PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A George Awad

Publications and source records attributed to A George Awad.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Reduction in psychotic symptoms as a predictor of patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: data from a randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction with antipsychotic treatment is important. Limited evidence suggests that satisfaction is associated with symptom improvement and compliance. Predictors of patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication were examined in a study of patients with a recent exacerbation of schizophrenia. METHODS: Data are from a randomized, double-blind trial comparing risperidone (n = 152), quetiapine (n = 156), and placebo (n = 73). Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) was completed after 14 days of treatment and after 6 weeks at last study visit. RESULTS: Medication satisfaction at both time points was significantly associated in multiple regression analysis with improvement on 3 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor scores (positive symptoms p < .01; uncontrolled hostility/excitement, p < .0005; anxiety/depression, p < .04) and treatment with risperidone (p < .03); at day 14, significant association was also found with older age (p = .01). At both time points, predictor variables explained over 30% of the variance in medication satisfaction. Change in Hamilton Depression Scale, prolactin levels, sex, and reported adverse events of extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and movement disorders were not significant predictors of satisfaction. Lower level of medication satisfaction at day 14 was associated with earlier discontinuation in the trial at week 6 end point. A focused principal components analysis of PANSS factors and MSQ suggested that medication satisfaction relates to 3 groups of factors in descending order of magnitude: lower levels of (a) uncontrolled hostility/excitement, (b) positive symptoms, and (c) negative symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and anxiety/depression. CONCLUSION: Results give further support that treatment satisfaction is positively associated with symptom improvement, particularly psychotic symptoms, and suggest that satisfaction may also be related to compliance, as those who were more satisfied remained in the trial for a longer period of time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Subjective and behavioural consequences of striatal dopamine depletion in schizophrenia--findings from an in vivo SPECT study.

Dysphoria is an integral part of the symptomatology of a variety of clinical states, though there is little empirical data available on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this phenomenon. The purpose of the study was to administer alphamethyl paratyrosine (AMPT), a catecholamine depleting agent as a chemical probe to induce dysphoria, and document the ensuing changes in mental status. AMPT (4-5 g/day) was administered to a group of medication-free schizophrenic patients (n=13) over a 48 hour period, and changes in their mental status were monitored at 12 hour intervals with the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI), Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) and other standardized rating scales. All of the subjects experienced dysphoric responses of variable severity. The profile of changes included blunted pleasure responsivity, clouded thinking, loss of motivation and lowered vigilance. Subtle subjective changes were experienced soon after the first dose of AMPT and the dysphoria steadily worsened, resulting in social withdrawal and personal distress. Subjective responses were the earliest to manifest, followed by akathisia, akinesia and rigidity. We conclude that AMPT induced dopamine depletion is a safe, rapid, reliable and reversible method of studying dysphoric states in humans. The technique is helpful in examining the phenomenology of dysphoria, the temporal relationship between subjective and behavioural consequences of dopamine depletion, and the role of dopamine in mediating subtle aspects of pleasure responsivity, which is in turn crucial to the understanding of treatment non-adherence in schizophrenia and the origins of comorbid substance abuse.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Chlorpromazine for schizophrenia: a Cochrane systematic review of 50 years of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Chlorpromazine (CPZ) remains one of the most common drugs used for people with schizophrenia worldwide, and a benchmark against which other treatments can be evaluated. Quantitative reviews are rare; this one evaluates the effects of chlorpromazine in the treatment of schizophrenia in comparison with placebo. METHODS: We sought all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing chlorpromazine to placebo by electronic and reference searching, and by contacting trial authors and the pharmaceutical industry. Data were extracted from selected trials and, where possible, synthesised and random effects relative risk (RR), the number needed to treat (NNT) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: Fifty RCTs from 1955-2000 were included with 5276 people randomised to CPZ or placebo. They constitute 2008 person-years spent in trials. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that chlorpromazine promotes a global improvement (n = 1121, 13 RCTs, RR 0.76 CI 0.7 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 5 to 10), although a considerable placebo response is also seen. People allocated to chlorpromazine tended not to leave trials early in both the short (n = 945, 16 RCTs, RR 0.74 CI 0.5 to 1.1) and medium term (n = 1861, 25 RCTs, RR 0.79 CI 0.6 to 1.1). There were, however, many adverse effects. Chlorpromazine is sedating (n = 1242, 18 RCTs, RR 2.3 CI 1.7 to 3.1, NNH 6 CI 5 to 8), increases a person's chances of experiencing acute movement disorders, Parkinsonism and causes low blood pressure with dizziness and dry mouth. CONCLUSION: It is understandable why the World Health Organization (WHO) have endorsed and included chlorpromazine in their list of essential drugs for use in schizophrenia. Low- and middle-income countries may have more complete evidence upon which to base their practice compared with richer nations using recent innovations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Body weight, image and self-esteem evaluation questionnaire: development and validation of a new scale.

This report describes the development of a new questionnaire designed to capture and quantify the psychosocial impact of weight gain associated with psychotropic drug use, and presents results of a preliminary validation study. Based on a review of literature, consultations with experts, interviews with individual patients and focus groups, themes relevant to weight gain and its psychosocial consequences were identified. A 12-item self-report questionnaire was designed and administered to a heterogeneous group of psychiatric outpatients (n = 141) receiving antipsychotic and other adjunctive medications. The scale could be self-administered in 2-3 min with minimal assistance. Correlational analysis showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.79) and fair split half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.76). The total scores were able to distinguish groups of people with higher and lower body mass index (BMI) (chi(2) = 16.4, p < 0.001), suggestive of good discriminant validity. Repeated administration of the scale in 56 subjects on 2 occasions with a gap of 1 week in between revealed a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.81 (p < 0.001). These preliminary findings indicate that body weight, image and self-esteem evaluation questionnaire (B-WISE) is a potentially useful instrument for clinical trials to measure the psychosocial consequences of weight changes associated with psychotropic drug use, and also in monitoring the impact of various intervention programs aimed at minimizing or preventing weight gain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Is neuroleptic dysphoria a variant of drug-induced extrapyramidal side effects?

OBJECTIVES: Neuroleptic drugs induce psychological side effects such as dysphoria, cognitive impairment, and loss of motivation. These side effects were largely underrecognized and trivialized in the past as variants of extrapyramidal side effects (EPSEs). We review the recent literature on the subject and clarify the relation between neuroleptic-induced dysphoria and EPSEs. METHODS: We critically examined clinical, interventional, neuroimaging, and basic science studies published in the past 10 years, delineating the temporal, phenomenological, biochemical, and neuroanatomical relation between dysphoria and EPSEs. RESULTS: Subjective responses occur within 4 to 6 hours of neuroleptic use, whereas acute dystonia is often observed within 24 hours and parkinsonian syndrome after 5 to 7 days. Neuroleptic-induced dopaminergic blockade mediates both dysphoria and EPSEs. However, impaired dopamine function in the nucleus accumbens seems to give rise to dysphoria, whereas blockade of D2 receptors in the nigrostriatal system is responsible for EPSEs. CONCLUSION: The earlier notion that neuroleptic dysphoria is a variant of EPSEs was simplistic and speculative. Exploring the differences rather than dwelling on the similarities will likely enhance our understanding of dopamine's role in the origin of varied side effects and in their distinctive characteristics.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2004

New antipsychotics, compliance, quality of life, and subjective tolerability--are patients better off?

OBJECTIVES: This overview reviews the impact of second-generation antipsychotics on less frequently researched outcomes such as medication-adherence behaviour, quality of life, and subjective tolerability in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We selectively reviewed recent literature and considered our own research and experiences in the field. RESULTS: Most published studies about second-generation antipsychotics have dealt with issues related to efficacy and safety. So far, not many studies have focused on effectiveness in terms of such important outcomes as medication-adherence behaviour, quality of life, subjective tolerability, and overall satisfaction with treatment. Although most studies are inconclusive and their results are inconsistent--which has to do with several design and methodological limitations--there seems, on balance, to be a trend indicating superiority of second-generation, compared with first-generation, antipsychotics in improving medication-adherence behaviour and quality of life. The trend toward more favourable subjective tolerability and less frequent neuroleptic dysphoria seems to be relatively stronger. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the state of the art can only indicate a more favourable trend for second-generation antipsychotics in regard to improving medication adherence behaviour, quality of life, and subjective tolerability. It is surprising that such important outcomes, which are likely the defining factors in the superiority of second-generation antipsychotics, have not received adequate research attention. Well-designed, controlled, and adequately powered studies are urgently needed before any firm conclusions can be reached.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is a long-term disabling illness that affects approximately 1% of the population. Its course is generally chronic with acute psychotic exacerbations that may require frequent hospitalisations. The clinical picture includes a range of symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, agitation, suspiciousness, hostility, conceptual disorganisation, blunted affect, emotional and social withdrawal, lack of spontaneity, poverty of speech and a wide range of neurocognitive deficits. Over the past 50 years, antipsychotic medications have emerged as the cornerstone of management in concert with other important interventions, such as psychosocial and economic support and rehabilitation efforts. However, the unrivalled role of conventional antipsychotic medications has been continuously challenged by the wide range of adverse effects of these medications and their lack of usefulness in the treatment of neurocognitive deficits as well as deficit and negative symptoms. In addition, the lack of subjective tolerability of these agents and their negative impact on quality of life have complicated management for a large number of patients. Over the last 15 years, several new atypical antipsychotic medications have been introduced, including amisulpride, remoxipride, risperidone, sertindole, olanzapine, zotepine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. In general, the new antipsychotics have shown themselves to be at least comparable in efficacy to conventional antipsychotics but with superior subjective tolerability and a more favourable adverse effect profile. The majority of quality of life studies involving new antipsychotic agents have evaluated the benefits of risperidone, olanzapine and clozapine; only a few studies have examined the effects of other new antipsychotics. While most of these studies have methodological and design limitations, the weight of evidence from them nevertheless points to a trend towards a more positive impact on quality of life with atypical agents. A number of recommendations can be made. First, more independent well designed and controlled studies are urgently needed to evaluate the effects of antipsychotic therapy on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. New comparative studies should explore not only the differences between new and old antipsychotics but also identify any potential differences between individual new agents. The role of cost-effectiveness studies such as cost utility approaches in schizophrenia needs to be revisited, notwithstanding the fact that these types of studies have been reported to be feasible in schizophrenia. Finally, quality-of-life-based pharmacoeconomic studies of antipsychotic agents should not concentrate solely on cost reduction or containment, as it is likely that in order to maximise the benefits of new antipsychotic medications, greater expenditure on rehabilitation programmes and other support services will be necessary in the short-term at least.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Personal evaluation of transitions in treatment (PETiT):a scale to measure subjective aspects of antipsychotic drug therapy in schizophrenia.

The paper describes the development and preliminary testing of a scale designed to capture aspects of subjective responses to, and tolerability of antipsychotic drugs, treatment adherence, and impact of antipsychotic drug therapy on the quality of life of individuals treated for schizophrenia. Using empirical study approaches and qualitative methods of data analysis, twelve themes were initially identified as relevant to the quality of life of individuals during antipsychotic drug therapy. Based on these dimensions, in the second phase, a 30 item self report questionnaire was constructed and field tested in a community based, heterogeneous sample of schizophrenic patients (n=335). The scale was easy to self-administer (in 2-5 min) and perceived as user-friendly by patients. Correlational analysis revealed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.92) and split half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.85). The scale scores were able to distinguish subjects with lower and higher rates of treatment adherence, and factor analysis confirmed the robustness of the original construct. Repeated administration of the scale in a sub-sample of clinically stable schizophrenic population (n=71) revealed a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.97 (P<0.001); and repeat administration at quarterly intervals in a sample of patients receiving active treatment (n=54) indicated a significant increases in mean scores (t=6.2, df=53, P<0.005), suggesting that the scale was sensitive to changes in patients' clinical status. Based on these preliminary data, PETiT could be considered as a potentially useful tool for measuring client-centred outcomes in clinical practice, drug trials, quality assurance programs and interventional research involving schizophrenic patients.

Adult↗