The group of the investigated included 25 individuals (11 F, 14 M), aged 55 +/- 1.5 years, with diabetes type II and hypertension. Known diabetes duration was 4.9 +/- 0.8 years and known hypertension duration--7.4 +/- 1.4 years. Two weeks after administering placebo in place of hypertension drugs applied so far, guanfacine was included as the only hypertensive drug. The dosage was increased from 0.5 mg up to 3 mg daily until a good control of blood pressure was achieved. The diabetic treatment, diet and the smoking habit were unchanged. The resting activity of the renin-angiotension-aldosterone system (RAA), cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL, serum glucose levels and HbA1c were assayed after a 5-month guanfacine period. After treatment a significant decrease in blood pressure both systolic and diastolic (p < 0.001), heart rate (p < 0.005) and plasma renin activity (p < 0.02) were observed. Preliminary measurements of RAA activity and its changes during treatment were not helpful in predicting guanfacine hypotensive effect. The level of lipids, lipoproteins, atherogenic factors, glucose and HbA1c did not change significantly during the study.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Evaluation of blood pressure changes and heart rate in young health men based on results of a 24-hour monitoring of pressure].

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were monitored in a group of 20 young healthy men for 24 hours. Period of time between 8 o'clock a.m. and 10 o'clock p.m. was treated as waking state whereas period of time from 12 p.m. to 6 a.m. as sleep phase. Mean value of systolic blood pressure for waking state was 124.6 +/- 7.6 mm Hg, and for sleep phase 110.4 +/- 11.5 mm Hg. (p < .001). Mean diastolic blood pressures were also significantly different (76.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg and 63.8 +/- 7.7 mm Hg, respectively), the same concerns heart rate (79.6 +/- 6.4 and 63.0-7.2 min-1, respectively). In both cases p < .001. To evaluate dependence of heart rate on systolic blood pressure in waking state the following calculation was made: HR = 0.230 x systolic blood pressure +51.4 (r = 0.24; p < .001) whereas for sleep phase r did not reach a level of statistical significance (HR = 0.074 x systolic blood pressure + 53.9; r = 0.094). Single or even multiple measurements of the arterial blood pressure are not sufficient to evaluate circadian changes.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Levels of insulin in serum during fasting and circadian blood pressure profile in young health men].

In order to investigate the relation of ambulatory blood pressure values to fasting plasma insulin, non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring was performed in 32 young normotensive males. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were averaged for awake and asleep periods. Fasting plasma insulin levels correlated significantly with both asleep (r = 0.61; p < 0.001) and awake systolic blood pressures (r = 0.44; p < 0.02) but not with casual systolic blood pressure (r = 0.27). There were no significant associations of awake, asleep and causal diastolic blood pressures values with fasting plasma insulin levels (r = 0.15, 0.05 and 0.21, respectively). These results support the hypothesis that insulin may be a physiological determinant of blood pressure.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Indices of left heart ventricle relaxation after 5-months of hypotensive therapy with guanfacine].

The subject of the work is to assess the clinical parameters and diastolic function in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension after 5-month treatment with guanfacine 0.5-3 mg/day, mean 1.7 mg. In the group there were 8 women and 8 men, mean age 53.7 +/- 7.6. The diastolic function of the left ventricle was assessed from the echocardiographic M-mode paper sweep of the left ventricle by the method of Gibson and Brown. In clinical parameters systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure was found to decrease significantly, the heart rate was unchanged. Essential improvement of the markers of relaxation was received while amelioration of filling was not significant. The before treatment data were compared with the similar ones of the 60 persons of the control group. The significant differences were found in values of blood pressure, markers of relaxation and indices Iv and Ip.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗