Biomedical subjects

A Fogliata

Publications and source records attributed to A Fogliata.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparison of advanced irradiation techniques with photons for benign intracranial tumours.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The potential benefits and limitations of different radiation techniques (stereotactic arc therapy (SRS/T), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT), Cyberknife and intensity-modulated multiple arc therapy (AMOA)) have been assessed using comparative treatment planning methods on twelve patients presenting with 'benign' brain tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plans for five acoustic neurinomas, five meningiomas and two pituitary adenomas were computed to generate dose distributions for all modalities using a common CT dataset to delineate planning target volume and organs at risk. RESULTS: HT, AMOA and IMRT resulted superior to SRS/T and Cyberknife for target coverage. For the first group V(95%) ranged from 98% to 100%, minimum dose ranged from 91% to 96% and standard deviation from 0.84% to 1.67%. For organs at risk all techniques respected planning objectives with a tendency of Cyberknife and SRS/T to better spare the brain stem and the healthy brain tissue (e.g., V(20Gy) of 2.0% and 2.3%, respectively, compared to 3.1-5.0% for the other techniques). AMOA is in general preferable to IMRT for all OARs. Conformity index (CI(95)) was better for HT and Cyberknife (both 1.8) and less for AMOA and IMRT (3.9 and 3.0, respectively). CONCLUSION: All techniques provided good OAR sparing and primarily differed in target coverage indices. For the class of tumours investigated in this report, HT, AMOA and IMRT had better target coverage with HT providing the best combination of indeces. Between AMOA and IMRT, target coverage was comparable and, considering organs at risk, AMOA was slightly preferable.

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

IMRT for breast. a planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of ten different treatment-planning systems when intensity modulated (IMRT) plans are designed for breast treatments that include the irradiation of the internal mammary chain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dataset of five patients (CT images and volumes of interest) was distributed to design IMRT plans on the ten systems. To minimise biases, the same geometry and clinical planning aims were imposed on the individual plans. Results were analysed in terms of dose distributions and dose volume histograms. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: For target coverage, the volume receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose ranged from 77% (OTP) to 91% (Eclipse and Pinnacle), the volume receiving more than 107% ranged from 3.3% (Hyperion) to 23.2% (OTP). The mean dose to ipsilateral lung ranged from 13 Gy (Eclipse) to 18 Gy (OTP). The volume of the contralateral breast receiving more than 10 Gy ranged from 3% (Pinnacle) to 26% (Precise). The volume of heart receiving more than 20 Gy ranged from 7% (Eclipse) to 47% (Precise), the maximum significant dose to heart ranged from approximately 27 Gy (XiO) to approximately 49 Gy (Precise). The maximum significant dose to healthy tissue ranged from approximately 51 Gy (Eclipse) to approximately 62 Gy (OTP). It was also possible to show that the treatment geometry proposed here enables to minimise contralateral breast irradiation while keeping minimal ipsilateral lung (or heart) involvement and satisfactory target coverage.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2001

Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations in the region outside the clinical photon beams have been investigated. The aim was to estimate the calculation accuracy of a specific TPS in areas that are becoming increasingly relevant with the advent of new technologies, such as, for example, intensity modulation radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed on two different linacs to obtain, separately, the head scatter (electrons and photons), the transmission below the jaws and the phantom scatter outside the primary beam for different photon energies, distances from the field edge and field sizes. Calculations with a commercial TPS (Helax TMS) were then obtained and compared with these measurements. RESULTS: In general, reasonable agreement between calculations and measurements was obtained (1-2%), especially for photon scattering (head and phantom). Nevertheless, some discrepancies were found in the electron contamination computation, due probably to the approximations and assumptions made in the TPS calculation algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed TPS presented good results, but for some particular clinical cases and moreover for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, the calculation behaviour with respect to measurements and patient dose delivery should be carefully evaluated.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In this work, the potential benefits and limitations of different treatment techniques, based on mixed photon-electron beams, 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photons (IM) and protons (passively scattered and spot scanned), have been assessed using comparative treatment planning methods in a cohort of patients presenting with advanced head and neck tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plans for five patients were computed for all modalities using CT scans to delineate target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and to predict dose distributions. The prescribed dose to the PTV was 54 Gy, whilst the spinal cord was constrained to a maximum dose of 40.5 Gy for all techniques. Dose volume histograms were used for physical and biological evaluation, which included equivalent uniform dose (EUD) calculations. RESULTS: Excluding the mixed photon-electron technique, PTV coverage was within the defined limits for all techniques, with protons providing significantly improved dose homogeneity, resulting in correspondingly higher EUD results. For the spinal cord, protons also provided the best sparing with maximum doses as low as 17 Gy. Whilst the IM plans were demonstrated to be significantly superior to non-modulated photon plans, they were found to be inferior to protons for both criteria. A similar result was found for the parotid glands. Although they are partially included in the treated volume there is a clear indication that protons, and to a lesser extent IM photons, could play an important role in preserving organ functionality with a consequent improvement of the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: For advanced head and neck tumours, we have demonstrated that the use of IM photons or protons both have the potential to reduce the possibility of spinal cord toxicity. In addition, a substantial reduction of dose to the parotid glands through the use of protons enhances the interest for such a treatment modality in cases of advanced head and neck tumours. However, in terms of target coverage, the use of 3D conformal therapy, although somewhat inferior in quality to protons or IM photons, has been shown to be a reasonable alternative to the more advanced techniques. In contrast, the conventional technique of mixed photon and electron fields has been shown to be inferior to all other techniques for both target coverage and OAR involvement.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2000

Comparative analysis of dose volume histogram reduction algorithms for normal tissue complication probability calculations.

A model for estimating radiotherapy treatment outcome through the probability of damage to normal tissue and the probability of tumour control is a useful tool for treatment plan optimization, dose escalation strategies and other currently used procedures in radiation oncology. Normal tissue complication estimation (NTCP) is here analysed from the point of view of the reliability and internal consistency of the most popular model. Five different dose volume histogram (DVH) reduction algorithms, applied to the Lyman model for NTCP calculation. were analysed and compared. The study was carried out for sets of parameters corresponding to quite different expected dose-response relationships. In particular, we discussed the dependence of the models on the parameters and on the dose bin size in the DVH. The sensitivity of the different reduction schemes to dose inhomogeneities was analysed, using a set of simple DVHs representing typical situations of radiation therapy routine. Significant differences were substantiated between the various reduction methods regarding the sensitivity to the degree of irradiation homogeneity, to the model parameters and to the dose bin size. Structural aspects of the reduction formalism allowed an explanation for these differences. This work shows that DVH reduction for NTCP calculation has still to be considered as a very delicate field and used with extreme care, especially for clinical applications, at least until the actual formulations are tuned against strong clinical data.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

Critical appraisal of a conformal head and neck cancer irradiation avoiding electron beams and field matching.

PURPOSE: In head and neck cancer patients, spinal chains are usually irradiated by a combination of photon and electron beams, requiring high precision in field matching. This study compares a conventional treatment approach where two lateral photon beams are combined to direct electron fields, to a conformal radiotherapy based on five photon fields, covering the whole neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comparative analysis of dose distributions and dose-volume histograms was carried out in patients with locally advanced head and neck tumors, for which planning target volumes (PTV) were outlined from the base of the skull down to the supraclavicular region. The prescribed dose to PTV (excluding booster irradiation) was 54 Gy, with spinal dose constraint not exceeding 75% of the total dose, whatever the technique. RESULTS: For the new five-field technique, minimum and maximum point doses showed mean deviations, on five patients entered in the study, of 84% and 113% from the ICRU prescription point. In the conventional treatment, the corresponding figures were 73% and 112%, respectively. A positioning error analysis (isocenter displacement of 2 mm, in all directions) did not elicit any systematic difference in five-field treatment plans while hot spots were found with electron fields. CONCLUSIONS: The five-field technique appears routinely feasible and compares favorably with the conventional mixed photon- and electron-therapy approach, especially in regard to its better compliance with dose homogeneity requirements and a reduced risk in dose inhomogeneity related to field matching and patient positioning.

Brain↗

PubMed1999

An adaptable mechanical multileaf delineator.

A mechanical device for a multileaf delineator, designed and built in our department, is described. Its scope is used as an accessory mounted on the head of the radiation therapy simulator to obtain reliable images of the treatment field, shaped for multileaf collimation, on the patient's skin and to record them on the reference X-ray films normally acquired during the simulation phases.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed1998

Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy.

The Hounsfield units into density conversion for a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) is discussed. The impact of an average calibration table provided by the manufacturer on computed doses was investigated when a customer calibration could not be included in the TPS. The maximum error determined on the computed monitor units per Gy was found to be about 2%, being below 1% on average. The relative importance of the parameters used for CT image acquisition is also discussed. The applied voltage was the most relevant parameter leading to errors in the reconstructed Hounsfield numbers of about 300 units for high densities.

Phantoms, Imaging↗