PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Kuss

Publications and source records attributed to A Kuss.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The efficacy and safety of a new ciprofloxacin suspension compared with co-amoxiclav tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

A multinational, multicentre, randomized, prospective, parallel-group study compared treatment with ciprofloxacin administered as an oral suspension (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) with co-amoxiclav tablets (625 mg three times daily for 7 days) in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). A total of 147 of 165 cases treated with ciprofloxacin (89.1%) and 146 of 162 cases treated with co-amoxiclav (90.1%) were classified as being clinical successes at the primary efficacy assessment 7 days after the end of therapy (assessed as reduced cough, improvement in dyspnoea, reduction in 24-h sputum volume or reduced purulence of sputum). Treatment equivalence was statistically confirmed; treatment difference:--1.0%, 95% CI--6.6% and 4.5%. Before treatment, 128 bacterial strains were isolated from 103 patients (60 ciprofloxacin and 68 co-amoxiclav). The most commonly isolated organism was Haemophilus influenzae (60 isolates), followed by Moraxella catarrhalis (12 isolates), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11 isolates) and Staphylococcus aureus (10 isolates). At day 14, 40 of 46 ciprofloxacin-treated patients (87.0%) and 46 of 55 co-amoxiclav-treated patients (83.6%) who were valid for bacteriological analysis were classified as being bacteriological success (classed as eradication, eradication with colonization or presumed eradication; treatment difference: 3.3%, 95% CI--8.3% and 14.9%). The adverse event profile was comparable between treatment groups. Most adverse events considered possibly or probably related to study drug were related to the gastrointestinal system and were of mild or moderate severity: nausea (13% ciprofloxacin, 10.6% co-amoxiclav), flatulence (10.3% ciprofloxacin, 3.9% co-amoxiclav), abdominal pain (7.6% ciprofloxacin, 7.3% co-amoxiclav) and diarrhoea (4.3% ciprofloxacin, 6.7% co-amoxiclav). We concluded that a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin suspension is equivalent to a 7-day course of co-amoxiclav tablets in terms of clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of AECB. Thus, ciprofloxacin suspension may offer a suitable alternative treatment for AECB patients who have difficulty in swallowing, or who prefer liquid medications to tablets.

Acute Disease↗

Type X collagen synthesis in human osteoarthritic cartilage. Indication of chondrocyte hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the appearance of hypertrophic chondrocytes in osteoarthritic (OA) cartilage, using type X collagen as a specific marker. METHODS: The biosynthesis of type X collagen was examined by metabolic labeling of freshly isolated articular chondrocytes with 3H-proline, immunoprecipitation, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the synthesized collagens. Extracellular deposition of types X and II collagen was analyzed immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Immunostaining revealed an irregular distribution of type X collagen, which was localized around chondrocyte clusters in fibrillated OA cartilage, but was absent from the noncalcified region of normal articular cartilage. Freshly isolated OA chondrocytes synthesized predominantly type X collagen, while control chondrocytes synthesized mostly type II collagen. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate focal premature chondrocyte differentiation to hypertrophic cells in OA cartilage.

Adult↗

[Software and system-induced errors in isokinetic force measurements].

In the literature a good reliability of isokinetic measurements is reported. In spite of these reports high variations of the peak torque and work values were registered when testing 24 patients with low back pain, using a CYBEX TR isokinetic trunk rotation apparatus. After a 3 week's training the patients force (peak torque) increased in the average between 10.7 p.c. (SD +/- 26.4) and 23.2 p.c. (SD +/- 63.8), corresponding to the test-velocity. Seven of the 24 patients improved or deteriorated more than 30 p.c. Analysing the parameters which could interfere with the results there was found a discrepancy between the original CYBEX software and the German Iso-Kin 4.0 software. The Isokin 4.0 does not warm up and calibrate the isokinetic apparatus daily. Investigations with definite weights showed that the values for peak torque are 40-50 m higher when using the Iso-Kin 4.0 software in comparison to the original CYBEX software. Furthermore there are a lot of other parameters such as acceleration of the body, psychological alterations, pain, motivation, learning effects, and artificial oscillations of the registered curve, which can affect the results even when using the original CYBEX software.

Adult↗