PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Ercole

Publications and source records attributed to A Ercole.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Attenuation in invasive blood pressure measurement systems.

Poor fidelity invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) traces are a frequent practical problem. It is common practice to describe any such trace as being 'damped'; the resonance behaviour of IABP measurement systems having been extensively described in the literature. However, as poor quality arterial blood pressure signals are seen even with optimal pressure transduction circuits, this cannot be the sole mechanism. In this commentary the classical lumped-parameter Windkessel model is extended by postulating an additional impedance proximal to the site of IABP measurement. This impedance represents any mechanical obstruction to laminar flow. Equations are presented relating measured and actual arterial blood pressures in terms of the model impedances. The reactive properties of such a partial obstruction may lead to an IABP trace that is superficially similar in appearance to the case of an over-damped measurement system. However, this phenomenon should be termed 'attenuation' rather than 'damping' and is probably more common. The distinction is of practical importance as the behaviour of the measured systolic and diastolic pressures is different -- both are systematically underestimated and the mean arterial pressure is thus not preserved. Furthermore, this error varies inversely with the peripheral vascular resistance of the tissues distal to the measurement point, therefore apparently magnifying the effect of vasodilatation on blood pressure or derived quantities.

Blood Pressure↗

Collusion detection in multiple choice examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a novel method for collusion detection in multiple choice examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Answers from two negatively marked medical prize examinations for two different years were analysed. Both examinations were administered electronically. One examination was formally invigilated, while the second was not; instead, candidates were able to sit the test at any time and at any computer with an internet connection. We examine pairs of students and compare correlations between their answers. Our approach allows us to correct for the difficulty of individual questions and for the estimated ability and the degree of risk aversion of the students. We compare the results of this statistical analysis with other information on the timing of the answers and the physical location of the computer, both of which are available to the web-server. RESULTS: Significant correlation between several candidates who either admitted having cheated or could be linked to other corroborating evidence of collusion was found. CONCLUSION: It is possible to detect collusion in multiple choice examinations in a statistical way by examining the patterns of answers between pairs of candidates. In examinations that are delivered on-line, information is often available on the location of the candidates and the timings of their answers, and can be used as additional corroborative evidence.

Bayes Theorem↗