PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Koskela

Publications and source records attributed to A Koskela.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning curve for add-on stereotactic core needle breast biopsy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve for an add-on 14 G stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 231 non-palpable breast lesions that had undergone add-on SCNB were evaluated in this prospective study. Five radiologists performed their first three biopsies under supervision. Subsequent, independently performed, biopsies were also evaluated. The samples were collected in three different containers: the first sample in container A, the second and third samples in container B, and subsequent samples in container C (available for four radiologists from the first biopsy on). Technically successful biopsies and false-negative rate in three container combinations (A, A+B, A+B+C) were reported as a function of operator experience. RESULTS: Technically unsuccessful biopsies occurred significantly more often in microcalcifications than in masses (14.9% versus 3.8%; P=0.04). For microcalcifications, the rate of successful biopsies was 75% (18/24) for the first 5 biopsies and 87.8% (79/90) for the subsequent biopsies (P=0.335); rates for the masses were 95.7% (22/23) and 96.3% (79/82) (P=1.0), respectively. A tendency was noted for the false-negative rate to be higher for the first five biopsies in three container combinations than in subsequent cases. CONCLUSION: Our results support the existence of a learning curve, especially in the biopsy of microcalcifications. More than three mentor-guided biopsies are needed.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Comparison of manual and automated quantification methods of 123I-ADAM.

UNLABELLED: 123I-ADAM is a novel radioligand for imaging of the brain serotonin transporters (SERTs). Traditionally, the analysis of brain receptor studies has been based on observer-dependent manual region of interest definitions and visual interpretation. Our aim was to create a template for automated image registrations and volume of interest (VOI) quantifications and to show that an automated quantification method of 123I-ADAM is more repeatable than the manual method. PATIENTS, METHODS: A template and a predefined VOI map was created from 123I-ADAM scans done for healthy volunteers (n = 15). Scans of another group of healthy persons (HS, n = 12) and patients with bulimia nervosa (BN, n = 10) were automatically fitted to the template and specific binding ratios (SBRs) were calculated by using the VOI map. Manual VOI definitions were done for the HS and BN groups by both one and two observers. The repeatability of the automated method was evaluated by using the BN group. RESULTS: For the manual method, the interobserver coefficient of repeatability was 0.61 for the HS group and 1.00 for the BN group. The introobserver coefficient of repeatability for the BN group was 0.70. For the automated method, the coefficient of repeatability was 0.13 for SBRs in midbrain. CONCLUSION: An automated quantification gives valuable information in addition to visual interpretation decreasing also the total image handling time and giving clear advantages for research work. An automated method for analysing 123I-ADAM binding to the brain SERT gives repeatable results for fitting the studies to the template and for calculating SBRs, and could therefore replace manual methods.

Automation↗