PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A D Viazis

Publications and source records attributed to A D Viazis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Enamel fluoride uptake from an experimental fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesive.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the fluoride uptake by enamel from an experimental visible light-cured orthodontic adhesive (VP-862) based on YbF3 filler. Sixteen contralateral premolars were extracted from 10 orthodontic patients and were classified in four groups (A, B, C, D) of four buccal surfaces each. Standardized enamel areas located on these surfaces were acid etched and were subjected to the following adhesive treatments: (A) VP-862; (B) Heliosit Orthodontic; (C) Heliobond + VP 862; and (D) Heliobond + Heliosit Orthodontic. Groups B and D were used as a reference. After 9 months in vivo, the teeth were extracted and cross-sectioned, and the enamel-adhesive interfaces were studied by combined wavelength-energy dispersive electron probe microanalysis. According to the results, the cumulative fluoride uptake by enamel from the experimental adhesive was not statistically different from the fluoride detected in the reference groups. No effect of the liquid resin, Heliobond, on the fluoride uptake gradients of enamel could be differentiated.

Acrylates↗
PubMed1992

Current concepts in education and research in orthodontics.

The science of dentistry is quickly advancing toward the 21st century. The constant innovations in dental material development, along with the ever-new concepts that are emerging in basic science and clinical research, are helping dentists to design methods of practice that have a more biologic and preventive substrate and a less restorative aim. As a result, all specialties of dentistry are undergoing constant changes in an effort to conform and manage the need of an educated, modern society. This report highlights some current concepts in orthodontic education and clinical research that are shaping the way that the specialty of orthodontics is taught and practiced.

Education, Dental↗
PubMed1991

Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: morphologic and structural considerations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the form and microstructure of three types of ceramic bracket and to assess their interfacial surface shapes and bond strengths with visible light-cured and chemically cured adhesives after thermocycling. One monocrystalline and two polycrystalline structures were identified. The form of the bonding bases implied three types of bonding with the adhesive: a chemical bonding, a combination of mechanical retention and adhesion, and a combination of micromechanical retention and adhesion. All the ceramic bases were covered with a layer of gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent. The thickness of the adhesive layer was affected by the design of the bracket bases. The highest bond strength was obtained from the brackets by a combination of micromechanical retention and adhesion, with the site of failure located at the resin/bracket interface. The other types of ceramic brackets had a greater amount of resin left on the enamel and some cases of cohesive bracket fractures.

Adhesives↗
PubMed1990

Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the potential enamel abrasion on contact with stainless steel and various ceramic orthodontic brackets under a simulated oral environment. Three groups of eight lower premolar ceramic brackets and one group of eight stainless steel brackets were used from four different manufacturers. An upper premolar was brought in contact with the bracket bonded to a lower premolar tooth and subjected to a lateral excursion type of movement by the artificial oral environment. A constant load of approximately 2 lb was used for the masticatory force. The rate of chewing was 1 cycle/sec. The teeth were subjected to 15, 60, and 100 masticatory cycles. The before-and-after occlusal surfaces of the upper premolars were compared by means of a computerized profiling system and the enamel volume loss was calculated. Qualitative changes, such as rate of enamel wear, were examined visually by means of computer graphics and the scanning electron microscope. Abrasion scores (mean +/- SD) in mm3 were 0.015 +/- 0.01 from the metal brackets and 0.135 +/- 0.103, 0.255 +/- 0.242, and 0.581 +/- 0.524 from the three ceramic bracket groups. The abrasion scores were significantly different at p less than 0.05. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater enamel abrasion than stainless steel brackets. Artificial mouth in vitro testing gave a good indication of clinical performance of orthodontic brackets.

Aluminum↗
PubMed1990

Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.

The shear bond strength and the potential enamel damage on debonding of various currently available ceramic and stainless steel brackets were examined in vitro using extracted premolar teeth. The brackets were divided into two groups, one bonded with a new light-cured orthodontic adhesive and the other with a conventional chemically cured system. An Instron Universal testing machine was used to apply the shear stress. Mean, standard deviation, and extreme values were calculated for each group. Statistical analysis showed that the mean shear bond strength of the silane chemical bond provided by some ceramic brackets is significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than the mean of the mechanical bond of other ceramic and stainless steel brackets. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean shear bond strength of the two adhesives used. Mechanical bonds failed primarily within the adhesive itself, whereas chemical bonds failed predominantly at the adhesive-bracket interface. Single-crystal ceramic brackets tend to be more brittle than the polycrystalline ones. Strong chemical bonds can potentially lead to enamel failure on debonding.

Acrylic Resins↗