Biomedical subjects

A Hornung

Publications and source records attributed to A Hornung.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

[Obesity surgery: the refusal rate of health care cost reimbursement despite expert opinion].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgery is an effective method to treat patients with morbid obesity. However health insurance companies frequently refuse to cover the costs for the procedure despite an existing DRG-code for this operation. Individual medical expertise are necessary to receive reimbursement. In the present study the acceptance of medical expertise to receive cost coverage was analysed in our patients of the years 2000-2003 eligible for obesity surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 617 medical expertise of patients eligible for obesity surgery in our hospital were reviewed and the acceptance rate was evaluated. Parameters such as body mass index, personal medical history, diets, comorbidity and prognosis were included. Expertise were submitted to the health care insurance companies and in case of acceptance the operation was performed. RESULTS: The average age of our patients was 39.1 +/- 11.2 years, 72.1% were female, 27.9% male. The average BMI was 47.5 +/- 7.4 kg/m2. There was a high incidence of comorbidity in these patients (58.7% arterial hypertension, 38.6% diabetes mellitus, 95.8% dyspnoea, 96.1% arthropathy, 89.0% psychosocial disorders). The difference between accepted and non-accepted regarding these secondary complications was not significant. 209 patients (33.8%) were operated. 14 patients of these paid the costs themselves. Only in 195 cases (31.6%) the health care insurance company covered the costs for the operation. CONCLUSION: The high number of refusals of medical expertise is not justified in view of the strict criteria for indication, the high frequency of comorbidity and the good results after the operation.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

[The doubling time of circulating CEA as an individual prognostic criterion of recurrence in patients with gastrointestinal cancers].

In a prospective study of 928 patients with gastrointestinal cancer registered for primary resection, the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) time courses were analysed in connection with disease recurrence. Only patients with established diagnosis of disease recurrence and complete follow-up to death entered the evaluation of prognostic criteria of the CEA time course. In this group the CEA time courses of 103/201 patients with recurrent disease exhibited an exponential increase of the serum CEA concentration, i.e. a linear relationship of log CEA and time, which allowed the calculation of the CEA doubling time. All 103 patients developed metastatic spread and generally exhibited CEA doubling times ranging between 10 and 158 days, in patients developing peritoneal carcinosis up to 343 days. The individual CEA doubling times of patients with recurrent disease who received no treatment (n = 71) correlated well with the times of individual survival after the initial CEA increase of the log CEA phase (rs = 0.812; P less than 0.001) thus confirming the results of a previous retrospective study. When the survival time is expressed in multiples of the individual CEA doubling time (IDT), no patient survived longer than 10.8 IDT. The median value of survival was 5.4 IDT. Patients with metastatic spread who underwent various treatments of recurrent disease (n = 32) survived distinctly longer showing survival times up to 32.6 IDT. This could be confirmed by comparing the observed survival after the initial CEA increase of treated and untreated patients (life table method) exhibiting highly significant differences (P less than 0.001).

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗

PubMed1985

[Carcinoembryonic antigen: diagnosis and tumor progression in gastrointestinal tumors].

Tumour progression in 340 patients with resected gastrointestinal primary tumours was monitored using the gradual increase in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum. The commencement of the rise in CEA generally preceded clinical detection of the cancer by several months. The degree to which the rise in CEA correlated with the recurrence of cancer was investigated. There was a marked difference in the distribution of the rises in CEA between local tumour growth and distant metastases. CEA increases of more than 1 microgram CEA/l serum in 10 days occurred exclusively in patients with distant metastases. There was a further marked difference in the distribution of the CEA increase between the group with liver metastases and the groups with peritoneal carcinomatosis or other metastases. The site of the primary tumour had no influence on the CEA increase during formation of metastases.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗

PubMed1985

The clinical validity of circulating tumor-associated antigens CEA and CA 19-9 in primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

The clinical validity of monitoring the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 were investigated in 602 patients with colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic carcinomas. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests were evaluated preoperatively as well as in the postoperative follow-up for early detection of disease progression and recurrence. At a 95% level of specificity as calculated from a group of 150 patients with benign diseases, the CEA test with monoclonal antibody had a preoperative sensitivity of 39% in colorectal cancer and 21% in gastric cancer. On the other hand, CA 19-9 had a sensitivity of 19% in colorectal cancer, 21% in gastric cancer, and 89% in pancreatic cancer. In the postoperative follow-up it was found that a combination of both tumor marker tests was most profitable in gastric carcinomas, yielding an increase of sensitivity from 59%-94%, showing a high degree of complementarity. The gain in sensitivity provided by the CA 19-9 test over the CEA-test in colorectal cancer was very low. The gain in sensitivity, however, provided by the CEA test over the CA 19-9 test in pancreatic carcinoma was also very low. On the basis of these results it has to be recommended that cases with pancreatic carcinoma are to be monitored most efficiently with the CA 19-9 test, whereas in cases with colorectal cancer the CEA test should be used primarily. However, in gastric cancer the combined use of CEA and CA 19-9 represents a highly valuable basis for monitoring the course of disease.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed1985

Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: III. An approach to scoring of prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.

In a clinical study of observed postoperative survival of colorectal cancer patients, we investigated the application of a risk score based on tumor-related prognostic parameters. Six hundred seventy-four patients have been registered for primary surgery of colorectal cancer since 1974 who did not receive further postoperative treatments. The prognostic parameters included operability, tumor extension, and preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. The scoring system was based on the average death-rate ratios of subgroups of patients and their age and sex-matched reference groups derived from the general life table of the population of the Federal Republic of Germany. The individual score sums of the patients exhibited score sum ranges which characterized groups of patients with entirely different observed survival. The prediction of individual survival after primary operation was only partly possible. In the plot of individual survivals vs individual score sums, a marginal risk zone was obtained which evidently represents the zone of maximum expected survival of patients who do not receive further postoperative treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed1985

Eighty-four potential second-look operations based on sequential carcinoembryonic antigen determinations and clinical investigations in patients with recurrent gastrointestinal cancer.

In our study of patients with resected primary gastrointestinal cancer, slope analysis of the post-operatively increasing carcinoembryonic antigen time courses signaled relapse in about 80 percent of the patients up to 12 months before positive clinical diagnosis. In 29 patients, clinical confirmation of the relapse could be obtained only after second-look surgery. Slope analysis generally differentiated localized from metastatic disease and therefore also predicted the site of relapse. A first evaluation of 84 patients with potential cases of second-look operations provided evidence for a significant increase in survival. Recently, the evaluation of individual carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times was used to derive an individual prognosis since doubling times strongly correlated with the survival of untreated patients. On this basis, it was clearly possible to show the benefit of second-look operation, since patients with resectable recurrences exhibited longer survival times compared with patients with similar carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times without treatment. Moreover, the introduction of monoclonal antibodies with increased specificity for malignant states, has facilitated the selection of patients for second-look operation because unspecific carcinoembryonic antigen elevations are less frequent and recurrent disease can be predicted more reliably due to the higher carcinoembryonic antigen increments associated with malignant growth.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed1985

Differentiation of disease recurrence in various primary malignancies using CEA slope analysis.

CEA slope analysis was performed for patients with various primary malignancies who developed recurrent disease. In 340 cases CEA slopes could be calculated, and in 289 cases correlated with distinct diagnosis of recurrent disease. Local recurrence showed a slope range of 0.02-15.2 micrograms CEA increase/l serum/10 days (median = 0.28) and metastatic spread a slope range of 0.03-456 micrograms CEA increase/l serum/10 days (median = 0.98). Subgroups of patients with metastatic spread to the liver, bone, peritoneum and other sites had distinct CEA slope distributions independent of the primary tumors. Comparable slope ranges were found with two different commercially available kits, one a radioimmunoassay (antiserum) and the other enzyme-immunoassay (monoclonal antibody).

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗

PubMed1985

Comparison of a CEA-EIA assay based on monoclonal antibody with a CEA-RIA assay with polyclonal antiserum.

A monoclonal CEA-EIA assay is evaluated with respect to clinically pertinent data. Comparison is done with the conventional CEA-RIA assay (Roche). Good interlaboratory reproducibility was found, and the stability was very good over the one year evaluation period. The EIA assay could be performed in samples of serum and plasma with compatible results. The correlation between the EIA and RIA values was different in different diagnostic groups, with high correlation in colo-rectal cancer, and low in non-malignant diseases, in which the EIA assay had a lower frequency of CEA positive values. In colo-rectal cancer the RIA assay shows a 20% specificity improvement compared with the EIA assay. This was also reflected in better predictability for true positive and true negative cancer diagnosis in this group of patients as well as increased ability to discriminate between malignant and non-malignant diseases. In other groups of patients, like lung cancer and uterine cervical cancer, such improvement was not seen. The discrimination between malignant and non-malignant diseases was comparable to that of the RIA assay. In follow-up series the EIA and RIA assays detected recurrences and responses to treatment in a quite similar way. In most cases of recurrences from colo-rectal cancer, however, the EIA values increased faster and were a better indicator for recurrent disease than the RIA values.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed1984

[Clinical significance of the circulating tumor-associated antigen CA 19-9 in cancers of the digestive tract].

The relevance of the tumour associated antigen CA 19-9, defined by a monoclonal antibody, was investigated in 471 patients with carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract and in 100 patients with benign diseases of the abdomen. In the early stages of gastric and colorectal carcinomas the sensitivity of the CA 19-9 test was between 10 and 25% and increased to about 50% in tumour stage IV. Detection rate in pancreatic carcinoma was 88% and thus markedly higher. The specificity of the test, as against the group of benign abdominal diseases, was 95%. Postoperative CA 19-9 follow-up showed unaltered individual baseline values in 192 out of 196 cases without clinical evidence of tumour progression. However, in 40 out of 61 cases (66%) with recurrencies or metastases continuous increases of CA 19-9 were observed which preceded the clinical relapse by up to 16 months (median 2 months). Concomitant determination of CEA increased sensitivity to 90% due to partial complementary information. This was particularly pronounced in gastric carcinomas in whom continuous increases of CEA involved only 58% of all patients with tumour progression. By simultaneous determination of both tumour markers this ratio rose by increases of both or one antigen to 83%.

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: II. Stomach cancer.

In a clinical investigation of postoperative survival after primary surgery for stomach cancer, 390 patients were registered since 1974. The potential prognostic parameters examined within the first days of hospitalization for primary resection included age of the patients, operability, tumour extension (TNM classification) and tumour stages I-IV (UICC). Statistical treatment of the data revealed that each of the clinical parameters covers critical ranges associated with highly significant differences in patient survival. The preoperative serum CEA concentration exhibited prognostic significance in addition to the criteria of operability and tumour extension. In selected subgroups of patients with distinct resectability and tumour extension, ranges of preoperative CEA concentration could be specified which were associated with statistically significant differences in the patient survival. The results indicate that the preoperative serum CEA level can be an independent prognostic parameter in stomach cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed1982

Doubling time of circulating cea and its relation to survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.

In a retrospective study the postoperative time courses of CEA in colorectal cancer patients with recurrent disease were analysed. In 87/114 cases with increasing concentrations of circulating CEA under close follow-up a linear relationship between log CEA and time could be established during disease recurrence. The individual doubling times of the serum CEA concentration in the log CEA period were calculated and found to cover distinct ranges dependent on the diagnosis of disease recurrence. The CEA doubling times concomitant with local recurrence or second primary carcinomas ranged from 142 to 868 days, visceral metastasis other than liver metastasis from 47 to 231 days and liver metastasis from 10 to 102 days. Patients with bone metastases exhibited CEA doubling times of 54-60 days and a patient with brain metastasis had a CEA doubling time of 598 days. The CEA doubling times of patients with liver metastasis and no further treatment, correlated well with the time of survival after the initial CEA increase of the log CEA phase (r = 0.870, n = 33). The mean survival expressed in multiples of the individual CEA doubling times was 7.0 +/- 1.8. Patients with liver metastasis who underwent various treatments of recurrent disease had a distinctly longer mean survival of 17.4 +/- 9.4 CEA doubling times (P less than 0.001). CEA doubling times can be used as a potential method to assess the efficacy of various treatments.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗