PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A E Tattersfield

Publications and source records attributed to A E Tattersfield.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Oral and inhaled corticosteroids and adrenal insufficiency: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal insufficiency, a well recognised complication of treatment with oral corticosteroids, has been described in association with inhaled corticosteroid use in over 60 case reports. The risk of adrenal insufficiency in people prescribed an oral or inhaled corticosteroid in the general population is not known. A study was undertaken to quantify the association between adrenal insufficiency and oral and inhaled corticosteroid exposure. METHODS: A case-control study was performed using computerised general practice data from The Health Improvement Network. RESULTS: From a cohort of 2.4 million people, 154 cases of adrenal insufficiency and 870 controls were identified. There was a dose related increased risk of adrenal insufficiency in people prescribed an oral corticosteroid with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.5) per course of treatment per year. Adrenal insufficiency was associated with a prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid during the 90 day period before the diagnosis with an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.9) and this effect was dose related (p for trend <0.001). After adjusting for oral corticosteroid exposure, this odds ratio was reduced to 1.6 (95% CI 0.8 to 3.2) although the dose relation remained (p for trend 0.036). CONCLUSION: People prescribed an oral or inhaled corticosteroid are at a dose related increased risk of adrenal insufficiency although the absolute risk is small. This analysis suggests that the increased risk in people prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid is largely due to oral corticosteroid exposure, but inhaled corticosteroids may have an effect when they are taken at higher doses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bone.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bone and their potential public health implications. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify articles published between 1966 and January 2004 with the following keywords in the title: inhaled corticosteroid, beclomethasone, budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone, mometasone, triamcinolone plus bone, fracture, osteoporosis, osteocalcin, growth, or height. STUDY SELECTION: Key studies of adequate size and duration that allowed for potential confounding factors where required were selected. RESULTS: Inhaled corticosteroids are absorbed into the systemic circulation and therefore have the potential to cause adverse effects on bone. Several of the larger studies showed that inhaled corticosteroids cause a dose-related reduction in bone mineral density. Three cross-sectional studies found a dose-related increase in fractures in people taking an inhaled corticosteroid compared with controls. Prospective studies found a short-term reduction in growth velocity in children taking an inhaled corticosteroid, although target adult height is usually achieved. CONCLUSION: Since osteoporotic fracture is common in elderly patients and up to 5% of the population in more developed countries take an inhaled corticosteroid, these findings have public health implications. Strategies are needed to reduce the systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid to prevent asthma exacerbations: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Asthma self-management plans that include doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when the condition deteriorates improve asthma control. Whether doubling the dose of corticosteroid in isolation is effective is unknown. We undertook a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteriods when asthma deteriorates. METHODS: 390 individuals with asthma who were at risk of an exacerbation monitored their morning peak flow and asthma symptoms for up to 12 months. When peak flow or symptoms started to deteriorate, participants added an active or placebo corticosteroid inhaler to their usual corticosteroid for 14 days to produce a doubling or no change in dose. The primary outcome was the number of individuals starting oral prednisolone in each group. FINDINGS: During 12 months, 207 (53%) started their study inhaler and 46 (12%) started prednisolone--22 (11%) of 192 and 24 (12%) of 198 in the active and placebo groups, respectively. The risk ratio for starting prednisolone was therefore 0.95 (95% CI 0.55-1.64, p=0.8). INTERPRETATION: We recorded little evidence to support the widely recommended intervention of doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when asthma control starts to deteriorate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Use of sequential quadrupling dose regimens to study efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used to treat asthma. There is a need to be able to compare different inhaled corticosteroids and different doses of an inhaled corticosteroid to determine potency and dose equivalence, but measuring efficacy in a dose related manner is difficult because of their slow onset of action. There is uncertainty about the role of sequential dosing regimens and the best end point for such studies. We have explored the use of sequential quadrupling dose regimens and a range of end points to assess the response to budesonide in subjects with asthma. METHODS: 21 subjects with mild asthma, aged 18-65, took part in a randomised three way crossover study comparing two sequential and one non-sequential regimen, separated by at least 3 weeks. The sequential regimens consisted of increasing doses of inhaled budesonide (100, 400 1600 microg/day) with each dose being given for 1 or 2 weeks; the non-sequential regimen consisted of 1600 microg/day for 2 weeks with end points measured after 1 and 2 weeks. The end points studied included the provocative dose of adenosine monophosphate causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20AMP), lung function, symptoms, and bronchodilator use. RESULTS: There was a dose related increase in PD20AMP with both sequential dose regimens. The increase in PD20AMP ranged from 1.49 doubling doses (DD) following the lowest dose (100 microg/day) to 3.1 DD following the highest dose (1600 microg/day) in the 1 week sequential regimen and from 1.98 to 4.03 DD in the 2 week sequential regimen; standard deviations (SD) for the changes in PD20AMP ranged from 1.3 to 2.6 DD. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were dose related but small and more variable (maximum change in FEV1=148 ml, SD 228 ml), while changes in evening PEFR, symptoms, and bronchodilator use were small and not dose related. Change in PD20AMP after budesonide 1600 microg did not differ significantly between regimens. CONCLUSION: Combining PD20AMP measurements with a sequential regimen of three quadrupling doses of an inhaled corticosteroid given for 1 or 2 weeks provides clear dose-response curves for comparative studies. PD20AMP is a more sensitive end point for this purpose than FEV1, PEFR, symptoms, or relief inhaler use.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Time course of action of two inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide.

BACKGROUND: It is important to be able to compare the efficacy and systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids but their slow onset of action makes it difficult to measure the maximum response to a given dose. Submaximal responses could be compared if the time course of action of the inhaled corticosteroids being compared was similar. We have compared the time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide, measuring response as change in the provocative dose of adenosine monophosphate causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20AMP). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with mild asthma, aged 18-65, took part in a three way randomised crossover study. Subjects took fluticasone (1500 microg/day), budesonide (1600 microg/day), and placebo each for 4 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks between treatments; PD20AMP and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were measured during and after treatment. The time taken to achieve 50% of the maximum response (T50%) was compared as a measure of onset of action. RESULTS: There was a progressive increase in PD20AMP during the 4 weeks of treatment with both fluticasone and budesonide but not placebo; the increase after 1 and 4 weeks was 2.28 and 4.50 doubling doses (DD) for fluticasone and 2.49 and 3.65 DD for budesonide. T50% was 9.3 days for fluticasone and 7.5 days for budesonide with a median difference between fluticasone and budesonide of 0.1 days (95% CI -1.4 to 2.65). There was a wide range of response to both inhaled corticosteroids but good correlation between the response to fluticasone and budesonide within subjects. FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased during the first week of both active treatments and were stable thereafter. There was a small progressive improvement in nocturnal symptoms with both active treatments. CONCLUSION: PD20AMP was a more sensitive marker of response to inhaled corticosteroid therapy than FEV1 and PEFR. The time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide on PD20AMP is similar, suggesting that comparative studies of their efficacy using 1 or 2 week treatment periods are valid. When a new inhaled corticosteroid becomes available, a pilot study comparing its time course of action with that of an established corticosteroid should allow comparative studies to be performed more efficiently.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Survival and disease progression in UK patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare and progressive disease of young women with no effective treatment. Previous estimates of 10 year survival, based mostly on case series or patients from tertiary centres, have ranged from 40% to 79%; no data are available on the progression of respiratory disability. In order to provide data for patients and for planning intervention studies, we have looked at the time course of LAM using a national cohort. METHODS: Time to death, time to MRC dyspnoea grades 2-5, and need for oxygen in patients on the UK LAM database were analysed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: Fifty seven of 72 patients responded with a median duration of follow up of 12.6 years (range 2.3-37) from the onset of symptoms. Ten year survival was 91% from onset of symptoms but varied widely with 11 patients alive after 20 years. Median time to MRC grade 3 dyspnoea (breathless walking on the flat) was 9.3 years (95% CI 5.1 to 13.4) from onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Survival from LAM appears to be better than that reported in early studies. These data should be helpful for patients and for planning clinical trials.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2003

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a case-control study of perinatal and early life events.

BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare disease affecting women, is caused by somatic mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex genes. METHODS: A case-control questionnaire study was carried out examining parental and family history, prenatal events, and early life events to try to shed light on the aetiology of the condition. Forty five patients identified from a national LAM register completed a questionnaire and 31 were compared with 117 age and sex matched control subjects using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: No differences were found in perinatal events, childhood infections, and parental or family history, except that patients were more likely to be an only child (odds ratio (OR) 4.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5 to 11.8)) and have a relative with uterine fibroids (OR 4.2 (1.4 to 13)). Patients with LAM had had fewer pregnancies and fewer children but no differences in miscarriage rates. A non-matched analysis using all 45 cases and 117 controls gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: No features in the family history, perinatal events, or early life events were detected that were associated with having LAM. Being more likely to be an only child and having an increased family history of uterine fibroids may, if confirmed, indicate some differences in reproductive function within the families of affected individuals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Plasma concentrations of fluticasone propionate and budesonide following inhalation from dry powder inhalers by healthy and asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: All currently available inhaled corticosteroids reach the systemic circulation and have the potential to produce adverse effects with long term use. This risk is often assessed by measuring the effect of different inhaled corticosteroids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in healthy subjects. Absorption of fluticasone propionate and its effects on the HPA axis are greater in healthy subjects than in subjects with moderately severe asthma, but we have failed to show any difference in morning budesonide plasma levels or systemic effects between healthy and asthmatic subjects following inhalation of budesonide. To provide more information on the absorption of fluticasone propionate and budesonide, we have compared the plasma levels of both drugs over 8 hours in healthy and asthmatic subjects. METHODS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of fluticasone propionate and budesonide after a single inhaled dose of each drug were compared in 12 healthy control subjects and 12 subjects with moderately severe asthma. RESULTS: Peak plasma levels of budesonide occurred much earlier and were approximately 20-fold higher than those of fluticasone propionate in both healthy and asthmatic subjects. The AUC and Cmax for fluticasone propionate were lower by 307 (95% CI 62 to 522) pg/ml/h or 43% (p=0.02) and 52 (95% CI -11 to 115) pg/ml or 39% (p=0.1) in subjects with asthma compared with healthy control subjects. In contrast, the AUC and Cmax for budesonide were almost identical between the two groups (mean differences 826 (95% CI -1493 to 3143) pg/ml/h (p=0.5) and 157 (95% CI -1026 to 1339) pg/ml (p=0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Following inhalation, healthy subjects have higher plasma levels of fluticasone propionate than subjects with asthma whereas budesonide plasma levels are similar in the two groups of subjects. Comparing the systemic effects of budesonide and fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects is unlikely to be relevant to subjects with asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Asthma.

Asthma is one of the commonest chronic diseases of affluent societies. The striking increase in prevalence of asthma over recent decades and the rarity of this disease in less affluent populations confirms the importance of environmental factors in the cause of asthma--although which environmental factors are responsible is still not clear. Family studies show that genetic factors are also important in determining individual susceptibility to asthma, with results of genetic studies suggesting that there are many genes with moderate effects rather than a few major genes. Asthmatic airways show inflammation and remodelling, with CD4+ helper cells, mast cells, and eosinophils characterising the inflammatory response. Inhaled corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment with the addition of long-acting beta agonists as the next step if symptoms continue. Leukotriene antagonists, the only new drugs to reach the market in the past decade, have modest effects. However, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying asthma and the genetic and environmental factors that predispose individuals to asthma should lead to better preventative strategies and new therapeutic approaches.

Asthma↗
PubMed2002

The TSC-2 product tuberin is expressed in lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipoma.

AIMS: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis is categorized by proliferation of abnormal smooth muscle cells (LAM cells) in the lungs and lymphatics and the presence of angiomyolipomas. Recently mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex-2 gene (TSC-2) have been described in LAM cells and angiomyolipomas. The TSC-2 protein tuberin is a tumour suppressor and its loss may result in cellular proliferation. We used immunohistochemistry to test the hypothesis that uncontrolled cellular proliferation in lymphangioleiomyomatosis is the result of reduced tuberin protein expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tissue from normal lung, normal kidney, lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipomas was immunostained with three separate anti-tuberin antibodies. Tuberin staining in normal tissues was similar to that previously described. Surprisingly, tuberin was strongly expressed in the LAM cells of all cases of lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipoma at a greater level than in normal smooth muscle cells. The perivascular cells of angiomyolipomas, however, did not stain for tuberin. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a loss of tuberin protein in LAM cells is not the cause of the cellular proliferation seen in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis may result either from the expression of a mutant tuberin with abnormal function, as a result of mutations in functionally related proteins, or from more than one mechanism.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of formoterol and terbutaline for as-needed treatment of asthma: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend that long-acting inhaled beta-agonists should be used as maintenance therapy for patients with asthma inadequately controlled on an inhaled corticosteroid. We studied the safety and efficacy of the long-acting beta-agonist formoterol compared with terbutaline, each taken as needed, in patients with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: Patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid (mean dose 870 microg daily) and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of at least 50% predicted (mean 74%). Those requiring an inhaled beta-agonist three to eight times a day during the study run-in period (362 of 621 who started) were randomly assigned formoterol 4.5 microg or terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed by Turbuhaler in daily doses up to 54 microg and 6 mg, respectively, for 12 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The 362 randomised patients (157 men, 205 women) had a mean age of 47 years. Patients taking formoterol had a longer time to their first severe asthma exacerbation (relative-risk ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.89]), took fewer inhalations of study drug, and had larger increases in FEV1 (5%) and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (mean difference in increase 11 L/min and 8 L/min) than those taking terbutaline. No safety issues were identified. INTERPRETATION: When taken as needed, formoterol 4.5 microg provided better asthma control than terbutaline 0.5 mg in patients requiring moderate doses of relief medication despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Safety studies should be extended to a wider population of patients with asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Adding formoterol to budesonide in moderate asthma--health economic results from the FACET study.

The FACET (Formoterol and Corticosteroid Establishing Therapy) study established that there is a clear clinical benefit in adding formoterol to budesonide therapy in patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with low to moderate doses of an inhaled corticosteroid. We combined the clinical results from the FACET study with an expert survey on average resource use in connection with mild and severe asthma exacerbations in the U.K., Sweden and Spain. The primary objective of this study was to assess the health economics of adding the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol to the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide in the treatment of asthma. The extra costs of adding the inhaled beta2-agonist formoterol to the corticosteroid budesonide in asthmatic patients in Sweden were offset by savings from reduced use of resources for exacerbations. For Spain the picture was mixed. Adding formoterol to low dose budesonide generated savings, whereas for moderate doses of budesonide about 75% of the extra formoterol costs could be recouped. In the U.K., other savings offset about half of the extra cost of formoterol. All cost-effectiveness ratios are within accepted cost-effectiveness ranges reported from previous studies. If productivity losses were included, there were net savings in all three countries, ranging from Euro 267-1183 per patient per year. In conclusion, adding the inhaled, long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol to low-moderate doses of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide generated significant gains in all outcome measures with partial or complete offset of costs. Adding formoterol to budesonide can thus be considered to be cost-effective.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: The potential for long term adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroids relates to their systemic absorption, usually assessed from proxy markers in short term studies. When fluticasone propionate and budesonide have been compared in this way the results have been inconsistent. To determine whether this is because of the subjects studied or the sensitivity of the systemic marker used, we have compared the effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide in healthy and asthmatic subjects and investigated the effect of treatment on three systemic markers. METHODS: Forty six healthy subjects were randomised to receive inhaled fluticasone propionate 1500 microg/day (via an Accuhaler), budesonide 1600 microg/day (via a Turbuhaler), or placebo; 31 subjects with moderately severe asthma were randomised to receive the same doses of fluticasone propionate or budesonide but not placebo. Systemic effects in healthy and asthmatic subjects were compared after 7 days. Treatment was continued for another 21 days in the subjects with asthma when systemic effects and asthma control were assessed. RESULTS: At baseline healthy subjects had higher urinary levels of total cortisol metabolites (TCM) than subjects with asthma. After 7 days of treatment with fluticasone propionate urinary TCM levels in the healthy subjects were significantly lower than in the subjects with asthma (mean difference between groups 1663 microg/day, 95% CI 328 to 2938). This was not the case with budesonide, however, where urinary TCM levels in the healthy subjects remained above those in the asthmatic subjects (mean difference between groups 1210 microg/day, 95% CI -484 to 2904). Urinary TCM levels were considerably more sensitive to the effects of inhaled corticosteroids than morning serum cortisol or osteocalcin concentrations. Only budesonide reduced the serum level of osteocalcin. CONCLUSIONS: When given by dry powder inhaler for 7 days, fluticasone propionate 1500 microg/day has a greater effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy subjects than in subjects with asthma, but this is not the case for budesonide 1600 microg/day. These findings, together with the differences in sensitivity between systemic markers, explain many of the discrepancies in the literature.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Bone mineral density in subjects with mild asthma randomised to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids or non-corticosteroid treatment for two years.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are clearly beneficial for patients with asthma of moderate severity, but the risks and benefits of using them in patients with milder asthma are less clear. We have compared the change in bone mineral density over 2 years in adults with mild asthma randomised to receive an inhaled corticosteroid or non-corticosteroid treatment. METHODS: Subjects with mild asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 86% predicted, mean age 35 years, taking beta agonists only) were randomised to receive inhaled budesonide, inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, or non-corticosteroid treatment for 2 years in a prospective randomised open study in 19 centres in France, New Zealand, Spain, and the UK. The corticosteroid dose was adjusted according to a written self-management plan. The main outcome measure-change in bone mineral density after 6, 12, and 24 months-was measured "blind". Secondary outcomes included lung function, the relation between change in bone density and inhaled steroid dose and change in biochemical markers of bone metabolism. RESULTS: Of 374 subjects randomised, 239 (64%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The median daily doses of inhaled budesonide (n=87) and beclomethasone (n=74) were 389 microg and 499 microg, respectively. Subjects treated with an inhaled corticosteroid had better asthma control than those in the reference group (n=78). Change in bone mineral density did not differ between the three groups over the 2 years, nor did it correlate with changes in markers of bone metabolism. The mean change in bone mineral density over 2 years in the budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, and reference groups was 0.1%, -0.4%, and 0.4% for the lumbar spine and -0.9%, -0.9%, and -0.4% for neck of the femur. Mean daily dose of inhaled steroid was related to reduction in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine but not at the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: In subjects with mild asthma an inhaled corticosteroid provided better asthma control than alternative non-corticosteroid treatment with no difference in change in bone mineral density over 2 years. The relation between dose of inhaled corticosteroid and change in bone density at the lumbar spine may be due to a direct effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bone. Since inhaled steroid dose is also related inversely to lung function, an effect of asthma severity on bone density was also possible.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Adverse effects of oral corticosteroids in relation to dose in patients with lung disease.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of oral corticosteroids are widely recognised but there are few quantitative data on which to base advice to patients. In a two part cross sectional study we compared adverse effects in patients with lung disease taking oral corticosteroids and control subjects and related the adverse effects to corticosteroid dose in the patient group. METHODS: Data on oral corticosteroid use, lifestyle, fractures, and other possible adverse effects were collected by questionnaire and compared between a community based cohort of patients taking continuous or frequent intermittent oral corticosteroids for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or alveolitis and age and sex matched control subjects. Dose related effects were explored in the corticosteroid group using cumulative dose quartiles and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients (> or = 50 years, 48% female) and 734 control subjects completed the questionnaire. The cumulative incidence of fractures since the time of diagnosis was 23% for patients taking oral corticosteroids and 15% in the control group (odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.6). Patients were more likely to have had a fracture of the vertebrae (OR 10; 95% CI 2.9 to 34), hip (OR 6; 95% CI 1.2 to 30), and ribs or sternum (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.6) than control subjects. They also reported a significant increase in cataracts, use of antacids, muscle weakness, back pain, bruising, oral candidiasis, and having fewer teeth. The effects of oral corticosteroids were dose related: the odds ratio for patients in the highest compared with the lowest cumulative dose quartile (median prednisolone dose 61 g versus 5 g) ranged from 2 for all fractures to 9 for vertebral fractures and bruising. CONCLUSIONS: By quantifying the morbidity associated with the use of oral corticosteroids, this study should help to rationalise their long term use.

Administration, Oral↗