PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A H Van Zomeren

Publications and source records attributed to A H Van Zomeren.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Divided attention 5 to 10 years after severe closed head injury.

The ability to divide attention of persons who had sustained a severe Closed Head Injury 5 to 10 years before (chronic CHI patients), was examined in a dual-task experiment administered to 15 CHI patients and 34 control subjects. Both the patient group and the control group consisted of active licenced drivers at the time of the investigation. One task was a compensatory tracking task requiring lane tracking, a basic skill or car driving. The other task was a self-paced visual choice reaction time task. Single-task difficulty was individually adjusted by adaptive task procedures (on both tasks CHI patients reached significantly lower performance levels in single task conditions). With individual differences in single-task performance thus controlled, the ability to divide attention was found to be approximately equal in the chronic CHI patients and the control group. A surprising finding in this light, however, was the significant positive correlation between severity of injury (PTA duration) and divided attention costs in the patient group.

Adult↗

Carotid endarterectomy: does it improve cognitive or motor functioning?

In a group of 20 patients who were to undergo endarterectomy for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the internal carotid artery, the stenosis did not appear to have resulted in cognitive or motor deficits. Consistent with this finding, surgery could not be shown to have a beneficial effect on cognitive or motor functioning. Control data were supplied by 20 patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery and 20 healthy subjects. The test-retest interval was 10 weeks.

Arteriosclerosis↗

Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury.

A follow-up study covering two years after a closed head injury was carried out on a group of 57 young males. Their reaction time was tested on both a simple and a four choice visual reaction task. The group was divided into three subgroups according to length of unconsciousness after the injury. Reaction time discriminated between subgroups, and a highly significant improvement during follow-up was shown. Choice reaction time discriminated better and continued to do so throughout the whole period of follow-up. Some relations of reaction time with clinical variables and outcome are discussed. The choice reaction in particular seems to have some value for monitoring recovery and predicting final outcome.

Adolescent↗