PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Gringeri

Publications and source records attributed to A Gringeri.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Current use of by-passing agents in Europe in the management of acute bleeds in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.

The ultimate goal of treatment for patients with inhibitory antibodies should be to permanently eradicate the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI). However, ITI procedures fail in a substantial number of patients and in many countries ITI is not even offered owing to its high cost. How patients with inhibitors are managed in different European countries is evaluated with a special focus on the use of by-passing agents, i.e. recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC), as well as the type of monitoring performed. Investigators from 22 large haemophilia centres participating within the network of the European Haemophilia Therapy Standardisation Board (EHTSB) were asked to complete a questionnaire. rFVIIa was routinely used in all centres for both children and adults at dosages ranging from 90 to 250 mug kg(-1) at an interval of 2-4 h. aPCC was used in 85% of the centres in adults and in 25% of the centres in children with haemophilia A at dosages of 50-100 IU kg(-1) every 6-12 h. The corresponding figures for children and adults with haemophilia B were 40% and 15% of the centres, respectively. Higher dosages of both agents were considered in the case of life-threatening bleeds. General recommendations were developed, based on the information provided by the survey. The results clearly indicate the need for well-designed comparative studies to optimize the use of by-passing agents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Occurrence of inhibitors in previously untreated or minimally treated patients with haemophilia A after exposure to a plasma-derived solvent-detergent factor VIII concentrate.

A solvent-detergent virus-inactivated plasma-derived FVIII concentrate (SD-pdFVIII) has been employed for treatment of Italian patients with haemophilia A for 15 years. This product is a non-monoclonally purified, high purity FVIII concentrate, containing large amounts of von Willebrand factor (VWF). A retrospective survey was carried out in Italy in order to evaluate the immunogenicity of SD-pdFVIII in previously untreated patients (PUPs) or in minimally treated patients (MTPs), i.e. previously exposed for up to 5 days only to other plasma-derived concentrates. The survey included 99 patients with ages ranging from 6 to 64 years (median=21.3) of whom 31 PUPs and 68 MTPs, the latter with a median of four exposure days (EDs; range 1-5) to other plasma products. Surveyed patients had been exposed to SD-pdFVIII for a median of 83 EDs (range 21-1580). Seven patients (three PUPs and four MTPs), all with severe haemophilia, had developed inhibitors [7.1%, 95%; confidence interval: 3-14%] after a median of 11 EDs (range 4-22). Of them, two were low responders (<or=5 BU mL-1) and five high responders. Two low responders and one high responder tolerated inhibitors spontaneously; one high responder underwent immunotolerance treatment with complete, long-standing response. These findings show that SD-pdFVIII is at low risk of inhibitor development in PUPs and MTPs with severe and moderate haemophilia, the risk of inhibitor development being similar to that previously reported for other plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII products.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Quality of life is associated to the orthopaedic status in haemophilic patients with inhibitors.

Inhibitors represent one major complication of haemophilia treatment, as they increase the risk of bleeding, physical disability and mortality. The Cost Of Care Inhibitors Study (COCIS) showed that modern strategies applied to manage patients with inhibitors adsorb high amounts of resources but provide satisfactory levels of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HR-QoL). This paper focuses on determinants of HR-QoL in inhibitory patients. Fifty adult patients, enrolled by 11 Italian Haemophilia Centres, were clinically assessed and filled in two HR-QoL generic questionnaires: the EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). According to our results, bleeding frequency and inhibitor titres were not found associated with HR-QoL. Global HR-QoL, and in particular the physical component of wellbeing in these patients was found negatively associated with their orthopaedic condition: the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (P<0.001) scores, the SF-36 domain 'physical functioning' and 'physical component summary' (P<0.01) scores were found significantly correlated with the orthopaedic joint score, even after adjusting for patients' age. These results were confirmed by those from the EQ-5D profile. To conclude, the COCIS study is the first study showing that HR-QoL in inhibitory patients is impaired by their orthopedic status, while other aspects do not seem to influence patients' global wellbeing. Our results suggest that while the management of this complication is satisfactory, the attention has now to be focused on the prevention of the orthopaedic problems in these patients, which nowadays constitute one of the most important aspects to be considered in the haemophilia care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Quality of life assessment in clinical practice in haemophilia treatment.

The modern management of haemophilia has greatly influenced not only survival of patients, their clinical symptoms and orthopaedic outcome but also their perceived quality of life (QoL). QoL measures recently became an essential part of clinical trials being one of the most important patient-rated outcomes (PROs). Moreover, QoL assessment is essential in pharmacoeconomics. In clinical trials, not only clinical outcomes but also the so-called PROs and health-economic outcomes are included. Different types of economic evaluations may be conducted in order to describe the economic burden of a disease condition, to determine the cost of care and to assess and evaluate alternative treatments in terms of both costs and effects as well as benefits and outcomes with the aim of optimizing the use of resources. For these evaluations, the following analyses are performed: descriptive cost of illness study, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, incremental cost-utility analysis and incremental cost-benefit analysis. By contrast, PROs are derived from direct patient reports and they allow to evaluate the impact of a disease and its treatment on patients' well-being and functioning. PROs include health-related quality of life, patient preferences/utilities, treatment satisfaction and other PROs such as functional assessment, etc. Choosing a QoL measure, study- and instrument-related aspects have to be taken into account. Finally, QoL assessment will become a part of the regular clinical assessment of persons with haemophilia, in order to provide trustworthy data of perceived well-being to be compared over time and in order to assess treatment efficacy and quality of care.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Current European practice in immune tolerance induction therapy in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.

The management of patients with inhibitors is an important challenge in haemophilia care. The lack of randomized controlled trials means that clinical decisions are generally based on subjective opinions, and purchasers' attention is likely to focus on the costs of treatment. In order to assess the current management of inhibitor patients and use of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) in Europe, we performed a survey within a European network of 21 comprehensive care centres from 14 countries (the European Haemophilia Therapy Standardisation Board). The survey identified a total of 381 patients with inhibitors attending the centres, 211 (55.4%) of whom had never been exposed to ITI. Between 1998 and 2003, the centres performed 233 procedures and 114 (48.9%) were successful. The survey demonstrated that dosing, which is the time to start and stop the ITI, the type of concentrate to use and the definition of success varied among the centres. Well-designed trials are warranted to guide decision-making, but in the absence of these studies we have developed consensus guidance for the management of inhibitor patients based on current clinical practice, as identified by the survey, and review of the literature.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Differences between patients', physicians' and pharmacists' preferences for treatment products in haemophilia: a discrete choice experiment.

The provision of health care to patients with haemophilia through replacement of the deficient coagulation factor is the result of a complex interaction between patients, physicians and policy makers, each carrying their individual sets of preferences. Preferences of patients, physicians and pharmacists towards perceived viral safety, risk of inhibitor development, infusion frequency during prophylaxis, pharmaceutical dosage form, distribution modes and price were evaluated by conjoint analysis, using a discrete choice experiment. Overall 178 patients', 69 physicians and 58 pharmacists completed the study. Patients, physicians and pharmacists displayed preferences: (i) similar in direction and strength for risk of inhibitors and frequency of prophylaxis, (ii) similar in direction, but not in strength for perceived viral safety and price, with patients showing lower strength compared with physicians and pharmacists, and (iii) dissimilar in direction and/or strength for: (i) dosage form, which tested important only for pharmacists and (ii) distribution mode, which tested important for patients and physicians only. Our study provides evidence of the differences between different stakeholders in the preferences towards haemophilia replacement therapy, indicating that different opinions should be taken into account when planning optimal care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.

The Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres reviewed and finally approved in November 2004 the new Italian Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with clotting factor inhibitors. The recommendations have been based on the identification of levels of clinical evidence derived from the systematic review carried out in 2003 by the School of Health and Related Research, the University of Sheffield, UK, and further integrated by clinical studies published from 2003 to 2004. The Italian guidelines consist of six major domains concerning inhibitor definition, epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, inhibitor eradication, management of bleeding episodes, in patients with congenital and acquired coagulation disorders, with 121 statements, 59 synthesis and 54 recommendations. We report here recommendations and open issues concerning the diagnosis and monitoring of inhibitors, inhibitor eradication and the management of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A and B.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

Health status and health-related quality of life of children with haemophilia from six West European countries.

A multicentre, international, cross-sectional study was carried out in the frame of field testing of the first haemophilia-specific quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire (Haemo-QoL). The aim of this paper is to describe health status and health care and their impact on QoL in haemophilic children in Western Europe. Children aged 4-16 years with severe haemophilia without inhibitors were enrolled by 20 centres in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. Clinical information was collected by the physicians with a medical documentation form. Health-related QoL (HRQoL) of children was assessed with Haemo-QoL, available for three age groups. Clinical data were available in 318 patients, 85.5% with haemophilia A. The mean age at first bleeding was 11 months, at first joint bleed 25 months. Functional joint impairments were found in 11.3%. Prophylaxis treatment was given to 66.7% of children in whom breakthrough bleeds occurred 0.4 times a month compared to 1.1 bleeds in children receiving on-demand treatment. A significantly higher factor consumption was found only in the two younger age groups of prophylaxis patients compared to on-demand patients. HRQoL was satisfactory in this cohort: young children were impaired mainly in the dimension 'family' and 'treatment', whereas older children had higher impairments in the so-called 'social' dimensions, such as 'perceived support' and 'friends'. Health care of children in Western Europe is progressively improving with a large diffusion of home treatment and prophylaxis. This provides a high level of health status and HRQoL, being better in haemophilic adolescents on prophylaxis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for haemophilia in Iran and Italy.

Prenatal diagnosis (PND) is an important issue in the comprehensive care of haemophiliacs. As a consequence of technological progress made in the field of PND, the early detection of an affected fetus provides the expectant couple with a chance to terminate pregnancy. This study was undertaken to assess the attitudes of two different haemophilic populations in Iran and Italy towards PND and termination of pregnancy. This study series included 59 Iranians (38 haemophilia A patients and 21 mothers) and 50 Italians (27 haemophilia A patients, 16 mothers and seven fathers). All the 109 participants received a questionnaire including demographic characteristics and evaluating the psychological effects stemming from PND and termination of pregnancy. Approximately 84.7% of the Iranians and 35.4% of the Italians were not familiar with the possibilities afforded by PND for haemophilia (P < 0.001). Termination of pregnancy appeared to be accepted by 58.2% of the Iranian and 16.7% of the Italian participants (P < 0.001). The greater rate of acceptability of abortion in Iranians may be due to differences in the quality of patient care in the two countries.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

Consensus perspectives on surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors: summary statement.

Summary. Participants in an international workshop on surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the meeting. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for minor and major surgery, including an intermediate degree of surgery. An evaluation system of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding was developed. Recommended doses of FEIBA((R)) and rFVIIa (both in bolus injections and in continuous infusion) for surgery were agreed. Participants also agreed on the main blood tests to be performed peri-operatively. They also suggested the need of a prospective evaluation in the future. Finally, the approximate number of surgical procedures and costs performed on haemophilia patients with inhibitors were analysed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.

Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long-term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality-of-life assessment instruments, and cost-benefit analyses.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed2003

Prospective controlled studies on prophylaxis: an Italian approach.

The benefits of prophylactic infusion of clotting factor in haemophilia A and B in delaying the onset of arthropathy are supported by retrospective data, but the possibility of selection bias and confounding factors cannot be ruled out by such studies. Many issues that have only been studied retrospectively require definitive data, including the optimal dose and infusion intervals, as well as when to start prophylaxis and when to stop it. Issues of cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis, quality of life and treatment satisfaction of patients on prophylaxis and their families also require prospective data. To advance the evidence-based approach in haemophilia treatment, ESPRIT (Evaluation Study on Prophylaxis: a Randomized Italian Trial), currently underway, is a prospective randomized 10-year study that will compare the efficacy and safety of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens in preventing joint deterioration and in reducing the number of bleeds in patients with severe haemophilia A.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2003

A multicenter pharmacokinetic study of the B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII concentrate using different assays and standards.

When the one-stage clotting assay is used in comparison with the chromogenic and immunological assays, plasma levels of factor (F)VIII are underestimated by 40-50% after infusion of B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD-rFVIII) in patients with hemophilia. A possible way to counteract the underestimation of FVIII levels by the one-stage assay is the adoption of a recombinant FVIII reference standard instead of a plasma standard. To evaluate the usefulness of such a standard [ReFacto Laboratory Standard (RLS)], the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single dose of BDD-rFVIII (25 U kg(-1)) were evaluated in a multicenter study carried out in 18 patients with severe hemophilia A. The very low in vivo recovery, obtained with the combination of the one-stage assay and plasma reference standard, was increased up to the values obtained by the chromogenic assay when the results were expressed in terms of RLS. When the plasma standard was used, the one-stage/chromogenic ratio was 0.82 +/- 0.12 for FVIII levels above 25 U dL(-1) and 1.42 +/- 0.99 for FVIII levels below 25 U dL(-1). Using the RLS, the one-stage/chromogenic ratio increased to 1.01 +/- 0.19 at FVIII levels above 25 U dL(-1), as a consequence of a complete overlap of the two decays; however, at FVIII levels below 25 U dL(-1), the one-stage/chromogenic ratio was still 1.6 +/- 0.85. After the twelfth hour, FVIII concentrations obtained by chromogenic assay were always lower than those resulting from the one-stage clotting assay, independently of the standard used. Results obtained by chromogenic assay were not affected by the type of standard used. Compared with those obtained by the one-stage assay, higher values of clearance, lower volume of distribution area and shorter plasma half-life or mean residence time were obtained by chromogenic assay because of a shape change of the decay curve due to a shift to higher values in the first part (time interval 0-12 h) and to lower values in the second part of the decay curve (time interval 12-48 h). As a consequence, the slope of the decay curve obtained by means of chromogenic assay was steeper. In conclusion, the more homogeneous results of in vivo recovery and pharmacokinetic analysis, due to the decrease of discrepancy between the two methods when RLS was used, make the cheaper and more widely used one-stage assay preferable to the more expensive chromogenic assay, on condition that the ReFacto specific standard has used.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with haemophilia care in Europe.

We conducted a multicentre, cross- sectional study of 1042 haemophilia subjects across Europe to compare various health outcomes associated with on-demand vs. prophylactic factor-substitution therapy. Demographic, medical history, and healthcare resource utilization data were analysed along with the number of bleeding events over the past 6 months. Treatment-cost data were also examined to provide preliminary information for future economic studies. A logistic regression analysis, controlling for other statistically significant covariates, showed that patients treated on demand were 3.4 times more likely to have had a joint bleed over the previous 6 months than those treated with prophylaxis. Multiple regression analyses further confirmed these findings, because on-demand subjects had, on average, 5.15 more joint bleeds over the reporting period than patients treated with prophylaxis. Notably, these findings were even more dramatic for younger haemophilia patients when our study sample was stratified by age. Due to the high cost of factor replacement, healthcare costs were significantly higher for subjects treated prophylactically. While hospital costs for prophylaxis subjects were, on average, lower, statistically significant cost savings for prophylactic subjects were not noted. These results suggest that clinicians and health policy decision-makers should consider the advantages of prophylactic therapy for haemophilia patients in formulating treatment protocols and allocating health resources.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Quality-of-life differences between prophylactic and on-demand factor replacement therapy in European haemophilia patients.

The European Study on the Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization associated with Haemophilia Care was designed to compare various health outcomes associated with on-demand and prophylactic factor substitution methods in European haemophilia patients. While the primary objective of this research is to conduct an economic analysis, an important component of this study is to evaluate quality-of-life differences that may exist between patients who utilize these two styles of therapy. Quality-of-life research has emerged as a primary measure of health outcomes because it allows the augmentation of traditional clinical indicators of health with data gathered from the patient's perspective. A total of 1033 haemophilia patients from 16 European haemophilia treatment centres were enrolled in this study. The SF-36, a multidimensional quality-of-life instrument, was administered to all participants. This instrument measures eight health-related quality-of-life dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations, and mental health. All haemophilia subjects enrolled in the study scored significantly lower than the population normative means in the three physical dimensions and in the general health dimension. HIV-negative haemophiliac subjects differed significantly by factor substitution type in a multivariate analysis examining all eight health dimensions. Univariate analyses testing each dimension separately indicated that patients treated prophylactically reported significantly less bodily pain, better general health, and scored significantly higher in the physical functioning, mental health, and social functioning dimensions. While these results suggest that health-related quality-of-life may be better for haemophilia patients treated prophylactically, future prospective studies that gather periodic quality-of-life data over time should be conducted.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2001

Therapeutic choices for patients with hemophilia and high-titer inhibitors.

Effective treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia with high titer inhibitors (HTI) remains a challenge, despite the fact that the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded considerably over the past few years. Treatment safety has improved with the availability of porcine factor VIII (FVIII) and bypassing products such as recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), and plasma-derived activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (aPCCs) that are virally inactivated. The major drawbacks of rFVIIa and aPCCs are their unpredictable hemostatic effect, lack of laboratory assays to monitor efficacy and dosing frequency, and the risk of thrombosis. The proceedings of a one-day workshop of physicians who specialized in treating patients with hemophilia held in Vienna on May 13, 2000 have been summarized. In making a decision regarding the choice of product, physicians often consider the type of bleeding episode (life or limb threatening), age of the patient, volume of the reconstituted product, previous exposure to plasma derived products, cost, efficacy, and safety. For plasma naïve patients, to achieve rapid hemostasis a majority of the panelists used porcine FVIII (for patients who lack porcine inhibitory antibodies) or rFVIIa. For patients previously treated with plasma derived factors, in addition to the above concentrates, aPCCs were recommended. Although no data exists regarding safety and efficacy, switching products was routinely practiced either because of availability or cost. Furthermore, the panelists were uncertain about the efficacy of bypassing agents in the prevention of joint disease in inhibitor patients. The workshop participants felt that future research offers the best solution to resolve some of the dilemmas faced by clinicians and may help individualise treatment in a hemophilia patient with a high titer inhibitor.

Animals↗