PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Flaus

Publications and source records attributed to A Flaus.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling.

During the past year, major advances have been made towards understanding the function of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities both in vitro and in vivo. These suggest that ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities are capable of both altering the structure of individual nucleosomes and acting in concert with other forms of chromatin-modifying enzymes, to regulate the formation and decondensation of chromatin fibres.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2000

Generation of superhelical torsion by ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities.

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities participate in the alteration of chromatin structure during gene regulation. All have DNA- or chromatin-stimulated ATPase activity and many can alter the structure of chromatin; however, the means by which they do this have remained unclear. Here we describe a novel activity for ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities, the ability to generate unconstrained negative superhelical torsion in DNA and chromatin. We find that the ability to distort DNA is shared by the yeast SWI/SNF complex, Xenopus Mi-2 complex, recombinant ISWI, and recombinant BRG1, suggesting that the generation of superhelical torsion represents a primary biomechanical activity shared by all Snf2p-related ATPase motors. The generation of superhelical torque provides a potent means by which ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities can manipulate chromatin structure.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2000

Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling.

Gene regulation involves the generation of a local chromatin topology that is conducive to transcription. Several classes of chromatin remodelling activity have been shown to play a role in this process. ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities use energy derived from the hydrolysis of ATP to alter the structure of chromatin, making it more accessible for transcription factor binding. The yeast SWI-SWF complex is the founding member of this family of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities. We have developed a model system to study the ability of the SWI-SWF complex to alter chromatin structure. Using this system, we find that SWI-SWF is able to alter the position of nucleosomes along the DNA. This is consistent with recent reports that other ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities can alter the positions of nucleosomes along DNA. This suggests that nucleosome mobilization may be a general feature of the activity of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling activities. Some of the mechanisms by which nucleosomes may be moved along DNA are discussed.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1999

Nucleosome mobilization catalysed by the yeast SWI/SNF complex.

The generation of a local chromatin topology conducive to transcription is a key step in gene regulation. The yeast SWI/SNF complex is the founding member of a family of ATP-dependent remodelling activities capable of altering chromatin structure both in vitro and in vivo. Despite its importance, the pathway by which the SWI/SNF complex disrupts chromatin structure is unknown. Here we use a model system to demonstrate that the yeast SWI/SNF complex can reposition nucleosomes in an ATP-dependent reaction that favours attachment of the histone octamer to an acceptor site on the same molecule of DNA (in cis). We show that SWI/SNF-mediated displacement of the histone octamer is effectively blocked by a barrier introduced into the DNA, suggesting that this redistribution involves sliding or tracking of nucleosomes along DNA, and that it is achieved by a catalytic mechanism. We conclude that SWI/SNF catalyses the redistribution of nucleosomes along DNA in cis, which may represent a general mechanism by which ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling occurs.

Catalysis↗
PubMed1998

Differential nucleosome positioning on Xenopus oocyte and somatic 5 S RNA genes determines both TFIIIA and H1 binding: a mechanism for selective H1 repression.

In Xenopus somatic cells histone H1 effects the transcriptional repression of oocyte type 5 S RNA genes, without altering the transcription of the somatic type 5 S RNA genes. Using an unambiguous nucleosome mapping method we find substantial differences between the multiple in vitro nucleosome positions on the two types of genes. These nucleosome positions determine both transcription factor and H1 binding, allowing TFIIIA to bind more efficiently to nucleosomes containing the somatic 5 S RNA gene than to nucleosomes on the oocyte 5 S RNA gene. Significantly, in a binding competition between TFIIIA and H1, TFIIIA preferentially binds to the somatic nucleosome whereas H1 preferentially binds to the oocyte nucleosome, excluding TFIIIA binding. These results strongly suggest that nucleosome positioning plays a key role in the regulation of transcription of 5 S RNA genes and provide a molecular mechanism for the selective repression of the oocyte 5 S RNA genes by H1.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

The mouse mammary tumour virus promoter positioned on a tetramer of histones H3 and H4 binds nuclear factor 1 and OTF1.

Modulation of eukaryotic gene expression is influenced by the organization of regulatory DNA-elements in chromatin. The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter exhibits regularly positioned nucleosomes that reduce the accessibility of the binding sites for sequence-specific transcription factors, in particular nuclear factor (NF1). Hormonal induction of the MMTV promoter is accompanied by remodeling of the nucleosomal structure, but the biochemical nature of these structural changes is unknown. Using recombinant histones, we have now assembled the MMTV promoter in particles containing either an octamer of the histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B or a tetramer of histones H3 and H4, and have compared the two particles in terms of structure, positioning, and exclusion of transcription factors. Using site-directed hydroxy radicals to map histone locations, two main nucleosome positions are found with dyads at position -107 and at -127. The same two main positions are found for particles containing only the H3/H4 tetramer, showing that the absence of H2A/H2B dimers does not alter positioning. The rotational orientation of the DNA double helix in both types of particles is essentially identical. However, the ends of the nucleosomal DNA as well as its central region are more accessible to cleavage reagents in the tetramer particle than in the octamer particle. In agreement with these structural features, the transcription factors NF1 and OTF1 were able to bind to their cognate sites on the tetramer particle, while they could not gain access to the same sites on the surface of the octamer particle. The DNase I digestion pattern of octamers treated with partially purified SWI/SNF complex from HeLa cells in the presence of ATP is indistinguishable from that of tetramer particles, suggesting that the SWI/SNF complex promotes ATP-dependent remodeling of the octamer particle but not of tetramer particles. These results are compatible with a hormone-induced removal of histone H2A/H2B during MMTV induction.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1998

Positioning and stability of nucleosomes on MMTV 3'LTR sequences.

Uniquely positioned nucleosomes were mapped in vitro on mouse mammary tumor 3' long terminal repeat (MMTV 3'LTR) DNA at base-pair resolution. Nucleosome A assembly was strongly favored over nucleosome B, and heating of each as a mononucleosome caused migration to the ends of the DNA fragment at a unique rate. Taken together with DNA sequence analysis, this suggests why MMTV 3'LTV nucleosome positions reported upstream of vector-derived sequences conflict and also how flanking genomic sequences could modulate the promoter in in vivo situations. Importantly, nucleosomes are shown to migrate for significant distances along DNA under physiologically relevant conditions, and the actual rates have been measured directly in solution. Exact positioning and shifting over greater than 60 bp has important consequences for transcription factor access to this MMTV promoter and for the role of nucleosomes in general.

Adenine↗
PubMed1996

Mapping nucleosome position at single base-pair resolution by using site-directed hydroxyl radicals.

A base-pair resolution method for determining nucleosome position in vitro has been developed to com- plement existing, less accurate methods. Cysteaminyl EDTA was tethered to a recombinant histone octamer via a mutant histone H4 with serine 47 replaced by cysteine. When assembled into nucleosome core particles, the DNA could be cut site specifically by hydroxyl radical-catalyzed chain scission by using the Fenton reaction. Strand cleavage occurs mainly at a single nucleotide close to the dyad axis of the core particle, and assignment of this location via the symmetry of the nucleosome allows base-pair resolution mapping of the histone octamer position on the DNA. The positions of the histone octamer and H3H4 tetramer were mapped on a 146-bp Lytechinus variegatus 5S rRNA sequence and a twofold-symmetric derivative. The weakness of translational determinants of nucleosome positioning relative to the overall affinity of the histone proteins for this DNA is clearly demonstrated. The predominant location of both histone octamer and H3H4 tetramer assembled on the 5S rDNA is off center. Shifting the nucleosome core particle position along DNA within a conserved rotational phase could be induced under physiologically relevant conditions. Since nucleosome shifting has important consequences for chromatin structure and gene regulation, an approach to the thermodynamic characterization of this movement is proposed. This mapping method is potentially adaptable for determining nucleosome position in chromatin in vivo.

Animals↗