Biomedical subjects

A Efthimiadis

Publications and source records attributed to A Efthimiadis.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1985

Role of the main immunogenic region of acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. An Fab monoclonal antibody protects against antigenic modulation by human sera.

Antigenic modulation of acetylcholine receptor (AChR), i.e., acceleration of its internalization and degradation rate by antibody-cross-linking, is considered to be one of the two main causes of AChR loss in myasthenia gravis (MG). The majority of the antibodies to AChR are directed to the main immunogenic region (MIR) on the alpha-subunit of the receptor. We here examine the relative contribution of the anti-MIR antibody fraction (as well as of another fraction) to the antigenic modulation caused by MG patients' sera. Fab fragments of an anti-MIR monoclonal antibody (mAb) or a mAb to the beta-subunit (neither of which causes antigenic modulation) were allowed to shield their corresponding regions on the AChR on the mouse muscle cell line BC3H1. The 27 MG sera subsequently added thus bound to all other regions except to the protected one, and the resulting antigenic modulation was measured. The anti-MIR mAb protected the AChR by 68 +/- 16%. This is interpreted as the contribution to antigenic modulation of the anti-MIR antibody fraction in the human sera. This percentage correlated very well with the occurrence of the anti-MIR antibodies in the same sera. The anti-beta mAb gave only small protection of the AChR. No significant pattern differences were observed between sexes, early and recent onset of the disease, or high and low antibody titers. It is concluded that as far as it concerns the one of the pathogenic mechanisms in MG, i.e., the antigenic modulation, the MIR seems to be the main pathogenic region. The observation that a single mAb can efficiently protect the AChR in this system may prove to be of therapeutic interest.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Nonasthmatic chronic cough: No effect of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid in patients without sputum eosinophilia.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in suppressing a chronic cough without asthma associated with sputum eosinophilia. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inflammatory characteristics in the induced sputum of patients with a chronic cough without asthma or known cause and the effects of budesonide treatment on chronic cough in those patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four adults (mean [minimu, maximum] age of 45 years [20,75], 28 women, 17 atopic subjects and 32 nonsmokers], with a daily bothersome cough for at least one year and who had no evidence of asthma or other known cause for the cough, were consecutively enrolled. The trial was a randomized, double-blind, controlled parallel group trial of budesonide 400 mg twice daily for two weeks versus placebo. Patients then received open administration of the same dose of budesonide for a further two weeks. Sputum was induced before and at the end of each treatment period. Cough severity was documented by a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (89%) patients produced mucoid sputum after induction on at least one study visit. At baseline, the majority (59%) had a mild elevation in the median proportion of neutrophils (65%). All had elevated fluid phase levels of fibrinogen (3200 mg/L) and albumin (880 mg/L), and high levels of interleukin-8 and substance P. Interleukin-8 correlated with neutrophils (rho=0.72, P<0.001), fibrinogen (rho=0.65, P<0.001), albumin (rho=0.67, P=0. 001) and eosinophil cationic protein (rho=0.60, P=0.001). Substance P correlated with albumin (rho=0.60, P=0.006). No subject had an increase in eosinophils. Treatment with budesonide did not affect cough or sputum measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonasthmatic chronic cough enrolled in this study had evidence of a mild neutrophilia and/or microvascular leakage. Chronic cough did not respond to treatment with budesonide, perhaps because the cause was not associated with sputum eosinophilia.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Protective effects of fluticasone on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum inflammatory markers.

BACKGROUND: A direct comparison of the protective effects of single and regular doses of inhaled glucocorticoid on allergen-induced asthmatic responses and inflammation has not been made. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of pretreatment with fluticasone 250 microg 30 min before allergen inhalation and two weeks of 250 microg twice daily (last dose 24 h before challenge) with single and regular (twice daily) placebo doses on early and late asthmatic responses, induced sputum cell counts and measures of eosinophil activation at 7 h and 24 h, and methacholine airway responsiveness at 24 h. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten mild asthmatic patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study. RESULTS: Regular fluticasone increased the baseline mean provocative concentration of methacholine to cause a 20% fall (PC20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from 2.6 to 6.4 mg/mL (P<0.05) and lowered the eosinophil count from 3.1% to 0.4% (P<0.05) compared with regular placebo. Neither single nor regular fluticasone had any effect on the early asthmatic response. Single fluticasone attenuated the late asthmatic response, the mean +/- SEM maximum percentage fall in FEV1 (10.8+/-3.6 compared with single placebo 18. 8+/-3.5, P=0.03), the allergen-induced increase of airway responsiveness (P<0.05), and the eosinophilia (P<0.005) and activated eosinophils at 7 h (P<0.01) but not at 24 h. Regular fluticasone also attenuated the late asthmatic response (11.1+/-2.5) compared with regular placebo (19.6+/-4.5), but this was not statistically significant and did not protect against the induced increase in airway responsiveness or the sputum eosinophilia. CONCLUSION: Two weeks of regular inhaled fluticasone discontinued 24 h before allergen challenge does not offer any additional protection against the early or late asthmatic responses, increased airway responsiveness or sputum eosinophilia compared with a single dose of 250 microg immediately before allergen challenge, despite increasing baseline PC20 and decreasing sputum eosinophilia prechallenge. The significance of the protective effect of a single dose of inhaled steroid before an allergen inhalation and the duration of the protective effect need further investigation.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Sputum cell counts and exhaled nitric oxide in patients with gastroesophageal reflux, and cough or asthma.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is commonly associated with chronic cough and asthma, but there is little or no information on the nature of any associated airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To observe whether the association with GER worsens airway inflammation in patients with chronic cough or asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The airway inflammatory indexes in induced sputum and exhaled air were examined in a cross-sectional study of 11 patients with cough and GER, nine patients with mildly symptomatic asthma and GER, nine patients with mildly symptomatic asthma without GER and nine normal, healthy control subjects. GER was shown objectively by 24 h ambulatory pH recording. RESULTS: The sputum total cell count, the proportion of neutrophils and macrophages, and the fibrinogen level were normal in all four groups, with no significant differences among the groups. The sputum eosinophil and metachromatic cell percentages, and eosinophil cationic protein levels were normal in patients with cough and GER. They were significantly increased in patients with asthma compared with healthy subjects (P<0.01) and patients with cough (P<0.01), but were not different between groups with and without GER. Exhaled nitric oxide levels showed similar results (P<0.01). The correlations between the number of episodes of reflux and the proportion of sputum eosinophils, neutrophils or exhaled nitric oxide were modest but not significant. CONCLUSIONS: GER, when associated with cough or mildly symptomatic asthma, does not cause or aggravate existing airway inflammation as measured by induced sputum cell counts and fibrinogen level, or by exhaled nitric oxide.

Adult↗