PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Grindon

Publications and source records attributed to A J Grindon.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

Human immunodeficiency virus infection among health care workers who donate blood.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among health care workers who donate blood. DESIGN: Point prevalence survey of blood donors. SETTING: 20 U.S. blood centers that participate in an ongoing interview study of HIV-seropositive blood donors. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence rates for HIV in persons who reported being health care workers were measured directly for 6 of the 20 blood centers. For the other 14 centers, we derived the numerator from the interview study in the same manner used for the 6 centers; we estimated the denominator using blood collection logs at those centers and extrapolations from the survey completed at the 6 blood centers. RESULTS: Between March 1990 and August 1991, 8519 health care workers donated blood at 6 hospitals and other medical facilities. Three persons were HIV seropositive: Two reported being health care workers and having nonoccupational risk factors for HIV infection; the occupation and other possible risk factors of the third seropositive donor could not be determined. Therefore, the highest overall prevalence of HIV infection among health care worker donors at these 6 centers was 0.04% (3 of 8519; upper limit of 95% CI, 0.1%). We estimated that during the same period, approximately 36,329 health care workers were tested for HIV at all 20 centers. Twenty-seven persons infected with HIV who donated at hospitals were identified; 7 did not return for interviews, so their health care occupations could not be verified. Thus, the highest estimated overall prevalence of HIV infection among health care worker donors at the 20 centers was 0.07% (27 of 36,329; upper limit of CI, 0.1%). Of the 20 known health care worker donors, 11 reported nonoccupational risks for HIV infection; 3 of the remaining 9 health care workers described occupational blood exposures that could have resulted in transmission of HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Blood donors can serve as a sentinel cohort when evaluating the risk for occupationally acquired HIV infection. These findings suggest that among the many health care worker donors in this study, HIV infection attributable to occupational exposure was uncommon.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Laboratory and epidemiologic evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to HTLV-III.

The enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for antibody to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) were rapidly adopted for screening donated blood and plasma. To evaluate the significance of a positive EIA reaction, test performance was examined in a blood bank screening program. Specimens were tested by EIA, Western blot assay, and HTLV-III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV) culture. The EIA was positive in 0.25% of 67 190 blood donations. Specimens were categorized and 57.3% had low (weak) reactivity, 12.7% had moderate reactivity, and 30.0% had high reactivity. Highly reactive specimens were strongly associated with a positive Western blot or culture (86.7%) in contrast to moderately and weakly reactive specimens (1.9%). Twenty-five of 29 donors interviewed with a highly reactive EIA had risk factors for HTLV-III/LAV infection. Risk factors were not identified for 74 of 75 interviewed donors with specimens of lower reactivity. The minimum calculated specificity was 99.82%. The use of the HTLV-III EIA has virtually eliminated the use of blood and plasma from HTLV-III/LAV infected donors.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Adverse reactions to whole blood donation and plasmapheresis.

Whole blood donation is recognized to be extremely safe, yet there have been reports of serious problems stemming from whole blood donation, and so-called "donor reactions" are regularly seen. While the physiologic causes of the common donor reactions are not completely understood, some effects of whole blood donation (such as transient iron deficiency) are understood but probably not significant. In order to avoid accepting any volunteer donor who might be at risk of a serious reaction, we may have been overly cautious in exclusion of potential donors. The pheresis donor is subjected to potential depletion of the protein or cellular elements being removed, problems caused by the device used for automated pheresis, or problems related to the infusion of potentially toxic substances. Documented benefit to the patient must balance these additional risks.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1982

Problems in donor recruitment.

Family members serve as an important source of cytapheresis donors, because they are concerned and are more likely to be histocompatible. However, products obtained from family members are often insufficient, and a need exists for nonrelated volunteer donors. These latter donors are often difficult to recruit, because the increased time required for donation requires an increase in employer cooperation, if donors are to give on company time. Recruitment is further complicated because the increased risk to the donor (over whole blood donation) requires a more detailed informed consent. The need for nonrelated volunteer cytapheresis donors can be met by education of business management to the need for such donors, and education of the donors regarding the relative risks.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1978

A modification of the automated immune precipitin method for quantitation of human serum immunoglobulins.

The use of the automated immune precipitin method to measure human serum immunoglobulins has been reported by several groups. The authors encountered difficulties in evaluating the technic even when they incorporated such recent modifications as the use of polyethylene glycol to enhance the reaction. By altering the flow pattern and prediluting each specimen, they were able to increase sampling rate, decrease processing time, and decrease the frequency of line obstructions while obtaining reproducible standard curves without using polyethylene glycol. There was good correlation between the results obtained by their modification of the technic and those obtained by the Fahey radial immunodiffusion method. As with other automated immune precipitin systems, abnormally high values gave characteristic notched peaks and lipemic specimens were centrifuged in order to obtain the infranatant for quantitation. The present modification of the automated immune precipitin system provides a rapid, simple and efficient method to quantitate human serum immunoglobulins.

Automation↗