PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A John Morris

Publications and source records attributed to A John Morris.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Abnormal liver function tests following bone marrow transplantation: aetiology and role of liver biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Liver dysfunction is common in bone marrow transplant recipients. Common causes are graft-versus-host disease, drugs, veno-occlusive disease, sepsis and iron overload. We studied the prevalence and aetiology of abnormal liver function tests following bone marrow transplantation and the role of liver biopsy. METHODS: All allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantations undertaken in our institution over a 2-year period were studied. Subsequent liver function tests, the use and timing of liver biopsy and the final cause of liver dysfunction were determined in each case. RESULTS: We studied 121 patients (58 allogeneic, 63 autologous). Abnormal liver function tests were found in 52% of bone marrow transplant recipients (72% allogeneic and 33% autologous; P = 0.015). The most common causes of liver dysfunction were graft-versus-host disease, drugs and iron overload in the allogeneic group, and drugs and sepsis in the autologous group. Nineteen patients (16%; 18 allogeneic) underwent liver biopsy. The majority of liver biopsies were carried out in the late post-transplant period to exclude or confirm graft-versus-host disease, although only one case was confirmed. Sixteen of the 19 patients who underwent biopsy had significant hepatic iron overload, but no biopsy revealed evidence of fibrosis or cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Liver dysfunction following bone marrow transplantation is common and most diagnoses can be ascertained without resorting to liver biopsy. In our series, hepatic iron overload was the most common finding in those who underwent liver biopsy.

Adult↗

A dental risk management protocol for electroconvulsive therapy.

This article describes the results of an evaluation of a system to use trained junior psychiatric doctors to perform the pre-ECT oral assessment. All junior doctors were given a 1-hour training session in making oral assessments, and their ability to diagnose was tested by dental follow-up visits to patients they had assessed. Seventy-one patients were seen by both doctor and dentist, and the sensitivity for doctors ranged between 92% for the presence of dentures or removable bridges to 8% for the presence of teeth vulnerable to fracture. Where the doctors made a positive diagnosis, these were not always correct; the positive predictive value ranging from 92% for dentures or removable bridges to 25% for teeth vulnerable to fracture. It is concluded that the use of trained doctors is better than no assessment but falls short of that provided by a dentist with experience of psychiatric patients undergoing ECT.

Adult↗