N-terminal proBNP--the most cost effective way to identify post myocardial infarction left ventriular dysfunction?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A D Struthers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether social deprivation has any independent effect on emergency cardiac hospitalisations in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). DESIGN: Cohort study of 478 patients with CHF who had been hospitalised before 1993 and who were followed up during 1993 and 1994. SETTING: Emergency admissions within Tayside acute hospitals. PATIENTS: 478 CHF patients who had a previous myocardial infarction, a previous CHF admission, and were on diuretic treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency hospital admissions are divided into those for all causes and those for cardiac causes only. RESULTS: Social deprivation was significantly associated with an increase in the number of cardiac hospitalisations (p = 0.007). This effect was mainly caused by increasing the proportion of patients hospitalised in each deprivation category (26% in deprivation category 1-2 versus 40% in deprivation category 5-6, p = 0.03). This effect of deprivation was independent of disease severity, as judged by the dose of prescribed diuretic, the death rate, and the duration of each hospital stay. Non-adherence with diuretic treatment could not account for these findings either. CONCLUSIONS: Social deprivation increases the chance of a CHF patient being rehospitalised independently of disease severity. Possible explanations are that doctors who look after socially deprived patients have a lower threshold for cardiac hospitalisation of their patients, or that social deprivation alters the way a CHF patient accesses medical care during decompensation. Understanding how social deprivation influences both doctor and patient behaviour in the prehospital phase is now crucial in order to reduce the amplifying effect that social deprivation appears to have on cardiac hospitalisations.
BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain whether angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors benefit all heart failure patients or just those with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the response to an ACE inhibitor, assessed by urine sodium excretion, was different in patients with low renin versus those with high renin. DESIGN: Plasma renin activity (PRA) was measured in 38 patients with stable chronic heart failure (21 male, 17 female; mean (SD) age 71 (6) years, range 59-82 years) on chronic diuretic treatment alone. They were divided into three groups: low (PRA </= 1.5 ng/ml/h, n = 11); normal (1.5 < PRA < 5, n = 14); and high (PRA > 5, n = 13). The effect of ACE inhibition was then assessed on diuretic induced natriuresis with respect to renin status. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age and sex distribution between the groups. Plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone increased serially from low to high renin groups, while 24 h urinary sodium concentrations fell from low to high renin groups (low PRA, 96.7 (39.5); normal PRA, 90.4 (26.7); high PRA, 66. 3 (18.9) mmol/l; p = 0.033), despite a higher diuretic dose in the high renin group. This blunted natriuretic effect of loop diuretics was caused by RAAS activation, which could partly be reversed by ACE inhibition. ACE inhibitors increased natriuresis by 22% in the high renin group (p = 0.029), but had no effect in the normal and low renin groups. Within the low renin group, five of the 11 patients had persistently low renin levels despite ACE inhibition. There was a non-significant reduction in natriuresis (-9.6%, p = 0.335) following ACE inhibition in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of heart failure patients in our study had low renin status and a non-activated RAAS, despite diuretic treatment. ACE inhibitors did not alter natriuresis significantly in this subgroup of patients, and enhanced natriuresis only in patients with high renin. There is thus tentative support for renin profiling in targeting ACE inhibitors to the most deserving, by showing that short term sodium retention does not occur in low renin patients if ACE inhibitors are withdrawn.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Therapeutic strategies against free radicals have mostly focused on the augmentation of antioxidant defenses (eg, vitamins C and E). A novel approach is to prevent free radical generation by the enzyme system xanthine oxidase. We examined whether the inhibition of xanthine oxidase with allopurinol can improve endothelial function in subjects with type 2 diabetes and coexisting mild hypertension compared with control subjects of a similar age. We examined 23 subjects (11 patients with type 2 diabetes and 12 healthy age-matched control subjects) in 2 parallel groups. The subjects were administered 300 mg allopurinol in a randomized, placebo-controlled study in which both therapies were administered for 1 month. Endothelial function was assessed with bilateral venous occlusion plethysmography, in which the forearm blood flow responses to intra-arterial infusions of endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilators were measured. Allopurinol significantly increased the mean forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine by 30% (3.16+/-1.21 versus 2.54+/-0.76 mL. 100 mL(-1). min(-1) allopurinol versus placebo; P=0.012, 95% CI 0.14, 1.30) but did not affect the nitroprusside response in patients with type 2 diabetes. There was no significant impact on either endothelium-dependent or -independent vascular responses in age-matched control subjects. Allopurinol improved endothelial function to near-normal levels. Regarding markers of free radical activity, the level of malondialdehyde was significantly reduced (0.30+/-0.04 versus 0. 34+/-0.05 micromol/L for allopurinol versus placebo, P=0.03) in patients with type 2 diabetes but not in control subjects. The xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes with mild hypertension but not in matched control subjects. In the former group, allopurinol restored endothelial function to near-normal levels.
Treatment of rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMC) with 1 or 100 microg ml-1 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 20-24 h led to expression of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) as detected by Western blotting for iNOS protein, and by determination of increased cellular nitrite formation. LPS-induced nitrite production was inhibited almost completely by concomitant treatment of cells with LPS and either (a) pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC, 25 microm), an antioxidant inhibitor of NF-kappaB activation; (b) N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK, 20 and 40 microm), a proteasomal inhibitor which prevents NF-kappaB activation; (c) nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA, 10 and 50 microm), a lipoxygenase inhibitor; or (d) apocynin (2, 3.5 and 5 m m), an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase. Gel-shift assays using nuclear protein extracts incubated with a 32P-labelled DNA binding probe for NF-kappaB detected two electrophoretically separable complexes containing NF-kappaB. A faster migrating complex obtained when using both LPS-treated and untreated cells appeared to represent a basal or constitutive NF-kappaB activity, whereas a slower band was found only after LPS-treatment. The latter band was abolished when using cells treated for 1 h with LPS in the presence of PDTC (25 microm) or TPCK (20 microm), but was not inhibited by NDGA (50 microm) or apocynin (3.5 m m). The basal band was unaffected by any of the cell signalling inhibitors. Densitometry of Western blots indicated that LPS-induced iNOS protein expression was inhibited to a similar extent (between 74 and 87%) by the latter concentrations of PDTC, TPCK, NDGA and apocynin. The ability of PDTC and TPCK to abolish LPS-specific NF-kappaB activation, while also producing considerable inhibition of iNOS protein expression and nitrite formation, suggests that induction of iNOS by LPS in RASMC involves NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. However, the failure of NDGA and apocynin to prevent NF-kappaB activation, at least during early stages (up to 1 h) of its nuclear accumulation, suggests that these agents may affect cell signalling pathways which regulate iNOS induction by another mechanism to be determined.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare different proposed methods of assessing adherence with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEI) therapy in chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: The use of ACEIs in chronic heart failure gives us a unique opportunity to assess a patient's adherence by measuring whether the expected biochemical effect of an ACEI is present in the patient's bloodstream. In fact, there are several different ways of assessing ACE in vivo: these are serum ACE activity itself, plasma N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (AcSDKP), urine AcSDKP, plasma angiotensin I (AI), plasma angiotensin II (AII), or the AII/AI ratio. METHODS: Patients with chronic heart failure (n = 39) were randomized to regimens of ACEI nonadherence for one week, ACEI adherence for one week or two versions of partial adherence for one week, after which the above six tests were performed. RESULTS: All six tests significantly distinguished between full nonadherence for one week and full or partial adherence. Only plasma AcSDKP produced a significantly different result between partial adherence and either full adherence or full nonadherence for one week. In terms of their ability to distinguish full nonadherence from full adherence, plasma AcSDKP was 89% sensitive and 100% specific with an area under its ROC of 0.95. Corresponding figures for urine AcSDKP were 92%, 97% and 0.95 and for serum ACE they were 86%, 95% and 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: All six tests distinguished full nonadherence from all other forms of adherence. The rank order of performance was plasma AcSDKP, urine AcSDKP, serum ACE, AII/AI ratio and plasma AII followed by plasma AI.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in heart failure. One therapeutic mechanism is believed to be the reduction of circulating angiotensin II and aldosterone. However, the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone axis (RAAS) is not uniformly suppressed during therapy for heart failure. This effect has been referred to as 'angiotensin II reactivation' and 'aldosterone escape' and their reactivation may herald clinical deterioration. In the CONSENSUS I trial, correlations were seen between mortality, and angiotensin II and aldosterone. Furthermore, mortality was lower in those with good angiotensin II suppression. Therefore, neurohormonal elevation despite adequate treatment may associate with a poorer prognosis. AIMS: To follow chronic heart failure patients on ACE inhibitors for 18 months to assess whether or not angiotensin II and aldosterone reactivation are progressive with time, whether reactivation of both occurs simultaneously, and whether different ACE inhibitors have different neurohormonal profiles. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 22 patients (M/F 19:3, 72.5+/-7 years) on stable ACE inhibitors. Five times, in 18 months, samples were taken for neurohormones and ACE activity. Mean levels of neurohormones were remarkably stable over time, although captopril takers had generally higher angiotensin II, but lower aldosterone and renin. Aldosterone 'escape' (> 80 pg/ml) occurred in 13/97 samples (13.5%), in 5/22 (23%) individuals. Angiotensin II was elevated > or =10 pg/ml in 8/102 samples (8%), in 6/22 (27%) individuals. Four subjects had isolated angiotensin II reactivation, and three had aldosterone escape alone. On regression analyses between neurohormones in captopril takers there were significant correlations between; renin and angiotensin II (r = 0.62; P<0.02); angiotensin II and aldosterone (r = 0.6; P<0.02); and renin and aldosterone (r = 0.92; P<0.00001). CONCLUSION: In stable heart failure patients un-suppressed levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone occur despite therapy, but they are not necessarily progressive, nor simultaneous. Furthermore, contemporaneous serum ACE activity makes it unlikely the data presented reflects poor compliance. The results suggest that captopril takers may have different neurohormonal profiles, i.e. higher angiotensin II, and also better correlations between RAAS components, compared to longer acting preparations, although the numbers are small. Our data supports that of Swedberg et al. who showed reductions in both aldosterone and angiotensin II due to ACE inhibitor therapy, but no correlation between ACE activity and angiotensin II and only a limited correlation (r = 0.37) between angiotensin II and aldosterone. This suggests that the interaction between the components of the renin-angiotensin system is not simple and linear. The fact that each phenomenon appears to occur in isolation means that neurohormonal monitoring of individual could provide useful information to direct additional therapy. The RALES study has demonstrated reduced mortality from the addition of spironolactone to an ACE inhibitor emphasising the benefit of enhanced suppression of aldosterone in heart failure. Captopril may be less effective at suppressing the RAAS due to its short duration of action which would logically be associated with a more fluctuating pattern of ACE inhibition. In the presence of high levels of renin and angiotensin I even small differences in ACE activity will produce large variations in angiotensin II levels. Further studies should be directed at understanding the different mechanisms behind angiotensin II and aldosterone generation during ACE inhibition.
AIMS: We wished to see if renin release in man was inhibited by nitric oxide blockade, suggesting a role for nitric oxide in renin release. Evidence from animal studies has shown variable effects on renin release depending on the model and stimulus used. METHODS: Ten normal male volunteers, received either L-NMMA as a front loaded infusion (4 mg kg-1 bolus, with 4 mg kg-1 infusion), or placebo, followed by an intravenous bolus of 5 mg frusemide to stimulate renin. To investigate whether any alteration in renin release was due to the pressor effect of the L-NMMA, the experiment was repeated using an equipressor dose of phenylephrine (0.5 microg kg-1 min-1 ). RESULTS: L-NMMA caused the expected increase in mean arterial pressure (96+/-2.6 vs 89+/-3.3 mmHg P<0.05 [mean+/-s.e.mean]), and a reduction in heart rate (59+/-3.6 vs 67+/-2.5 beats min-1 P<0.05). L-NMMA completely blocked the renin rise following the bolus of frusemide (1.18+/-0.196 vs 1.96+/-0.333 ng ml-1 h-1 P<0.01). Phenylephrine 0.5 microg kg-1 min-1 produced very similar haemodynamic effects to L-NMMA, and also suppressed the renin response to frusemide (1.43+/-0.290 vs 2.67+/-0.342 ng ml-1 h-1 P<0. 01). CONCLUSIONS: In man, the renin inhibition seen with NO synthesis inhibition is similar to that seen with a standard pressor stimulus, hence inhibition of renin in man by L-NMMA, may be due to both direct effects on macula densa cells and indirect haemodynamic effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare QT dispersion in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function and in matched control patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. DESIGN: A retrospective, case-control study with controls matched 4:1 for age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, and diuretic and beta blocker treatment. SETTING: A regional cardiology centre and a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 25 patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function and 100 patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QT and QTc dispersion measured by three methods: the difference between maximum and minimum QT and QTc intervals, the standard deviation of QT and QTc intervals, and the "lead adjusted" QT and QTc dispersion. RESULTS: All measures of QT/QTc dispersion were closely interrelated (r values 0.86 to 0.99; all p < 0.001). All measures of QT and QTc dispersion were significantly increased in the patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function v controls (p < 0.001): 71.9 (6.5) (mean (SEM)) v 46.9 (1.7) ms for QT dispersion, and 83.6 (7.6) v 54.3 (2.1) ms(-1-2) for QTc dispersion. All six dispersion parameters were reduced in patients taking beta blockers (p < 0.05), regardless of whether left ventricular function was normal or impaired-by 9.4 (4.6) ms for QT dispersion (p < 0.05) and by 13.8 (6. 5) ms(-1-2) for QTc dispersion (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: QT and QTc dispersion are increased in patients with systolic heart failure in comparison with matched controls, regardless of the method of measurement and independently of possible confounding factors. beta Blockers are associated with a reduction in both QT and QTc dispersion, raising the possibility that a reduction in dispersion of ventricular repolarisation may be an important antiarrhythmic mechanism of beta blockade.