PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Eccersley

Publications and source records attributed to A J Eccersley.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to devise a symptom scoring system to assist in diagnosing constipation and in discriminating among pathophysiologic subgroups. METHOD: A structured symptom scoring questionnaire (11 questions) was completed by 71 chronically constipated patients and by 20 asymptomatic controls. The symptom score was correlated with a previously validated constipation score (Cleveland Clinic Score). All patients underwent colonic transit studies, standard anorectal physiology testing, and evacuation proctography. On the basis of these investigations alone, an observer blinded to the questionnaire results allocated patients to one of three pathophysiologic subgroups: slow-transit constipation, rectal evacuatory disorder, or mixed (slow-transit constipation and rectal evacuatory disorder). Linear discriminant analysis was used to assess the ability of different questionnaire symptoms to discriminate among these subgroups. RESULTS: Total symptom score was strongly correlated with the Cleveland Clinic Score (r = 0.9). The median total score in constipated patients was 20 (range, 11-35) compared with a median of 2 in controls (range, 0-6). Discriminant analysis using cross validation estimated that pathophysiology could be predicted correctly for 55 percent (95 percent confidence interval = 43-67 percent) of patients using just five symptoms. The discriminant function rarely misclassified patients with rectal evacuatory disorder as slow-transit constipation and vice versa, but could not effectively discriminate between patients with single and mixed pathologies. CONCLUSION: This new scoring system is a valid technique to assist in the diagnosis of constipation and is the first study using appropriate statistical methodology to demonstrate a discriminatory ability of multiple symptoms in constipation. At present, symptom analysis does not adequately differentiate major pathophysiologic subgroups for use in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Vertical reduction rectoplasty: a new treatment for idiopathic megarectum.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of idiopathic megarectum is unknown and the results of surgery are often unsatisfactory. Rectal hyposensation is common and poor perception of rectal filling may contribute to the poor evacuatory function. By reducing the capacity of the rectum, it was hypothesized that sensory thresholds to rectal distension and perception of urge to defaecate would be improved. METHODS: Vertical reduction rectoplasty (VRR) and concomitant sigmoid colectomy was performed on six patients with idiopathic megarectum. Patients were evaluated before and after operation by detailed questionnaire and anorectal physiology. Postoperative rectal compliance was also studied by means of a programmable electronic barostat. Where appropriate, physiological data were compared with those obtained in eight healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Bowel frequency increased from a preoperative median of 2.5 to 16 per month after operation. Four patients reported improved rectal perception of the urge to defaecate. Thresholds for defaecatory urge and maximum tolerated volume were significantly reduced following VRR (P<0.05). Post-VRR rectal compliance was no different from that in healthy volunteers. Colonic transit time decreased significantly after VRR (P<0.05) and evacuation on proctography increased from a median of 30 per cent to 50 per cent. At a median of 57 weeks' follow-up five of the six patients expressed continued satisfaction with the results. CONCLUSION: VRR is a new approach to the treatment of idiopathic megarectum. Clinical and physiological studies confirm that it can improve sensory feedback and defaecation. The procedure needs further evaluation as the number of patients undergoing the procedure increases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Comparative study of two sites of colonic conduit placement in the treatment of constipation due to rectal evacuatory disorders.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation may be treated by antegrade colonic irrigation via a colonic conduit. METHODS: Two alternative sites of colonic conduit construction were evaluated for their effect on the symptoms of 21 consecutive women with intractable constipation primarily due to rectal evacuatory disorders. The conduit was constructed in the sigmoid colon in the first 11 patients and in the transverse colon in the subsequent ten. Symptomatic outcome was evaluated clinically and by questionnaires, with a prospective quality of life assessment in the transverse group. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 (range 6-60) months, reflux or stenosis necessitated revision or dilatation in six patients. Irrigation with a median of 1.3 (0.8-2.0) litres of water achieved evacuation in all patients. Improvements in abdominal pain and bloating were reported by seven of the ten patients in the transverse conduit group, but benefit was found in only three of 11 in the sigmoid group. There was no significant improvement in quality of life scores. In the medium term, seven patients retained a transverse conduit compared with three with a sigmoid conduit. CONCLUSION: The transverse colonic conduit offers better relief from the symptoms of constipation due to rectal evacuatory dysfunction than the sigmoid conduit.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1998

Anorectal reconstruction--restoring continence after abdominoperineal excision of the anorectum.

This article describes the technique of anal sphincter reconstruction using electrically stimulated graciloplasty. The results of recent published series of reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision are analyzed, and the modifications used to reduce complications are explored. Techniques of rectal reconstruction and methods of improving evacuation are also discussed. Techniques of reconstruction after high anorectal atresia as well as possible future developments in this field are considered. In the final section the possible qualitative benefits and the health economics of anorectal reconstruction are examined.

Abdomen↗