The national cancer data base: what does it mean to the community surgeon?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Fremgen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Database is an electronic registry system sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1985 to 1995 were analyzed for trends in stage of disease, treatment patterns, and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Seven annual requests for data were issued by the National Cancer Database from 1989 through 1995. Data on 100,313 patients were voluntarily submitted using a standardized reporting format. RESULTS: The anatomic site distribution was: head, 78%; body, 11%; and tail, 11%. The ratios of limited to advanced disease (Stage I/Stage IV) were 0.70 for tumors in the head, 0.24 for body tumors, and 0.10 for tail tumors. Of all patients, 83% did not have a surgical procedure and 58% did not have cancer-directed treatment. Resection was done for 9,044 (9%) patients, including 22% of those with Stage I disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 23.4% for patients who had pancreatectomy, compared with 5.2% for those who had no cancer-directed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival rates for pancreatic cancer have not changed in 2 decades. A small minority of patients presented with limited, resectable disease, but the best survival rates per stage were achieved after surgical resection. Five-year survival rates after resection reported herein corroborated the improved survival rates of more recent large, single institution studies.
PURPOSE: The Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons conducts Patient Care Evaluation studies to describe practice patterns and trends in disease management. This report surveys changing strategies in the initial treatment of patients with invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using a standard data collection form designed by a multidisciplinary committee of specialists, cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anonymous data on 11,721 total cervical cancer patients diagnosed in 1984 and 1990. RESULTS: Between the two study years, the use of radiation as all, or a component, of the initial course of therapy declined from 70 to 60.3%, coincident with a 32.3% increase in the use of hysterectomy alone and a 33.7% reduction in the use of radiation alone. The percentage of all patients receiving combined hysterectomy and radiation (preoperative or postoperative) remained virtually unchanged--10.2% in 1984, and 9.3% in 1990. However, women who were treated by hysterectomy in 1990 were less likely to receive radiation as part of their treatment than patients treated by hysterectomy in 1984. Among patients treated by radiation without hysterectomy, the use of intracavitary brachytherapy techniques substantially exceeded interstitial brachytherapy techniques in both study years. Among patients treated by local radiation without hysterectomy, the frequency of adjunctive chemotherapy use increased from 6.9% in 1984 to 24.8% in 1990, with chemotherapy and radiation increasingly administered concurrently rather than sequentially. Although differences based on age, histology, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were observed, these general management trends were seen in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the utilization of radiation and surgery may reflect the increasing surgical involvement of gynecologic oncologists in the management of early stage cervical cancer, rather than significant alterations in the demographics of the disease. Although brachytherapy is recognized as an important component of radiation treatment, some patients may not receive the potential benefit of this modality. Despite controversy concerning its efficacy, the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to supplement local treatment modalities appears to be increasing rapidly.
BACKGROUND: Patterns of and progress against childhood cancer have been reported on multi-institution, regional, national, and international bases by several sources in the past. These sources have included clinical cooperative group trials and population-based registries. In general, the population-based surveys have excluded brain tumors of either benign or uncertain behavior. The authors of this article investigated the patterns of data reported for the period 1985-1993, motivated by their interest in assessing the potential of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data to 1) facilitate individual institution review and 2) cover institutions that are not members of the Pediatric Oncology Group or the Children's Cancer Group, which are both national clinical cooperative groups. METHODS: Six annual calls for data, starting with a call for 1985 and 1988 cases, were issued to approximately 2100 hospitals with cancer programs (1340 programs approved by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and 760 other programs). The baseline data items of the NCDB included patient demography, tumor characteristics, initial treatment, and follow-up. The data for each patient were coded in the traditional manner by trained cancer registrars before being transmitted to the NCDB in standard format. RESULTS: In the most recent year for which data were reported, the NCDB included 42% of all estimated U.S. childhood cancers. The cases were reported by institutions that were members of the Pediatric Oncology Group and the Children's Cancer Group as well as nonmember institutions. The distribution of diagnostic groups reported to the NCDB was generally similar to that reported to SEER, except for lymphomas and brain cancer (the NCDB series included benign as well as malignant brain tumors). The distribution of diagnostic groups reported to the NCDB did not change over the 9-year reporting period (1985-1993). With regard to ethnicity, the most varied distribution of diagnostic groups was found among African American patients. For many types of cancer, the survival of those patients reported to the NCDB was similar to that of patients included in the SEER population-based series. These cancers included Wilms' tumor (NCDB 89% vs. SEER 88%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NCDB 74% vs. SEER 70%), soft tissue sarcomas (NCDB rhabdomyosarcomas 70% and sarcomas 79% vs. SEER soft tissue sarcomas 71%), and neuroblastoma (NCDB 58% vs. SEER 57%). CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that the number of brain tumors of benign and uncertain behavior being diagnosed were significant enough in number that they should be included in regional and national cancer registries that report data for clinical purposes. They further concluded that for reasons of data inclusion and institutional coverage, the NCDB will be an important data base for pediatric cancers that will warrant increased use by pediatric investigators.
OBJECTIVE: To assess case-mix characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for laryngeal cancer using the largest series of patients to date. DESIGN: Analyses performed on retrospectively collected survey data submitted by hospitals for diagnostic periods 1980 through 1985 and 1990 through 1992 (with a 9-year follow-up for the long-term group). SETTING: Broad spectrum of US hospitals (N = 769). PATIENTS: Consecutively accrued series of patients with laryngeal cancer (N = 16,936), with only squamous cell carcinomas (N = 16,213) analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analyses of case-mix, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics plus recurrence and 5-year, disease-specific survival outcomes. RESULTS: There was a slight increase across these years in stage IV disease and in radiation therapy (with or without surgery and/or chemotherapy). Overall diversity of management of this disease (by site and stage) was apparent. Five-year survival rates indicated a large difference between modified groupings of the T and N classifications, separating stages III and IV cases into localized disease (87.5% for T1-T2; 76.0% for T3-T4 cases) and regional metastasis (46.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of improvements in entering data in hospital records (most commendably, staging), more rigorous standards are needed. Also, the small increase in advanced-stage patients indicates that efforts toward early detection have not been successful. The rise in radiation therapy perhaps reflected an increased use of nonsurgical treatment for early-stage patients and organ-sparing radiochemotherapy protocols for advanced-stage patients. Regrouping stages III and IV cases into localized disease vs regional metastasis appears to predict survival better. Ongoing refinements of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme will hopefully improve this cancer's classification.
BACKGROUND: The elderly represent a large proportion of the women with breast cancer. However, there is a lack of information regarding breast cancer care in the elderly. METHODS: A patient care evaluation survey for breast carcinoma was conducted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons for 1983 and 1990. Data were obtained from hospital tumor registries from all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Canada. Information regarding presentation, diagnostics, staging, treatment, recurrence, and survival were analyzed. Comparisons were made between women 75 years and older and those younger than 75 years. RESULTS: Included were 17,029 diagnosed with breast carcinoma during 1983 and 24,004 diagnosed during 1990. In 1983 and 1990, 20.4% and 23.4% of women, respectively, were 75 years or older. Fewer cancers were detected mammographically and needle localized biopsies were performed less often in the elderly. There was no difference in tumor location or histology. Stage at diagnosis appeared more advanced in the elderly. Most women regardless of age, underwent modified radical mastectomy. Of the elderly who did undergo breast conserving surgery in 1983 and 1990, 72% and 39%, respectively, did not receive radiation therapy. No difference was found in the local recurrence rates between the elderly and younger groups. In the elderly, 20% of deaths occurred from causes other than breast cancer. Overall disease specific survival was worse in the elderly but, when analyzed by stage, was significantly different for only certain stages. CONCLUSIONS: There are several differences in the detection, diagnostic methods, stage at diagnosis, treatment approaches, and outcome of breast cancer in elderly women compared with younger women.
Using a standard collection form designed by a multidisciplinary committee of specialists, cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anonymous data on 11,721 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during 2 study years, 1984 and 1990. Information concerning the initial use of diagnostic assessments was analyzed with respect to the potential influences of clinical stage, patient age, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and modalities of therapy employed. Estimates of the yield of diagnostic information for each test were correlated with clinical stage and patient age. Judged by the number of procedures performed, the intensity of pretreatment assessment declined between 1984 and 1990. Substantially increased use of the newer body imaging modalities (computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) with high probabilities of revealing abnormalities attributed to cancer, balanced major declines in utilization of procedures historically important in staging and assessment (cystoscopy, proctoscopy, barium enema, excretory urography (intravenous pyelogram), bone scintography, and lymphangiography). Race/ethnicity and insurance status had no discernible independent impact on the intensity of diagnostic evaluation. Patients with more advanced clinical stages underwent more extensive testing, as did patients treated initially with radiation compared to surgery. Periodic review of assessment strategies would seem prudent to avoid widening discrepancies between sanctioned staging formalisms with endorsed and authorized appraisals and actual clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: As the use of Papanicolaou cytologic screening became widespread in the United States of America, there was a shift toward diagnosis of earlier clinical stages in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. This increase in early stage disease has also resulted in increased use of surgery as the primary treatment. Thus, it seems appropriate to investigate the role of hysterectomy in the modern treatment of patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix, including survival rates and the role of the gynecologic oncologist. STUDY DESIGN: Approximately 1,800 hospitals were sent invitations to submit data on a standard collection form designed by a multidisciplinary committee of specialists. Cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anonymous data on 11,721 patients with carcinoma of the cervix who were diagnosed or treated, or both, in 1984 and 1990. RESULTS: There were 6,570 (56.1 percent) women who had major operations. An operation with curative intent, either total hysterectomy (TAH) or radical type II or III hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection PND (RHPND), was carried out in 5,105 (43.6 percent) women, constituting 38.9 percent of the patients in 1984, and 48.2 percent of the patients in 1990. Overall (both years), 66.5 percent of patients had squamous cell carcinomas and 21.1 percent had adenocarcinomas. The type of operation performed was judged appropriate in 95.6 percent of the patients who underwent RHPND, but in only 80.0 percent of the patients who underwent TAH. Gynecologic oncologists performed 46.8 percent of the hysterectomies in 1984, and 63.8 percent in 1990. Recurrence and long-term survival data are available for the 1984 patients; five-year survival rates for women who underwent TAH (n = 1,013) and RHPND (n = 1,279) were 89 and 85 percent, respectively. A RHPND with negative nodes resulted in a 90 percent five-year survival rate (n = 916) as compared to 70 percent in those with positive nodes (n = 194). CONCLUSIONS: The use of hysterectomy as definitive therapy increased markedly from 1984 to 1990 and was associated with low complication and high five-year survival rates. Gynecologic oncologists now perform the majority of hysterectomies for this type of carcinoma, with general gynecologists playing a lesser role than in the earlier study year. Guidelines should be developed for the use of TAH in patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix.
BACKGROUND: Extragastric lymphadenectomy (D2 node dissection) is strongly supported by Japanese data to have survival benefit. Randomized trial data are either inconclusive or nonsupportive of this view. We have reviewed a prospectively gathered database of 18,346 cases of gastric carcinoma from a gastric cancer patient care evaluation study conducted by the American College of Surgeons to assess whether the performance of extragastric node dissection was associated with improved survival in patients who had resection with curative intent (all margins microscopically clear). STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed a subgroup of patients with curatively resected gastric carcinoma and compared the outcome in patients having extragastric lymph node dissection with the outcome in patients who did not have dissection of N2 nodes. RESULTS: Among the 3,804 patients having curative resection in the long-term study with more than a five-year follow-up, 695 had dissection of the nodes along the celiac axis, hepatic artery, or splenic artery (N2 nodes); 1,529 patients had removal of the adjacent nodes (N1 nodes) along the gastric tube or the gastric or perigastric nodes (N1 nodes); and 903 patients who had no nodes identified in the resection specimen (essentially N0 nodes removed). For patients having a dissection of N2 nodes, the median survival time was 19.7 months with a five-year survival rate of 26.3 percent; for patients having a dissection of N1 nodes, the median survival time was 24.8 months with a five-year survival rate of 30 percent; among patients having no nodes removed, the median survival time was 29.5 months with a five-year survival rate of 35.6 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node dissection (D2) of N2 nodes did not augment survival compared with gastrectomy without node dissection or that included perigastric nodes in the resection. Subgroup analysis of patients with gastric carcinoma having a curative resection did not show benefit of the extragastric node dissection (D2). Continued study is warranted and the data from ongoing clinical trials may yield more conclusive information.
BACKGROUND: The authors' aim was to assess whether there is a difference in biologic behavior and survival in comparing adenocarcinoma (AdCA), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and adenosquamous carcinoma (Ad/SC) of the cervix. METHODS: Cancer registrars at 703 hospitals submitted anonymous data on 11,157 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed and/or treated in 1984 and 1990 for a Patient Care Evaluation Study of the American College of Surgeons. Among these patients, 9351 (83.8%) had SCC; 1405 (12.6%), AdCA; and 401 (3.6%), Ad/SC cancers. There were no significant changes in percentages of the different histologic types between the study years 1984 and 1990, nor was the patient distribution different regarding age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic background for each histologic group. Furthermore, the distribution of patients who had had a hysterectomy did not change between 1984 and 1990. RESULTS: A larger percent of patients with SCC (63.8%) than those with Ad/SC (59.8%) or AdCA (50.2%) had tumors larger than 3 cm at greatest dimension. Early stage patients (IA, IB, IIA) often were treated by hysterectomy alone (45.5%) or combined with radiation (21.1%). The remaining patients (21.9%) received radiation alone. Of the patients with clinical stage I disease, 7.6% of Ad/CA patients, 15.5% of Ad/SC patients and 12.6% of SCC patients had positive nodes. Although patients with SCC had higher survival rates for all four clinical stages (I-IV), the differences were only significant for Stage II patients. Patients with clinical stage IB SCC and AdCA treated by surgery alone were found to have significantly better survival rates (93.1% and 94.6% at 5 years, respectively) than women treated by either radiation alone or a combination of surgery and radiation (P < 0.001, both histologic comparisons). For women with Ad/SC tumors, however, the 5-year survival rate was 87.3% for those receiving combined treatment compared with those receiving surgery alone (69.2%) or radiation alone (79.2%). However, these survival curves were not significantly different (P = 0.496). One hundred six patients with positive nodes were available for analysis. The 5-year survival rate of patients with SCC and positive nodes was 76.1%. Surprisingly, patients with Ad/SC and positive nodes had the highest 5-year survival rate (85.7%), whereas, women with AdCA and positive nodes had a sharply reduced 5-year survival rate (33.3%). The curves were significantly different (P < 0.01). For patients with clinical stage I, the risk factors for age, tumor size, nodal status, histologic features, and treatment were analyzed with Cox's multivariate regression. In this analysis, subset IB, greater tumor size, age 80 or older, and positive nodal status were each independently significant for poorer survival. Patients who were treated by surgery alone had a significantly better survival than patients who had other types of treatment or no treatment. Histologic characteristics had no significant effect on survival. In the analysis of patients with pathologic stage I disease, those with SCC had significantly poorer survival and those with Ad/SC had significantly better survival than patients with Ad/CA. Positive nodes had no significant independent effect on survival. In another analysis, tissue type was not found to be an important factor in recurrence time. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Ad/CA and Ad/SC tumors were found to represent 12.6% and 3.6%, respectively, of a large series (N = 11,157) of cervical cancers diagnosed in 1984 and 1990 and reported to the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons. 2. Two thirds of women with early clinical stage disease (IA, IB, IIA) had hysterectomy as all or part of their primary therapy. 3. No significant differences were found in 5-year survival among the three tissue types in any clinical stage except American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between survival and patterns of clinical management for ovarian carcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cancer registry data including follow-up, operative reports, and pathology reports. SETTING: Seventy-seven Illinois hospitals with active cancer registries. PATIENTS: A total of 2669 women with newly diagnosed ovarian carcinoma from 1983 through 1988. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of use of specific staging procedures and treatment options. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. RESULTS: Thirty percent of 632 stage I patients, 31% of 233 stage II patients, and 45% of 516 stage III patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, sampled peritoneal washings, and node biopsy. Five-year survival for those receiving this extensive surgery (who were therefore pathologically staged) was as follows: stage I, 80%; stage II, 63%; and stage III, 28%. For those not receiving this extensive surgery (who were therefore clinically staged), the 5-year survival at these stages was 76%, 62%, and 21%, respectively. The overall survival curves were not significantly different between those who were pathologically staged and those who were clinically staged for stage I patients (P = .27) or stage II patients (P = .47), but were for stage III patients (P = .01). Platinum-based combination chemotherapy was given to 76% of 221 patients with pathological stage III disease. Their 5-year survival--50% for the group with no residual disease and 20% for the group with residual disease--was better than for those receiving regimens without platinum--37% and 5%, respectively, for the two groups--and the overall survival curves were significantly better for those receiving platinum (P < .0005 for both groups). The groups receiving platinum had younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive surgery for pathological staging was not usually done for management of ovarian cancer, while platinum-based chemotherapy was commonly used. Failure to undergo extensive surgery had little impact on survival for stage I and II patients. However, use of extensive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy improved survival for stage III patients. The improved survival for this group receiving platinum-based chemotherapy may be explained in part by selection of younger patients for this treatment.
Renal pelvic carcinoma is a rare tumor. There are several staging systems currently in use based on a bladder cancer staging model. An analysis of the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, experience with 611 cases of renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma suggested that the kidney parenchyma may be a determinant in the anatomic spread of disease. A tumor-node-metastasis system for renal pelvic (separate from ureteral) cancer is recommended.
Renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma constitutes about 7 percent of all kidney cancer. This report is a summary of 611 Illinois patients with this tumor treated between 1975 and 1985. Overall, the five-year relative survival rate was 62 percent and the observed five-year rate was 48 percent. Stage was a major determinant of survival, as expected, in these cancer patients. The Illinois experience is reviewed and compared with the accumulated literature experience with renal pelvic cancers since 1944.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of compliance with clinical standards among hospitals for care of breast cancer patients and account for variations in compliance. DESIGN: Analysis of cancer registry data submitted to the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, Chicago, for a concurrent prospective descriptive study of breast cancer, supplemented by other hospital data from public sources. SETTING: Ninety-nine Illinois hospitals evenly distributed among rural counties, counties with small cities outside the Chicago metropolitan area, exurban counties in the Chicago metropolitan area, suburban Cook County, and urban Chicago. PATIENTS: A total of 5766 newly diagnosed patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer in 1988, representing 84% of the estimated 6900 new cases in the state for that year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses of five dependent quality variables from clinical indicators related to early diagnosis, hormone receptor determination, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy, and axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: At the hospitals studied, (1) late stage (IIb through IV) at diagnosis was associated with urban location, higher proportion of poorly insured patients, fewer breast cancer cases treated, and lower oncology charges (proportion of variance explained, R2 = .50, P less than .00001); (2) omission of hormone receptor test for stages II through IV was associated with urban location and higher proportion of poorly insured patients (R2 = .18, P less than .00003); and (3) omission of indicated radiation therapy was associated with urban location and fewer breast cancer cases (R2 = .21, P less than .00001). Omission of adjuvant therapy and omission of axillary lymph node dissection were not significantly associated with any of the hospital variables examined. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there is a group of urban hospitals, generally small and marginally reimbursed, where comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are not obtained.
A retrospective study of survival results for pancreatic cancer was performed. The study had two objectives: 1) to relate the extent of disease and management to survival, and 2) to determine whether newer treatment combinations have altered prognosis. Cancer registrars from 88 Illinois hospitals reviewed original medical records and submitted standardized report forms on 2,401 patients diagnosed between 1978-84. Three-year survival time was longer after laparotomy/bypass plus radiation/chemotherapy than for laparotomy/bypass alone (P less than .02). But the difference in survival between resection versus resection, radiation, and chemotherapy was not significant (P = .16). After resection, the median survival for 78 Stage I patients was 12.5 months, whereas for 181 Stage I patients after laparotomy/bypass it was 6.8 months (P less than .00001). For patients without metastases, 3-year survival was significantly better for 249 patients in whom cancer was resected versus 568 unresected patients (P less than .001). Survival was longer for 568 unresected patients without gross metastases than for 954 patients with metastatic disease found at laparotomy (P less than .05). From this study the authors concluded that: 1) since 3-year survival results were higher than expected after resection for localized cancers, resection is still desirable when it can be done with acceptable complication risks, and 2) the use of multiple treatment modalities for pancreatic cancer warrants further study in organized trials.
Since 1975, the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, has published end results of major cancer sites drawn from patient data contributed voluntarily by hospital cancer registries throughout the state. The current study was undertaken, in part, to apprehend information regarding contested areas in the management of patients having differentiated (papillary/follicular) thyroid cancer. A total of 2,282 patients with either papillary or follicular carcinoma of the thyroid from 76 different Illinois hospitals and providing 10 years of follow-up information (life-table analysis) were retrospectively analyzed for demographic, disease, and treatment-related predictors of survival. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards method was made for stage, age, race, sex, morphology, history of radiation exposure, presence of positive lymph nodes, initial surgical treatment, postoperative iodine 131 therapy, and replacement/suppressive thyroid hormone treatment. Statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.05) predictors of favorable survival after thyroid cancer were low stage (I and II), young age (less than 50 years), white race, female sex, and the administration, postoperatively, of either thyroid hormone or radioactive iodine. Factors that had no influence on survival were lymph node status, choice of initial surgical treatment, and a history of prior irradiation. We suggest that where a prospective clinical trial is impracticable, a retrospective analysis of a large and detailed database, such as that available from cooperating hospital-based tumor registries, may yet provide useful insights to solutions of cancer management problems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A retrospective analysis of survival results for colorectal cancer patients in Illinois was performed by the Cancer Incidence and End Results Committee of the Illinois Division of the American Cancer Society. Cancer registry data on 1,774 patients from 63 hospitals were used to investigate whether the preoperative level of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was a prognostic indicator of survival for cancers diagnosed between 1976 and 1978. A direct relationship was found between the preoperative level of serum CEA and both the thickness and stage of the tumor at initial diagnosis. For Stage B2/3 colorectal cancer, the actuarial survival curves corresponding to normal, elevated, and markedly elevated CEA levels were significantly different (p less than 0.0001). The five-year survival rates for these patients were 61, 50, and 32 percent, respectively. Similar trends for patients with Stage C2/3 cancer were observed (p = 0.0058). The corresponding five-year survival rates were 44, 30, and 26 percent, respectively. Using a statewide cancer registry system, the analysis suggested that the preoperative level of serum CEA was an indicator of survival in patients with colorectal cancer, independent of the stage of disease at diagnosis.