A Führer | PubMed Health

PubMed2002

HepatoConsult: a knowledge-based second opinion and documentation system.

HepatoConsult is a publicly available knowledge-based second opinion and documentation system aiding in the diagnosis of liver diseases. The positive results of a prospective diagnostic evaluation study encouraged its use in clinical routine, although the available hardware infrastructure was not optimal. The comments of the physicians who used the system confirmed the results of the study and showed that the time for data entering is acceptable and the implicit standardization of terminology and documentation is welcome. Suggestions for improvement included the interface to enter data more easily, the scope to be usable for more patients and the additional capability to generate medical reports from the data.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed1999

[The evaluation of HepatoConsult, a hepatological expert system--the initial results and trends].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: HepatoConsult (HC) is a medical expert system, based on the expert system building block D3, designed to aid in the diagnosis of liver and biliary tract disease. It was the aim of this study to evaluate its diagnostic competence in clinical cases prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of HC was tested prospectively in 106 consecutive patients with the main diagnosis of liver disease. 57 were ambulant, 49 were in-patients. The data were obtained and stored at defined phases of the diagnosis. The diagnoses put forward by HC were compared with the final clinical diagnosis and, on the basis of the data, checked for plausibility by four experienced physicians. RESULTS: After history taking and physical examination HC put forward the main diagnosis, as established by the doctors in charge, in 60% of patients. After addition of the results of basic laboratory tests and sonography, HC provided the correct diagnosis in 85% and, after inclusion of all the findings, in 93%. In almost all cases HC put forward diagnoses that were, on the basis of the supplied data, considered correct by the four physicians experienced in liver disease. In 56% of cases HC provided more differentiated diagnoses or items in the differential diagnosis than the attending doctors. In the opinion of the four assessors HC had not put forward any seriously wrong diagnoses. CONCLUSION: HC can be useful in solving diagnostic problems and thus in ensuring the quality of medical diagnoses.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗