Biomedical subjects

A Fellows

Publications and source records attributed to A Fellows.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Post-transfusion hepatitis revisited.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of post-transfusion and postoperative non-A non-B hepatitis in Australia immediately before the introduction of screening for hepatitis C. DESIGN: Retrospective testing of blood samples from a prospective study of cardiac surgery patients. Samples were taken from transfusion recipients and non-transfused controls at regular intervals for 12 months after surgery during 1987-1989. For all donor, recipient and control samples, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured and tests for antibody to hepatitis B (anti-HBc, anti-HBs) and, when available, to hepatitis C (anti-HCV) were performed. SETTING: Cardiac surgery units. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were included if they lived in the metropolitan area, and had not had a transfusion in the past year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-transfusion hepatitis (two consecutive samples showing raised ALT levels, > 90 IU/L with no other known cause); hepatitis C infection and carriage (antibody to hepatitis C). RESULTS: Post-transfusion hepatitis occurred in 1.1% of 736 recipients of blood not screened for hepatitis C (i.e., two cases per 1000 unscreened units given). No hepatitis occurred in 514 controls. Seven of the eight patients with post-transfusion hepatitis seroconverted to hepatitis C virus infection. Seven of the 26 anti-HCV-positive donations transmitted hepatitis C, six of these were positive by recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) (one by second generation testing only) and one was RIBA indeterminate. Nineteen were RIBA non-reactive; one transmitted hepatitis but the recipient did not develop anti-HCV, although hepatitis C RNA was detected in the donation. Serum ALT was raised in four of the six infective donations. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis C virus infection accounted for almost all cases of non-A non-B post-transfusion hepatitis. First generation anti-HCV tests detected about 85% of infective donations. Surrogate testing of donations by ALT or anti-HBc offers no additional advantage.

Alanine Transaminase↗

PubMed1989

Is an information booklet for patients leaving hospital helpful and useful?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a booklet given to patients being discharged from hospital giving details of their admission and treatment increased their knowledge and recall when reviewed in outpatient clinics. DESIGN: Patients alternately allocated to receive a booklet or to serve as controls. Assessment by a questionnaire at first attendance at outpatient clinic after discharge. Data were collected over nine months. SETTING: One general medical and cardiological ward in a large teaching hospital and associated outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: One hundred and thirty one patients discharged taking at least one drug and scheduled to return to clinic within 12 weeks. Patients stratified by age and by the number of weeks between discharge and outpatient appointment. INTERVENTION: A booklet was given to 65 patients at discharge from the ward; 66 patients served as controls. MAIN RESULTS: Of the patients who received the booklet, 56 (86%) knew the names of their drugs, 62 (95%) the frequency of the dose, and 55 (85%) the reasons for taking each drug. The numbers in the control group were 31 (47%), 38 (58%), and 28 (42%) respectively. These differences were highly significant (p less than 0.001). Twenty six (40%) who received the booklet brought all their drugs to clinic compared with 12 (18%) control patients. Appreciably more of the first group of patients than control patients knew the reason they had been in hospital, and more of the first group indicated that they would take the correct action when their prescribed drugs ran out. Most general practitioners thought that the booklet was a good idea, that it was helpful, and that it was better than the existing interim discharge letter. CONCLUSIONS: Giving patients an information booklet at discharge from hospital appreciably increased the accuracy and thoroughness of their recall of important medical details concerning their illness and its treatment. The booklet was shown to be feasible, helpful in the outpatient clinic, and preferred by most general practitioners.

Adult↗