PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Spencer

Publications and source records attributed to A J Spencer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of water fluoride exposure at crown completion and maturation on caries of permanent first molars.

Pre-eruptive fluoride exposure has been shown to be important for caries prevention. This paper aimed to determine the relative effects of water fluoride exposure during crown completion (CC) and maturation on caries experience in first permanent molars. Parental questionnaires covering residential history were linked to oral examinations of 19,885 6- to 15-year-old Australian children conducted in 1992 by the School Dental Services of South Australia and Queensland. The percentage of lifetime exposed to optimally fluoridated water at CC, maturation (MAT) and post-eruption (POST) was calculated. Combined exposure variables describing different levels of CC, maturation and post-eruption were created using a threshold exposure of 50%. Compared to the reference of CC <50%/MAT <50%/POST <50%, the categories CC > or =50%/MAT <50%/POST > or =50% [rate ratio (RR) 0.52], CC > or =50%/MAT > or =50%/POST <50% (RR 0.61) and CC > or =50%/MAT > or =50%/POST > or =50% (RR 0.67) had the strongest caries-preventive effect, followed by CC > or =50%/MAT <50%/POST <50% (RR = 0.79) and CC <50%/MAT > or =50%/POST > or =50% (RR = 0.81) in negative binomial regression models (p < 0.05). The categories CC <50%/MAT > or =50%/POST <50% (RR = 0.85) and CC <50%/MAT <50%/POST > or =50% (RR = 0.84) had weaker, non-significant caries-preventive effects. In conclusion a high exposure at CC was important for caries prevention irrespective of the effect of exposure at maturation and post-eruption. The strongest caries-preventive effect was produced by a high exposure at CC supplemented by a high exposure at maturation and/or post-eruption, but the latter two phases could not produce a significant caries-preventive effect on their own. Since most of the caries occurred on pit and fissure surfaces, the findings relate to this class of lesion.

Adolescent↗

Dental fear in Australia: who's afraid of the dentist?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe both the prevalence of dental fear in Australia and to explore the relationship between dental fear and a number of demographic, socio-economic, oral health, insurance and service usage variables. METHODS: A telephone interview survey of a random sample of 7312 Australian residents, aged five years and over, from all states and territories. RESULTS: The prevalence of high dental fear in the entire sample was 16.1 per cent. A higher percentage of females than males reported high fear (HF). Adults aged 40-64 years old had the highest prevalence of high dental fear with those adults aged 80+ years old having the least. There were also differences between low fear (LF) and HF groups in relation to socioeconomic status (SES), with people from higher SES groups generally having less fear. People with HF were more likely to be dentate, have more missing teeth, be covered by dental insurance and have a longer time since their last visit to a dentist. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a high prevalence of dental fear within a contemporary Australian population with numerous differences between individuals with HF and LF in terms of socioeconomic, socio-demographic and self-reported oral health status characteristics.

Adolescent↗

Longitudinal comparison of factors influencing choice of dental treatment by private general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Service rate variations and appropriateness of care issues have focused attention on factors that influence treatment decisions. The aims of this study were to examine what factors dentists consider in choosing alternative treatments, the stability of these factors over time and whether stability of treatment choice was related to age of dentist. METHODS: Baseline data were collected by mailed self-complete questionnaires from a random sample of Australian dentists (response rate = 60.3 per cent, n = 345 private general practitioners provided service data from a typical day) in 1997-1998 and follow-up data were collected in 2004 (response rate = 76.8 per cent, n = 177 matched longitudinal cases). RESULTS: The most frequent factors considered important across six alternative treatment pair choice scenarios were caries rate for 'exam v. x-ray', age of patient for 'preventive v. restorative intervention', cost of treatment for 'crown v. build-up', 'root canal v. extraction' and 'bridge v. denture', and calculus for 'prophylaxis v. scaling'. The only differences over time were (t-test, P < 0.05): higher proportions of responses in the mouth status group at follow-up for 'exam v. x-ray'; higher proportions of responses in the visit history group at follow-up for 'preventive v. restorative intervention'; a lower proportion of responses in the caries group at follow-up for 'crown v. build-up'; and a higher proportion of responses in the treatment constraints group at follow-up for 'prophylaxis v. scaling'. CONCLUSIONS: While a wide range of responses were offered as factors influencing the choice of alternative treatments, cost of treatment was a major consideration in situations where significantly cheaper alternatives existed, while patient preference was commonly included as a secondary consideration across a wide range of treatment choice scenarios. The treatment choice responses showed a high degree of stability over time across all age groups of dentists, suggesting that if routines are developed these are established before or soon after graduation as a dentist.

Adult↗

Trends in service provision among Australian private general dental practitioners over a 20-year period.

AIM: To-investigate time trends in service provision. DESIGN: Five cross-sectional surveys across a 20-year period. SETTING: Australian private general practice PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of dentists. METHODS: Mailed questionnaires were collected in 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998 and 2003 (response rates 71%-76%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Services per visit, annual services per dentist; annual services per patient. RESULTS: Total services per visit increased over the study period from 1.78 to 2.37 (Poisson regression; P<0.05). However the annual number of services provided per dentist did not vary significantly, reflecting a trend among dentists to supply fewer patient visits per year. The annual number of services provided per patient increased from 3.47 to 5.50 (OLS regression; P<0.05), reflecting both increased service rates per visit and increased numbers of visits by patients. Dentists provided less restorative, prosthodontic and extraction services per year, but more diagnostic, preventive, endodontic and crown and bridge services. The annual care received per patient also included more diagnostic, preventive, endodontic and crown and bridge services but differed from the dentist pattern through increased rates of restorative services over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The content of dentist workloads has changed to include less emphasis on removal and replacement of teeth and more effort on diagnosis and prevention aimed at retention of natural dentitions.

Adolescent↗

The role of dentist, practice and patient factors in the provision of dental services.

OBJECTIVES: Service provision varies by dentist, practice and patient factors. However, limited subsets of these potential influences on service rates have been explored. More comprehensive models could improve our understanding of the factors influencing the pattern of care delivered. The aim of this study was to examine variation in dental services by dentist (treatment choice, practice beliefs, preferences for patients, demographics), practice (type, location, size and volume of practice) and patient (visit, demographic, oral health and socio-economic) characteristics. METHODS: A random sample of Australian dentists was surveyed in 1997-98 (response rate=60.3%). Private general practitioners (n=345) provided dentist and practice data, and service provision and patient variables were collected from a log of a typical clinical day (n=4,115 patients). Multivariate negative binomial regression models were fitted for diagnostic, preventive, restorative, extraction and prosthodontic services. RESULTS: Significant dentist factors included (P<0.05; RR=rate ratio): lower diagnostic rates (RR=0.78) for dentists with stronger practice beliefs for giving information about cost and treatment options; preventive rates were lower (RR=0.74) for male dentists and higher (RR=1.48) for younger dentists aged 20-29 years; restorative rates were higher (RR=1.27) for dentists that rated patient preferences more highly in treatment choice and in the dentist age group 30-39 years (RR=1.25); extraction rates were lower (RR=0.61) for dentists with stronger preferences for patients that would adhere with treatment but higher (RR=1.57) for dentists with stronger preferences for sociable patients; and prosthodontic rates were lower (RR=0.38) for dentists with stronger preferences for adaptable patients who were willing to cooperate when expected to do so. Practice factors included: higher preventive (RR=1.28) and prosthodontic rates (RR=2.07) in solo practice; higher preventive (RR=1.34) but lower prosthodontic rates (RR=0.42) in capital cities; lower diagnostic (RR=0.82) and extraction rates (RR=0.55) in practices with fewer other dentists; higher diagnostic (RR=1.33) and extraction (RR=1.62) rates but lower restorative rates (RR=0.84) in practices with lower patient visits per year. Patient factors included: lower preventive (RR=0.76) but higher extraction rates (RR=1.45) for emergency visits; lower extraction rates (RR=0.60) for the insured; higher diagnostic rates (RR=1.17) for new patients; higher restorative (RR=1.31) but lower prosthodontic rates (RR=0.46) for patients with decayed teeth; higher prosthodontic rates (RR=2.14) for those with dentures; and lower preventive (RR=0.66), but higher extraction (RR=2.22) and prosthodontic rates (RR=1.82) for patients from lower socio-economic status areas. CONCLUSIONS: Dental service rates were influenced by large number of small effects from a wide range of dentist, practice and patient factors. Socio-economic and geographic barriers may need broad policy innovations to be addressed, but factors such as insurance and visit type have the potential to be altered to achieve better service outcomes and there is scope for research into clinical outcomes to improve the knowledge upon which treatment decisions are based.

Adult↗

Why do poor adults rate their oral health poorly?

BACKGROUND: The reasons why socioeconomic circumstances are associated with oral health are not well understood. This study investigated whether psychosocial factors might play an explanatory role. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were used from the 1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey together with information from an accompanying questionnaire sent to adult interviewees. Household income and self-rated oral health were assessed with single items and life dissatisfaction, personal constraint and perceived stress were evaluated with standard psychometric scales. Bivariate associations were tested using chi-square and ANOVA and odds ratios estimated for low self-rated oral health using logistic regression. RESULTS: Response to the questionnaire was 64.6 per cent and analysis was limited to dentate adults (n = 3678). Low household income was positively associated with low self-rated oral health. Higher dissatisfaction with life, personal constraint and perceived stress scores were associated with low income and with low self-rated oral health. After adjusting for gender, age, income and missing teeth, adults with high personal constraint scores had greater odds of low self-rated oral health (OR 1.26; 1.10-1.43) as had adults with higher perceived stress scores (OR 1.69; 1.34-2.13). CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors are important in understanding pathways between socioeconomic position and oral health status.

Adolescent↗

Job satisfaction of registered dental practitioners.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to measure job satisfaction among registered clinical dentists so as to identify issues which may influence recruitment and retention of dentists in active clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire measuring dimensions of job satisfaction was mailed to a stratified random sample of 80 private and 80 public sector dentists selected from the 1999 Victorian Dental Register. RESULTS: An adjusted response rate of 60 per cent was achieved (n = 87). Analyses showed significant differences (ANOVA; p < 0.05) in levels of satisfaction for various dimensions of job satisfaction by gender, age group and practice type. Differences in job satisfaction between male and female dentists related to the personal time dimension. Differences in satisfaction between dentists of different age groups were attributable to six dimensions: relationships with colleagues, relationships with patients, relationships with staff, personal time, community and administrative responsibilities. Differences between levels of satisfaction among private and public dentists related to the autonomy, relationships with patients, pay and resources dimensions. CONCLUSION: There are various dimensions of job satisfaction that may be pertinent to issues influencing recruitment and retention of dentists. Differences that exist between levels of job satisfaction among private and public sector dentists, between male and female dentists and dentists of different age groups need to be addressed in order to improve recruitment and retention rates of dentists in active clinical practice in different sectors of the dental care system.

Adult↗

The oral health assessment tool--validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) was a component of the Best Practice Oral Health Model for Australian Residential Care study. The OHAT provided institutional carers with a simple, eight category screening tool to assess residents' oral health, including those with dementia. This analysis presents OHAT reliability and validity results. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21 residential care facilities (RCFs) in urban and rural Victoria, NSW and South Australia used the OHAT at baseline, three-months and six-months to assess intra- and inter-carer reliability and concurrent validity. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty five residents completed all study phases. Intra-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 74.4 per cent for oral cleanliness, to 93.9 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.51-0.60) for lips, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Inter-carer reliability for OHAT categories: percent agreement ranged from 72.6 per cent for oral cleanliness to 92.6 per cent for dental pain; Kappa statistics were in moderate range (0.48-0.60) for lips, tongue, gums, saliva, oral cleanliness, and for all other categories in range of 0.61-0.80 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients for OHAT total scores were 0.78 for intra-carer and 0.74 for inter-carer reliability. Validity analyses of the OHAT categories and examination findings showed complete agreement for the lips category, with the natural teeth, dentures, and tongue categories having high significant correlations and percent agreements. The gums category had significant moderate correlation and percent agreement. Non-significant and low correlations and percent agreements were evident for the saliva, oral cleanliness and dental pain categories. CONCLUSION: The Oral Health Assessment Tool was evaluated as being a reliable and valid screening assessment tool for use in residential care facilities, including those with cognitively impaired residents.

Aged↗

Comparison of a generic and a specific measure of oral health related quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to compare the discriminant validity of a generic health state measure, the EuroQol, and a specific oral health measure, the Oral Health Impact Profile. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated by a random sample of South Australian dentists. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Data were collected in 2001-02 using mailed self-complete questionnaires. Dentists recorded the diagnosis of dental conditions and provided patients with self-complete questionnaires to record the nature, severity and duration of symptoms using the EuroQol (EQ-5D+) and 14-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) instruments. Data were available from 375 patients (response rate = 72%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three measures (simple counts, additive scores and scale scores) were used for each instrument and compared by oral health, patient demographic and visit factors, and main presenting dental condition. RESULTS: Across all three measures the OHIP-14 was associated with the oral health factors of dentate status, number of teeth, denture wearing and number of decayed teeth while the EuroQol was associated with decayed teeth. For patient demographics both the EuroQol and OHIP-14 were associated with age of patient. For visit factors both the EuroQol and OHIP-14 were associated with visit type and insurance status, while only the EuroQol was associated with time since last visit. Both the EuroQol and OHIP-14 were associated with main dental condition. CONCLUSIONS: There was little difference in the number of associations of either EuroQol or OHIP-14 scores regardless of whether simple counts, additive scores or scale score measures were used. In bivariate analyses the OHIP-14 was more sensitive to oral health factors, but the EuroQol performed as well or better than the OHIP-14 for patient demographics, visit factors and main dental condition, and was associated with the oral health factor of number of decayed teeth. Both measures performed similarly in multivariate analysis.

Adolescent↗

Practice patterns of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia: 1990 and 2000.

This study was undertaken to describe practice patterns of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia and compare trends over time. All registered oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia were surveyed in 1990 and 2000 using mailed self-complete questionnaires. Data were available from 79 surgeons from 1990 (response rate = 73.8%) and 116 surgeons from 2000 (response rate = 65.1%). In both 1990 and 2000 the majority of surgeons worked 80+% of the time in the private sector (64.1 and 71.4%), had 80+% referrals from dental versus medical sources (74.0 and 74.7%), and had 80+% of patients from dentoalveolar rather than major maxillofacial surgery (70.7 and 69.7%). The percentage of dual qualified (dental plus medical degree) surgeons increased from 2.5% in 1990 to 17.1% in 2000 (P < 0.05; chi2). In 2000, surgeons who worked less than 80% in the private sector were more likely to report being overworked (57.9%) and that more surgeons were required in the public sector (65.0%) than those who worked 80% or more private (17.0 and 24.0%, respectively). Multivariate linear regressions of annual non-dentoalveolar surgical procedures per surgeon showed (P < 0.05) higher provision of implant (beta = 0.362), TMJ (beta = 0.267) and bone graft surgery (beta = 0.208) in 2000 compared to 1990, and higher provision of orthognathic (beta = 0.199), implant (beta = 0.194) and bone graft surgery (beta = 0.289) by dual qualified surgeons compared to those with only dental qualifications. Despite the mix of cases remaining predominantly dentoalveolar there was some change over time for selected non-dentoalveolar surgical procedures, with growth in the percentage of medically qualified surgeons and differences in surgery rates by qualification.

Adult↗

Service provision by patient and visit characteristics in Australian oral and maxillofacial surgery: 1990 to 2000.

This study was set-up to describe main areas of service by patient and visit characteristics and compare trends in services between 1990 and 2000. All registered oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia were surveyed in 1990 and 2000 using mailed self-complete questionnaires. Service provision data were collected from a one-week log. Data were available from 79 surgeons from 1990 (response = 73.8%) and 116 surgeons from 2000 (response = 65.1%). Service distributions were dominated by dentoalveolar surgery in 1990 (66.6%) and 2000 (63.5%). Multivariate analysis showed: patient age, location of visit (office/theatre/inpatient facility) and referral source (general/specialist and dental/medical) were associated with all five main areas of service; type of visit (consult/operation/review) was associated with four main areas; patient sex and place of visit (private/public) was associated with three main areas; the only significant change over time was an increased percentage of orthognathic surgery, odds ratio = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.7) times higher in 2000 compared to 1990. Main areas of service were associated with a range of explanatory variables such as age and sex of patients, and place, location and type of visit, and referral source. However, the distribution of services remained relatively stable over time.

Adolescent↗

Changes in caries experience among Australian public dental patients between 1995/96 and 2001/02.

OBJECTIVE: Health Card holders are a financially disadvantaged group and are the target population eligible for public-funded dental care. The aims of this study were to describe the oral health status of public-funded dental patients by age, sex, type of care and geographic location, and to compare trends over time. METHODS: Patients were sampled randomly by State/Territory dental services in 1995/ 96 and 2001/02. Dentists recorded oral health status at the initial visit of a course of care using written instructions. The samples were weighted in proportion to the numbers of public-funded dental patients for each State/Territory. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that caries experience measured by the DMFT index increased across older age groups (p<0.05). For male compared with female patients mean numbers of decayed teeth were higher (beta=0.74), and filled teeth lower (beta=-1.16). For emergency compared with general care, mean numbers of decayed and missing teeth were higher (beta=0.52 and beta=0.76), and filled teeth lower (beta=-1.08). For major city compared with regional/remote patients, mean numbers of decayed (beta=-0.35) and missing teeth were lower (beta=-0.34). Between 1995/96 and 2001/02 numbers of decayed teeth were higher (beta=0.81) while numbers of filled teeth were lower (beta=-0.55). CONCLUSIONS: There was variation in oral health among public dental patients by sex, type of care and location, and there was a trend towards lower numbers of filled teeth but higher numbers of decayed teeth and higher overall caries experience over time. IMPLICATIONS: Despite population trends towards improved oral health, levels of untreated decayed teeth have increased among public dental patients.

Adolescent↗

Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.

AIM: To examine the provision of amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations, and to assess whether these main restorative services varied by patient, visit and oral health characteristics. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey incorporating a log of service items provided on a typical day. SETTING: Australian private general practice. METHODS: Data on services and patients were collected by a mailed survey from a random sample of dentists from each State/Territory in Australia in 1998-99 with a response rate of 71%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates per visit of amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations among dentate adults who had received a restoration. RESULTS: Analysis showed older patients had lower amalgam rates but higher glass ionomer rates, composite resin rates were lower at emergency visits, capital city patients had higher amalgam rates but lower composite resin rates, patients with decayed teeth had higher amalgam and composite resin rates, and use of restorative materials varied by clinical problem. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread use of alternative materials, amalgam rates remained high in circumstances such as replacement restorations and restorations involving more than one surface. Other restorative materials also had specific applications. Both amalgam and composite resins were provided at higher rates to patients with active caries but composite resins were also used at higher rates for aesthetic problems. Glass ionomer restorations were used at higher rates for initial and one-surface restorations, and for conditions such as root caries and dentinal sensitivity.

Adult↗

Restorative service trends in private general practice in Australia: 1983-1999.

OBJECTIVES: Restorative services are a major component of the annual workload of a dentist, but are undergoing a period of change as population oral health continues to improve and restorative materials and techniques are developed. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the provision of restorative services over a 15-year period spanning 1983-84 to 1998-99. METHODS: A series of cross-sectional surveys was performed in 1983-84, 1988-89, 1993-94 and 1998-99 with response rates of over 70%. Data were collected by a mailed survey from a random sample of dentists from each state/territory in Australia. Dentists provided data on patients treated on a typical clinical day from which annual rates of provision of services per dentist were derived for restorative and related services. RESULTS: The overall number of annual restorative services provided per dentist declined over the four points of the study period. This trend reflected a steady decline in the annual number of amalgams provided per dentist. However, composite resins increased between 1993-94 and 1998-99, while glass ionomers, other-restorative services, crowns and fissure sealants all showed increases over the first three points of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Over the study period the highest provision of restorative and related services changed from amalgams to composite resins, reflecting trends towards improved oral health and development of restorative materials. The decline in restorative services was not uniform across all age groups of patients, with increases observed among 45-64 and 65+ year olds, reflecting increased retention of teeth among adults.

Adolescent↗

Diagnostic and preventive service trends in private general practice: 1983-1984 to 1998-1999.

BACKGROUND: Aggregate trends have indicated increases in the provision of diagnostic and preventive services but there have been few reports based on their component sub-categories. The aims of this study were to investigate time trends in the provision of sub-categories of diagnostic an preventive services across a 15-year period. METHODS: A random sample of Australian dentists was surveyed by mailed questionnaire in 1983-1984, 1988-1989, 1993-1994 and 1998-1999 (response rates 71-75 per cent). Data were weighted to provide representative estimates for the age by sex distribution of private general practitioners in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1998. RESULTS: Rates per visit were higher, Poisson regression, P<0.05, in 1998-1999 compared to baseline for examinations, radiographs, prophylaxis and topical fluoride. Diagnostic and preventive service rates varied by age of patient: compared to patients aged 65+ years, examinations were higher among children aged <5 years to adults aged 25-44 years, radiographs were lower among children <5 years and 5-11 years but higher among adults aged from 18-24 years to 45-64 years, prophylaxis services were lower among children <5 years but higher among adolescents 12-17 years to adults aged 45-64 years, while topical fluoride was higher among children 5-11 years and adolescents 12-17 years. CONCLUSIONS: Examination, radiograph, prophylaxis, and topical fluoride rates increased over the study period. While examination rates increased for both children and adults, and prophylaxis rates increased for adolescents and adults, rates for radiographs and topical fluoride only increased for adults. Age-specific changes in service rates over time indicate the effect of changing oral health status and population demographics on service provision.

Adolescent↗

Service provision trends among Australian private general dental practitioners: 1983/84 to 1998/99.

AIM: To investigate time trends in service provision. DESIGN: Four cross-sectional surveys across a 15-year period. SETTING: Australian private general practice. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of dentists. METHODS: Dentists were surveyed by mailed questionnaire in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1998 (response rates 71%-75%). Data were weighted to provide representative estimates for the age by sex distribution of private general practitioners in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Services per visit, annual services per dentist, annual services per patient. RESULTS: Total services per visit increased over the study period from 1.78 to 2.14 (Poisson regression; p < 0.05). However the annual number of services provided per dentist did not vary significantly, reflecting a trend among dentists to supply fewer patient visits per year. The annual number of services provided per patient increased over the period from 3.47 to 5.22 (OLS regression; p < 0.05), reflecting both the increased service rate per visit and increased numbers of visits by patients. Dentists provided less restorative, prosthodontic and extraction services per year, but more endodontic and crown and bridge services. The pattern of annual care received per patient also included more endodontic and crown and bridge services but differed from the dentist pattern through increased service rates over the study period in areas such as restorative, diagnostic and preventive. CONCLUSIONS: While dentists are providing a similar number of services annually, the content of their workload has changed to include less emphasis on removal and replacement of teeth and more effort on maintenance and retention of natural dentitions.

Adult↗

An evidence-based approach to the prevention of oral diseases.

The evidence-based approach has become the mantra of health care and service delivery. But just what it means, whether it is feasible, how to build it and the outcome of its use are not well understood. The aims of this paper are to provide an overview of an evidence-based approach to the prevention of oral disease, to examine the assessment of clinical trial evidence, to examine emerging approaches to assessing population-wide interventions and oral health promotion, and to illustrate some principles and issues through examples from preventive dentistry. The evidence-based approach to prevention is presented using an evidence loop, which emphasizes that the evidence-base should begin with an understanding to the burden of oral disease and its determinants, rather than a consideration of the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in clinical dental research. A systematic review of evidence from clinical dental research is compiled and assessed, after which the intervention is decided upon and implemented. The evidence loop is completed by the monitoring of outcomes and reassessment of the intervention process. Attention is also given to steps in assessing non-randomized population-wide interventions and evidence on oral health promotion based on expert opinion. The requirement for evidence creates a substantial challenge which can only be met by increased research activity, improved quality of information and the appropriate application of the outcomes of research to policy making for the prevention of oral disease.

Cost of Illness↗

Provision of diagnostic and preventive services in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis and prevention are among the most frequently provided services in Australian private general dental practice, and have increased over recent times. The aims of this study were to examine the provision of examinations, radiographs, prophylaxis and topical fluoride, and to assess whether these services varied by patient, visit and oral health characteristics. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Data were collected by a mailed survey of a random sample of dentists from each State/Territory in Australia in 1998-99 with a response rate of 71%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected from a log of service items provided on a typical day. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses of services showed that emergency visits were associated with higher rates [RR = Rate ratio, 95%CI] of radiographs (RR = 1.32, 1.06-1.66) but lower rates of prophylaxis (RR = 0.37, 0.29-0.48) and topical fluoride (RR = 0.20, 0.08-0.47) compared to non-emergency visits. Capital city patients had a higher rate of topical fluoride (RR = 2.06, 1.17-3.64) services than non-capital city patients. Patients with decayed teeth had a lower rate of prophylaxis services (RR = 0.82, 0.68-0.99) than patients with no decay. Compared to the reference of caries, patients with aesthetic problems had lower rates of radiographs (RR = 0. 19, 0.08-0.47) and topical fluoride (RR = 0.24, 0.08-0.71), those with cuspal fracture/failed restoration also had lower rates of radiographs (RR = 0.54, 0.37-0.80) and topical fluoride (RR = 0.52, 0.28-0.95), those with denture problems had lower rates of examinations (RR = 0.53, 0.32-0.87), radiographs (RR = 0.05, 0.01-0.28), prophylaxis (RR = 0.13, 0.04-0.37) and topical fluoride (RR = 0.04, 0.01-0.32), those with periodontal disease had higher rates of examinations (RR = 1.45, 1.13-1.85) and prophylaxis (RR = 2.39, 1.79-3.19), those with pulpal/periapical infection had lower rates of examination (RR = 0.55, 0.42-0.74) and prophylaxis (RR = 0.36, 0.19-0.66), but higher rates of radiographs (RR = 1.92, 1.48-2.50), those with recall/maintenance care had higher rates of examinations (RR = 2.23, 1.85-2.69), prophylaxis (RR = 2.63, 2.05-3.38) and topical fluoride (RR = 2.88, 1.76-4.70), while those with other diagnoses had lower rates of prophylaxis (RR = 0.60, 0.37-0.97) and topical fluoride (RR = 0.28, 0.10-0.77) services. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographs may often be used to confirm disease rather than in early detection, and prevention was mainly provided to asymptomatic patients in routine maintenance schedules. Many emergency patients and those with oral diseases present missed the benefits of prevention.

Adolescent↗