive to at least one of the allergens tested. The prevalence of atopy was significantly higher in UR children (6.55%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5% to 9.2%) than in UP (2.9%, 95% CI 0.9% to 6.7%) and R children (1.5%, 95% CI 0.4% to 3.7%), respectively (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of EIB and atopy is higher in urban rich than in urban poor or rural children suggesting that, in addition to genetic predisposition, social and environmental factors such as wealth, life style, and housing are important determinants of these phenotypes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Aerodynamic properties of the major dog allergen Can f 1: distribution in homes, concentration, and particle size of allergen in the air.

Exposure and sensitization to dog allergen is a significant cause of asthma. In this study we investigated the distribution, aerodynamic characteristics, and particle-size distribution of the major dog allergen Can f 1. Dust samples were collected in 50 homes with a dog and 50 homes without dogs. Airborne Can f 1 concentration was measured in 28 homes with dogs and 36 homes without a dog. Particle-size distribution was determined by using 10 separate Andersen sampler measurements in a dog-handling facility, and in 10 homes with dogs, and by repeated measurements in a home with one dog. High levels of Can f 1 (> 10 microg/g) were found in dust in all but one home with a dog and in eight of 50 homes without dogs. Airborne Can f 1 levels varied greatly between the homes with dogs (range: 0.3 to 99 ng/m3). Low levels of airborne Can f 1 (range: 0.4 to 1.1 ng/m3) were detected in 11 of 36 homes without a dog. Can f 1 was predominantly associated with large particles collected on the first stage of the Andersen sampler (> 9 microm), which averaged 42 to 49% of the total allergen recovered in the dog-handling facility and in homes with dogs. Small particles (< 5 microm diameter) also carried Can f 1, and these particles comprised approximately 20% of the total airborne allergen load. There was an excellent concordance between the results obtained in different sampling areas, and between the total Can f 1 recovered on the Andersen sampler and on the parallel filter. In conclusion, airborne Can f 1 was detectable in undisturbed conditions in all homes with dogs and in almost one third of the homes without dogs. In houses with dogs, a significant proportion (approximately 20%) of airborne Can f 1 was associated with small particles (< 5 microm diameter). Owing to their aerodynamic characteristics, these particles would be expected to remain airborne for a long period and, when inhaled, could penetrate into the lower airways and initiate asthma attacks.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗
PubMed1996

Exposure to house dust mite allergens and the clinical activity of asthma.

BACKGROUND: House dust mite allergens play an important role in inducing IgE-mediated sensitization and the development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and asthma. This study investigated the relationship between mite allergen exposure and the clinical activity and severity of asthma. METHODS: Nonsmoking adult patients with asthma (n = 53) were randomly recruited from the asthma registry of two large family practitioner surgeries. Each participant underwent skin testing with common inhalant allergens, a methacholine bronchoprovocation test, and pulmonary function testing on up to 3 separate occasions over a 4-week period. BHR was expressed both as PD20 and dose-response ratio (DRR), and the patients with patients with PD20 of less than 12.25 mumol methacholine were classified as methacholine reactors. Patients were also asked to record peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values at 2-hour intervals during waking hours for 1 month. Daily PEFR variability was calculated as amplitude percent mean. Dust samples were collected by vacuuming bedding, bedroom carpets and mattresses. In addition, in the homes of 32 subjects with positive skin test responses to mites, airborne samples were taken overnight for 8 hours with a personal sampler attached to each subject's pillow. Der p 1 and Der p 2 levels were determined by a two-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. RESULTS: No difference in mite exposure was found between subjects who were sensitive to mites and those who were not. However, mite-sensitive methacholine reactors were exposed to significantly higher concentrations of Der p 1 in beds than mite-sensitive methacholine nonreactors (13.2 micrograms/gm and 1.45 micrograms/gm, respectively; p < 0.02). Der p 1 and Der p 2 were undetectable in 30 of 32 airborne samples. In mite-sensitive patients both Der p 1 and Der p 2 in beds significantly correlated with BHR (PD20: r = -0.49, DRR, r = 0.49; PD20: r = -0.46, DRR: r = 0.43) and amplitude percent mean PEFR (r = 0.38, r = 0.41) for Der p 1 and Der p 2, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between exposure to Der p 1 and percent predicted FEV1 (r = -0.43). The correlation between Der p 2 and percent predicted FEV1 just failed to reach a significant level but showed a clear trend ( r = -0.35, p = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical activity and severity of asthma (measured by the level of BHR, PEFR variability, and percent predicted FEV1) in mite-sensitive patients is related to exposure to mite allergens in the dust reservoir, with levels in bed being an important indicator that correlated with disease activity.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Reduction in humidity as a method of controlling mites and mite allergens: the use of mechanical ventilation in British domestic dwellings.

BACKGROUND: Low humidity is an important limiting factor for mite population growth. Reducing humidity can therefore be used as a method to control mites within the home. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of mechanical ventilation heat recovery (MVHR) units on house dust mites and mite allergen Der p 1 in typical homes in the North-West of England. METHODS: Mite counts and Der p 1 levels were measured at 3-monthly intervals over a period of 1 year in 18 houses (nine with MVHR units and nine architecturally matched control houses). Paired dust samples were collected using a vacuum cleaner with an air-flow rate 451/sec, adapted to collect the sample onto a preweighed filter paper. A 1 m2 area of bedroom carpet, living room carpet and mattress was sampled for 2 min. Indoor temperature and relative humidity (RH) levels were recorded for a period of 1 week before and after the winter period (November and February: 3 and 6 months data sets). The environmental questionnaire was completed at the beginning and at the end of the study. RESULTS: No difference in either Der p 1 concentrations or mite counts in any of the sampling sites at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months as compared with the baseline values was found, both within and between the groups (P > 0.01). The measured levels of RH performed in autumn and winter were found to be lower in the MVHR houses compared to the architectural controls. The indoor temperature during each period did not differ between the groups. Questionnaire data showed that the severity of condensation improved in the MVHR homes, whilst during the winter period, the severity of condensation had increased in the architectural control group. CONCLUSIONS: The MVHR unit does not reduce indoor humidity to levels capable of retarding the mite population growth and decreasing mite allergens in the type of houses predominantly found in the mild and humid climate of the North-West of England.

Allergens↗
PubMed1996

Asthmatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness varies with ambient levels of summertime air pollution.

It is widely believed that the mechanisms of action of outdoor air pollutants are the same as those found in the laboratory, although few studies have attempted to clarify this issue. This study investigates the relationship of asthmatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a marker of airway inflammation, and pulmonary function to ambient levels of summertime air pollution. Thirty eight nonsmoking adult asthmatic subjects underwent repeated measurement of methacholine BHR, using Yan's method, at differing levels of air pollution (O3, SO2, NO2, smoke) during summer 1993. A total of 109 evaluable tests were performed: 31 subjects completed three or more challenge tests, and seven managed two. Levels of all pollutants remained within current World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for Health. Changes in BHR were found to correlate significantly with changes in the levels of 24 h mean SO2, NO2 and smoke; 48 h mean NO2 and smoke; 24 h lag NO2; although the effect was only small, accounting for approximately 10% of the variability in within-subject BHR between visits. Twenty four hour lag NO2 was also associated with forced vital capacity (FVC). In conclusion, in subjects with asthma, methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness varies with ambient levels of summertime air pollution. This suggests that changes in airway inflammation underlie the increased respiratory morbidity known to accompany pollution episodes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

New mattresses: how fast do they become a significant source of exposure to house dust mite allergens?

BACKGROUND: Sensitization and exposure to mite allergens is a major risk factor for asthma. Little is known about the rate of build-up of allergens in the mite micro-habitats. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the rate of increase in mite allergen levels in new mattresses. METHODS: Der p 1 was measured in the dust samples collected from six identical new single mattresses over a period of 2 years. RESULTS: Der p 1 increased significantly at 4 months as compared with baseline level (P < 0.01), but no difference was found between the concentrations at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months. There was a significant correlation between Der p 1 concentration in mattresses at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months and Der p 1 levels in the bedroom carpet at the beginning of the study. CONCLUSIONS: New mattresses can become a significant source of exposure to mite allergens after a short period of time (< 4 months). There is little justification for advising mite sensitive patients to replace their mattresses as a part of avoidance regime.

Allergens↗
PubMed1996

Domestic allergens in public places. II: Dog (Can f1) and cockroach (Bla g 2) allergens in dust and mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in the air in public buildings.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization and exposure to indoor allergens are the major risk factors for asthma. It is possible that significant exposure to domestic allergens occurs outside the home. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the levels of Can f 1 and Bla g 2 in the dust from carpeted floors and upholstered seats in public buildings and public transport and the airborne concentrations of Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1 and Bla g 2 in schools and offices. METHODS: Can f 1 and Bla g 2 were measured in the dust collected by vacuuming a 1 m2 area of carpet, as well as upholstered seats in five schools, six hotels, four cinemas, six pubs, three buses and two trains. Dust was also collected from the bedroom carpet, living room carpet, mattress and sofa in 20 homes with and 20 homes without a dog in the same area. Personal airborne sampling (2 L/min) was conducted for 8 h in offices (n = 16) and classrooms (n = 9). In addition, airborne samples in schools were collected using a high volume pump (60 L/min) for 1 h in three classrooms immediately after the children vacated the school. Can f 1, Bla g 2, Der p 1 and Fel d 1 were assayed using a two-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. RESULTS: Can f 1 was detected in all dust samples from public places, ranging from 0.2 to 52.5 micrograms/g. Significantly higher levels were found in upholstered seats (geometric mean--GM 9.4 micrograms/g) than in carpets (GM 1.5 micrograms/g; P < 0.001), and levels of Can f 1 > 10 micrograms/g were found in 40% of upholstered seats in public places. Can f 1 was significantly higher in upholstered seats in public places than in sofas in homes without a dog (GM 1.8 micrograms/g; P < 0.001). Detectable levels of Bla g 2 were found in all of the schools (GM 2.4 U/g, range 0.8-4.4 U/g). Bla g 2 concentration greater than 2U/g (provisional threshold level representing risk of sensitization) was measured in 65% of the classrooms sampled. Der p 1 and Bla g 2 were below the detection limit in all airborne samples. However, airborne Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were detected in schools and offices, albeit in low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Upholstered seats from public places constitute a reservoir for the accumulation of dog allergen, and a source of exposure to Can f 1 inside public buildings or on public transport. Exposure to cockroach allergens in schools may be important for cockroach sensitized asthmatic children.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗