Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A D Hanssen.
A classification for periprosthetic tibial fractures is presented. It is based on the anatomic location of the fracture in reference to the tibial component; whether the fracture occurred during surgery or in the postoperative period; and whether the prosthesis is radiographically well-fixed or loose. A treatment algorithm is proposed for each fracture type.
Acetabular fracture during insertion of a cementless acetabular component occurred in 13 patients. The preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 6 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 2 patients, avascular necrosis in 3 patients, hip fracture nonunion in 1 patient, and developmental dysplasia of the hip in 1 patient. Several different components were used; however, the acetabulum was underreamed by 1 to 3 mm in all cases. The acetabular fracture was identified in 9 of 13 cases intraoperatively. The fracture was identified on postoperative radiographs for the other 4 cases. Fractures were treated by a variety of means, including the addition of augmentation screws in or around the cup, use of autograft bone at the fracture site, modified postoperative weight-bearing status, and immobilization. In 2 cases, the socket needed to be revised after it progressively migrated and failed. One patient had cup migration, and another had a radiolucent line about the cup but was not symptomatic enough to require revision. In 3 of these 4 cases, the fracture was not identified intraoperatively. Underreaming of the acetabulum and use of an oversized acetabular component has been recommended to improve the initial stability of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty. Impaction of an oversized component requires bone to undergo plastic deformation if the cup is to be fully seated. Theoretically, this technique provides improved component stability with enhanced osseous ingrowth into the cup. The 13 cases reported in this study demonstrate that acetabular fracture is a complication that may occur in association with uncemented hip arthroplasty, particularly if oversized components are used. The importance of recognizing acetabular fractures intraoperatively and the need to institute appropriate treatment to ensure a stable acetabular component is emphasized. In patients with osteoporotic bone, line-to-line reaming with use of a cementless acetabular component or insertion of a cemented socket may be considered to avoid this significant complication.
An intravenous antibiotic, administered just before skin incision, effectively reduces the prevalence of deep wound infection. The optimal antimicrobial agent has not been determined definitively; however, a short duration of prophylaxis is recommended. Institutional compliance strategies are cost-effective and improve the timing of antibiotic administration. Also, published antimicrobial restriction recommendations are warranted because of the concern of emerging antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Specifically, restriction of vancomycin in orthopaedic surgery should be targeted critically. Supplemental antibiotic administration includes additional intra-operative antibiotic dosing, use of antibiotic-irrigant solutions, and admixture of antibiotics into acrylic bone cement or bone graft. There are no established standards or clinical guidelines for these supplemental antibiotic applications. Post-operatively, antimicrobial agents frequently are overused for various clinical scenarios and this pattern of antibiotic usage is potentially detrimental. A prophylaxis strategy for prevention of early and late hematogenous infection requires consideration of host risk factors, wound environment variables, and sources of potential bacteremia. This strategy should include deliberation of the cost-effectiveness, efficacy, and complications associated with routine use of antibiotics. Advisory statements for elective procedures, which potentially may cause bacteremia, are being developed and additional research is required for this area of antimicrobial agent prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND: Pelvic discontinuity is a distinct form of bone loss, occurring in association with total hip arthroplasty, in which the superior aspect of the pelvis is separated from the inferior aspect because of bone loss or a fracture through the acetabulum. The purpose of this study was to describe the population of patients who are at risk for this condition, to identify the characteristic radiographic features associated with it, and to report the results of revision total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of pelvic discontinuity. METHODS: The cases of all twenty-seven patients (thirty-one hips) who were identified as having a pelvic discontinuity at the time of a reoperation for a failed hip arthroplasty at one institution were reviewed retrospectively, and demographic information was collected. The preoperative radiographs and the operative notes were reviewed, and the postoperative results and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Pelvic discontinuity was identified in association with thirty-one (0.9 percent) of 3505 acetabular revisions. The mean age of the patients was sixty-one years (range, thirty-eight to eighty years). Twenty-eight hips were in women, and three were in men. Women (p < 0.001) and patients who had rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.003) had a significantly increased risk of pelvic discontinuity. The radiographic findings included a visible fracture line through the anterior and posterior columns, medial translation of the inferior aspect of the hemipelvis relative to the superior aspect (seen as a break in Kohler's line), and rotation of the inferior aspect of the hemipelvis relative to the superior aspect (seen as asymmetry of the obturator rings) on a true anteroposterior radiograph. Two patients died within two years after the revision, and two had a resection arthroplasty for the treatment of the pelvic discontinuity; thus, twenty-seven hips were reconstructed and were eligible for follow-up at least two years after the operation. A number of different methods were used for reconstruction, but the results were best in patients who did not have severe segmental acetabular bone loss (type IVa [a satisfactory result in three of three hips]) and poorer in those who had severe segmental or combined segmental and cavitary bone loss (type IVb [a satisfactory result in ten of nineteen hips]) and in those who previously had been treated with irradiation to the pelvis (type IVc [a satisfactory result in three of five hips]). Nine of the twenty-seven hips needed another operation: four, because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component; four, because of recurrent dislocation; and one, because of deep infection. Excluding three hips that were revised early because of infection or dislocation, a mechanically stable construct (that is, a stable socket and a possibly or definitely healed discontinuity) was obtained in seventeen of twenty-four hips. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic discontinuity is uncommon, and treatment is associated with a high rate of complications. For hips with type-IVa bone loss and selected hips with type-IVb defects, in which a socket inserted without cement can be satisfactorily supported by native bone, we prefer to use a posterior column plate to stabilize the pelvis and a porous-coated socket inserted without cement. For most hips with type-IVb and type-IVc bone loss, we prefer to use particulate bone graft or a single structural bone graft protected with an antiprotrusion cage.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate in patients with Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the microorganism-specific cumulative probability of treatment failure after prosthesis removal and delayed reimplantation arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with S aureus THA or TKA infection, according to a strict case definition, who were treated with prosthesis removal and delayed reimplantation arthroplasty at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1980 and 1991 were identified. The study group comprised patients who were free of infection at the time of reimplantation arthroplasty. This cohort was followed up until treatment failure, infection with another organism, prosthesis removal, death, or loss to follow-up occurred. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 120 S aureus prosthetic joint infections treated with prosthesis removal during the study period, 38 episodes (22 THA, 16 TKA) in 36 patients met the study inclusion criteria. After a median of 7.4 years (range, 0.9 year-16.4 years) of follow-up, treatment failure occurred in 1 (2.6%) of 38 episodes 1.4 years after reimplantation arthroplasty. The 5-year cumulative probability of treatment failure was 2.8% (95% confidence interval, 0%-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that prosthesis removal and delayed reimplantation arthroplasty is an effective treatment to limit the recurrence of S aureus prosthetic joint infection, provided there is no evidence of infection at the time of reimplantation arthroplasty.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Between 1977 and 1993, 64 patients had local muscle flap transposition as an integral portion of treatment for lower-extremity osteomyelitis. All muscle flaps were performed by a single surgeon. There were 54 men and 10 women with an average age of 45 years (range, 16 to 87 years). Median follow-up period was 9.3 years (range, 5 to 21 years). The muscles used included medial gastrocnemius (n = 28), soleus (n = 19), lateral gastrocnemius (n = 13), and peroneus tertius (n = 1). At final follow-up, the recurrence free rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94, 92.5, and 86 percent, respectively. These long-term results support the use of local muscle flap transposition as an important management method in the treatment of lower extremity osteomyelitis; however, the risk of treatment failure may arise after extended periods of time.
We conducted a matched case-control study to determine risk factors for the development of prosthetic joint infection. Cases were patients with prosthetic hip or knee joint infection. Controls were patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty and did not develop prosthetic joint infection. A multiple logistic regression model indicated that risk factors for prosthetic joint infection were the development of a surgical site infection not involving the prosthesis (odds ratio [OR], 35.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-154.6), a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System surgical patient risk index score of 1 (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3) or 2 (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.0-7.5), the presence of a malignancy (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.2), and a history of joint arthroplasty (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-3.0). Our findings suggest that a surgical site infection not involving the joint prosthesis, an NNIS System surgical patient risk index score of 1 or 2, the presence of a malignancy, and a history of a joint arthroplasty are associated with an increased risk of prosthetic joint infection.
Between 1990 and 1995, 25 painful primary posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasties were revised for flexion instability. These patients shared typical clinical presentations that included a sense of instability without frank giving way, recurrent knee joint effusion, soft tissue tenderness involving the pes anserine tendons and the retinacular tissue, posterior instability of 2+ or 3+ with a posterior drawer or a posterior sag sign at 90 degrees flexion, and above average motion of their total knee arthroplasty. The primary total knee arthroplasty was performed for osteoarthritis in 23 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in two patients. There were 13 male and 12 female patients and their mean age was 65 years (range, 35-77 years). Before the revision operation, Knee Society knee scores averaged 45 points (range, 17-68 points) and function scores averaged 42 points (range, 0-60 points). Twenty-two of the knee replacements were revised to posterior stabilized implants and three underwent tibial polyethylene liner exchange only. Nineteen of the 22 knee replacements revised to a posterior stabilized implant were improved markedly after the revision surgery. Only one of three knee replacements that underwent tibial polyethylene exchange was improved. After the revision for flexion instability, Knee Society knee scores averaged 90 points (range, 82-99 points) and function scores averaged 75 points (range, 45-100 points) for the 20 knees with a successful outcome. This study suggests that flexion instability can be a cause of persistent pain and functional impairment after posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. A revision operation that focuses on balancing the flexion and extension spaces, in conjunction with a posterior stabilized knee implant, seems to be a reliable treatment for symptomatic flexion instability after posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Forty-two patients (forty-two hips) who had an infection following a hip arthroplasty were managed with open débridement, retention of the prosthetic components, and antibiotic therapy. After a mean duration of follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 0.14 to twenty-two years), only six patients (14 per cent) -- four of nineteen who had had an early postoperative infection and two of four who had had an acute hematogenous infection -- had been managed successfully. Of the remaining thirty-six patients, three (7 per cent of the entire group) were being managed with chronic suppression with oral administration of antibiotics and thirty-three (79 per cent of the entire group) had had a failure of treatment. All nineteen patients who had a late chronic infection were deemed to have had a failure of treatment. Débridement had been performed at a mean of six days (range, two to fourteen days) after the onset of symptoms in the patients who had been managed successfully and at a mean of twenty-three days (range, three to ninety-three days) in those for whom treatment had failed. Débridement with retention of the prosthesis is a potentially successful treatment for early postoperative infection or acute hematogenous infection, provided that it is performed in the first two weeks after the onset of symptoms and that the prosthesis previously had been functioning well. In our experience, this procedure has not been successful when it has been performed more than two weeks after the onset of symptoms. Retention of the prosthesis should not be attempted in patients who have a chronic infection at the site of a hip arthroplasty as this approach universally fails.
Between 1985 and 1987, 1837 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses were implanted in 1503 patients. Group I included 843 knee with metal-backed patellar components (MBPC), and group II included 994 knees with all polyethylene patellar components (APPC). Follow-up averaged 5.7 years (range, 2 to 11 years). Twenty-four MBPC (2.9%) and 16 APPC TKA cases (1.6%) developed deep infection. In the time interval between arthroplasty and 2-year follow-up, eight MBPC and 11 APPC knees developed deep periprosthetic infection. The difference in the cumulative probability of infection between the two groups during this time interval was not significant (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-2.1; P = 0.73). However, after the 2-year follow-up, 16 MBPC and 5 APPC knees developed late infection, and the difference in the cumulative probability of infection between the MBPC and APPC knees during this time interval was significant (relative risk, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.5; P = 0.02). Although the mechanism for this increased risk of these late infections is not well understood, the attendant synovitis, effusion, and relative hyperemia of these knees in the presence of the particulate metal and polyethylene debris may increase the potential of bacterial seeding to these prostheses. Particulate metal debris has been previously shown to suppress bacterial phagocytosis and may play a role in the pathogenesis of these infections. We propose that the presence of metal-backed patellar failure represents a "prosthesis at risk" for the development of late prosthetic infection.
Prosthetic joint replacement is being performed more frequently for patients with prior septic arthritis due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prosthetic joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis does occur, but is rare. We report the clinical characteristics and outcome of seven cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis prosthetic joint infection seen at our institution over a 22-year period and summarize the English-language literature regarding current prophylaxis and treatment strategies. Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection most often represents reactivation of prior tuberculous septic arthritis. The diagnosis of tuberculous prosthetic joint disease is often delayed, because a history of prior Mycobacterium tuberculosis septic arthritis is not known. Treatment of tuberculous prosthetic joint infection requires a combined medical and surgical approach. Removal of the prosthesis has been the traditional surgical modality, followed by appropriate antituberculous therapy, but other surgical methods have been used successfully in selected cases. To decrease the risk of reactivation of infection after prosthesis implantation in patients with quiescent tuberculous septic arthritis who have not received prior antituberculous therapy, consideration should be given to preoperative or perioperative antituberculous prophylaxis.
From 1969 through 1980, 90 hips in 82 patients had cemented total hip arthroplasty for Type III developmental hip dysplasia. Seventy hips were reviewed at an average of 16.6 years (range, 5-23 years) after operation. Aseptic loosening developed in 53% of acetabular cups and 40% of femoral stems. Despite attempts to place acetabular components in the anatomic center, 18 cups (25.7%) were placed outside that area. Using a measurement method to determine the true acetabular region and approximate femoral head center, final acetabular loosening strongly correlated with initial cup placement. Loosening occurred in 15 of 18 cups (83.3%) initially positioned outside of the true acetabular region compared with loosening in 22 of 52 cups (42.3%) initially positioned within the true acetabular region. Acetabular loosening also correlated with initial lateral displacement or initial superior displacement of the hip center from the approximate femoral head center. Initial cup placement medial to the approximate femoral head center was predictive of successful long term acetabular component fixation. The method of acetabular reconstruction did not affect eventual cup loosening. Placement of the hip arthroplasty center of rotation in or near the true acetabular region is recommended.
Debridement and retention of the prosthesis was the initial treatment modality in 30 patients with 33 Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) who presented to the Mayo Clinic between 1980 and 1991. Treatment failure, defined as relapse of S. aureus PJI or occurrence of culture-negative PJI during continuous antistaphylococcal therapy, occurred in 21 of 33 prosthetic joints. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative probabilities of treatment failure were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-71%) and 69% (95% CI, 52%-86%), respectively. A median of 4 additional surgical procedures (range, 1-9) were required to control the infection in the 21 prosthetic joints for which treatment failed. Prostheses that were debrided >2 days after onset of symptoms were associated with a higher probability of treatment failure than were those debrided within 2 days of onset (relative risk, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.6-10.3). These data suggest that debridement and retention of the prosthesis as the initial therapy for PJI due to S. aureus is associated with a high cumulative probability of treatment failure and that the probability of treatment failure may be related to the duration of symptoms.
Between 1976 and 1992, reinfection developed in 34 patients treated for an infected total hip arthroplasty with removal of the prosthesis and implantation of another prosthesis. These patients included 15 men and 19 women with a mean age of 62 years. Infection recurred an average of 2.2 years after reimplantation of the new prosthesis. Followup after the diagnosis of reinfection averaged 5.1 years. Reinfection after an attempt at reimplantation total hip arthroplasty was seldom compatible with a good functional outcome. Resection arthroplasty was reliable in eradicating reinfection but led to poor function and was associated with persistent pain. Although reimplantation of a third prosthesis allowed 3 patients to achieve an excellent result, the 8 hips that failed a third reimplantation attempt had the worst functional results in this study. The results from the present series suggest that reinfection after an attempt at reimplantation is a contraindication to further attempts at a 1-stage reimplantation of another prosthesis. Those patients in whom the same single microorganism has been identified from the failed primary total hip and from the failed first reimplantation, however, may be reasonable candidates for an attempt at a 2-stage reimplantation of a third prosthesis, particularly when a deficiency in prior antibiotic therapy or surgical technique can be identified.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.