PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A I Ramzy

Publications and source records attributed to A I Ramzy.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Helmet use, patterns of injury, medical outcome, and costs among motorcycle drivers in Maryland.

A comprehensive study was conducted of all motorcycle traffic crashes occurring in Maryland during a one-year period. All available medical and cost data were linked with police crash reports. During the study period, 1,900 motorcycle drivers were involved in crashes. The data indicated that (i) helmet usage was 35% overall, 30% among fatally injured drivers, and only 16% among drivers with a history of drug/alcohol conviction, (ii) unhelmeted drivers seen at an emergency department were almost twice as likely to have sustained head injury (40%) as were helmeted drivers (21%) (the corresponding percentages for hospitalized drivers were 55% and 38%), and (iii) acute care cost for unhelmeted drivers was three times ($30,365) that of helmeted drivers.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed1992

Inter-rater reliability of preventable death judgments. The Preventable Death Study Group.

This study examined the inter-rater reliability of preventable death judgments for trauma. A total of 130 deaths were reviewed for potential preventability by multiple panels of nationally chosen experts. Deaths involving a central nervous system (CNS) injury were reviewed by three panels, each consisting of a trauma surgeon, a neurosurgeon, and an emergency physician. Deaths not involving the CNS were reviewed by three panels, each consisting of two trauma surgeons and an emergency physician. Cases for review were sampled from all hospital trauma deaths occurring in Maryland during 1986. Panels were given prehospital and hospital records, medical examiner reports, and autopsy reports, and asked to independently classify deaths as not preventable (NP), possibly preventable (POSS), probably preventable (PROB), or definitely preventable (DEF). Cases in which there was disagreement about preventability were discussed by the panel as a group (via conference call). Results indicated that overall reliability was low. All three panels reviewing non-CNS deaths agreed in only 36% of the cases (kappa = 0.21). Agreement among panels reviewing CNS deaths was somewhat higher at 56% (kappa = 0.40). Most of the disagreements, however, were in judging whether deaths were NP or POSS. Agreement was higher for early deaths and less severely injured patients. For non-CNS deaths agreement was also higher for younger patients. When both autopsy results and prehospital care reports were available reliability increased across panels. A variety of approaches have been used to elicit judgments of preventability. This study provides information to guide recommendations for future studies involving implicit judgments of preventable death.

Central Nervous System↗
PubMed1992

Hospitalizations for traumatic injuries among children in Maryland: trends in incidence and severity: 1979 through 1988.

Trends in incidence and severity of hospitalized injury among children aged 0 through 13 years in the state of Maryland from 1979 through 1988 (n = 35,746) were examined using routinely reported hospital discharge data. Hospital discharge rates declined over the study period from 509 per 100,000 population in 1979 to 320 in 1988. There was a decline in incidence trends for both races. However, the decrease in the nonwhite population was smaller than in whites. Analysis of incidence rates for specific Injury Severity Score groups revealed a declining trend in all Injury Severity Score groups, although the mildest group (Injury Severity Score 1 through 4) had the most notable decline of 44% compared with an average decline of 20% in the other severity groups. These data suggest a change in admission practices of mildly injured children as a major cause for the observed overall decline in hospitalization rates. The smaller decrease in the hospitalization rates of non-white children compared with white children requires further study to determine the cause.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Trauma case mix and hospital payment: the potential for refining DRGs.

Uniform hospital discharge abstract data from Maryland were used to examine the homogeneity of trauma-related DRGs with respect to a well-established measure of injury severity, the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Thirty DRGs were identified as including trauma cases with a wide range of severity; for each of these DRGs, ISS explains a significant amount of variation in length of stay. By applying statistical techniques similar to those used to create the original DRG groupings, these 30 DRGs were subdivided by severity and age categories to create a new set of severity-modified DRGs. The potential effects of using DRGs and modified DRGs to pay for inpatient care within the Maryland state regionalized system of trauma care were examined. Payments based on regional averages per DRG and per modified DRG were compared to actual hospital charges regulated by the state's Health Services Cost Review Commission. Using average charges per DRG as a basis of payment, approximately !1.4 million (11 percent of total hospital charges) would be shifted from trauma centers to nontrauma centers. This shift represents an 18 percent loss in revenues to trauma centers and a 30 percent gain in revenues to nontrauma centers. Using a payment system based on severity-modified DRGs, trauma centers would still experience a net loss in revenues and the nontrauma centers a net gain, but the total amount of the shift would be reduced from $11.4 million to $9.8 million. The results argue for the need to explore alternative payment systems not strictly based on current DRGs. Because of DRGs do not adequately reflect severity differences, using them to pay hospitals will create financial incentives that discourage regionalization of trauma care.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1990

Evaluating performance of statewide regionalized systems of trauma care.

A new methodology is presented for evaluating the extent to which patients within regionalized systems of trauma care are treated at the appropriate hospitals. Criteria are proposed for retrospectively classifying trauma patients as to whether they should have been treated at a trauma center. The criteria were developed by a panel of nationally recognized trauma experts and are based on the age of the patient and the type and AIS severity of injuries sustained. The criteria were then applied to uniformly collected data available for all trauma discharges in 1988 from acute care hospitals in a state with a well developed system of regionalized trauma care. According to the criteria, 19% of all trauma discharges in 1988 should have been treated at a trauma centers. Of those who should have been treated at a trauma center according to criteria, 66% actually received treatment at a center. Of those who were classified not to have required care at a trauma center, 62% actually were treated at non-trauma center hospitals. The congruence between where patients should have been treated and the actual level of hospital care received varied by the type and severity of the traumatic injuries sustained. The results of the analysis provide insights into the characteristics of trauma patients at higher risk of not getting the appropriate level of trauma care and should assist in improving guidelines for triage and transfer within a regionalized system of care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Methodologic approach for a large functional trauma registry.

The utility of a clinical trauma registry (TR) is directly related to the constituents of the data base and to the accuracy of the data, which is contingent on a carefully constructed data collection system. A TR was developed by traumatologists at a busy Level I trauma facility that predominantly receives patients having incurred blunt injury. Four dedicated data collectors gather the AP information within 24 to 48 hours after admission, with prompt Attending Surgical review for verification. Examples of data output prove this is a functional system. Using a careful methodologic approach for design and implementation, clinicians can create a large, functional trauma registry with many potential applications.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1988

Management of major tracheobronchial ruptures in patients with multiple system trauma.

Major tracheobronchial injury presents special problems in the context of multiple system trauma. A 14-year review of a clinical experience revealed eight patients who had operative repair of major bronchial or intrathoracic tracheal injuries. The diagnosis was suspected by subcutaneous emphysema, and especially by persistent pneumothorax or a significant air leak. Bronchoscopy confirmed the diagnosis in all patients before thoracotomy. All eight patients had multiple system injuries. All five with abdominal injuries were hypotensive at admission and underwent celiotomy before thoracotomy. The decision to perform thoracotomy or celiotomy first in patients with major tracheobronchial injuries and concomitant abdominal trauma must be individualized. If both injuries are recognized simultaneously and the patient is hemodynamically unstable but has adequate oxygenation and ventilation, the celiotomy can be performed first. On the contrary, if oxygenation and ventilation are the most threatening problems in a hemodynamically stable patient despite evidence of hemoperitoneum, the bronchial repair should have priority.

Adolescent↗