PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Demaille

Publications and source records attributed to A Demaille.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Epilarynx: pharynx or larynx?

BACKGROUND: As a general rule, epilarynx is studied as a part of supraglottis. On the contrary, in France, due to its particular natural history, it is often studied separately. METHODS: To assess the value of this French classification, we compared from an epidemiologic point of view, in one study, 86 cases of epilarynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with 431 oropharynx, 339 hypopharynx, and 89 vestibule SCC. In another study, we compared, from a clinical point of view, 232 epilarynx SCC with 1351 oropharynx, 652 hypopharynx, and 372 vestibule SCC. RESULTS: Epilarynx patients appeared to be much heavier drinkers than larynx patients and similar to pharynx patients but tobacco consumption did not differ. The patterns of nodal involvement were similar for pharynx and epilarynx SCC. For stages I and II, patterns of failures were similar, but for stages III and IV, there were fewer locoregional failures in vestibule patients; distant metastases were equally frequent for these tumors. From the standpoint of multiple primaries, epilarynx SCC appeared to be more akin to pharynx than to larynx SCC with a much lower incidence of lung cancers. Finally, the outcome after treatment was different for vestibule, epilarynx, and pharynx SCC, with a 5-year survival of 43%, 27%, and 13%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the identification of epilarynx as a real entity that should be taken into account for stratification in clinical trials.

Actuarial Analysis↗

An evaluation of CA 549, a circulating marker of breast cancer using a procedure for comparison with CA 15.3.

A serum assay of CA 549 (Hybri-BREScan CA 549 degrees, Hybritech), a new tumor marker, was performed in 129 patients with breast cancer and 35 healthy women, in parallel with CA 15.3 (ELSA-CA 15.3 degrees, CIS Biointernational). Comparing 95 women with primary breast carcinoma and 35 controls, Relative (or Receiver) Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) of CA 15.3 was significantly higher than that of CA 549, indicating that, for our population, the first marker was more effective. Parallel and series analyses were also performed using ROC AUC and revealed that the combination of these two tests did not give more information than the CA 15.3 test alone; however, they did not in any way constitute diagnostic tools. In our experience, the best field of application for CA 549 seems to be the therapeutic monitoring and early detection of breast cancer recurrences. However, further investigations on a larger scale are necessary to assess more precisely the place of CA 549 in following the clinical course of breast cancer patients.

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate↗

Plasma acid and alkaline phosphatase in patients with breast cancer.

Acid and alkaline phosphatase were determined in 107 breast cancer patients to study their potential value in case of bone metastases. The patients were divided into 4 groups: A, patients without metastases (n = 34); B, metastatic patients without bone lesions (n = 37); C, patients with metastases in and outside of bones (n = 24), D, patients with bone-only metastases (n = 12). Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TR-ACP), and bone alkaline phosphatase (bone-ALP) were significantly higher in patients with metastases than in patients without. However, no difference in TR-ACP was observed between subgroups of metastatic patients.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Effect of the long-acting somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 (Sandostatin) in advanced breast cancer.

Sixteen post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with a long acting somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995 (Sandostatin): 0.1 mg bid sub-cutaneously. The dose was chosen on the basis of efficiency in acromegaly treatment. SMS 201-995 activity was evaluated assaying Insulin Growth Factor 1 (IGF1) plasma concentration. A merely partial IGF1 decrease was noted. To be evaluable for response, patients had to be treated for at least 30 days. Among the 14 evaluable patients, we observed no response to SMS 201-995. However, we noted tumor stabilization in 3 patients after a 90 days treatment period. Side-effects were very mild. This first report on SMS 201-995 treatment of breast cancer suggests that further studies evaluating the effect of other modes of administration or drug association should be warranted.

Adult↗