PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

A Hamadeh

Publications and source records attributed to A Hamadeh.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Computer assisted spine surgery.

When inserting screws into a vertebral pedicle, the surgeon usually exposes the back part of the vertebra and uses his or her anatomic knowledge to align the drill in the proper direction. A slight error in direction may result in an important error in the position of the tip of the screw. This is done with no direct visibility of crucial structures (spinal cord, pleura, vessels). Statistical analysis of a series of surgical procedures has shown that 10% to 40% of the screws are not installed correctly. To reduce the risk of complication, a computer assisted method is proposed that enables the surgeon to place a screw at a position preoperatively defined in 3 dimensions using computed tomography images. This allows the surgeon to align a standard surgical drill with the optimal position and direction. The depth of the pilot hole during drilling also is monitored by the system to prevent penetration of the anterior cortex of the vertebral body. Using this procedure, in vitro tests were performed and showed that an accuracy of less than 1 mm can be obtained. Clinical trials were done in 10 patients who suffered severe scoliosis or spondylolisthesis. The trajectory of the holes drilled in L2, L3, L4, and L5 vertebrae were checked for all clinical tests. Postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans showed that the screws were well inserted in each plane for each pedicle. This technique also can be used to perform osteosynthesis at the thoracic and cervical levels.

Adult

Building a hybrid patient's model for augmented reality in surgery: a registration problem.

In the field of Augmented Reality in Surgery, building a hybrid patient's model, i.e. merging all the data and systems available for a given application, is a difficult but crucial technical problem. The purpose is to merge all the data that constitute the patient model with the reality of the surgery, i.e. the surgical tools and feedback devices. In this paper, we first develop this concept, we show that this construction comes to a problem of registration between various sensor data, and we detail a general framework of registration. The state of the art in this domain is presented. Finally, we show results that we have obtained using a method which is based on the use of anatomical reference surfaces. We show that in many clinical cases, registration is only possible through the use of internal patient structures.

Algorithms

MR imaging-guided breast intervention: experience with two systems.

PURPOSE: To evaluate two different systems for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided breast intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 34 lesions detected exclusively with contrast material-enhanced MR imaging underwent 51 interventional procedures (23 needle biopsies and 28 preoperative wire localizations) with two different systems. An add-on device for surface coils was used in 25 cases, and a dedicated single breast biopsy coil was used in 26. For needle biopsies, material was aspirated with nonmagnetic 19.5-gauge needles. For preoperative localizations, nonmagnetic hook wires were used. RESULTS: Surgical excision or follow-up verified the cytologic findings in 19 of the 23 cases sampled for biopsy. Cytologic diagnosis was impossible in three of the 23 cases. One technical failure occurred with the biopsy coil. Open biopsy performed after MR imaging-guided localization successfully removed 26 of the 28 lesions. One missed carcinoma was found at repeat localization and removed. One technical failure occurred with the biopsy coil. In that case, the lesion was close to the chest wall. CONCLUSION: Both systems are suitable for fine-needle biopsy and preoperative localization of lesions seen exclusively on MR images.

Adult