Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Hayden.
Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) is an investigational cardiovascular surgical procedure for patients with severe advanced coronary artery disease refractory to conventional treatment. The following case study traces one particular patient undergoing TMR from preoperative evaluation through a 6-month follow-up visit based on TMR research protocol.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to determine if there were predictors of the symptomatic course of patients with chronic unexplained (essential) dyspepsia. After endoscopic assessment, 111 patients with essential dyspepsia were followed up by telephone interview every second month. Data were gathered, for a mean of 17 mo per patient, on the number of days of upper abdominal pain (the response variable) each month. In the 6-mo period before entry to the study the following predetermined predictor variables were collected: demographic factors (age, sex, social grade), number of pain days in the 6 mo before diagnosis, environmental factors (analgesics, nonsalicylate nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, alcohol, smoking, coffee, tea), length of dyspepsia history, and past history of peptic ulcer. Prospectively for each month of follow-up, the following additional variables were recorded: environmental factors, treatment, and development of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. It was found that patients with more pain before diagnosis were significantly more likely to have pain over the follow-up, and the taking of medications for dyspepsia and development of gastroesophageal reflux were associated with more days of pain over the follow-up (all p less than 0.001). Demographic and environmental factors, length of dyspepsia history, and a past history of ulcer were of no significant predictive value. There was a decrease in pain over the follow-up period (p = 0.002), but this effect was limited to the first two periods after endoscopic diagnosis.
Nonulcer dyspepsia remains a difficult disorder to treat because it is a heterogeneous syndrome. Once patients with the irritable bowel syndrome, esophagitis, and other organic diseases are excluded, there remain patients with dyspepsia of unknown cause (termed "essential dyspepsia") and patients with dyspepsia plus symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux without esophagitis. The aim of this study was to determine whether cimetidine or pirenzepine is efficacious in relieving the symptoms of these latter subgroups. Sixty-two consecutive patients were studied who had chronic upper abdominal pain or nausea where endoscopy had shown no evidence of peptic ulceration, esophagitis, or malignancy; 47 had essential dyspepsia, and 15 had dyspepsia plus gastroesophageal reflux. They were initially randomized to either cimetidine or placebo, or pirenzepine or placebo. Patients continued each medication for 1 mo, and, after a washout period, crossed over when again symptomatic; 51 patients completed cimetidine and placebo, and 50 completed pirenzepine and placebo. The results showed that cimetidine was superior to placebo in decreasing the number of upper abdominal pain episodes weekly and the severity of pain, but the absolute improvement was small. Pirenzepine was not superior to placebo in decreasing symptoms.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.