PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A K Jha

Publications and source records attributed to A K Jha.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Gender and utilization of ancillary services.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender is associated with the use of ancillary services in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: A retrospective study of laboratory and radiology tests ordered for medical and surgical inpatients over 16-month and 20-month periods, respectively. Obstetric patients were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Number of clinical laboratory and radiology tests per admission, their associated charges, and total charges per admission were measured. In crude analyses, women had 16.5% fewer clinical laboratory tests (p < .0001) with 18.8% lower associated charges (p < .0001) and 24.4% fewer radiology tests (p < .0001) with 15.6% lower associated charges (p < .0001) than men. Total changes for the admission were lower for women in both the clinical laboratory study period ($16,178 vs $18,912, p < .0001) and the radiology study period ($14,621 vs $18,182, p < .0001). When adjusted for age, race, insurance status, service, diagnosis-related-group weight, and length of stay, these differences were smaller but persisted: women had 3.7% fewer laboratory tests performed (p < .001) with 4.8% lower associated charges (p < .001). In similarly adjusted analyses for radiology studies, women received 10.4% fewer radiology examinations (p < .001), with 4.1% lower associated charges (p < .01). There were no significant differences in the adjusted total charges in the laboratory group ($17,450 vs $17,655, p = .20) and only a marginally significant difference in the radiology group ($16,278 vs $16,498, p = .05). When we compared ancillary utilization within the five largest diagnosis-related groups, these differences persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Men receive more ancillary services than women, even after adjusting for potential confounders.

Ancillary Services, Hospital↗
PubMed1996

Negative interaction between lithium and electroconvulsive therapy--a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent use of lithium and ECT is suspected to increase neurotoxicity. METHOD: A retrospective case-control study over an eight-year period was conducted to investigate the adverse effects of a combined lithium/ECT treatment. Thirty-one subjects with combined lithium/ECT treatment were compared with a control group (ECT only) of 135 cases matched for age and sex. RESULTS: Most cases in both groups had no adverse effects. Three (10%) study group subjects and 15 (11%) controls experienced brief delirium. Three controls and none of the subjects developed a prolonged confusion. There were no significant differences in the profile of other adverse effects between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Prescription of lithium together with ECT was not associated with higher frequency of adverse effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Ecotoxicological aspects of aspergilli present in the phylloplane of stored leaves of chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tobaccum).

Nine different species of Aspergillus were isolated from the phylloplane of stored chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tobaccum) of different ages. The maximum number of species were isolated from 12 and 18 month old leaves. A. ruber, A. ochraceus, A. flavus and A. nidulans were usually associated with older leaves while A. niger, A. fumigatus and A. flavus were isolated from 6 month old leaves. Approximately 18% of Aspergilli were found to be mycotoxigenic. Sterigmatocystin was produced by three different species. A. ochraceus produced patulin and ochratoxin. All aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus produced aflatoxin B1 but none of the isolates of A. flavus produced aflatoxin G2. The percentage of toxigenic isolates of different species varied considerably.

Aflatoxins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are both common and costly. Most hospitals identify ADEs using spontaneous reporting, but this approach lacks sensitivity; chart review identifies more events but is expensive. Computer-based approaches to ADE identification appear promising, but they have not been directly compared with chart review and they are not widely used. OBJECTIVES: To develop a computer-based ADE monitor, and to compare the rate and type of ADEs found with the monitor with those discovered by chart review and by stimulated voluntary report. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in one tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to nine medical and surgical units in a tertiary-care hospital over an eight-month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse drug events identified by the computer-based monitor, by chart review, and by stimulated voluntary report. METHODS: A computer-based monitoring program identified alerts, which were situations suggesting that an ADE might be present (e.g., an order for an antidote such as naloxone). A trained reviewer then examined patients' hospital records to determine whether an ADE had occurred. The results of the computer-based monitoring strategy were compared with two other ADE detection strategies: intensive chart review and stimulated voluntary report by nurses and pharmacists. The monitor and the chart review strategies were independent, and the reviewers were blinded. RESULTS: The computer monitoring strategy identified 2,620 alerts, of which 275 were determined to be ADEs. The chart review found 398 ADEs, whereas voluntary report detected 23. Of the 617 ADEs detected by at least one method, 76 ADEs were detected by both computer monitor and chart review. The computer monitor identified 45 percent; chart review, 65 percent; and voluntary report, 4 percent. The ADEs identified by computer monitor were more likely to be classified as "severe" than were those identified by chart review (51 versus 42 percent, p = .04). The positive predictive value of computer-generated alerts was 16 percent during the first eight weeks of the study; rule modifications increased this to 23 percent in the final eight weeks. The computer strategy required 11 person-hours per week to execute, whereas chart review required 55 person-hours per week and voluntary report strategy required 5. CONCLUSIONS: The computer-based monitor identified fewer ADEs than did chart review but many more ADEs than did stimulated voluntary report. The overlap among the ADEs identified using different methods was small, suggesting that the incidence of ADEs may be higher than previously reported and that different detection methods capture different events. The computer-based monitoring system represents an efficient approach for measuring ADE frequency and gauging the effectiveness of ADE prevention programs.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗