Qualitative research in health care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A F Merry.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Cook Pigtail central venous catheter (CVC) has been designed to diminish the risk of vascular perforation and consequent cardiac tamponade. With the participation of 12 consultant anaesthetists and 19 registrars, adults undergoing elective surgery were randomized to receive either a Pigtail (n = 101) or their consultant anaesthetists' "standard" CVC (n = 102). Median ease of insertion was rated 8 for Pigtail CVCs and 9 for standards (10 being best; P = 0.001). Arrhythmias occurred during 16 standard and 33 Pigtail central venous catheter insertions (P < 0.006). No significant difference was found in insertion time or radiographically assessed tip depth for standard and Pigtail central venous catheters. A perforated right atrium of uncertain cause occurred in a patient who received an Arrow triple-lumen central venous catheter. Participating consultant anaesthetists preferred their "standard" central venous catheter for routine use, but five indicated that they would select a Cook Pigtail where long-term use was planned because of in vitro evidence of its greater safety.
A 37-year-old 91 kg man presented with features of Ludwig's angina. Anaesthesia for incision and drainage of his submandibular abscess was undertaken by two specialist anaesthetists with an otorhinolaryngological surgeon prepared for immediate tracheostomy. After preoxygenation, gas induction with sevoflurane in oxygen was followed by a gush of pus into the oral cavity and laryngospam causing acute upper airway obstruction. This resolved with 25 mg of suxamethonium and an endotracheal tube was passed into the trachea with difficulty. Options for management of the difficult airway in Ludwig's angina are discussed.
We studied 90 adults undergoing surgical removal of at least both lower third molar teeth as day cases under standardized general anaesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly (with stratification for surgeon) to receive tenoxicam 40 mg, tenoxicam 20 mg or placebo i.v. at induction of anaesthesia and orally (effervescent tablets) with food on each of the subsequent 2 days. Panadeine (paracetamol 500 mg-codeine 8 mg) was given before operation and was available as needed for pain thereafter, to a limit of two tablets every 4 h. Nefopam i.v. was also available. Efficacy variables and adverse reactions were assessed over 6 days. Over the 6-day period, patients who received tenoxicam reported less pain on rest (area under the curve; P < 0.05) and less disturbance in sleep (P < 0.01) even though they used fewer Panadeine tablets (P < 0.05). Differences between tenoxicam 40 mg and 20 mg were not significant. There was no significant difference in nefopam requirements or side effects, and no adverse event attributable to the study medication.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We developed and introduced into clinical practice a leaflet to improve the delivery of information to patients before obtaining their consent to anaesthesia. The amount of information needs to be what a "reasonable" patient thinks appropriate; therefore we tested patients' responses to three levels of information: "full" disclosure, "standard" disclosure (as contained in our leaflet) and "minimal" disclosure. Forty-five patients scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled in the study. None of the information sheets caused a significant change in state anxiety score and only the "full" disclosure significantly increased knowledge about anaesthesia (P = 0.016). All leaflets were easy to understand. When only one leaflet was provided 64-73% of patients thought the content was "just right", whereas when all three leaflets were viewed together, 63% of patients thought the "minimal" leaflet withheld too much information.
AIM: To document the problem of drug administration error in anaesthesia in New Zealand, with regard to: prevalence (in context of the total number of drugs that might be administered during an anaesthetist's career); preventative strategies; and anaesthetists' perceptions concerning the medicolegal environment prevailing in New Zealand. METHODS: A questionnaire was posted to a random sample of 75 New Zealand anaesthetists. Drug administrations per anaesthetic were counted on a random sample of anaesthetic records at Green Lane Hospital. Ten anaesthetists were asked the number of anaesthetics administered per year. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of 66 respondents reported at least one error of drug administration, and 12.5% had actually harmed patients. There was no relationship between any preventative strategy and frequency of error. All respondents were concerned about the possibility of manslaughter charges arising from a drug error; 57% thought the medicolegal environment in New Zealand impacted adversely on their practice; 83% thought it might impede the reporting of errors. There seems to be no definitive strategy for the elimination of drug error. CONCLUSION: Error is inherent in drug administration in anaesthesia, as it is in any complex human endeavour; therefore it is illogical to treat it as necessarily criminal. Instead, effort and resources should be aimed at rational initiatives to reduce this worrying problem.
Central venous catheter (CVC) depth relative to the cephalic limit of the pericardial reflection (CLPR) was assessed retrospectively in 100 adult patients from chest radiographs taken after admission to the intensive care unit. A well known landmark proved to be considerably influenced by parallax; therefore we located the CLPR by a new landmark, the junction of the azygos vein and the superior vena cava, identified by the angle of the right main bronchus and the trachea. The majority (58) of CVC tips lay below the pericardial reflection on the first chest radiograph (CXR). Of these only two had been corrected by the time of the next routine CXR. No case of cardiac tamponade secondary to erosion by a CVC could be remembered, or identified from records of routine departmental audit meetings, for the last ten years. Nevertheless, reported incidents of this complication have often been fatal and vigilance is necessary in any patient with a CVC.
We have investigated the contribution of the anaesthetist and surgeon to outcome after 1301 consecutive coronary artery bypass grafting operations (first operation). The mean + 1 SD aspartate amino transferase concentration on the day after surgery (AST-D1) was 134 u litre-1 (or, after logarithmic transformation, 94 u litre-1). Twenty patients were selected at random from each of three groups having AST-D1 less than 100 u litre-1, 100-134 u litre-1 or greater than 134 u litre-1; positive ECG diagnoses of perioperative myocardial infarction were significantly more frequent with AST-D1 values greater than 100 u litre-1 than with smaller values, but no more frequent with AST-D1 greater than 134 u litre-1. Because several deaths occurred before AST-D1 could be measured, an "adverse outcome" was defined as either hospital death or AST-D1 greater than 100 u litre-1. Univariate analysis implicated both anaesthetist and surgeon as significant predictors of adverse outcome but, after allowing for 12 patient-related factors, only cardiopulmonary bypass time (or ischaemic cross-clamp time) (P less than 0.01) and anaesthetist (P = 0.05) were associated significantly with outcome.
We have shown that a single i.v. dose of tenoxicam 20 mg, after thoracotomy, when compared with placebo in 20 patients (with one exclusion), was associated with a reduction in consumption of papaveretum, assessed by patient-controlled analgesia, of 2.2 mg h-1 (22%) to 4 h and 1.4 mg h-1 (23%) to 12 h after operation (repeated measures analysis of variance: P less than 0.01). There was no reduction from 12 to 24 h. There was no significant difference between groups in pain scores or in side effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Inadequately treated acute and chronic pain remains a major cause of suffering, in spite of enormous advances in pharmacology and technology. Opioids provide a powerful, versatile, widely available means of managing this pain, but their use is too often restrained by ignorance and mistaken fears of addiction. The management of postoperative pain (perhaps the most common form of acute pain) is traditionally attempted with fixed dosages of analgesics by relatively unpredictable routes (e.g. oral, rectal and intramuscular). Intravenous opioid infusions (an improvement) risk respiratory depression and require close monitoring and titration. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), by contrast, permits the most efficacious medication (pure opioid agonist) by the optimal route (intravenous) under direct control of the patient, and provides high levels of satisfaction and safety. Ideally, any opioid use should be integrated with a wide spectrum of other analgesic modalities in an anaesthesiology-based 'acute pain service'. The use of opioids for chronic pain of nonmalignant origin remains controversial. There is a perceived conflict between patients' interests and those of society. However, problems (such as tolerance, physical dependence, addiction and chronic toxicity), anticipated from experience with animal experiments and pain-free abusers, seldom cause difficulties when opioids are used appropriately to treat pain (so-called 'dual pharmacology'). With sensible guidelines, and in the context of a multidisciplinary pain clinic, opioids may provide the only hope of relief to many sufferers of chronic pain.
Flumazenil (Anexate) was used to reverse midazolam sedation in a series of 108 patients undergoing minor diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. At a mode dose of 0.5 mg IV, flumazenil was shown to rapidly and predictably reverse the sedation produced by a mode dose of 5 mg midazolam. Amnesia for the procedure was excellent in all but three cases, and side effects were infrequent and minor. In the endoscopy clinic, the use of flumazenil was perceived by clinicians to significantly improve the speed and quality of recovery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.