PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A E McCullen

Publications and source records attributed to A E McCullen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of nifedipine on conduction delay during ventricular myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.

Nifedipine has been suggested to have more potent slow channel blocking action than other agents of this type. However, its use in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias has been limited. Electrophysiologic studies on AV conduction have shown that nifedipine lacks any significant effect. However, the action of the drug on intraventricular conduction has not been investigated with regard to its potential in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias especially during ischemia. Therefore, the effects of nifedipine on conduction delay during ischemia and reperfusion were assessed in the present study. Sixteen dogs (eight control and eight nifedipine-treated dogs) were used. Transmural electrodes were positioned in normal, ischemic, and reperfused tissue, and at the border of these segments. The left anterior descending artery was initially ligated below the second diagonal branch (first ligation) and 30 minutes later below the first diagonal branch (second ligation); the second ligation was released 30 minutes later. Conduction of electrically induced premature impulses from the midwall of the left ventricle was recorded at epicardial and endocardial sites. Conduction delay was measured from the stimulus artifact to the first high-frequency deflection in each zone in the anterograde (base to apex) and retrograde (apex to base) directions. Intravenous nifedipine 0.1 mg/kg was given over 10 minutes immediately after the first ligation. Nifedipine slightly decreased the magnitude of conduction delay in the ischemic myocardium at 15 minutes of ischemia, which corresponded with the peak plasma nifedipine level. However, conduction delay throughout the remainder of the study was essentially unaltered by nifedipine. In conclusion, though nifedipine may improve ischemic myocardial metabolism, infarct size, and hemodynamics, the effect on the electrophysiologic parameters affecting conduction was insignificant. This lack of any further deterioration in conduction in the ischemic and reperfused tissue by the drug further attests to its safety during acute myocardial ischemia.

Animals↗

Comparative effects of overdrive on sinus and subsidiary pacemaker function.

Recent evidence has suggested a difference in response to overdrive pacing dependent on the location of the pacemaker within the A-V conduction system. To test this hypothesis, the effects of overdrive pacing were evaluated in five anesthetized dogs with experimentally induced A-V block and in seven patients with advanced A-V block. In the animals, sinoatrial node recovery times were studied over wide ranges of rates (130 to 210 beats per minute) and durations (30 to 180 seconds) of atrial pacing. All sinus node recovery times were less than 600 msec. with a mean maximum pause of 0.540+/-0.043 seconds (M.+/-S.E.M.). In contrast, after ventricular pacing (rates 90 to 150 beats per minute; durations 30 to 180 seconds), subsidiary pacemaker recovery times were significantly greater (p less than 0.025) with a mean maximum recovery time of 28.4+/-8.3 seconds. In the seven patients studied, all sinus node recovery times were less than 1,400 msecs. with a mean maximum pause of 0.954+/-0.051 seconds. As seen with the experimental animals, a significantly longer (p less than 0.025 mean maximum subsidiary pacemaker recovery time of 3.55+/-0.92 seconds was observed. The present studies in both experimental animals and in man without evidence of sinus node dysfunction showed that sinus node recovery time was independent of both rate and duration of atrial overdrive pacing. In contrast, subsidiary pacemaker recovery time was correlated with both rate and duration of ventricular overdrive pacing. In both experimental protocols, subsidiary pacemaker recovery time was shown to exceed sinus node recovery time at all rates and at all durations of pacing. Postrecovery sinus node acceleration was consistently observed after atrial overdrive pacing. In contrast, postrecovery subsidiary pacemaker "depression" characterized ventricular overdrive pacing. It is concluded that subsidiary pacemakers are significantly more susceptible to overdrive suppression than the sinoatrial node, a feature of substantial clinical significance.

Adolescent↗