PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A F Smith

Publications and source records attributed to A F Smith.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Incident reporting schemes and the need for a good story.

Incident reporting is a central strategy for improving safety in the NHS (UK National Health Service). In this paper we discuss incident reporting in anaesthesia. We discuss four schemes for reporting: longstanding, departmental based schemes; newer, hospital wide schemes; a national scheme; and an inter-departmental scheme (developed by the authors). We also discuss an example report. We argue that this example report gives an expert 'story' of an incident, describing the incident in a way that is useful for the practical activities of maintaining and improving safety. We argue that stories are told and retold in reporting schemes. The reporting schemes are not just there to collect data but to afford the stories of what went wrong. In turn these schemes must be afforded stories by the anaesthetists, safety managers and the organisation at large. We consider how schemes can be designed to afford a 'good' story, one that is useful for the maintaining and improvement of safety.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital↗
PubMed2006

What defines expertise in regional anaesthesia? An observational analysis of practice.

BACKGROUND: Published work on knowledge in regional anaesthesia has focused on competence, for instance by identifying numbers of procedures required to achieve competence, or by defining criteria for successful performance of blocks. We aimed to define expertise in regional anaesthesia and examine how it is acquired. METHODS: We observed anaesthetists performing 15 regional anaesthetic blocks and analysed the resulting transcripts qualitatively and in detail. RESULTS: Expertise in regional anaesthesia encompasses technical fluency but also includes non-cognitive skills such as handling of the patient (communicating, anticipating and minimizing discomfort) and recognizing the limits of safe practice (particularly deciding when to stop trying to insert a block). Such elements may be underplayed by the experts who possess them. Focusing on a small number of regional anaesthetic procedures in detail (as is standard with such qualitative analytical approaches) has also allowed us to develop a model for the acquisition of expertise. In this model, trainees learn how to balance theoretical and practical knowledge by reflection on their clinical experiences, an iterative process which leads to the embedding of knowledge in the expert's personal repertoire of individual techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Expertise in regional anaesthesia extends beyond competence at technical performance; non-cognitive elements are also vital. Further work is needed to test our learning model, and the hypothesis that learning can be enhanced by deliberate promotion of the tacit elements of 'expertise' we have described.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2006

Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore how critical and acceptable practice are defined in anaesthesia and how this influences the discussion and reporting of adverse incidents. Method. We conducted workplace observations of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and anaesthetic staff. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively for recurrent themes and quantitatively for adverse events in anaesthetic process witnessed. We also observed departmental audit meetings and analysed meeting minutes and report forms. RESULTS: The educational value of discussing events was well-recognized; 28 events were discussed at departmental meetings, of which 5 (18%) were presented as 'critical incidents'. However, only one incident was reported formally. Our observations of anaesthetic practice revealed 103 minor events during the course of over 50 anaesthetic procedures, but none were acknowledged as offering the potential to improve safety, although some were direct violations of 'acceptable' practice. Formal reporting appears to be constrained by changing boundaries of what might be considered 'critical', by concerns of loss of control over formally reported incidents and by the perception that reporting schemes outside anaesthesia have purposes other than education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear official definitions of criticality in anaesthesia, there is ambiguity in how these are applied in practice. Many educationally useful events fall outside critical incident reporting schemes. Professional expertise in anaesthesia brings its own implicit safety culture but the reluctance to adopt a more explicit 'systems approach' to adverse events may impede further gains in patient safety in anaesthesia.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

Incidence and significance of errors in a patient 'track and trigger' system during an epidemic of Legionnaires' disease: retrospective casenote analysis.

Early warning scoring is designed to be an objective tool to aid identification of hospital patients at risk of deterioration. 'Track and trigger' systems using such scores are widely used but many aspects of scoring have not been clarified. We aimed to document how observations and scores are used in practice as part of a typical track and trigger system. We extracted patient observations and early warning scores from the casenotes of 189 patients admitted to Furness General Hospital during a large outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in 2002. We used these 3739 sets of primary observations to recalculate scores, and compared them with those recorded in the casenotes. Recording of patient observations was variable. Early warning scores were derived from 2607 sets of observations (69.7%), of which 571 (21.9%) had been incorrectly calculated. Incorrect scoring meant that 66 of 270 patients (24.4%) whose observations should have reached the trigger value did not. Patients with more abnormal observations were more likely to be misscored. Scoring errors were more likely to lead to underscoring as the degree of physiological abnormality increased. Patients with confirmed Legionnaires' disease were more likely to be incorrectly scored. We conclude that the assignment of early warning scores is prone to error and this may delay referral of at-risk patients for critical care management.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Involving users in the design of a system for sharing lessons from adverse incidents in anaesthesia.

In this qualitative study using observation and interviews, 10 anaesthetists from five Departments of Anaesthesia in the North-West region of England were enlisted to participate in the design of an online system to allow the sharing of critical incidents. Respondents perceived that existing schemes had differing and sometimes conflicting aims. Reporting was used for reasons other than simply logging incidents in the interests of promoting patient safety. No existing scheme allowed the lessons learned from incidents to be shared between members of the professional group from which they arose. Using participants' suggestions, we designed a simple, secure, anonymous system favouring free-text description, intended to enable the on-line sharing and discussion of selected incidents. Seven incidents were posted during the 6-month pilot period. The practitioners in our study valued the opportunity to share and discuss educational incidents 'horizontally' within their community of practice. We suggest that large-scale reporting systems either incorporate such a function or allow other systems that permit such sharing to co-exist.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2005

Methodological approaches to anaesthetists' workload in the operating theatre.

This review examines the basic concepts of workload and methods of measuring them. The components of anaesthetists' operating room activities, and the factors contributing to workload, are analysed using an ergonomic-based model for technological environments. The available evidence on the relationship between workload and training and supervision is presented and the effect of workload on the quality and safety of anaesthetic care is reviewed. There is, as yet, only a small body of work examining workload and its effects in anaesthesia. While studies have identified the general pattern of workload in relation to the different stages of the perioperative period, measurement, particularly of overlapping tasks, is still evolving. It is clear, however, that induction and emergence are the most intense periods of both practical and 'non-technical' aspects of work. Allocation of attention to a range of tasks simultaneously is a key characteristic of anaesthetic practice. Experienced staff appear to show 'spare capacity' in performance during routine cases, which, we suggest, allows them an attentional 'safety margin' should adverse events occur. The effects of production pressure and mental 'overload' remain speculative and so practical recommendations for anaesthetic staffing, both in terms of numbers and matching skills to surgical demand, cannot be made. The potential for delegation of tasks, for instance to non-physician anaesthetists, can also not be made on evidence-based grounds. Strategies for active management of workload may be useful in practice.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital↗
PubMed2005

The Barrow-in-Furness legionnaires' outbreak: qualitative study of the hospital response and the role of the major incident plan.

OBJECTIVE: To document the organisational response of Furness General Hospital to the large outbreak of legionnaire's disease in April 2002 and assess the contribution made by the hospital's major incident plan. METHOD: Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts and written comments from some staff involved in the management of the incident. Documentary analysis of major incident plan and other written materials. RESULTS: The incident posed considerable managerial and clinical problems and this paper describes how they were overcome. In particular, strategies for dealing with supply (of staff, beds, and resources) and managing demand (by liaising with primary care and the public) seem to have been successful. Many functions necessary for managing the incident were poorly dealt with in the plan, especially procedures for handling the news media and liaison with agencies outside the hospital. Lack of explicit guidance appeared not to hinder the organisational response. There may have been an unspoken high level decision to allow staff to draw on their skills and experience in improvising a response to the initial challenge and learning adaptively as the incident unfolded. There was also evidence that staff disregarded existing job and role boundaries and focused instead on tasks, working flexibly to ensure that these tasks were completed. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted major incidents pose particular management challenges and may benefit from an approach different from that set out in typical major incident plans. Staff must be able to act flexibly and responsively. Some form of checklist or toolkit may be preferable to a detailed plan for some types of incident.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

Comparative effectiveness and safety of physician and nurse anaesthetists: a narrative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread debate on the merits of different models of anaesthesia care delivery, there are few published data on the relative safety and effectiveness of different anaesthesia providers. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search for, and critical appraisal of, primary research comparing safety and effectiveness of different anaesthetic providers. RESULTS: Our search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HMIC for material published between 1990 and April 2003 yielded four articles of relevance to the question. The studies used a variety of methodologies and all had potential confounding factors limiting the validity of the results. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the paucity of high-level primary evidence in this area, it is not possible to draw a conclusion regarding differences in patient safety as a function of provider type. There are difficulties in classifying events as "anaesthesia-related", and also in the variable definitions of "supervision" and "anaesthesia care team". We suggest that existing attempts to show differences in outcome might usefully be complemented by studies examining measures of anaesthetic process.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2004

Impacted cerumen: composition, production, epidemiology and management.

In the UK, some 2.3 million people suffer cerumen ('ear wax') problems serious enough to warrant management, with approximately 4 million ears syringed annually. Impacted cerumen is a major cause of primary care consultation, and a common comorbidity in ENT patients, the elderly, infirm and people with mental retardation. Despite this, the physiology, clinical significance and management implications of excessive and impacted cerumen remain poorly characterized. There are no well-designed, large, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies comparing treatments, and accordingly, the evidence surrounding the management of impacted cerumen is inconsistent, allowing few conclusions. The causes and management of impacted cerumen require further investigation. Physicians are supposed to follow the edicts and principles of evidence-based medicine and clinical governance. Currently, in patients with impacted cerumen, the lack of evidence makes this impossible.

Cerumen↗
PubMed2004

An American tale - professional conflicts in anaesthesia in the United States: implications for the United Kingdom.

Professional conflict between nurse anaesthetists and anaesthesiologists in the United States of America is well known in the UK but has not been explored and documented in detail. We present an account, based on critical analysis of published literature and other documentary evidence, of the historical, professional and financial factors which have led to this. In the USA, anaesthesia developed as a nursing specialty until physicians began to take on this work after the Second World War. Payment arrangements between the 1960s and the 1990s made anaesthesiology a lucrative career choice for medical graduates and this led both to considerable growth in the number of anaesthesiologists and to a strengthening of the resolve of nurse anaesthetists to retain their scope of work and preserve their professional status. Changes in payment regulations in the 1980s and 1990s threatened anaesthesiologists' income and led to re-appraisal of evidence over relative cost-effectiveness and safety of different provider models. More recently, the terms of engagement have shifted from disputes over evidence to political lobbying to promote the professional capabilities and status of each of the anaesthesia providers. Factors of relevance to possible changes in the provision of anaesthesia in the United Kingdom are highlighted.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2003

Making monitoring 'work': human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia.

This study aimed to explore the use of electronic monitoring within the context of anaesthetic practice. We conducted workplace observation of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and other anaesthetic staff in two UK hospitals. Transcripts were analysed inductively for recurrent themes. Whilst formal sources of knowledge in anaesthesia deal with the issue of monitoring in terms of theoretical principles and performance specifications of devices, anaesthetists in practice often 'disbelieve' monitoring information. They call on and integrate other sources of knowledge about the patient, especially from their clinical assessment. The ability to distinguish 'normal' and 'abnormal' findings is vital. Confidence in electronic information varies with experience, as does the degree to which electronic information may be considered 'redundant'. We conclude that electronic monitoring brings new dimensions of understanding but also the potential for new ways of misunderstanding. The tacit knowledge underlying the safe use of monitoring deserves greater acknowledgement in training and practice.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2001

Chemoreduction for retinoblastoma may prevent intracranial neuroblastic malignancy (trilateral retinoblastoma).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (chemoreduction) for retinoblastoma reduces the risk for associated intracranial neuroblastic tumor (trilateral retinoblastoma). DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen consecutive children with newly diagnosed retinoblastoma treated at a major ocular oncology center from January 1, 1995, to July 1, 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Development of associated intracranial neuroblastic tumor (trilateral retinoblastoma). RESULTS: During the 54-month study period, 142 patients (66%) received chemoreduction (consisting of vincristine sulfate, etoposide phosphate, and carboplatin therapy) as part of their treatment strategy (chemoreduction group), whereas 72 (34%) were treated with nonchemoreduction methods (nonchemoreduction group). In the chemoreduction group, no associated intracranial neuroblastic tumor developed during the mean 47-month follow-up. Based on a recent meta-analysis of the prevalence of trilateral retinoblastoma, we would have expected the intracranial tumor to develop in 5 to 15 patients with hereditary retinoblastoma. This lack of associated trilateral retinoblastoma in the chemoreduction group was significantly less than expected using binomial distribution (P<.001). In the nonchemoreduction group, associated intracranial tumor (pinealoblastoma) developed in 1 patient, a finding consistent with the expected frequency. CONCLUSION: Chemoreduction protects against the highly fatal associated intracranial neuroblastic tumor (trilateral retinoblastoma). This observation is especially important in children with bilateral or familial retinoblastoma who are at greatest risk for this brain tumor.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Intraocular pressure changes after treatment for Graves' orbitopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in subjects with Graves' orbitopathy (GO) after orbital decompression, strabismus surgery, and orbital radiation. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: The charts of 172 consecutive subjects from the Neuro-ophthalmology Service at Wills Eye Hospital (Philadelphia, PA) with GO who underwent either orbital decompression, strabismus surgery, or orbital radiation between 1994 and 1999 were analyzed. Subject age, gender, diagnosis of glaucoma in either eye, use of systemic steroids or topical glaucoma medications, procedure performed, and the preoperative and postoperative IOP (in primary position and upgaze) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 116 eyes that underwent orbital decompression, the mean preoperative IOP was 21.6+/-4.6 mmHg (standard deviation) in primary position and 27.9+/-6.8 mmHg in upgaze. The postoperative IOP was 17.5 mmHg +/- 3.0 mmHg in primary position and 20.1+/-4.7 mmHg in upgaze, a decrease in IOP of 18.9% in primary position and 27.9% in upgaze (P<0.001). Subjects taking glaucoma medication or who had IOP greater than 21 mmHg demonstrated a significantly (P<0.001) greater reduction in IOP postoperatively. The mean preoperative IOP in the 32 subjects who had strabismus surgery was 18.5+/-2.8 mmHg (primary position), and 24.7+/-4.3 mmHg (upgaze). Postoperative IOP was 16.1 mmHg (primary position) and 16.9 mmHg (upgaze), a decrease of 2.4 mmHg (13.3%, P<0.01 in primary position) and 7.8 mmHg (31.2%, P<0.01 in upgaze). There was no statistically significant reduction in IOP after orbital radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In the selected subgroup of subjects with GO who required intervention, orbital decompression and strabismus surgery resulted in a significant reduction in IOP in the early postoperative period, especially in subjects with preoperative IOP greater than 21 mmHg.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Conjunctival lymphoid tumors: clinical analysis of 117 cases and relationship to systemic lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical features of conjunctival lymphoid tumors and factors predictive of systemic lymphoma. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. SETTING: Clinical practice of ocular oncology. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included 117 consecutive patients with lymphoid tumors of the conjunctiva treated at the Oncology Service of Wills Eye Hospital between 1974 and 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was the development of systemic lymphoma. Cox proportional regression models were used to calculate the risk of eventual systemic lymphoma. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to analyze the development of systemic lymphoma as a function of time. RESULTS: There were 55 males (47%) and 62 females (53%); 110 patients (94%) were white and 7 patients (6%) were African AMERICAN: The mean age at ocular presentation was 61 years, and the conjunctival lymphoid infiltrate was unilateral in 72 patients (62%) and bilateral in 45 patients (38%). In 8 patients (7%), initial unilateral conjunctival disease evolved into bilateral involvement over a mean of 32 months. Additional sites of ocular involvement were found in 27 patients (23%) and included lymphoid tumor in the eyelid in 3 cases, orbit in 18, choroid in 5, and vitreous in 1. Systemic lymphoma was known to exist before ocular diagnosis in 16 patients; (14%; for a mean of 51 months) and was found subsequent to ocular diagnosis in 20 patients (17; at a mean of 21 months). Therefore, of 117 patients with conjunctival lymphoid infiltration, 36 (31%) had or eventually developed systemic lymphoma, and 81 (69%) did not manifest systemic lymphoma during the mean follow-up of 38 months. Of the 64 patients with unilateral conjunctival involvement, 11 (17%) manifested systemic lymphoma, and of the 53 patients with bilateral involvement, 25 (47%) manifested systemic lymphoma. By univariate analysis, the clinical factors at date first seen predictive of the presence or development of systemic lymphoma included location of the tumor at an extralimbal site (fornix or midbulbar conjunctiva; P = 0.02) and increasing number of conjunctival tumors (P = 0.02). Using Kaplan-Meier life table analysis of those 101 patients who had conjunctival lymphoid tumor(s) and no evident systemic lymphoma at presentation, systemic lymphoma was eventually discovered in 7% of patients at 1 year, 12% at 2 years, 15% at 5 years, and 28% at 10 years. Overall, only one patient (<1%) died of systemic lymphoma, at 28 months after the diagnosis of the ocular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoid tumors of the conjunctiva are associated with systemic lymphoma in 31% of patients. Systemic lymphoma is found more often in those patients with forniceal or midbulbar conjunctival involvement and in those with multiple conjunctival tumors. Long-term systemic follow-up is advised, because related systemic lymphoma can manifest many years later.

Adult↗