Inhibition of contact allergy reactions by topical FK506.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A I Lauerma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine whether systemic hydrocortisone can elicit allergic skin reactions in patients with contact hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone, we studied four patients with contact hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and two patients with contact hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate but not to hydrocortisone. Open oral provocation with 100 or 250 mg hydrocortisone in patients with hydrocortisone contact hypersensitivity elicited cutaneous reactions at sites of previous allergic dermatitis caused by hydrocortisone in two patients and at sites of earlier allergic patch test reactions caused by hydrocortisone in the other two patients. Provocations in two patients with contact hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate but not to hydrocortisone remained negative. To determine whether the adrenal cortical hormone cortisol, which is identical to hydrocortisone, could induce similar skin reactions, one patient with hydrocortisone contact hypersensitivity underwent adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation tests; as a control, one hydrocortisone-sensitive patient underwent analogous provocations with placebo. After an 8-hour infusion with the adrenocorticotropic hormone analog tetracosactide, a similar skin reaction to that seen with oral hydrocortisone was observed, whereas provocations with placebo remained negative. We conclude that both oral hydrocortisone and intrinsic cortisol are able to induce allergic skin reactions in presensitized subjects.
3 corticosteroids have so far been tried as markers for corticosteroid contact sensitivity: hydrocortisone, tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate. The present study compared these steroids for screening in addition to a standard patch test series. Of 727 patients, 28 (3.9%) reacted to tixocortol pivalate and 10 (1.4%) to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate; hydrocortisone gave an allergic reaction in 2 of 521 (0.4%) patients. Serial dilutions suggested that tixocortol pivalate, not marketed in Finland, caused allergic reactions which could possibly be cross-reactions to hydrocortisone. In contrast to previously published data, frequent cross-reactions occurred with hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and tixocortol pivalate. All allergic reactions to other corticosteroids found by testing with tixocortol pivalate concurred with reactions to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate. The study suggests that the most effective choice for routine testing for corticosteroid contact sensitivity would be both tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Corticosteroids suppress delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions in vivo and impair lymphoid cell functions in vitro. In contact hypersensitivity (CHS) to corticosteroids, however, the corticosteroids are capable of inducing DTH responses in vivo. The present study examined the capacity of corticosteroids to induce in vitro proliferation of T lymphocytes from patients with CHS to corticosteroids. With peripheral blood mononuclear adherent cells as antigen-presenting cells (APC) and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate (H-17-B) as hapten, no proliferation responses were detected of T lymphocytes from patients with CHS to H-17-B. However, when epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) were used as APC, weak proliferation responses were observed.
To determine whether patients with familial benign chronic pemphigus have an increased risk for the development of contact allergies to topical therapy, we performed epicutaneous tests in 15 patients with this disease. Nine had positive patch test reactions of which seven were allergic to compounds used in local treatments. Allergic reactions in more than one patient were seen to neomycin sulfate (three patients), bacitracin (two), and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and betamethasone-17-valerate (two). Although no comparable control group was similarly studied, the frequency of sensitization appears to be increased in patients with familial benign chronic pemphigus.
We showed earlier that most patients with contact dermatitis due to corticosteroids show cross-reactions when patch tested with hydrocortisone-17-butyrate (H-17-B). To test whether H-17-B could be used for detecting topical corticosteroid allergy, we screened patients undergoing routine patch testing with H-17-B. Patients with clearly allergic or doubtful/mildly irritant patch test reactions to H-17-B, and with a history suggesting topical corticosteroid allergy, were further tested with a large panel of steroid preparations. 20 out of 4039 patients (0.5%) showed definite allergic test reactions to corticosteroids. A further 165 patients with clinically suspected corticosteroid allergy were directly tested with a panel of steroid preparations; 14 patients showed positive patch test reactions. Altogether, 33 out of 34 patients with corticosteroid allergy had positive test reactions to H-17-B. Inclusion of 1.0% H-17-B in ethanol in the standard patch test series improves the diagnosis of topical corticosteroid hypersensitivity.
To study whether inhalant allergens could induce eczematous reactions on normal skin of atopic patients we applied birch pollen and house dust mite antigens at 500 times the concentration used for prick testing as epicutaneous tests. Six out of 17 patients with atopic dermatitis in remission had positive delayed type reactions to birch pollen and three to house dust mite. Only one out of 13 atopic patients without history of atopic dermatitis but with seasonal allergic rhinitis had a positive patch test reaction to birch pollen and no patient had positive test reactions to house dust mite. No positive patch test reactions to birch pollen or house dust mite were seen in the ten healthy control subjects. In patients with positive test reactions biopsies from the test sites revealed epidermal spongiosis and vesiculation. Immunostaining of the epidermis revealed keratinocytes displaying both CD1 and HLA-DR. The present study suggests that inhalant allergens can exacerbate atopic dermatitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.