Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Farris.
A case of erythema multiforme along Blaschko's lines is reported in a 20-year-old female suffering from recurrent herpes labialis. Histological examination was compatible with the clinical features. Spontaneous resolution followed in 4 weeks without therapy.
Sardinian population can be instrumental in defining the molecular basis of cancer, using the identity-by-descent method. We selected seven Sardinian breast cancer families originating from the northern-central part of the island with multiple affected members in different generations. We genotyped 106 members of the seven families and 20 control nuclear families with markers flanking BRCA2 locus at 13q12-q13. The detection of a common haplotype shared by four out of seven families (60%) suggests the presence of a founder BRCA2 mutation. Direct sequencing of BRCA2 coding exons of patients carrying the shared haplotype, allowed the identification of a 'frame-shift' mutation at codon 2867 (8765delAG), causing a premature termination-codon. This mutation was found in breast cancer patients as well as one prostate and one bladder cancer patient with shared haplotype. We then investigated the frequency of 8765delAG in the Sardinian breast cancer population by analysing 270 paraffin-embedded normal tissue samples from breast cancer patients. Five patients (1.7%) were found to be positive for the 8765delAG mutation. Discovery of a founder mutation in Sardinia through the identity-by-descent method demonstrates that this approach can be applied successfully to find mutations either for breast cancer or for other types of tumours.
Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(-2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18-34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28-40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy versus that of tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression in pre-/perimenopausal estrogen receptor-positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8 (CMF), with all drugs restarted on day 29, or 5 years of tamoxifen, 30 mg/d, plus ovarian suppression with surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, or monthly goserelin 3.6-mg injections. Disease-free survival was the main study end point. Overall survival and toxicity were additional end points. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1997, 120 patients were assigned to CMF and 124 to tamoxifen and ovarian suppression (oophorectomy, n = 6; ovarian irradiation, n = 31; and goserelin injections, n = 87). At the time of analysis (median follow-up time, 76 months; range, 9 to 121 months), 82 patients had relapsed and 39 had died. No difference between groups had emerged with respect to either disease-free or overall survival. Treatments were comparable even in respect to age, tumor size, and nodal status, although a nonsignificant trend favored patients with poorly differentiated tumors treated with CMF. Leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were significantly more common in patients treated with CMF. There were few patients who developed benign gynecologic changes in either group, and numbers were comparable. CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen with ovarian suppression seems to be safe and to yield comparable results relative to standard CMF.
Germline mutations impairing the p16(INK4)-function have previously been demonstrated to be responsible for genetic predisposition in at least one half of melanoma-prone kindreds of North European origin. Familial melanoma kindreds have also been found to present an increased risk of pancreatic cancer and other cancers, but results relative to more common neoplasias incidence, in particular, are heterogeneous. We report here a clinical-epidemiological study, including the presence of additional neoplasias, in 14 apparently unrelated kindreds coming from a small geographic region of Northern Italy (Liguria), having therefore lived for generations in similar environmental conditions. We identified the common p16 missense mutation (Gly101Trp) reported in several previously studied kindreds, in 7 of 14 families, whereas the remaining 7 families had no detectable mutations in the coding region of p16 gene. Median age at diagnosis and other melanoma features were studied. When compared with the expected figures, based on regional incidence rates, a significant excess of pancreatic cancer, with 4 cases diagnosed, and of breast cancer, with 7 cases, was observed. The 7 families without apparent CDKN2A involvement were also negative for hot-spot exon 2 mutation of CDK4. Environmental factors do not appear to play a role in the excess of non-melanoma neoplasia in our families, as somewhat substantiated by the control group, composed of spouses and members of non-affected branches; they do not reveal any increased cancer incidence compared with the general population. Furthermore, given the proven significance of interaction between the melanoma susceptibility gene and the propensity to sunburns and other environmental risk factors, our results, obtained from a small but homogeneous sample, may have important implications for further risk assessment studies.
The first GROCTA trial compared 5-year tamoxifen treatment to ten chemotherapy cycles in a group of 504 pre-/post-menopausal, node-positive, ER-positive breast cancer patients. This study also included an arm combining tamoxifen with chemotherapy. Fifteen-year results showed no difference between tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus chemotherapy, while both treatments were significantly superior to chemotherapy alone. A confirmatory study (GROCTA 02) was performed in 244 pre-/perimenopausal patients by comparing 5 years of tamoxifen treatment (plus 2 years of goserelin) to six CMF cycles. No difference has emerged so far between the tamoxifen and CMF arms at a median follow-up time of 62 months. Post-menopausal women were scheduled to receive 3 years of tamoxifen treatment and then to be randomly allocated to further 2 years of tamoxifen or to 2 years of low-dose aminoglutethimide (GROCTA 04B). So far 662 patients have been entered, 375 of whom have been randomized to tamoxifen (n = 188) or aminoglutethimide (n = 187). Preliminary results (median follow-up time 32 months) show no major difference in patients' outcome. A new trial (ITA trial) with a similar design but employing anastrozole in place of aminoglutethimide has been activated in 1998. The GROCTA 03 study investigated the potential superiority of alternating adjuvant chemotherapy over standard CMF. This study, which included 107 node-positive ER-negative pre-menopausal women, was prematurely closed because more patients allocated to the triple alternated chemotherapy appeared to have relapsed and died at the first interim analysis. The use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) was explored by the GROCTA 06 trial which included 53 patients with ten or more involved nodes and a maximum age of 55 years. These patients were scheduled to receive three standard CEF cycles followed by one cycle of HDC (cyclophosphamide 5 g/m2; etoposide 1.5 g/m2; cisplatin 150 mg/m2) without any form of bone marrow rescue. This HDC program proved to be feasible but was not superior to CMF-based chemotherapy we had previously employed in a comparable group of patients in previous GROCTA trials. These findings prompted us to explore new HDC programmes with the use of peripheral stem cell support and in addition the possible value of new drugs such as Taxol and vinorelbine. New-generation trials will also explore the value of new prognostic indicators such as tumor proliferative activity, which are prospectively used to allocate patients to different treatment options.
We assessed the activity and tolerability of a cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy in 28 advanced breast cancer patients. The schedule of treatment was as follows: 60 mg/ m2 epirubicin followed by 40 mg/m2 cisplatin given on days 1 and 2 every 21 days, with 450 mg lonidamine being given per os (three tablets) on days of chemotherapy administration and in the period intervening between one cycle and the next. Patients received a median of 5 (range 1-6) cycles. Overall, 22 patients were evaluable for response and 28, for toxicity. Four patients refused to continue the treatment after the first course, one was lost to follow-up, and one died due to toxicity (septic shock). The incidence of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was found to be greater than that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine alone. The addition of cisplatin resulted in an increase in platelet and hemoglobin toxicities, whereas the WBC toxicity did not differ from that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine. The hematological toxicity was found to be cumulative, leading to treatment delay in about 50% of patients at the fifth and sixth courses. The activity of this cytotoxic regimen was noteworthy, with the overall response rate being 81.8% (31.8% complete responses and 50.0% partial responses) in evaluable patients. This response rate decreased to 64.2% when all registered patients were included according to an intent-to-treat analysis. In conclusion, the association of cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine given on the schedule described herein, appears to be very active but substantially toxic. We are now testing this combination in a randomized comparison, with the cisplatin dose being reduced to 30 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 2.
BACKGROUND: High dose Epirubicin (HD-EPI) (>90 mg/m2) and Vinorelbine (VNR) demonstrated antitumor activity as single agent (about 20%) in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This trial compares these two agents combined with cisplatin (CP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1992 to February 1996, 228 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus plus Cisplatin (CP) 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen A) or VNR 25 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days up to a maximum cumulative dose of EPI of 840 mg/m2 or 12 cycles. Eligible patients were 212 and 198 patients were evaluable for objective response (95 in arm A and 103 in arm B). The main characteristics of eligible patients were: male/female 179/33; median age 61 (42-72); median Karnofsky PS 80 (70-100); stage IIIA 12%, stage IIIB 40%, stage IV 41%, recurrence 7%; histotype: epidermoid 48%, adenoca 36%, others 16%. RESULTS: The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively; CR, 1 and 2%, PR, 32 and 25% (P = 0.4567). Median CR + PR duration was 9 and 8 months, respectively. Median survival was 10.5 and 9.6 months, respectively. Grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 38 and 21% in arm A and arm B, respectively(P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6 and 0% (P = 0.02), anemia in 8 and 7% (n.s.). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88 vs. 33% in arm A and B, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on regimen A; a >15% LVEF absolute decrease was observed in 9 (22.5%) and three (14%) patients on arm A and arm B, respectively (n.s.). No congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION: HD-EPI+CP and VNR+CP are both active combinations in advanced NSCLC with a similar response rate, response duration and survival but regimen A was significantly more toxic (myelosuppression and alopecia).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The combination of vinorelbine (VNR), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously been shown to be active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC). This multicenter Phase II study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of this combination in patients with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced SCHNC. METHODS: Sixty patients with previously untreated, unresectable SCHNC were treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on Days 2-5, and VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on Days 2 and 8. There were 15 patients with laryngeal carcinoma, 19 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 15 with carcinoma in the oral cavity, 5 with carcinoma in the hypopharynx, and 4 with carcinoma in the maxillary sinus. Most patients (78%) had Stage IV disease. After achievement of the best possible objective response, patients were subjected to definitive locoregional treatment, i.e., radiotherapy and/or surgery, as appropriate. RESULTS: All patients completed the induction chemotherapy. After a mean of 3.86 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%), with a complete response rate of 23% (95% CI, 14-26%). Complete responses were more frequently seen in patients with N0-1 disease than in those with N2-3 disease (P = 0.037). No other statistically significant correlation between type of response and extent of disease was noted. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects. After definitive locoregional treatment, 58% of patients were clinically free of disease. These patients included those who had complete response after induction chemotherapy, 19 of 39 patients who had partial response, and 2 with stable disease. Median disease free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 23 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU, and VNR was very active in previously untreated SCHNC. It was well tolerated in most cases, and neurotoxicity was not a major side effect. This regimen, which does not require hospitalization, should be compared with standard chemotherapy, such as the combination of CDDP and continuous-infusion 5-FU.
BACKGROUND: Aminoglutethimide was the first aromatase inhibitor to be used successfully in breast cancer patients. However, this drug also inhibits mineralcorticoid and glucocorticoid synthesis, making co-medication with corticosteroids necessary, and it is often poorly tolerated. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of vorozole, a new non-steroidal oral aromatase inhibitor, in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic activity of the drug. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four postmenopausal patients previously treated with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting and/ or for advanced disease were treated with vorozole, 2.5 mg once daily. Patients were monitored with respect to treatment efficacy and safety. Hormonal evaluations were performed at baseline and during the course of treatment in order to evaluate the pharmacodynamic efficacy and safety of vorozole. RESULTS: According to UICC criteria, there were seven responders, one complete and six partial, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9%-38%). The median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% CI 4.6-0), the median time to progression for the entire group was 4.7 months (95% CI 2.9-6.6) and the median survival time was 29.7 months (95% CI 19.1-0). Tolerability was excellent to good in 97% of the patients. Oestradiol and oestrone levels were suppressed to the limit of detection of the assays used. No effect was observed on the other endocrine parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that vorozole is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of advanced postmenopausal breast cancer following tamoxifen failure.
In order to study the relationship between circulating levels of CA 15-3 and the disease extent in predicting survival, we prospectively followed 312 breast cancer (BC) patients, from October 1988 to March 1995, from the time of first relapse. CA 15-3 values were assessed before treatment onset. Disease extent was defined as the percentage of liver or lung involvement and the number of bone segments positive at scintigraphy. The covariates were primary tumour characteristics (T, N and hormone receptor status) and patient characteristics at recurrence (menopause, performance status and age). Higher CA 15-3 serum levels were found in patients with visceral metastases or with pleural effusion. A logistic regression model selected disease extent in liver, lung and bone as independent variables for the determination of abnormal CA 15-3 values. Univariate survival analysis confirmed the positive prognostic influence of low CA 15-3 serum levels, absence of visceral metastases and the presence of only one metastatic site. Multivariate Cox's survival analysis selected disease extent in liver, lung, bone and soft tissue but not level of CA 15-3 as prognostic factors. In conclusion, CA 15-3 is not an independent variable in determining survival, its prognostic role being linked to the disease extent. This association suggests that CA 15-3 may be useful in assessing disease extent when this is not easily assessable.
A multicentric randomized trial was performed in premenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen-receptor-negative breast tumors to assess the potential superiority of alternating adjuvant chemotherapy over 'standard' CMF chemotherapy. Between January 1989 and June 1992, 107 patients were entered into the study and randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 per as on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8 (CMF), every 4 weeks for a total of 6 cycles, or the following regimens: CMF as previously; epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and vincristine 0.75 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8 (EV); mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and vindesine 2 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8 (MVs). The three regimens were given every 4 weeks for a total of 6 cycles according to the following schedule: CMF, EV, MVs, CMF, EV, MVs. At a median follow up of 48 months (range 30-72), 40 patients have relapsed and 17 have died overall. More patients in the triple-combination arm have relapsed and more have died, the latter difference tending toward statistical significance (p = 0.06). There was no statistical difference in the site of relapse between the two groups. Total duration of adjuvant therapy was similar in the two arms (312 chemotherapy cycles in the triple arm and 308 in the CMF arm). Treatment toxicity was also comparable, although more patients in the triple-combination arm were still regularly menstruating 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. This study failed to show any advantage ensuing from the use of alternating chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Some evidence in vitro and in vivo shows that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the activity of doxorubicin and epirubicin (EPI). On this basis, a multicenter prospective randomized trial was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to determine if the addition of LND to EPI could increase the response rate of EPI alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 1991 to May 1993, 207 patients were enrolled onto this study and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) EPI (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) alone or with LND (600 mg orally daily). EPI administration was repeated every 21 days until tumor progression or for a maximum of eight cycles. LND was administered continuously until chemotherapy withdrawal. RESULTS: Response rate was significantly superior for the EPI plus LND scheme compared with the single-agent EPI either considering assessable patients (60.0% v 39.8%; P < .01) or including all registered patients according to an intention-to-treat analysis (55.3% v 37.5%; P < .02). The distribution of the response rate according to the site of disease did not show any significant difference between the treatment arms, except for the patient subgroup with liver metastases in which the combination EPI plus LND resulted in a significant improvement of responses than EPI alone. Toxicity was moderate, and except for myalgia, no adjunctive side effects were observed in the EPI plus LND arm. Overall survival and time to progression were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms in vivo that the administration of EPI is enhanced by the concomitant LND administration.
This phase II study was aimed to evaluate the activity of a combination of megestrol acetate (MA) and alpha 2a interferon (IFN) in a group of tamoxifen-responsive breast cancer patients. Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer either previously treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 24 months or treated with tamoxifen for metastatic disease and showing an objective response or stability of disease, were given MA (single daily dose of 160 mg per os) and alpha 2a IFN (3 million units-MU-three times per week intramuscularly-i.m.-). Of the 29 evaluable patients, 2 (6.8%) achieved a complete response and 4 (13.8%) a partial response for an overall response rate of 20.6% (95% confidence limits = 5.9%-35.4%). Treatment toxicity was mild and no patient had to discontinue or delay the treatment due to IFN side effects. Our results seem to rule out that alpha 2a IFN is able to improve the activity of MA as second-line therapy in tamoxifen-responsive patients.
PURPOSE: Vinorelbine has been demonstrated to be active against squamous cell carcinomas of the head/neck (SCHNC) and lung. This multicenter phase II trial was carried out to evaluate the activity and tolerability of the combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil given on an outpatient schedule in a series of 80 patients with recurrent SCHNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCHNC were treated with a combination of CDDP 80 mg/m2on day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on days 2-5, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 2 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 28 days. Most patients had oral cavity, larynx, or oropharynx carcinoma (88%). Forty-seven had previously received surgery alone, two radiotherapy alone, and 31 surgery plus radiotherapy. Seventy-two patients had locoregional recurrency, and eight had distant metastases. RESULTS: According to an intent-to-treat analysis, complete response (CR) of a mean duration of 12.7+ months was achieved in 13% of cases (95% CI 5%-21%), and partial response of 8.3+ months in 45% of patients (95% CI 33%-56%), for an overall response rate of 55% (95% CI 43%-65%). Nine patients (11%) showed no change, and 22 (28%) progressed. Five patients were not evaluable for response and toxicity. CR were seen more frequently in patients pretreated with only surgery than in those who had also received radiotherapy (15% vs. 9%; p = 0.7). No statistically significant differences in response rate according to site of primary tumor were found (p = 0.8, NS). The received dose intensities of 5-FU, CDDP, and VNR were 90%, 92%, and 82%, respectively. The overall survival of the series as a whole was 9.7+ months (range 4-27). Toxicity was generally acceptable. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were recorded in 11% and 5% of patients, respectively. Noteworthy was the occurrence of pain at the tumor site after vinorelbine administration in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU and vinorelbine is quite active in the treatment of metastatic and/or recurrent SCHNC. This regimen should be tested as initial treatment in previously untreated patients and compared to a standard regimen in recurrent SCHNC.
A case of a patient with headache, visual deficiency in his left eye quickly worsening up to blindness and ischemic necrosis in the scalp regions supplied by the superficial temporal arteries, is reported. This acute gangrene began as a bandlike ischemic lesion in the temporo-parietal regions of both sides, rapidly enlarged, and acquired bizarre irregular outlines. Laboratory investigations and particularly superficial temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of Horton's temporal arteritis, in accordance with the anamnestic and clinical data assessed at admission.
In this work assess the labelling index in sixty patients affected by breast cancer and treated with only local surgical therapy, without subsequent chemo- or radiotherapy. We had considered L.I. a single prognostic factor and in relation with other common prognostic factors of this neoplasia. The patients with a high L.I. have shown a greater probability of relapses, also in absence of lymph nodal metastases.