PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Avery

Publications and source records attributed to A J Avery.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate studies of interventions in primary care aimed at reducing medication related adverse events that result in morbidity, hospital admission, and/or mortality. METHODS: Fourteen electronic databases were systematically searched for published and unpublished data. Bibliographies of retrieved papers were searched and experts and first authors contacted in an attempt to locate additional studies. There were no restrictions on language of publication. All interventions applied in primary care settings which aimed to improve patient safety by reducing adverse events resulting from medication overuse or misuse were considered. Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series studies were eligible for inclusion. Study quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care data collection checklist and template. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: 159 studies were initially identified, of which 38 satisfied our inclusion criteria. These were categorised as follows: 17 pharmacist-led interventions (of which 15 reported hospital admissions as an outcome); eight interventions led by other primary healthcare professionals that reported preventable drug related morbidity as an outcome; and 13 complex interventions that included a component of medication review aimed at reducing falls in the elderly (the outcome being falls). Meta-analysis found that pharmacist-led interventions are effective at reducing hospital admissions (OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.96)), but restricting analysis to the randomised controlled trials failed to demonstrate significant benefit (OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.05)). Pooling the results of studies in the other categories did not demonstrate any significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is relatively weak evidence to indicate that pharmacist-led medication reviews are effective in reducing hospital admissions. There is currently no evidence for the effectiveness of other interventions which aim at reducing admissions or preventable drug related morbidity. More randomised controlled trials of primary care based pharmacist-led interventions are needed to decide whether or not this intervention is effective in reducing hospital admissions.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2005

Assessing the accuracy of a computerized decision support system for digoxin dosing in primary care: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out as part of a European Union funded project (PharmDIS-e+), to develop and evaluate software aimed at assisting physicians with drug dosing. A drug that causes particular problems with drug dosing in primary care is digoxin because of its narrow therapeutic range and low therapeutic index. OBJECTIVES: To determine (i) accuracy of the PharmDIS-e+ software for predicting serum digoxin levels in patients who are taking this drug regularly; (ii) whether there are statistically significant differences between predicted digoxin levels and those measured by a laboratory and (iii) whether there are differences between doses prescribed by general practitioners and those suggested by the program. METHODS: We needed 45 patients to have 95% Power to reject the null hypothesis that the mean serum digoxin concentration was within 10% of the mean predicted digoxin concentration. Patients were recruited from two general practices and had been taking digoxin for at least 4 months. Exclusion criteria were dementia, low adherence to digoxin and use of other medications known to interact to a clinically important extent with digoxin. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were recruited. There was a correlation of 0.65 between measured and predicted digoxin concentrations (P < 0.001). The mean difference was 0.12 microg/L (SD 0.26; 95% CI 0.04, 0.19, P = 0.005). Forty-seven per cent of the patients were prescribed the same dose as recommended by the software, 44% were prescribed a higher dose and 9% a lower dose than recommended. CONCLUSION: PharmDIS-e+ software was able to predict serum digoxin levels with acceptable accuracy in most patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Patient safety features of clinical computer systems: questionnaire survey of GP views.

AIM: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs') stated knowledge, use and training needs related to the patient safety features of computerised clinical systems in England. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: GPs from six English primary care trusts. OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs' views on the importance of specified patient safety features on their computer system; their knowledge of the presence of specified safety features; previous training and perceived future training needs. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty one GPs (64.0%) completed and returned the questionnaire. Although patient safety features were considered to be an important part of their computer system by the vast majority of GPs, many were unsure as to whether the system they were currently using possessed some of the specified features. Some respondents erroneously believed that their computers would warn them about potential contraindications or if an abnormal dose frequency had been prescribed. Only a minority had received formal training on the use of their system's patient safety features. CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety was an issue high on the agenda of this GP sample. The importance of raising GPs' awareness of both the potential use and deficiencies of the patient safety features on their systems and ensuring that appropriate training is available should not be underestimated.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Variation in how mothers, health visitors and general practitioners use the personal child health record.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, a national personal child health record (PCHR) with local adaptations is in widespread use. Previous studies report that parents find the PCHR useful and that health visitors use it more than other health professionals. This study was carried out in Nottingham, where the local PCHR is similar to the national PCHR. OBJECTIVES: To explore variation in use of the PCHR made by mothers with differing social characteristics, to compare heath visitors' and general practitioners' (GPs') use of the PCHR, and to compare health visitors' and GPs' perceptions of the PCHR with those of mothers for whose children they provide care. METHODS: Questionnaires to 534 parents registered with 28 general practices and interviews with a health visitor and GP at each practice. A score per mother for perceived usefulness of the PCHR was developed from the questionnaire, and variation in the score was investigated by linear regression adjusted for clustering. RESULTS: Four hundred and one (75%) questionnaires were returned. Three hundred and twenty-five (82%) mothers thought the PCHR was very good or good. Higher scores for usage of the PCHR were significantly associated with teenage and first-time mothers, but no association was found with mother's social class, education or being a single parent. There was no association between variation in the score and practice, health visitor or GP characteristics. Mothers, health visitors and GPs reported that mothers took the PCHR to baby clinic more frequently than when seeing their GP, and that health visitors wrote in the PCHR more frequently than GPs. Eighteen (67%) health visitors and 20 (71%) GPs said they had difficulty recording information in the PCHR. CONCLUSION: The PCHR is used by most mothers and is important for providing health promotion material to all families with young children. It may be particularly useful for first-time and teenage mothers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Risk factors for development of impaired renal function in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in primary care.

AIMS: To evaluate risk factors for the development of an impaired renal function, defined as a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by Cockcroft-Gault formula < 50.5 ml/min, in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A case-control study of Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired renal function and age, sex and practice matched controls with Type 2 diabetes mellitus without impaired renal function in 10 Dutch family practices performing the Nijmegen Monitoring Project. Main outcome measure was the independent risk factors of impaired renal function. RESULTS: Eighty-seven individuals with impaired renal function were identified. The point prevalence of impaired renal function in the sample population on 31 March 2001 was 87/873 (10.0%; 95% confidence interval 7.0-15.1%). Of 87 cases, 23 (26.5%; 17.3-30.9%) were found to have impaired renal function at diagnosis. Conditional multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for the development of impaired renal function: duration of diabetes > or = 8 years (adjusted odds ratio 5.6 (2.5-12.5); P < 0.001), glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault formula 50.5-80.5 ml/min at diagnosis [3.5 (1.5-8.1); P < 0.01] and existing macrovascular complications at diagnosis [2.6 (1.1-6.3); P < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: Duration of diabetes > or = 8 years, mild renal impairment at the time of diagnosis and existing macrovascular complications at the time of diagnosis are independent risk factors for the development of impaired renal function in white patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Indicators for preventable drug related morbidity: application in primary care.

AIM: To apply in practice a series of validated indicators for preventable drug related morbidity (PDRM). DESIGN: A pilot study to identify retrospectively potential PDRM events over a 2 year 3 month time frame using the MIQUEST computer software program. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The electronic patient record of all patients aged 18 years and over in nine English general practices. OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of potential PDRM events identified, as defined by the indicators. RESULTS: Five hundred and seven potential PDRM events were identified from 49 658 electronic patient records, giving an overall incidence of 1.0%. A small number of the indicators (n = 4) accounted for approximately 60% of the events, while for many indicators few events were identified. The most common events related to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with congestive heart failure or hypertension, lack of monitoring in patients prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and the use of hypnotic-anxiolytic agents. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of indicators contributed to the majority of the PDRM events. Interrogation of electronic patient records in primary care using computerised queries shows potential for detecting PDRM.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Views of older people on cataract surgery options: an assessment of preferences by conjoint analysis.

BACKGROUND: Key issues in the quality of care for people with cataracts in the UK include hospital waiting lists, complication rates from surgery, and the use of junior surgeons. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relative importance that older people attach to these factors when given theoretical choices over options for cataract surgery. METHOD: A systematic sample of 194 individuals aged 60-84 years on a general practice register in Nottingham were invited to take part in an interview based survey. Respondents ranked 11 "cataract surgery packages" containing different waiting list lengths, complication risks, and surgeon grades. Conjoint analysis was performed to determine the relative importance of these factors for individuals and for the group as a whole. RESULTS: Of the 194 subjects invited to participate, 146 (72%) completed the interview. For the group as a whole the "averaged importance" of the factors was: complication risk 45.8%; waiting time 41.1%, surgeon grade 13.1%. Analysis of importance scores for individuals showed that some were particularly concerned about complication risk while others were more concerned about waiting times. There was a strong negative correlation between importance scores for these factors (Spearman's rho -0.78, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents thought that either risk of damage to sight and/or waiting time were important, while surgeon grade was relatively unimportant. The findings show that some potential cataract patients prefer a greater risk of complication combined with a short wait than a low complication rate and a longer wait.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Investigation into the reasons for preventable drug related admissions to a medical admissions unit: observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the drugs and types of medicine management problems most frequently associated with preventable drug related admissions to an acute medical admissions unit. DESIGN: Observation study. SETTING: Medical admissions unit in a teaching hospital in Nottingham, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 4093 patients seen by pharmacists on the medical admissions unit between 1 January and 30 June 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of admissions that were drug related and preventable, classification of the underlying causes of preventable drug related admissions, and identification of drugs most commonly associated with preventable drug related admissions. RESULTS: Of the admissions seen by pharmacists, 265 (6.5%) were judged to be drug related and 178 (67%) of these were judged to be preventable. Preventable admissions were mainly due to problems with prescribing (63 cases (35%)), monitoring (46 cases (26%)), and adherence to medication (53 cases (30%)). The drugs most commonly implicated were NSAIDs, antiplatelets, antiepileptics, hypoglycaemics, diuretics, inhaled corticosteroids, cardiac glycosides, and beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially preventable drug related morbidity was associated with 4.3% of admissions to a medical admissions unit. In 91% of cases these admissions were related to problems with either prescribing, monitoring, or adherence.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2002

Survival in a cohort of social services placements in nursing and residential homes: factors associated with life expectancy and mortality.

The aim of this study was to examine the life expectancy of elderly people in nursing and residential care over a 20-month period and its relationship to specific risk factors. Using a retrospective cohort design, data obtained on 1888 residents placed between 1 July 1997 and 30 April 1999 in residential, nursing and dual registered homes within Nottingham Health Authority boundaries were examined. Additional data on physical and mental disability at placement were available for 514 residents. Main outcome measures comprised survival rate overall, and in relation to gender, age, home type (nursing, residential or dual), source of placement (hospital or community) and various disability factors.One-year survival rates were: overall, 66%; nursing homes, 59%; dual homes, 58%; and residential homes 76%. Median survival in nursing homes was 541 days, but was not reached in residential homes. Male gender, admission to nursing or dual registered homes, placement from hospital, decreased mobility and increased age were associated with decreased life expectancy. Although no association was found between length of survival and level of cognitive function, lack of cognitive impairment was associated with lower survival. In conclusion, mortality is high in nursing, dual and residential homes where life expectancy has been shown to be associated with gender, home type, origin of placement and mobility. Rates of survival are related to higher comorbidity and disability. Important data for planning and assessing care needs can be yielded through the analysis of mortality data.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Assessing the quality of preschool child health surveillance in primary care: a pilot study in one health district.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for measuring the quality of preschool child health surveillance acceptable to primary health care teams and measurable at individual primary health care team level. DESIGN: Published research evidence was identified and criteria developed by a local multidisciplinary expert group. The criteria were discussed with primary health care teams. How well they were achieved was assessed. SETTING: Twenty-eight general practices in one health authority area. METHODS: Data collection included observation of baby clinics, interviews with health visitors and general practitioners (GPs), questionnaires to parents, collation of child health surveillance reviews recorded in personal child health records and immunization rates. RESULTS: The criteria for assessing preschool child health surveillance were thought to be acceptable and achievable by primary health care teams. Fifteen of the 22 criteria used to assess baby clinics were met by over 90 of practices. Almost all practices completed child health surveillance reviews within a standard time and achieved 90 coverage for primary immunizations. At many practices, less than 90 of parents felt welcome at the baby clinic, usually had enough time to talk to their health visitor or had the purpose or results of the 6 to 8 week child health surveillance review explained to them. GPs were less likely than health visitors to discuss health promotion at child health surveillance reviews (chi(2) 11.52, P = 0.0007). Few practices had a call-up and recall system for all reviews. CONCLUSION: The framework that we developed for assessing preschool child health surveillance was acceptable and achievable by primary health care teams.

Child Health Services↗
PubMed2002

GPs' views on computerized drug interaction alerts: questionnaire survey.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that patients are being prescribed potentially hazardous drug-drug combinations in general practice despite the use of computerized drug interaction alert systems. One reason for this may be that general practitioners (GPs) are overriding these alerts without properly checking them. AIMS: (i) To assess GPs views on the relevance of information provided by alert systems; (ii) To determine the proportion of GPs that admit to frequently overriding interaction alerts without properly checking them and (iii) To explore factors that might be associated with a tendency to override alerts. METHODS: Questionnaire survey of GPs in four primary care trusts in the Nottingham area of the UK. RESULTS: The response rate was 70% (236 of 336) and detailed analysis was conducted on the 220 respondents who had drug interaction alert systems on their practice computers. Of these, 22% (49 of 220) admitted to frequently or very frequently overriding drug interaction alerts without properly checking them. Potential reasons for overriding alerts included the perception that the alerts were frequently irrelevant. Nevertheless 90% (198 of 219) agreed that it should be more difficult to override alerts for potentially lethal drug combinations. Logistic regression analysis showed that users of the EMIS (Egton Medical Information Systems) computer system were much less likely to admit to overriding alerts without properly checking them than users of other computer systems. CONCLUSION: A minority of GPs admit to frequently overriding their drug interaction alert systems without properly checking them. The type of computer system used by GPs may make it more or less likely that they override alerts.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2002

Primary care teams work harder in deprived areas.

BACKGROUND: The NHS Plan promises an equitable distribution of resources within primary care. To inform the debate on the extent to which resources should be redistributed we examined the association between primary care activity and deprivation. We used the natural experiment of the organization of primary care in Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, where town centre general practices have patients from electoral wards with a range of socio-economic characteristics who are subject to the same degree of supplier-induced demand and variations in data quality. METHODS: We used one year's prospective data for two practices with 20,106 patients from 15 electoral wards. We performed linear regression analysis of directly age-standardized rates for different types of primary care activity and primary care morbidity-specific contacts against Townsend and Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 scores. RESULTS: There were 44 per cent more out-of-hours contacts in more deprived areas (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 17-70 per cent), 18 per cent more surgery consultations (95 per cent CI 8-27 per cent), and 28 per cent more same-day consultations (95 per cent CI 12-44 per cent). Routine visits by doctors and contacts by district and practice nurses did not have substantial associations with deprivation. Morbidity-specific contacts for psychological problems and respiratory problems were associated with deprivation but there was no significant association for contacts for low back pain, asthma or menopausal problems. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of primary care activity and contacts for different morbidities had different associations with deprivation. This makes it difficult to recommend a simple list size adjustment; however, increased activity in deprived wards needs to be recognized in resource allocation, service configuration and performance management in primary care.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Self-reported medication use for older people in England and Wales.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the patterns of self-reported medication use, including both prescription and non-prescription drugs, for older people in five areas in England and Wales, and to identify the effects of socio-demographic features on medication use. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey on population random samples of people aged 65 and over. The survey is a part of the screening interviews at the first stage of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS) carried out between 1991 and 1994. The sample was stratified to provide equal numbers in the 65-74 years and 75 years and over age groups. SETTING: Three urban (Newcastle, Nottingham and Oxford) and two rural (Cambridgeshire and Gwynedd) centres. Older people living in both the general community and institutions were included. PARTICIPANTS: 12489 older people whose medication data were collected among the 13009 participants of the CFAS, of which the participation rate is 80%. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of medication use was 75% (95% confidence interval 74-76%) for people aged 65-74 and 84% (83-85%) for people aged 75 and over, with a mean number of 2.03 (standard deviation 1.95) and 2.47 (2.02) drugs reported per respondent in each group, respectively. Concurrent use of five or more drugs (polypharmacy) was found in 11% (10-12%) of people in the 65-74 age group and in 15% (14-16%) in the 75 and over age group. People aged 75 and over were more likely to be taking at least one drug than people aged 65-74 (OR=1.69, 1.54-1.85), and women were more likely to be so compared with men (OR=1.43, 1.30-1.56). Centre variation was found but none of the centres consistently showed higher or lower usage of medications across the major drug categories. People living in institutions were more likely to be taking gastrointestinal drugs, central nervous system drugs and experience polypharmacy. The use of respiratory and central nervous system drugs (except hypnotics and anxiolytics) increased in lower social class and decreased in people attending full-time education for 10 years or more. The use of haematology/dietetic drugs (85% of which were vitamin and mineral preparations) decreased in lower social class. CONCLUSION: This study provides representative estimates of medication usage among older people in England and Wales and identified associated factors and regional variations for medication use in a category-specific manner. The findings, suggesting the existence of centre variation and the association between type of accommodation, social class and medication use warrant further investigation.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

What can students learn from studying medicine in literature?

OBJECTIVE: To identify what students can learn from studying medicine and literature as part of a final-year special study module in general practice. METHOD: The project reports and evaluation forms completed by all eight students who had chosen to study medicine and literature as part of their special study module in general practice at Nottingham University Medical School were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: Students said that they gained a greater understanding of the patient's experience of illness, as a result of the texts they had read. They learned how illness can affect family or friends of the patient and about the psychological impact of physical illness. Most students thought their future care of patients would be influenced by what they had learned. Studying medicine in literature during a clinical attachment allowed students to draw comparisons between literature and their clinical experience. DISCUSSION: This study is based on a small number of students who chose to study medicine in literature. The results may not be generalizable to all medical students and not all students may be receptive to this method of learning. However, we recommend that students who are interested should be given the opportunity to study medicine in literature during their clinical years. This can enable them to reflect on their clinical experience and can provide a more profound understanding of the consequences of illness for the patient and their family.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2000

A prescription for improvement? An observational study to identify how general practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how some general practices have low growth in prescribing costs relative to other practices. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Trent region of England. PARTICIPANTS: 162 general practices: 54 with low growth in prescribing costs, 54 with average increases in costs, and 54 with large increases in costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in prescribing costs in therapeutic categories in which it has been suggested that savings can be made. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the three groups of practices in terms of their changes in prescribing costs for almost all the variables studied. For the group of practices with lowest growth in costs the most important factors were reducing numbers of prescription items and costs per item; relatively low growth in the costs of "new and expensive" drugs; increasing generic prescribing; and reducing costs for modified release products. This group of practices did not increase costs as much as the others for lipid lowering drugs (P=0.012) and hormone replacement therapy (P=0. 007). The practices with the greatest increases in costs had particularly large increases for proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and modified release products. Compared with the other groups these practices had larger increases in costs for "expensive hospital initiated drugs" (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: General practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs in many ways, with growth in costs for "new and expensive" drugs being particularly important.

Drug Costs↗
PubMed2000

Age and proximity to death as predictors of GP care costs: results from a study of nursing home patients.

This paper reports the results of a study of GP costs associated with a group of nursing home patients who died at various stages during a 12-month period. The relationship between costs per month of care, patient age and proximity to death, where sex and diagnosis are controlled for are reported. A comparison of care costs for patients in their last year of life and those who survived the course of the study is also made. The study found that those in their last year of life were significantly more expensive to care for than those who survived the duration of the study, but that there was no statistically significant difference in age. In multivariate regression analyses, it was also found that among those who died during the study care costs were unrelated to age, but significantly related to proximity to death. The study supports the contention of others (Zweifel P, Felder S, Meiers M. Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring? Health Econ 1999; 8: 485-496) that health care costs are more directly related to proximity to death than age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Is there a role for computerized decision support for drug dosing in general practice? A questionnaire survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine: (i) whether general practitioners have difficulty with drug dosing; (ii) what information sources they currently use to help them with drug dosing; (iii) their views on the potential value of decision support software for drug dosing. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Nottingham, U.K. PARTICIPANTS: 263 general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS: The response rate was 78% (263/336). Most GPs reported difficulties with drug dosing for children, the elderly and patients with renal impairment. Compared with 'patients in general', GPs had particular difficulties in drug dosing for these specific groups (P < 0.001). Paper-based formularies were the most common source of information for help with drug doses. Nevertheless, most GPs had positive views on the potential usefulness of computerized decision support. CONCLUSION: GPs commonly have problems in drug dosing for certain groups of patients. The development and use of computerized decision support might help GPs in these situations.

Drug Prescriptions↗