[Identification of tumor antigens: strategies and perspectives].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Knuth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study evaluates the clinical benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), previously treated with conventional anthracyclines. Seventy-nine women with MBC previously treated with anthracyclines received PLD 50 mg m(-2) every 4 weeks. All patients were previously treated with chemotherapy and 30% of patients had > or =3 prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease. Patients were considered anthracycline resistant when they had disease progression on anthracycline therapy for MBC or within 6 months of adjuvant therapy. The overall clinical benefit rate (objective response+stable disease > or =24 weeks) was 24% (16.1% in patients with documented anthracycline resistance vs 29% in patients classified as having non-anthracycline-resistant disease). There was no difference with respect to the clinical benefit between patients who received PLD >12 months and those who received PLD < or =12 months since last anthracycline treatment for metastatic disease (clinical benefit 25 vs 24.1%, respectively). Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.6 and 12.3 months, respectively. The median duration of response was 12 months, and the median time to progression in patients with stable disease (any) was 9.5 months. Fourteen patients (17.7%) had a prolonged clinical benefit lasting > or =12 months. In conclusion, PLD was associated with an evident clinical benefit in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC.
Until recently, cancer therapy was based on three modalities: surgery, radiotherapy, and cytostatic chemotherapy. In most instances treatment of solid tumors was a surgical domain. For patients with incomplete resection or relapse after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy usually offered only partial response and mostly of limited duration. By the mid-1990s visions of antibody-based therapies, vaccination strategies, and even gene-specific therapies existed but seemed far from clinical practice. United States Federal Drug Administration approval of the humanized antibody rituximab (1997) and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (2001) has changed perceptions of oncologic treatment. These drugs turned visions into reality and led the pharmaceutical industry, clinicians, and patients to new perspectives. This article gives an overview of the development of this fourth modality in cancer therapy, so-called targeted therapy.
Cancer immunotherapy includes passive and active strategies. Passive immunotherapy such as the use of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, and in a broader sense also of other immunological effector molecules, such as interferon-alpha is clinically established. The efficacy of passive immunotherapy attests to the fact that the immune system can successfully fight cancer. The logical next step is therefore to develop strategies for active immunotherapy, i.e. "vaccines against cancer". This review focuses on the current status of active immunotherapy with respect to clinical application. Although active immunotherapy is still in the experimental stage, the data are highly encouraging and it is expected that vaccination will soon become part of cancer management.
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication after solid organ transplantation. Here, we report our first experience with the use of PET/CT (positron emission tomography combined with computed tomogram) for the management of patients with PTLD after liver transplantation. Four patients with histologically proven PTLD were analyzed. Conventional work-up included physical examination and head-to-pelvis CT. PET/CT was used in one patient for initial staging and in all patients for follow-up. PET/CT positive findings underwent biopsy. Information provided by PET/CT resulted in a change of medical management in three of the four patients. Conventional work-up missed residual disease after surgery in one and failed to detect a tumor relapse in another patient. However, one patient disclosed a false positive PET/CT finding in the lungs. In conclusion, PET/CT may be a useful tool for staging and therapy monitoring of PTLD after liver transplantation.
Drug treatment of colorectal cancer has made impressive progress during the past 10 years. In addition to the traditional 5-fluorouracil, newer anticancer drugs are available including irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Monoclonal antibodies like bevacizumab and cetuximab have been integrated into modern treatment regimens. Based on randomized clinical trials we can formulate rational treatment strategies as outlined in this article.
The identification of tumor antigens is crucial for the development of antigen-specific immunotherapies in cancer. Ideal target antigens for immunotherapies have a tumor specific expresssion pattern. Antigen expresssion in solid tumors is typically heterogenous. Therefore an effective immunotherapy should target several antigens simultaneously (polyvalent vaccine). Here we discuss strategies how tumor antigens can be identified and further analyzed as potential target antigens for active immunotherapy (cancer vaccine).
Since the development of hybridoma technology in 1975 monoclonal antibodies with pre-defined specificity can be produced. Only twenty years later did it become possible to make therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies in oncology. To this end it was necessary to attach the antigen-binding site of a mouse antibody onto the scaffold of a human antibody molecule. Such chimeric or "humanized" antibodies may be used in passive immunotherapy without eliciting an immune response. Rituximab and trastuzumab are such humanized antibodies. They are used today routinely in the treatment of malignant lymphoma and breast cancer, respectively. These antibodies are usually used in combination with conventional cytostatic anticancer drugs.
Drug treatment of colorectal cancer has made impressive progress during the past 10 years. In addition to fluorouracil new anticancer drugs like irinotecan and oxaliplatin have become available. The activity of fluorouracil was optimized by using schedules of prolonged infusion. Capecitabine is an oral pro-drug of fluorouracil. When colorectal metastases are limited to the liver they should be resected if possible. Sometimes they can be reduced in size by primary chemotherapy (downstaging) and resected later. Very new and exciting are reports with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Bevacizumab blocks angiogenesis. So far it is available only in the USA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin [GVP]) prolongs overall survival in comparison to cisplatin-free chemotherapy (gemcitabine and vinorelbine [GV]) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and June 2001, 300 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease were randomly assigned to receive GV (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or GVP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks). Primary end point of the study was overall survival. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (GV, 143 patients; GVP, 144 patients) were eligible for analysis. At the time of analysis, April 15, 2002, 209 patients (GV, 103 patients; GVP, 106 patients) of 287 patients had died (73%). No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival (P =.73; median survival, 35.9 versus 32.4 weeks; 1-year survival rate, 33.6% versus 27.5%) as well as for event-free survival (P =.35; median time-to-event, 19.3 versus 22.3 weeks) between GV and GVP. Two hundred fourteen patients were assessable for best response. The overall response rates were 13.0% for GV versus 28.3% for GVP (P =.004; complete responders, 0% versus 3.8%; partial responders, 13.0% versus 24.5%). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the GV treatment arm compared with GVP. No statistically significant difference in quality of life was observed. CONCLUSION: In this phase III study, the cisplatin-based GVP regimen showed no survival benefit as first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC when compared with the cisplatin-free GV regimen, which was substantially better tolerated.
In an attempt to improve the complete remission (CR) rates and to prolong the remission duration especially in elderly patients > 50 years of age, we have used a combination chemotherapy of idarubicin (10 mg/m2 IV x 3 days), cytarabine (AraC, 100 mg/m2 CIVI x 7d), and etoposide (100 mg/m2 x 5 days) in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming [5 mg/kg SQ day 1 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery] for remission induction. Responding patients received two consolidation courses of idarubicin, AraC, and etoposide, followed by a late consolidation course of intermediate-dose AraC (600 mg/m2 IV every 12 h x 5 days) and amsacrine (60 mg/m2 IV x 5 days). A total of 112 patients (57 male/55 female) with a median age of 58 years (range: 22-75) have been entered and are evaluable for response: 19 refractory anemia with excess of blast cells in transformation (RAEB-T), 84 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and 9 secondary AML after chemotherapy/radiotherapy. The overall CR rate was 62%, partial remission (PR) rate 10%, treatment failure 16%, and early death rate 12%. The CR rate was higher in patients < or = 60 years (68 vs 55%), mainly due to a lower early death rate (5 vs 21%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up of 58 months, the median overall survival is 14.5% and median duration of relapse-free survival 8 months. After 60 months, the probability of CR patients to still be in CR and alive is 16% (20% in patients < or = 60 years and 13% in patients >60 years), while the probability of overall survival is 12% (15% in patients < or = 60 years and 9% in patients > 60 years). Compared to our previous trial (AML-MDS Study 01-92) which was done with identical chemotherapy but no G-CSF priming in 110 patients with RAEB-T, AML after MDS, or secondary AML (identical median age, age range, and distribution of subtypes), the CR rate in all patients, as well as CR rate, overall survival, and relapse-free survival in patients > 60 years have significantly been improved. Thus, intensive chemotherapy with G-CSF priming is both well tolerated and highly effective for remission induction in these high-risk patients.
Chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (WX-G250) binds to a cell surface antigen found on >90% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A multicentre phase II study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of WX-G250 in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients. In all, 36 patients with mRCC were included. WX-G250 was given weekly by intravenous infusion for 12 weeks. Patients with stable disease (SD) or response were eligible to receive additional treatment for 8 weeks. None of the 36 enrolled patients experienced any drug-related grade III or IV toxicity. Only three patients had grade II toxicity possibly related to the study medication. In all, 10 patients had SD and received extended treatment. One complete response and a significant regression was observed during the follow-up of the treatment. Five patients with progressive disease at study entry were stable for more than 6 months after study entry. The median survival after treatment start was 15 months. The weekly schedule of WX-G250 was well tolerated. With a median survival of 15 months after the start of this treatment and two late clinical responses, WX-G250 seems to be able to modulate mRCC. To improve the activity of WX-G250-specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and the clinical response rate, currently combinations of WX-G250 with cytokines are in phase II trials.
BACKGROUND: Trofosfamide is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with several types of malignancies. However, the optimal dose of trofosfamide for patients with advanced cancer has not been systematically investigated yet. The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous oral trofosfamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 16 patients with advanced lung cancer (14 nonsmall cell lung cancer, 2 small cell lung cancer; 10 male, 6 female; median age 64 years (range 46-82); median Karnofsky status 70%; median number of organs involved 3 (range 1-6)) were enrolled. All patients were previously treated with chemotherapy (median 2x, range 1-6) and 8/16 (50%) with radiotherapy. Patients received trofosfamide p.o. administered in 3 doses per day for 3 weeks (1 cycle) using a 3-patient-cohort dose-escalation strategy. Toxicities were graded according to the WHO Criteria. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 2 cycles of trofosfamide (range 1-4) at 3 dose levels (90, 125, and 175 mg/m2). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 20, 13.3, and 6.6%, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle were grade 3 muscle weakness and anorexia observed in 1/6 patients in cohort 1 (trofosfamide 90 mg/m2), grade 3 neutropenia in 1/6, and encephalopathy in 1/6 patients in cohort 3 (trofosfamide 175 mg/m2). Therefore, the dose level of 125 mg/m2 was defined as the MTD. CONCLUSION: Trofosfamide at 125 mg/m2 administered in 3 doses per day was well tolerated. This dose level is recommended for further clinical studies.
To assess the response rate and the tolerance of irinotecan as first-line therapy, 40 patients with metastatic gastric cancer received irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks administered as a 30 min infusion. Among the 35 patients evaluable for response, two complete and five partial responses were recorded (response rate: 20.0% (95% CI:8.4-36.9%)). In total, 16 patients achieved stable disease and 12 progressive disease. In all, 66 percent of the patients benefited from tumour growth control. The median time to progression was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.4%). The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.0%). The probability of being alive at 6 months and 9 months was 61.0 and 32.4%, respectively. The median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range 1-14), and the relative dose intensity was 0.98. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities by patients were diarrhoea 20%, asthenia 10%, nausea 7.5%, vomiting 5.0%, abdominal pain 5%, neutropenia 38.5%, leucopenia 28.2%, anaemia 12.8% and thrombocytopenia 5.1%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 12.5% of patients. These findings indicate that irinotecan is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and warrants further evaluation in this clinical setting.
Of 405 patients with stage IV transitional cell carcinoma from an international multicenter phase III trial, 70 were randomized in Germany to receive either gemcitabine/cisplatin or standard MVAC systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Overall survival as the primary endpoint of the study was similar in both arms (median survival GC 15.4 months vs MVAC 16.1 months), as were tumor-specific survival and time to progressive disease. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the 5-year overall survival rate was 10% for patients randomized to GC and 18% randomized to MVAC. Tumor overall response rates (GC 54%, MVAC 53%) were similar. The toxic death rate was 0% in the GC arm and 3% (one patient) in the MVAC arm. Significantly more GC than MVAC patients experienced grade 3/4 anemia (GC 52%, MVAC 20%) with significantly more red blood cell transfusions in the GC arm.Significantly more GC than MVAC patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (GC 54%, MVAC 17%) without grade 3/4 hemorrhage or hematuria in either arm. More MVAC patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia (GC 56%, MVAC 61%, p=1.000), neutropenic or leukopenic fever (GC 0%, MVAC 10%, p=0.237), mucositis (GC 0%, MVAC 7%, p=0.495), and alopecia (GC 6%, MVAC 36%, p=0.004). GC represents a reasonable alternative for the palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma. Sustained long-term survival was only found for patients with locally advanced cancer, lymphatic metastases, or solitary distant metastasis but not for visceral metastatic disease.
BACKGROUND: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH. METHODS: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim. RESULTS: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Application of SEREX (serological analysis of recombinant tumor cDNA expression libraries) to different tumor types has led to the identification of several categories of human tumor antigens. In this study, the analysis of a breast cancer library with autologous patient serum led to the isolation of seven genes, designated NY-BR-1 through NY-BR-7. NY-BR-1, representing 6 of 14 clones isolated, showed tissue-restricted mRNA expression in breast and testis but not in 13 other normal tissues tested. Among tumor specimens, NY-BR-1 mRNA expression was found in 21 of 25 breast cancers but in only 2 of 82 nonmammary tumors. Structural analysis of NY-BR-1 cDNA and the corresponding genomic sequences in the recently released working draft of human genome indicated that NY-BR-1 is composed of 37 exons and has an open reading frame of 4.0-4.2 kb, encoding a peptide of Mr 150,000-160,000. A bipartite nuclear localization signal motif indicates a nuclear site for NY-BR-1, and the presence of a bZIP site (DNA-binding site followed by leucine zipper motif) suggests that NY-BR-1 is a transcription factor. Additional structural features include five tandem ankyrin repeats, implying a role for NY-BR-1 in protein-protein interactions. NY-BR-1 thus represents a breast tissue-specific putative transcription factor with autoimmunogenicity in breast cancer patients. In addition to NY-BR-1, a homologous gene, NY-BR-1.1, was identified in this study. NY-BR-1.1 shares 54% amino acid homology with NY-BR-1 and also shows tissue-restricted mRNA expression. However, unlike NY-BR-1, NY-BR-1.1 mRNA is expressed in brain, in addition to breast and testis. The exon structure of NY-BR-1.1 remains to be defined. Using human genome database, NY-BR-1 was localized to chromosome 10p11-p12, and NY-BR-1.1 was tentatively localized to chromosome 9.