Biomedical subjects

A Dubrowski

Publications and source records attributed to A Dubrowski.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements.

We investigated the mechanisms underlying human prehension movements, by perturbing the size and position of virtual targets. Subjects grasped virtual target discs with thumb and index finger. In 25% of trials, target size or position (single perturbation), or both (double perturbation) were changed 300 ms after target appearance. The experiments were designed such that the kinematic profiles of grasp formation and hand transport had a similar shape, and were analysed by the same algorithm. We found that grasp kinematics were influenced by changes of target position, and transport kinematics by changes of target size; we also found that the kinematics of double-perturbation trials could not be explained as a linear combination of single-perturbation effects. These findings confirm and expand previous evidence against the view that grasp and transport are controlled by fully independent channels. Most importantly, we found that the time of correction onset was not the same for grasp and transport, neither in single- nor in double-perturbation trials. This outcome argues against a holistic (single-channel) model of prehension; instead, our data are consistent with the notion of two mutually coupled channels.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Control strategies when intercepting slowly moving targets.

In 3 experiments, the authors investigated and described how individuals control manual interceptive movements to slowly moving targets. Participants (N = 8 in each experiment) used a computer mouse and a graphics tablet assembly to manually intercept targets moving across a computer screen toward a marked target zone. They moved the cursor so that it would arrive in the target zone simultaneously with the target. In Experiment 1, there was a range of target velocities, including some very slow targets. In Experiment 2, there were 2 movement distance conditions. Participants moved the cursor either the same distance as the target or twice as far. For both experiments, hand speed was found to be related to target speed, even for the very slowly moving targets and when the target-to-cursor distance ratios were altered, suggesting that participants may have used a strategy similar to tracking. To test that notion, in Experiment 3, the authors added a tracking task in which the participants tracked the target cursor into the target zone. Longer time was spent planning the interception movements; however, there was a longer time in deceleration for the tracking movements, suggesting that more visually guided trajectory updates were made in that condition. Thus, although participants scaled their interception movements to the cursor speed, they were using a different strategy than they used in tracking. It is proposed that during target interception, anticipatory mechanisms are used rather than the visual feedback mechanism used when tracking and when pointing to stationary targets.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.

Milner and Goodale (1995) have proposed that visuomotor and perceptual processes are mediated by discrete visual systems that reflect the functional independence of action and perception. The visuomotor system is proposed to be insensitive to pictorial illusions of object size, whereas the perceptual system is reliably "tricked" by such figures. Brenner and Smeets (1996) and Jackson and Shaw (2000) demonstrated that grasp preshaping, but not grasping force, is immune to the Ponzo visual illusion, suggesting that not all visuomotor processes operate independently of the perceptual system. The present study investigated the effect of illusory object size on prehension kinematics and grasping dynamics (i.e., grip force and load force) as well as perceptual judgements of object size. Unlike previous investigations, object mass was held constant independent of changes in size. The Ponzo figure reliably affected perceptual estimates of object size, but this effect was restricted to one form of the illusion. Some aspects of the prehension movement were sensitive to veridical but not illusory object size (peak grip aperture, peak grip force, peak vertical wrist acceleration), whereas other movement parameters demonstrated illusory size effects (movement time, peak wrist velocity). Still other movement parameters were not sensitive to veridical or illusory object size (peak load force). Together the data suggest that certain prehension components are immune to pictorial illusions of object size, whereas others are not. Complex interactions between the perceptual and visuomotor systems appear to underlie the anticipatory scaling of grasping forces in prehension.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2000

Target velocity effects on manual interception kinematics.

Participants generated manual interception movements toward a target cursor that moved across a computer screen. The target reached its peak velocity either during the first third, at the midpoint, or during the last third of the movement. In Experiment 1 the view of the target was available for either the first 316, 633, 950, or 1267 ms, after which it disappeared. Results showed that for all viewing conditions, the timing of the interception velocity was related to the temporal properties of the target's trajectory. In Experiment 2, when the portion of the target trajectory that was viewed was reversed (such that participants did not see the first 316, 633, 950, or 1267 ms of the trajectory, but instead saw only the later portions of the trajectory), there was no clear relationship between the target trajectory and the timing of the aiming trajectory. These results suggest that participants use visual information early in the target's trajectory to form a representation of the target motion that is used to facilitate manual interception.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Task dependent processing of visual information about target acceleration.

The objective of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of the perceptual and motor systems to target acceleration information using verbal magnitude estimations of target acceleration and manual interception of these targets. The results showed that in the perceptual task the participants were responding mainly to acceleration threshold values, which is acceleration as a function of initial, final, and average velocities, rather then to the absolute accelerations. When manually intercepting the targets the participants responded mainly to the absolute acceleration value and target initial velocity. Thus, these results suggest that target motion can be processed in the ventral (perception) and dorsal (action) visual streams however different motion characteristics are processed in these streams depending on the required output.

Adult↗